Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / October 2005
Atkin's, Bernstein, ADA Duk what is right
|
|
Thread rating:  |
DaveT - 25 Oct 2005 15:30 GMT I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from advise to me when doctors and not dieticians gave the dietary advice. That was advice before money ruled this disease with the multitude of research funded (often secretly) by multinationals and other trading groups. I know many on here do low carb, what daily figure do you put on your low carb? Also others follow the ADA/Duk recommendations so do you know what daily carbs you are eating if so how much is it. It must be confusing for newbie's to see all these diets and I thought a thread by diabetics on here might clear the muddy waters a bit. To ask on ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it?
 Signature DaveT Dx 1955 T1 on BeefL and humalog when needed
s.miles5 - 25 Oct 2005 15:44 GMT Hi DaveT I eat 250 gms carbs/day using 38 units of bovine insulin. I suspect I can eat this amount due to the length of time the bovine insulin is active compared to the synthetic insulin's I've been insulin dependant for over 40 yrs but went up to 250 carbs in 1976. Sue type 1
> I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal > of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would > ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it? CeeBee - 25 Oct 2005 16:59 GMT "DaveT" <justask@privacy.com> wrote in alt.support.diabetes.uk:
> Also others follow the ADA/Duk recommendations so do you know what daily > carbs you are eating if so how much is it. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > would ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing > it? You're a T1, you use humalog, and you can use a bolus to counter the carbs you eat. If your PP BG-levels are okay, there's no need to consider how many carbs you "should" eat. There's certainly no need for "low carb".
What's more important is what your insulin need per gram of carbs is. Is it 10 mg of carbs per unit of humalog? 12, 15? If you know, you can simply calculate your bolus for each meal. If you know what carbs you eat, and how much units of insulin you need to counter them, you're doing alright.
What to eat? Eat a normal, balanced and healthy diet, which provides you with all nutrients, vitamins, minerals you need. There's plenty of bandwidth in "good food choice" as long as you can keep BG's under control with the insulines you use.
The ADA recommendations and that food pyramid give you a good _idea_ of what your daily meal should consist of. It's no law. Nothing is. Don't follow anything slavishly - listen to your own body, and cater its whims, not the whims of websites, Usenet posters and neighbours doing diet X.
Keep an eye on the total amount of calories; sit down and try to calculate what your daily intake is. If you start to gain weight, and you're eating normally, you should consider adapting your diet to take in less calories, and maybe start exercising a bit more to compensate.
If you're overweight, and want to lose weight, the best thing is to cut back on calories without cutting back on the diversity of food, and _especially_ increase your exercise, like walking each day for at least half an hour. With a negative energy balance, you'll lose weight.
Remember that it can happen that people concerned with their eating habits turn it into some kind of "orthorexia" obsession. For some "stuff X" is the big bad wolf and should be erased from their diet, for others "stuff Y" is the main culprit of everything since the dawning of time. For some, carbohydrates have become such a category. Don't get yourself lured into such obsessive behaviour with food, twisting and turning in your bed if you're eating right and what could be wrong.
Listen to your body, read your meter, keep going to those checkups, and you chose the best way to handle things. Good luck.
 Signature CeeBee
***Ancient Wisdom in a Crunchy Treat***
DaveT - 25 Oct 2005 19:39 GMT > "DaveT" <justask@privacy.com> wrote in alt.support.diabetes.uk: Snip
> You're a T1, you use humalog, and you can use a bolus to counter the carbs > you eat. If your PP BG-levels are okay, there's no need to consider how [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > calculate your bolus for each meal. If you know what carbs you eat, and > how much units of insulin you need to counter them, you're doing alright. I better say what I do so there is no confusion I use BeefL for basal, after trying it out I did a test on myself (I think it was an idea posted by Beav) were I found a background dose that lasted me a full day. Under normal circumstance it is 25u but weather illness and such can make small differences of a unit or two. The humalog I take to cover what I eat and like Fester there is a difference between morning and night. I do have to use a little more than him but I believe that is more to do with age than anything else Often if I am out for a meal (quite a bit of my eating is done in cafes) I will give 10u kind of on speck then adjust to the meal later. Another thing I have found if I get my sums wrong and I go high I inject enough to half it then inject again to put it right. I do not try to correct it in one go. I try never to exceed 160 grams in a day unless it is Xmas or something. Often it is less because I never eat breakfast, never have. Some meals I totally miss altogether I may make up for them later but often not, that is the beauty of the concocted DAFNE I use.
