Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Atkin's, Bernstein, ADA Duk what is right

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DaveT - 25 Oct 2005 15:30 GMT
I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal
of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from
advise to me when doctors and not dieticians gave the dietary advice. That
was advice before money ruled this disease with the multitude of research
funded (often secretly) by multinationals and other trading groups.
I know many on here do low carb, what daily figure do you put on your low
carb?
Also others follow the ADA/Duk recommendations so do you know what daily
carbs you are eating if so how much is it.
It must be confusing for newbie's to see all these diets and I thought a
thread by diabetics on here might clear the muddy waters a bit. To ask on
ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would
ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it?
Signature

DaveT
Dx 1955
T1 on BeefL and humalog when needed

s.miles5 - 25 Oct 2005 15:44 GMT
Hi DaveT
I eat 250 gms carbs/day using 38 units of bovine insulin.
I suspect I can eat this amount due to the length of time the bovine insulin
is active compared to the synthetic insulin's
I've been insulin dependant for over 40 yrs but went up to 250 carbs in
1976.
Sue type 1
> I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal
> of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would
> ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it?
CeeBee - 25 Oct 2005 16:59 GMT
"DaveT" <justask@privacy.com> wrote in alt.support.diabetes.uk:

> Also others follow the ADA/Duk recommendations so do you know what daily
> carbs you are eating if so how much is it.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> would ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing
> it?

You're a T1, you use humalog, and you can use a bolus to counter the carbs
you eat. If your PP BG-levels are okay, there's no need to consider how
many carbs you "should" eat. There's certainly no need for "low carb".

What's more important is what your insulin need per gram of carbs is. Is
it 10 mg of carbs per unit of humalog? 12, 15? If you know, you can simply
calculate your bolus for each meal. If you know what carbs you eat, and
how much units of insulin you need to counter them, you're doing alright.

What to eat? Eat a normal, balanced and healthy diet, which provides you
with all nutrients, vitamins, minerals you need. There's plenty of
bandwidth in "good food choice" as long as you can keep BG's under control
with the insulines you use.

The ADA recommendations and that food pyramid give you a good _idea_ of
what your daily meal should consist of. It's no law. Nothing is. Don't
follow anything slavishly - listen to your own body, and cater its whims,
not the whims of websites, Usenet posters and neighbours doing diet X.

Keep an eye on the total amount of calories; sit down and try to calculate
what your daily intake is. If you start to gain weight, and you're eating
normally, you should consider adapting your diet to take in less calories,
and maybe start exercising a bit more to compensate.

If you're overweight, and want to lose weight, the best thing is to cut
back on calories without cutting back on the diversity of food, and
_especially_ increase your exercise, like walking each day for at least
half an hour. With a negative energy balance, you'll lose weight.

Remember that it can happen that people concerned with their eating habits
turn it into some kind of "orthorexia" obsession. For some "stuff X" is
the big bad wolf and should be erased from their diet, for others "stuff
Y" is the main culprit of everything since the dawning of time. For some,
carbohydrates have become such a category.
Don't get yourself lured into such obsessive behaviour with food, twisting
and turning in your bed if you're eating right and what could be wrong.

Listen to your body, read your meter, keep going to those checkups, and
you chose the best way to handle things. Good luck.

Signature

CeeBee

***Ancient Wisdom in a Crunchy Treat***

DaveT - 25 Oct 2005 19:39 GMT
> "DaveT" <justask@privacy.com> wrote in alt.support.diabetes.uk:
Snip
> You're a T1, you use humalog, and you can use a bolus to counter the carbs
> you eat. If your PP BG-levels are okay, there's no need to consider how
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> calculate your bolus for each meal. If you know what carbs you eat, and
> how much units of insulin you need to counter them, you're doing alright.

I better say what I do so there is no confusion
I use BeefL for basal, after trying it out I did a test on myself (I think
it was an idea posted by Beav) were I found a background dose that lasted me
a full day. Under normal circumstance it is 25u but weather illness and such
can make small differences of a unit or two.
The humalog I take to cover what I eat and like Fester there is a difference
between morning and night. I do have to use a little more than him but I
believe that is more to do with age than anything else Often if I am out for
a meal (quite a bit of my eating is done in cafes) I will give 10u kind of
on speck then adjust to the meal later. Another thing I have found if I get
my sums wrong and I go high I inject enough to half it then inject again to
put it right. I do not try to correct it in one go.
I try never to exceed 160 grams in a day unless it is Xmas or something.
Often it is less because I never eat breakfast, never have. Some meals I
totally miss altogether I may make up for them later but often not, that is
the beauty of the concocted DAFNE I use.

