Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / October 2003
Butter vs Plastic
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ira Jamison - 22 Sep 2003 05:09 GMT DID YOU KNOW...
Both have the same amount of calories.
Butter is slightly higher in saturated fats at 8 grams compared to 5 grams
Eating margarine can increase heart disease in women by 53% over eating the same amount of butter according to a recent Harvard Medical Study
Eating butter increases the absorption of many other nutrients in other foods. Butter has many nutritional benefits where margarine has a few only because they are added.
Butter tastes much better than margarine and it can enhance the flavors of other foods.
Butter has been around for centuries where margarine has been around for less then 100 years.
Now for Margarine... Very high in Trans Fatty Acids. Triple risk of Coronary Heart Disease
Increases total and LDL ( this is the bad cholesterol). Lowers HDL cholesterol and this is the good one.
Increases the risk of cancers by up to five fold.
Lowers quality of breast milk. Decreases immune response. Decreases insulin response.
And here is the most disturbing fact....
Margarine is but ONE MOLECULE from being PLASTIC...!!!!
( This fact alone was enough to have me avoiding margarine for life and anything else that is hydrogenated. This means Hydrogen is added changing the molecular structure of the food )
YOU can try this yourself.
Purchase a tub of margarine and leave it in your garage or a shaded area. Within a couple of days you will note a couple of things. No flies, not even those pesky fruit flies will go near it, (that should tell you something) It does not rot, or smell differently...Because it has no nutritional value, nothing will grow on it, even those teeny weeny microorganisms will not find a home to grow...Why? Because it is nearly plastic. Would you melt your Tupperware and spread that on your toast?
I LOVE BUTTER BETTER ANYWAY.....
 Signature --- If you eat something and no one sees you eat it, it has no calories.
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 07:08 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:09:54 -0400, "Ira Jamison" <shrimplomaine@hotmail.com> wrote:
>No flies, not even those pesky fruit flies will go near it, >(that should tell you something) G'day G'day Ira,
Fruit flies are attracted to the fermentation products of sugars. What it tells me is the margarine doesn't contain fermentable sugar.
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 07:16 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:09:54 -0400, "Ira Jamison" <shrimplomaine@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Now for Margarine... Very high in Trans Fatty Acids. G'day G'day Ira,
This is true in some countries. It isn't true of spreadable margarines sold in NZ where intense lobbying years ago ensured they must have less than 0.9% trans fats. In international forums it easy to forget that what is true in America at this moment in time isn't necessarily true in other countries and most likely won't be true once the Americans introduce trans fats labeling legislation. The forces of competition are almost certain to ensure manufacturers swiftly adopt the solutions current in practice in countries like NZ.
Best wishes.
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Ozgirl - 22 Sep 2003 08:14 GMT "Quentin Grady" <quentin@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message
The forces
> of competition are almost certain to ensure manufacturers swiftly > adopt the solutions current in practice in countries like NZ. And Oz :) I also checked both types of margarine I have in the house at present and neither have more than a minimal amount of sat fats and even less of trans fats. Taste is great for the one with added plant sterols too.
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 09:22 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:14:15 +1000, "Ozgirl" <someone@nothere.com> wrote:
>"Quentin Grady" <quentin@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >even less of trans fats. Taste is great for the one with added plant >sterols too. G'day G'day Ozgirl,
I think that is the point. Margarine started out as pretty cheap and nasty stuff. Where the dairy lobby provided stiff opposition to its introduction it improved and improved and improved.
In case anyone is wondering I don't have either butter or margarine in the house. Don't know what I would do with them if I did.
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
loralspam@ozconnect.net - 22 Sep 2003 10:15 GMT >In case anyone is wondering I don't have either butter or margarine in >the house. Don't know what I would do with them if I did. Have you seen "Last Tango in Paris"?.....
Cheers Alan, T2, Oz
Ed Seedhouse - 22 Sep 2003 16:24 GMT >>Now for Margarine... Very high in Trans Fatty Acids.