 Signature DaveT Dx 1955 T1 on BeefL and humalog when needed
CeeBee - 26 Oct 2005 00:07 GMT "DaveT" <justask@privacy.com> wrote in alt.support.diabetes.uk:
> I better say what I do so there is no confusion > I use BeefL for basal, after trying it out I did a test on myself (I > think it was an idea posted by Beav) were I found a background dose that > lasted me a full day. Under normal circumstance it is 25u but weather > illness and such can make small differences of a unit or two. Most basals won't last a full day, regardless of the dose. If the insulin has peaked and goes down, it doesn't matter how much there's left, it just disappears without working. Insulin has a limited life span. Maybe Lantus might give a 24 hour stable reading but I hear various stories about its effectivity.
> The humalog I take to cover what I eat and like Fester there is a > difference between morning and night. I do have to use a little more [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Some meals I totally miss altogether I may make up for them later but > often not, that is the beauty of the concocted DAFNE I use. I guess the confusion is more in your header than in the content of your message. Your question seems to be "what is considered a low carb diet", and not so much "how many grams of carbohydrates a day are right" as the latter is no issue at all.
If Madison thinks her normal meal consists of 80 grams of carbs a day, and she manages, it's okay. It seems you manage with the double amount without any problem, so both are right and neither are wrong.
In many Atkins-like _diets_ to lose weight, carb content is practically annihilated to less than 20 grams of carb a day. But the problem is that in the discussion, which is mainly between people with T2 diabetes who are only using meds, two targets interfere: "low carb" for weight loss and "low carb" for BG control. To keep BG-levels under control they have the need to restrict their carb intake on a per meal basis. This can eventually mean that they eat more meals a day and smaller portions, and still reach more than 80 grams a day. It really isn't "low carb", but carb-restriction per meal".
Often the two coincide: weight loss due to overweight and carb restriction due to proper BG control. But as the experience shows, even for all of them the results based on carb restriction varies from person to person.
If you ask yourself: "what is better for me, as a T1 on DAFNE", Atkins, Bernstein etc., the answer is simply "nothing is better, just eat normal, like any non-diabetic does. Keep an eye on your carbs and DAFNE does the rest".
 Signature CeeBee
***Ancient Wisdom in a Crunchy Treat***
Fester - 25 Oct 2005 18:41 GMT > I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal > of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would > ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it? I don't stick to any one amount per day, i just eat what i want and inject accordingly although i doubt i go much over 180 to 200g in total for the day - sometimes less.
Although Madison is different because she's younger and more active and probably burning off a lot more than "we" do, she's also probably still on honeymoon.
As for insulin amounts, first thing in the morning i could use up to 10u of novorapid for 4 sausages in a wholemeal small bun, the same food at night would only need 6u at most.
It's not so much a question of low carb as a question of watched carb up to a certain amount that i know my system can handle without spiking. I generally stick to between 60 and 80g per meal and inject between 8 and 12u of novorapid.
I've been doing pretty the same thing for a year or more now and it's working well. I know what i need to inject for all of the foods i eat at whatever time of day i eat them, i also know how much insulin i need per 20g of carb which is around 2u if it's evening or 4u if it's early morning.
I've been trying out porcine isophane from cp pharma, so far it seems ok ... have definitely lost some weight, bgs fluctuated for a bit but i think i've got the hang of it now. I'll know at the next set of tests what effect i've had on my A1c.
Patrick
VBHol - 25 Oct 2005 23:19 GMT >I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal >meal [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would > ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it? I fear my comments would be relatively useless being a T2 speaking to a T1, but if any T2s want to discuss "how low" then I'll jump in.
Make it a new thread tho ;)
VBH
DaveT - 26 Oct 2005 00:18 GMT > >I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal > >meal [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > VBH Please do in the other thread. What I hoped for was an idea of how we all are managing this disease from the point of view of diet both T1 and T2. I realised too late that I should have removed the T1 stuff from the sig. Please state your type when you post on that thread though. As I said I believe this group could supply a thread without any of the Atkins is stupid or the ADA is stupid type of remarks. No recommendations we all know this is a YMMV type of thing, so why bother, no one is going to change anyone's mind. A dieticians recommendations whatever they say the science is, is only a recommendation. We live with the disease and when a newbie asks the question if there was a thread of different experiences it could be a useful pointer in the future. This would (I hope) also be a chance for us to see the differences and similarities between the two types.