Signature

DaveT
Dx 1955
T1 on BeefL and humalog when needed

CeeBee - 26 Oct 2005 00:07 GMT
"DaveT" <justask@privacy.com> wrote in alt.support.diabetes.uk:

> I better say what I do so there is no confusion
> I use BeefL for basal, after trying it out I did a test on myself (I
> think it was an idea posted by Beav) were I found a background dose that
> lasted me a full day. Under normal circumstance it is 25u but weather
> illness and such can make small differences of a unit or two.

Most basals won't last a full day, regardless of the dose. If the insulin
has peaked and goes down, it doesn't matter how much there's left, it just
disappears without working. Insulin has a limited life span.  Maybe Lantus
might give a 24 hour stable reading but I hear various stories about its
effectivity.

> The humalog I take to cover what I eat and like Fester there is a
> difference between morning and night. I do have to use a little more
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Some meals I totally miss altogether I may make up for them later but
> often not, that is the beauty of the concocted DAFNE I use.

I guess the confusion is more in your header than in the content of your
message. Your question seems to be "what is considered a low carb diet",
and not so much "how many grams of carbohydrates a day are right" as the
latter is no issue at all.

If Madison thinks her normal meal consists of 80 grams of carbs a day, and
she manages, it's okay. It seems you manage with the double amount without
any problem, so both are right and neither are wrong.

In many Atkins-like _diets_ to lose weight, carb content is practically
annihilated to less than 20 grams of carb a day. But the problem is that
in the discussion, which is mainly between people with T2 diabetes who are
only using meds, two targets interfere: "low carb" for weight loss and
"low carb" for BG control. To keep BG-levels under control they have the
need to restrict their carb intake on a per meal basis. This can
eventually mean that they eat more meals a day and smaller portions, and
still reach more than 80 grams a day. It really isn't "low carb", but
carb-restriction per meal".

Often the two coincide: weight loss due to overweight and carb restriction
due to proper BG control.
But as the experience shows, even for all of them the results based on
carb restriction varies from person to person.

If you ask yourself: "what is better for me, as a T1 on DAFNE", Atkins,
Bernstein etc., the answer is simply "nothing is better, just eat normal,
like any non-diabetic does.  Keep an eye on your carbs and DAFNE does the
rest".

Signature

CeeBee

***Ancient Wisdom in a Crunchy Treat***

Fester - 25 Oct 2005 18:41 GMT
> I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal
> of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would
> ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it?

I don't stick to any one amount per day, i just eat what i want and
inject accordingly although i doubt i go much over 180 to 200g in total
for the day - sometimes less.

Although Madison is different because she's younger and more active and
probably burning off a lot more than "we" do, she's also probably still
on honeymoon.

As for insulin amounts, first thing in the morning i could use up to 10u
of novorapid for 4 sausages in a wholemeal small bun, the same food at
night would only need 6u at most.

It's not so much a question of low carb as a question of watched carb up
to a certain amount that i know my system can handle without spiking. I
generally stick to between 60 and 80g per meal and inject between 8 and
12u of novorapid.

I've been doing pretty the same thing for a year or more now and it's
working well. I know what i need to inject for all of the foods i eat at
 whatever time of day i eat them, i also know how much insulin i need
per  20g of carb which is around 2u if it's evening or 4u if it's early
morning.

I've been trying out porcine isophane from cp pharma, so far it seems ok
... have definitely lost some weight, bgs fluctuated for a bit but i
think i've got the hang of it now. I'll know at the next set of tests
what effect i've had on my A1c.

Patrick
VBHol - 25 Oct 2005 23:19 GMT
>I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal
>meal
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would
> ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it?

I fear my comments would be relatively useless being a T2 speaking to a T1,
but if any T2s want to discuss "how low" then I'll jump in.

Make it a new thread tho ;)

VBH
DaveT - 26 Oct 2005 00:18 GMT
> >I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal
> >meal
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> VBH

Please do in the other thread. What I hoped for was an idea of how we all
are managing this disease from the point of view of diet both T1 and T2. I
realised too late that I should have removed the T1 stuff from the sig.
Please state your type when you post on that thread though.
As I said I believe this group could supply a thread without any of the
Atkins is stupid or the ADA is stupid type of remarks. No recommendations we
all know this is a YMMV type of thing, so why bother, no one is going to
change anyone's mind.
A dieticians recommendations whatever they say the science is, is only a
recommendation. We live with the disease and when a newbie asks the question
if there was a thread of different experiences it could be a useful pointer
in the future.
This would (I hope) also be a chance for us to see the differences and
similarities between the two types.
Signature

DaveT
Dx 1955
T1 on BeefL and humalog when needed

Fester - 26 Oct 2005 19:13 GMT
>>>I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal
>>>meal
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> This would (I hope) also be a chance for us to see the differences and
> similarities between the two types.

