
Signature
Chris
E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net
>> "Claims that dark chocolate is good for you may be misleading, according to
>> health experts."
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> great chunks of stuff called 'cooking chocolate'. Would that be
> unrefined I wonder, and if so, where can you get it?
It's supposedly unsweetened chocolate. Quite possibly messed about, with
a high proportion of non cocoa butter solids in it at the cheaper end of
the market. The cocoa butter's the stuff that gives it a nice feel in
the mouth, & the cooking chocolate I've tried doesn't exactly feel smooth.
Lindt do a 90% cocoa solids bar which I buy when I can find it, which
runs to 15 or 20% carbs, but with enough kick that a couple of squares
is plenty. For quite a bit more per gram, they make a 99% cocoa bar...
*That* only takes one square, but it's very bitter.
For a bit of a change, try their bar with cherry & chili in it. 70%
cocoa, still, & not a lot of sugar.
Hotel Chocolat...
http://www.hotelchocolat.co.uk/src/google/cid/DNSK0SL6GAFDLHHT0TS1UKE3LA45EGJH/P
urist-Bar--Organic-Dark-100-P240007/
(I hope that URL doesn't break when it wraps)
The description's a bit pretentious, mind. So is the price.
I've seen the Lindt 70% in smallish bars in motorway services recently.
It's about 35% carbs. None of the above do anything drastic to my BG
levels in moderation, & with the amount of cocoa in them, you won't need
to eat much :-)
Thierry, a French company do a nice range from 65 to 85% cocoa solids.
All these are dark chocolates. Milk chocolates normally have a high
sugar content to go with the high dairy content.
Green & Black's is nice, but what I've seen is mostly only about 70% cocoa.

Signature
Tciao for Now!
John.
(Type 2, Gliclazide & metformin.)
Chris Hogg - 23 Dec 2007 08:18 GMT
>>> "Claims that dark chocolate is good for you may be misleading, according to
>>> health experts."
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
>Green & Black's is nice, but what I've seen is mostly only about 70% cocoa.
Thanks for those comments. I get Lindt 85% cocoa and eat half-squares
at a time as I'm prone to migraines :-(
But is there any way of knowing whether even these high-cocoa
chocolates are flavanol-reduced, as implied by 'The Lancet'? I guess
not.

Signature
Chris
E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net
John Williamson - 23 Dec 2007 21:08 GMT
> But is there any way of knowing whether even these high-cocoa
> chocolates are flavanol-reduced, as implied by 'The Lancet'? I guess
> not.
The only way to be 100% sure would be to get in touch with the makers
direct & ask them. Even then, they may decline to answer as the answer
could be commercially sensitive.
If you do find out, There are a few in here who might like to know.
Sorry I can't help more.

Signature
Tciao for Now!
John.
Peter C - 23 Dec 2007 10:16 GMT
>> By a curious coincidence, I was just reading a newspaper article this
>> morning at a friend's house extolling the virtues of dark chocolate!
Hi there Chris old boy,
a great resource for nutritional information is ...
www.nutritiondata.com
Here is their take on dark chocolate, unfortunately doesn't mention which
brand ...
http://www.nutritiondata.com/facts-C00001-01c21QE.html#nutrients-per-serving
Three very important flavanoids are ...Quercetin, Epicatechin and Oligomeric
proanthocyanidins
( a bit of a mouthful in themselves !)
So if you are analysing the nutritional content of dark choc bars those are
the names to watch out for.