 Signature DaveT Dx 1955 T1 on BeefL and humalog when needed
Fester - 26 Oct 2005 19:13 GMT >>>I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal >>>meal [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > This would (I hope) also be a chance for us to see the differences and > similarities between the two types. From a dietary perspective .. i can't see that there is or should be a difference. We all require a basically healthy diet, sure the control of that diet differs, but the foods that make it up should not. As a T1 who has taken on board a lot of the T2 information regarding food, it's made my blood sugar much easier to control ... the ability to eat foods that don't actually require an injection is fantastic. I can go have a chicken salad in a restaurant now and really enjoy it and know that it won't spike my blood sugar.
Things like scrambled egg or ommlettes for breakfast can help you when you really aren't hungry but need to eat something quick and easy. For me understanding that I can have Insulin Resistance yet still be a T1 was a major milestone - it helped me understand why i needed more insulin than the other T1s i know. Since there's not that many of us who are T1 it's important that we learn all we can from other diabetics as they have more to add to the discussion simply by way of numbers and breadth of experience.
The only difference i see between T1 and T2 is the medication we take and how we use it to control our respective conditions ... food, excercise, spike control and all the other things we do are as important to a T1 as they are to a T2. It's not us that has made divisions between the two types but the medical profession that we're all guilty of placing too much trust in. Not that i think we should mistrust a doctor, it's just that i think there's a lot more to YMMV than they care to give us credit for.
The key thing is that there is not and never will be a "one size fits all" care routine for any of us. We know that, but newbies don't and neither it seems do the medical profession.
Right i'm getting off my soapbox now - nice bottle of red awaits me and i think i hear the curry delivery man at the door.
Patrick
Patti - 26 Oct 2005 23:01 GMT >Right i'm getting off my soapbox now - nice bottle of red awaits me and >i think i hear the curry delivery man at the door. Hi Fester and sorry... I am not a believer of quoting miles of text to add a sentence!
>>> It's not us that has made divisions between >>the two types but the medical profession that we're all guilty of >>placing too much trust in. Not that i think we should mistrust a doctor, >>it's just that i think there's a lot more to YMMV than they care to give >>us credit for. You are dead right in what you say! I dunno whether I am t1 or t1.5 or whatever label you want to put on me. I am insulin dependant and I also know that my resistance is higher in the am... and stuff fluctuates... but from conversation with others I am not taking overmuch insulin for what I eat. We have to live with it and we have to do the YMMV and if we do then we are responsible. If we don't and we just follow the DN or the Doctor's advice about how much to inject or "let's ignore testing" then we're sheep and deserve what we get!
Patti Penzance, Cornwall On 16u Levemir @ 8pm and 10u Levemir @ 8 am Novorapid as required Perindopril, aspirin, Simvastatin, 300mg Quinine Sulphate & 75msg Thyroxin. A1c 5.7
vbhol - 27 Oct 2005 11:58 GMT >>>I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal >>>meal [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > This would (I hope) also be a chance for us to see the differences and > similarities between the two types. Yup, the reason I brought it up is that since you are a T1 then people started replying from the perspective of a T1 and this brought in a lot of mentions of insulin. Being able to vary insulin with carbs is actually quite an advantage. For a non-injecting (bolus) T2 like myself on Metformin then we are fixed to a routine of meds and that is a factor which cannot be varied with any great success.
So we cannot necessarily vary the number of carbs quite as easily, not being able to compensate with a varied bolus.
So although there are common factors, there is a significant difference which has to be borne in mind. Although more experienced readers of the group will have been aware of this for some time, I thought that some newer members may be either misled by some of the comments or even discount it completely because it does not apply to them. When I first came here I discounted a lot of threads which mentioned insulin because it did not apply to me. The relevant stuff is in there but it may take some working out to figure out what applies to you and what does not.
My general feeling is one that I believe most experienced DMers share in that the only right answer for managing your DM is the one which you and your meter come up with. However, it can always be tweaked and improved so the experiences of others are highly valuable. There is a lot that T1s, Injecting T2s and Non-injecting T2s (with or without meds) can learn from each other.