From a dietary perspective .. i can't see that there is or should be a
difference. We all require a basically healthy diet, sure the control of
that diet differs, but the foods that make it up should not. As a T1 who
has taken on board a lot of the T2 information regarding food, it's made
my blood sugar much  easier to control ... the ability to eat foods that
don't actually require an injection is fantastic. I can go have a
chicken salad in a restaurant now and really enjoy it and know that it
won't spike my blood sugar.

Things like scrambled egg or ommlettes for breakfast can help you when
you really aren't hungry but need to eat something quick and easy.  For
me understanding that I can have Insulin Resistance yet still be a T1
was a major milestone - it helped me understand why i needed more
insulin than the other T1s i know. Since there's not that many of us who
are T1 it's important that we learn all we can from other diabetics as
they have more to add to the discussion simply by way of numbers and
breadth of experience.

The only difference i see between T1 and T2 is the medication we take
and how we use it to control our respective conditions ... food,
excercise, spike control and all the other things we do are as important
to a T1 as they are to a T2. It's not us that has made divisions between
the two types but the medical profession that we're all guilty of
placing too much trust in. Not that i think we should mistrust a doctor,
it's just that i think there's a lot more to YMMV than they care to give
us credit for.

The key thing is that there is not and never will be a "one size fits
all" care routine for any of us. We know that, but newbies don't and
neither it seems do the medical profession.

Right i'm getting off my soapbox now - nice bottle of red awaits me and
i think i hear the curry delivery man at the door.

Patrick
Patti - 26 Oct 2005 23:01 GMT
>Right i'm getting off my soapbox now - nice bottle of red awaits me and
>i think i hear the curry delivery man at the door.

Hi Fester and sorry... I am not a believer of quoting miles of text to
add a sentence!

>>> It's not us that has made divisions between
>>the two types but the medical profession that we're all guilty of
>>placing too much trust in. Not that i think we should mistrust a doctor,
>>it's just that i think there's a lot more to YMMV than they care to give
>>us credit for.

You are dead right in what you say! I dunno whether I am t1 or t1.5 or
whatever label you want to put on me.  I am insulin dependant and I
also know that my resistance is higher in the am... and stuff
fluctuates... but from conversation with others I am not taking
overmuch insulin for what I eat.  We have to live with it and we have
to do the YMMV and if we do then we are responsible.  If we don't and
we just follow the DN or the Doctor's advice about how much to inject
or "let's ignore testing" then we're sheep and deserve what we get!


Patti
Penzance, Cornwall
On 16u Levemir @ 8pm and 10u Levemir @ 8 am
Novorapid as required
Perindopril, aspirin, Simvastatin,
300mg Quinine Sulphate  & 75msg Thyroxin.
A1c 5.7
vbhol - 27 Oct 2005 11:58 GMT
>>>I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal
>>>meal
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> This would (I hope) also be a chance for us to see the differences and
> similarities between the two types.

Yup, the reason I brought it up is that since you are a T1 then people
started replying from the perspective of a T1 and this brought in a lot
of mentions of insulin.  Being able to vary insulin with carbs is
actually quite an advantage.  For a non-injecting (bolus) T2 like myself
on Metformin then we are fixed to a routine of meds and that is a factor
which cannot be varied with any great success.

So we cannot necessarily vary the number of carbs quite as easily, not
being able to compensate with a varied bolus.

So although there are common factors, there is a significant difference
which has to be borne in mind.  Although more experienced readers of the
group will have been aware of this for some time, I thought that some
newer members may be either misled by some of the comments or even
discount it completely because it does not apply to them.  When I first
came here I discounted a lot of threads which mentioned insulin because
it did not apply to me.  The relevant stuff is in there but it may take
some working out to figure out what applies to you and what does not.

My general feeling is one that I believe most experienced DMers share in
that the only right answer for managing your DM is the one which you and
your meter come up with.  However, it can always be tweaked and improved
so the experiences of others are highly valuable.  There is a lot that
T1s, Injecting T2s and Non-injecting T2s (with or without meds) can
learn from each other.

Certainly I have learned a lot from T1s in the past and expect to in the
future.

