Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NHS urged to save money on statins

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peter C - 28 Dec 2006 15:04 GMT
BBC report...
"The NHS could save at least £85m a year through more efficient prescribing
of statins, drugs which lower cholesterol, the government says.
The health service spends about £600m a year on the drugs.

Costs of statins depend on whether they are a brand or are a cheaper generic
version.

Ministers said if the NHS used generic drugs in 69% of cases - as a quarter
of trusts do - the saving would be made, but experts said lives could be
risked."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6212133.stm
simon - 28 Dec 2006 16:05 GMT
> BBC report...
> "The NHS could save at least £85m a year through more efficient prescribing
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6212133.stm

Yes and they can f**k off with my statins. I started with simvastatin
and whilst it may or may not have been any good, it did make me feel
like shite. My Dr changed me to atorvastatin (lipitor) which was
fantastic but apparently expensive.

Simon
Flying Rat - 28 Dec 2006 16:50 GMT
> > BBC report...
> > "The NHS could save at least £85m a year through more efficient prescribing
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Simon

there's obviously a lot more to this story than the BBC page includes.

Statins are a wide ranging group of drugs with an equally wide ranging
price tag. Some are more effective than others, and some have different
effects on the good and bad cholesterol levels.

From what I've seen and read, most GPs or consultants lock on to one or
more of the various brands and blanket prescribe them. Some go for
lipitor, others Zocor or the simvastatin generic. I think what's now
being said is that by applying a little more thought and research to the
prescribing, a lot of dough could be saved as atorvastatin isn't yet in
generic form.

Not everyone who is on expensive Lipitor needs to be on it, and
similarly those who don't tolerate a certain statin well (or get the
required results) should have that choice available. It's also going to
have the effect of driving Lipitor prices down in the medium term.

Ratty
Phil - 29 Dec 2006 08:57 GMT
>> > BBC report...
>> > "The NHS could save at least £85m a year through more efficient prescribing
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
>Ratty
My local PCT have issued an edict that all pateints on Atorvastatin
should be tried on Simvastatin as soon as practical. I'm made the
change, and things seem to be fine. I think it saves the PCT about £85
a month or so.

Phil
simon - 29 Dec 2006 09:58 GMT
>>>> BBC report...
>>>> "The NHS could save at least £85m a year through more efficient prescribing
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Phil
#
Went and checked my latest prescription and what i have is Pfizer
Torvast atorvastatina. Very definitely an Italian version of
atorvastatin and not Lipitor! Wonder how much cheaper it is to
distribute foreign meds (from LLoyds the chemists)

Simon
Flying Rat - 29 Dec 2006 12:52 GMT
> >>>> BBC report...
> >>>> "The NHS could save at least £85m a year through more efficient prescribing
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> Simon

Lloyds do that a lot. They can import within the EU if the prices are
better thanks to harmonization of standards, and it's common for
companies to use different brands in different countries.

I use a Numark supply chain pharmacy these days and they do the same.
Might not be a huge difference, but if you are buying in hundreds of
thousands of units it could be worth the while. There are companies in
Europe who act as drugs brokerages for just this purpose.

IIRC CP, who do the beef insulin, are also a major generics trader and
supplier.

Ratty
Peter C - 29 Dec 2006 13:10 GMT
> #
> Went and checked my latest prescription and what i have is Pfizer
> Torvast atorvastatina. Very definitely an Italian version of
> atorvastatin and not Lipitor! Wonder how much cheaper it is to
> distribute foreign meds (from LLoyds the chemists)

Lloyds the Chemist was taken over earlier this year by a German
company, the biggest Pharmaceutical distributor in Europe. It was
relaunched as "Lloyds Pharmacy" shortly afterwards. The German parent
runs the same drugs/supplies right across Europe and achieves huge
economies of scale.
Boots and Alliance Unichem howled with rage at first but tied the knot
shortly after in an attempt to compete.
bill - 31 Dec 2006 23:16 GMT
>>> Not everyone who is on expensive Lipitor needs to be on it, and
>>> similarly those who don't tolerate a certain statin well (or get the
>>> required results) should have that choice available. It's also going
>>> to have the effect of driving Lipitor prices down in the medium term.
>>>
>>> Ratty

>> My local PCT have issued an edict that all pateints on Atorvastatin
>> should be tried on Simvastatin as soon as practical. I'm made the
>> change, and things seem to be fine. I think it saves the PCT about £85
>> a month or so.
>>
>> Phil

> Went and checked my latest prescription and what i have is Pfizer
> Torvast atorvastatina. Very definitely an Italian version of
> atorvastatin and not Lipitor! Wonder how much cheaper it is to
> distribute foreign meds (from LLoyds the chemists)
>
> Simon

here in the USA, afaik, Lipitor has another 4 or 5 years
to go before it goes off patent.  Pfizer is the company
that offers it (and has the patent on it)

i'd think that that your Italian "Pfizer Torvast
atorvastatina" *is* Lipitor, as sold in Italy,
of course

bill t1 since '57
Flying Rat - 29 Dec 2006 12:34 GMT
> >> > BBC report...
> >> > "The NHS could save at least £85m a year through more efficient prescribing
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Phil

people seem to forget that the generic policy was started under Margaret
Thatcher, because of a perceived waste of millions on branded drugs such
as Distalgesic. That particular drug (a common pain medication) was
prescribed by name and was much more expensive than buying a generic.

The statin thing is an extension of the generic-if-available policy, in
that it has been expanded to cover both generics and like-for-like
substitutions. If it works then I don't see a problem, but there must be
the alternatives freely available for the policy to work.

Pravastatin is another which has apparently gone generic. Some patients
also need something which is more aggressive in its action.

Ratty
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.