Certainly I have learned a lot from T1s in the past and expect to in the future.
Cheers, VBH T2/Dx Oct2003/Metformin/Enalopril/Simvastatin/"Controlled" Carbs Diet
vbhol - 27 Oct 2005 12:28 GMT > I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal > of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would > ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it? I've stuck to the same thread but started another branch ;)
I am a type 2 on 1500mg Metformin per day for bg control. Since my meds are fixed I have no flexibility to increase meds to deal with a large intake of carbs. Increasing Met over a short period does not have a significant effect on BG for a meal. However, I do reduce to 1000mg on some days when my carb intake is lower. This appears to work for me although I do not get overly scientific about it.
The trouble with any baseline figure of X carbs per day is that it is too generic a term. Sugar, white starches, brown starches are all carbs, but have different impacts on the BG. Within those categories and others, each item has a different level of effect. If you were to cap an individual meal at 50 carbs then 50g of white bread is vastly different from 50g of rye bread.
However, so long as you are reasonably consistent (boring!) with your food choices then having a target figure is more reasonable. My target tends to be 40g carbs max per meal. That would be 120 per day plus snacks - around 140/160.
But I do not always meet the target from either side. If a meal is heavily veggie based then that is less of a concern than if I am having 40g of starches of any type. So I will vary from 20 to 50 and occasionally 60. But this is all down to experience on how individual foods and the combination of various meals affect me. It is something which can only really be done by experience and meter watching.
I also have the complication of the dawn phenomenon and increased insulin resistance in the morning. So breakfast is a problem. These days it tends to be egg based whenever possible so the carb count will tend to be in the region of < 10. Alternatively I will have something with bread, but this would normally be rye bread (burgen) so although a couple of slices is around 25g carbs, the low GI of the bread means that I can get away with it without a huge spike.
If I am exercising in the morning I will go for porridge about 30 mins before but that is because I know I will burn off the carbs at the time when they hit the bloodstream as glucose.
So when it comes to all these recommendations on how many carbs to have, who is right?
None of them. YOU are.
The task is to work out what you can eat without raising your BG. All the recommendations are based on eating what they expect you to eat. Follow their diet recommendations then it will work - to a point. If they are expecting you to eat brown starches (brown bread, brown rice etc) and you actually eat white then their carb figure will not work.
But you also have to bear in mind that they deal with mass populations. So although a diet change will improve the overall health of thousands of people, the health of the individual may actually get worse if it does not work for you. Everybody's body reacts differently. The numbers they give are very rough based on a rough idea of what you are eating.
They also expect a large number of people to "fail" and just grab a cream cake once in a while - I'm exaggerating but you know what I mean.
The numbers they give are useful for initial guidance, to give an approximate idea. What really matters is working out what your body can deal with and which foods work best for you.
So it is a matter of testing for as many meals as possible, knowing how foods affect you and what is a "safe" meal. The more effort you take to learn about it then the easier time you have because after some time then you will be able to just eat a particular meal and know that it will not send your BG soaring.
I have not been in tight control for the last 6 months but I know I will not be facing a disasterous A1c because I know the general rules for what I can eat. I have strayed from that but not too much and not too often.
So if we are talking general guidelines I would suggest to try and limit to 40 carbs at an individual meal and not eat any more carbs within an hour. Also make sure those carbs are as slow as possible (low GI).
Note: When I talk about GI I mean real GI and GL numbers for individual foodstuffs and products, not this traffic light bollocks. That crap is HORRENDOUSLY misleading. I particularly liked the table I saw in one book that had bread in all of the red, yellow and green columns. Very helpful!
Hope that loooong essay makes useful reading to some poor sod! Thanks for making it this far. I feel a series of personal articles / blog entries coming on. Time to use that webspace I paid for and lies dormant ;)
VBH.
Peter C - 27 Oct 2005 15:52 GMT did you go on to an ace inhibitor that time ( about a year ago ) when you showed some abnormal kidney readings ?
vbhol - 27 Oct 2005 20:36 GMT > did you go on to an ace inhibitor that time ( about a year ago ) when you > showed some abnormal kidney readings ? Wasn't expecting that question here...
Yes I did. But readings resolved themselves just after. May have just been a freaky reading. Its one of the things I am focussing on with my next test in the next couple of weeks - when I get to a blood draw. Got a review with the doc on the 11th.
VBH
|
|
|