Cheers,
VBH
T2/Dx Oct2003/Metformin/Enalopril/Simvastatin/"Controlled" Carbs Diet
vbhol - 27 Oct 2005 12:28 GMT
> I was up on ASD last week and young Maddison told of 'having her normal meal
> of 80 grams'. That is half my total content for the day, that was from
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ASD would cause a war but I believe this group to be different but I would
> ask for just the figures and length of time you have been doing it?

I've stuck to the same thread but started another branch ;)

I am a type 2 on 1500mg Metformin per day for bg control.  Since my meds
are fixed I have no flexibility to increase meds to deal with a large
intake of carbs.  Increasing Met over a short period does not have a
significant effect on BG for a meal.  However, I do reduce to 1000mg on
some days when my carb intake is lower.  This appears to work for me
although I do not get overly scientific about it.

The trouble with any baseline figure of X carbs per day is that it is
too generic a term.  Sugar, white starches, brown starches are all
carbs, but have different impacts on the BG.  Within those categories
and others, each item has a different level of effect.  If you were to
cap an individual meal at 50 carbs then 50g of white bread is vastly
different from 50g of rye bread.

However, so long as you are reasonably consistent (boring!) with your
food choices then having a target figure is more reasonable.  My target
tends to be 40g carbs max per meal.  That would be 120 per day plus
snacks - around 140/160.

But I do not always meet the target from either side.  If a meal is
heavily veggie based then that is less of a concern than if I am having
40g of starches of any type.  So I will vary from 20 to 50 and
occasionally 60.  But this is all down to experience on how individual
foods and the combination of various meals affect me.  It is something
which can only really be done by experience and meter watching.

I also have the complication of the dawn phenomenon and increased
insulin resistance in the morning.  So breakfast is a problem.  These
days it tends to be egg based whenever possible so the carb count will
tend to be in the region of < 10.  Alternatively I will have something
with bread, but this would normally be rye bread (burgen) so although a
couple of slices is around 25g carbs, the low GI of the bread means that
I can get away with it without a huge spike.

If I am exercising in the morning I will go for porridge about 30 mins
before but that is because I know I will burn off the carbs at the time
when they hit the bloodstream as glucose.

So when it comes to all these recommendations on how many carbs to have,
who is right?

None of them.  YOU are.

The task is to work out what you can eat without raising your BG.  All
the recommendations are based on eating what they expect you to eat.
Follow their diet recommendations then it will work - to a point.  If
they are expecting you to eat brown starches (brown bread, brown rice
etc) and you actually eat white then their carb figure will not work.

But you also have to bear in mind that they deal with mass populations.
 So although a diet change will improve the overall health of thousands
of people, the health of the individual may actually get worse if it
does not work for you.  Everybody's body reacts differently.  The
numbers they give are very rough based on a rough idea of what you are
eating.

They also expect a large number of people to "fail" and just grab a
cream cake once in a while - I'm exaggerating but you know what I mean.

The numbers they give are useful for initial guidance, to give an
approximate idea.  What really matters is working out what your body can
deal with and which foods work best for you.

So it is a matter of testing for as many meals as possible, knowing how
foods affect you and what is a "safe" meal.  The more effort you take to
learn about it then the easier time you have because after some time
then you will be able to just eat a particular meal and know that it
will not send your BG soaring.

I have not been in tight control for the last 6 months but I know I will
not be facing a disasterous A1c because I know the general rules for
what I can eat.  I have strayed from that but not too much and not too
often.

So if we are talking general guidelines I would suggest to try and limit
to 40 carbs at an individual meal and not eat any more carbs within an
hour.  Also make sure those carbs are as slow as possible (low GI).

Note:  When I talk about GI I mean real GI and GL numbers for individual
foodstuffs and products, not this traffic light bollocks.  That crap is
HORRENDOUSLY misleading.  I particularly liked the table I saw in one
book that had bread in all of the red, yellow and green columns.  Very
helpful!

Hope that loooong essay makes useful reading to some poor sod!  Thanks
for making it this far.  I feel a series of personal articles / blog
entries coming on.  Time to use that webspace I paid for and lies dormant ;)

VBH.
Peter C - 27 Oct 2005 15:52 GMT
did you go on to an ace inhibitor that time ( about a year ago ) when you
showed some abnormal kidney readings ?
vbhol - 27 Oct 2005 20:36 GMT
> did you go on to an ace inhibitor that time ( about a year ago ) when you
> showed some abnormal kidney readings ?

Wasn't expecting that question here...

Yes I did.  But readings resolved themselves just after.  May have just
been a freaky reading.  Its one of the things I am focussing on with my
next test in the next couple of weeks - when I get to a blood draw.  Got
a review with the doc on the 11th.

VBH
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.