Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Third trip to County Med Center

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
noneyabusiness - 31 Jul 2005 02:35 GMT
Went to County Medical Center for my second refill of Metformin.
SEVEN hours later...

The triage nurse took a reading... used a blade style lancet.
Pressed sooo hard before triggering it, I can probably still squeeze
blood out 9 hours later! After a 12 hour fast (3 hours after taking 3
500mg metformin pills), I was at 132 (139 per my 1Touch ultra).

(I really need to work on getting more exercise.)

Neither she nor the doctor thought it was "too bad"!!!??!!

And I found out that in spite of it being routine for first time
Diabetes diagnosis, an A1C was NOT DONE 2 months ago!

ARRGH!

And they wouldn't do one now :(

Would it be useful to know at this time, considering I KNOW I've been
elevated for two of the last 3 months that an A1C test covers?
(The test kits aren't TOO expensive at Rite-Aid, IIRC.)

But at least the Doc was nice enough to give me a 2 month supply of 3x
pills daily (up from the last Rx of 2 pills daily for only ONE month).
(And the very first Rx of 1 pill daily / 1 month.)

Was really hoping he would go for 4 pills a day, but he wanted to take
it one step at a time.

[end rant mode]

...
Alan S - 31 Jul 2005 03:52 GMT
>Went to County Medical Center for my second refill of Metformin.
>SEVEN hours later...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Neither she nor the doctor thought it was "too bad"!!!??!!

Is that good or bad compared to your dx levels?
Use your own lancet next time to provide the sample.

Rant all you like:-)

Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

bj - 31 Jul 2005 15:44 GMT
> Use your own lancet next time to provide the sample.

The nurse does a bg when I go to my endo (hospital based). She won't let me
do my own lancing if she's doing the test, but she will let me do my own
lancing & test on my meter & accept the results.
I think that's a bit weird.
bj
Cheri - 31 Jul 2005 20:58 GMT
That is wierd. Did she mention why? I'm curious. I always do my own
lancing at the doctor office.

--
Cheri

bj wrote in message ...

>The nurse does a bg when I go to my endo (hospital based). She won't let me
>do my own lancing if she's doing the test, but she will let me do my own
>lancing & test on my meter & accept the results.
>I think that's a bit weird.
>bj
bj - 31 Jul 2005 21:55 GMT
No. She didn't answer when I expressed a surprised "how come".
I just let it go, do my own test (I've even gotten away with "I just tested
5 min ago, which was true), & report my results. She hasn't even found it
necessary to actually look at my meter, just took my word for it.
bj

> That is wierd. Did she mention why? I'm curious. I always do my own
> lancing at the doctor office.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>I think that's a bit weird.
>>bj
Alan S - 31 Jul 2005 22:33 GMT
>> Use your own lancet next time to provide the sample.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I think that's a bit weird.
>bj

If her technique is OK, no problem. If not, I'd dig my heels
(and my own lancet) in. I'm sure the doc would support you
if you objected - but I understand that sometimes things
aren't worth the hassle.

Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

noneyabusiness - 01 Aug 2005 03:51 GMT
>>Went to County Medical Center for my second refill of Metformin.
>>SEVEN hours later...
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Is that good or bad compared to your dx levels?

"Dx"?

...

>Use your own lancet next time to provide the sample.
>
>Rant all you like:-)
>
>Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.
Wild Monkshood - 01 Aug 2005 04:08 GMT
>>>Went to County Medical Center for my second refill of Metformin.
>>>SEVEN hours later...
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>>Is that good or bad compared to your dx levels?

> "Dx"?

    Diagnosis, mayhap? In the past month I've learned all sorts of
interesting terms.

Wild Monkshood

> ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>>Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.
Alan S - 01 Aug 2005 07:27 GMT
<snip>

>>>Is that good or bad compared to your dx levels?
>>
>> "Dx"?
>
>    Diagnosis, mayhap? In the past month I've learned all sorts of
>interesting terms.

Yep - diagnosis.

Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

noneyabusiness - 02 Aug 2005 01:24 GMT
><snip>
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.

AH!

Well, June 10 2005 I was Dx'd at 300.
(FIVE years of no checkups, preceded by normal glucose response for
the previous 5+ years.)

I am now getting down into the 120-140 range on a fasting check.
(With the help of Metformin. And, um, oh yeah, exercise. Yeah. No,
really!)

But almost anyone here would comment that anything over 90 isn't good.
Right?

Hmmmm.....

I just looked at my LifeScan logbook again, and in the opening section
it has a chart showing the following:

90-120 Excellent
150-180 Good
210-240 Fair
270-300 Poor

Someone here needs to put this in perspective for me now. :(

...
Colleen - 02 Aug 2005 01:31 GMT
okay...see below

Signature

Colleen

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things
over and over and over again for the truth to sink in,
to kind of catapult the propaganda."

G.W. Bush
Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

>><snip>
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> 210-240 Fair
> 270-300 Poor

210-240 Fair????  Even 180 isn't fair.  150 I think is fair control.

Oh, and readings above 90 are okay.  Shouldn't go above 140 is you desire
normal #'s.  Even ADA recommends <180 2hr.PP
> Someone here needs to put this in perspective for me now. :(
>
> ...
Chris J. - 02 Aug 2005 03:30 GMT
>Oh, and readings above 90 are okay.  Shouldn't go above 140 is you desire
>normal #'s.  Even ADA recommends <180 2hr.PP

Under 180?!?!?!!? Good grief, that's high! If I'm over 120 PP my
insulin chart calls for a shot.
Chris J. - 02 Aug 2005 03:36 GMT
>Well, June 10 2005 I was Dx'd at 300.
>(FIVE years of no checkups, preceded by normal glucose response for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>(With the help of Metformin. And, um, oh yeah, exercise. Yeah. No,
>really!)

I'm in the same boat as you. I was DX'd July 23rd, at mid 600's
The FBG seems to be my biggest obstacle, too.

>But almost anyone here would comment that anything over 90 isn't good.
>Right?

I wish I could help, I'm trying to figure that out myself. The best
reference I've seen so far is Jennifer's page.
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm

I hope Jennifer won't mind, but here are the suggested levels;
FBG                                  under 110

One hour after meals       under 140

Two hours after meals     under 120
Alan S - 02 Aug 2005 06:57 GMT
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:24:51 GMT, noneyabusiness
<snip>

>Well, June 10 2005 I was Dx'd at 300.
>(FIVE years of no checkups, preceded by normal glucose response for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>But almost anyone here would comment that anything over 90 isn't good.
>Right?

Wrong. I'd be thrilled to be under 90(5) more often and I
rarely see it as a FBG number. See below.

>Hmmmm.....
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>...
OK. Go to Joslins page titled:
Goals for Blood Glucose Control
http://joslin.org/511_523.asp

I hope Palm is reading this post.

"People who have diabetes should be testing their blood
glucose regularly at home. Regular blood glucose testing
helps you determine how well your diabetes management
program of meal planning, exercising and medication (if
necessary) is doing to keep your blood glucose as close to
normal as possible. The results of the nationwide Diabetes
Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) show that the closer
you keep your blood glucose to normal, the more likely you
are to prevent diabetes complications such as eye disease,
nerve damage, and other problems."
<snip>

I've modified the table slightly to fit here. I'll repeat
that last phrase "the closer you keep your blood glucose to
normal, the more likely you are to prevent diabetes
complications". For that reason, my goals are the
non-diabetic numbers, not the diabetic ones.

............................non-diabetic...diabetic
       
"Before breakfast (fasting).....< 110......90 - 130
       
Before lunch, supper and snack..< 110......90 - 130
       
Two hours after meals...........< 140.......< 160
       
Bedtime.........................< 120......110 - 150
       
A1C (also called glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, HbA1c or
glycohemoglobin A1c).............< 6%........< 7%"

Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.