>This is true in some countries. It isn't true of spreadable >margarines sold in NZ where intense lobbying years ago ensured they >must have less than 0.9% trans fats. It isn't true of the vast majority of "tub" margarines sold anywhere in North America, either. If the margarine is nicely spreadable straight out of the fridge then it *cannot* have a high percentage of either trans or saturated fatty acids. Both of these make oils hard at room temperatures and rock-hard at refrigerator temperatures.
Any easily cold-spreadable margarine therefore has a low percentage of trans-fats in it, period. It may have lots of other things wrong with it, of course, but a high percentage of trans fats isn't one of them.
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 22:30 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:24:36 GMT, Ed Seedhouse <eseedhouse@spamshaw.ca> wrote:
>>>Now for Margarine... Very high in Trans Fatty Acids. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >trans-fats in it, period. It may have lots of other things wrong with >it, of course, but a high percentage of trans fats isn't one of them. G'day G'day Ed,
I love it when blokes say, blah,blah, period. It is sounds almost like a papal pronouncement to mix a metaphor or two. One can wait for the facts to orbit around and smack them or present some evidence as a basis for discussion. The later seems kinder.
1: Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3):370-5.
Effect of different forms of dietary hydrogenated fats on LDL particle size.
Mauger JF, Lichtenstein AH, Ausman LM, Jalbert SM, Jauhiainen M, Ehnholm C, Lamarche B.
Institute on Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
[snip]
semiliquid margarine (0.6 g trans FAs/100 g fat), soft margarine (9.4 g trans FAs/100 g fat), shortening (13.6 g trans FAs/100 g fat), stick margarine (26.1 g trans FAs/100 g fat), or butter, which was low in trans FAs (2.6 g trans FAs/100 g fat) but rich in saturated fat.
Words, words, words. How our personal understanding of them can deceive us. My interpretation of "soft margarine" is spreadable margarine, the sort people take out of the refrigerator and spread on their toast. Perhaps it isn't. But if it is then it has ten times the maximum allowable trans fats of NZ and presumably Australian spreadable margarines.
For those that are wondering trans fat refers to a mixture of related fats with a similar geometric feature. Those found in partially hydrogenated margarine tend to have a high proportion of elaidic acid. Those found in butter tend to have a high proportion of vaccinic acid. Vaccinic acid may even be beneficial as it can be converted to conjugated linoleic acid,CLA. Elaidic acid appears to be harmful as the percentages creep up.
Your hypothesis that spreadable margarines must have LESS trans and saturated fats to be spreadable has some validity. One can clearly see the stick margarine(solid) has over 25% trans fat and the semi liquid margarine less than 1%. The question is what is in the tubs of spreadable margarine in different countries. If one were to follow your logic that the table margarines HAD to have low trans fats in order to be spreadable then the legislation passed in NZ would have no point. The dairy companies lobbied for the low level (<0.9%) anticipating it would be difficult to meet. If it was automatic they could have saved their breath.
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Ozgirl - 23 Sep 2003 00:01 GMT > It isn't true of the vast majority of "tub" margarines sold anywhere > in North America, either. If the margarine is nicely spreadable > straight out of the fridge then it *cannot* have a high percentage of > either trans or saturated fatty acids. Both of these make oils hard > at room temperatures and rock-hard at refrigerator temperatures. Ed, that is a very sweeping statement. In Australia we have had soft, spreadable, straight from the fridge margarines that were much higher in trans fats. We still have soft, spreadable, straight from the fridge margarines with virtually no trans fat. Your statement could have detrimental effect on people in countries where trans fat isn't on the labels. Some people would think that because it was soft and spreadable it was safe. I think you need to back this up with a cite.
Ed Seedhouse - 23 Sep 2003 00:58 GMT >> It isn't true of the vast majority of "tub" margarines sold anywhere >> in North America, either. If the margarine is nicely spreadable >> straight out of the fridge then it *cannot* have a high percentage >>of either trans or saturated fatty acids. Both of these make oils hard >> at room temperatures and rock-hard at refrigerator temperatures.
>Ed, that is a very sweeping statement. In Australia we have had soft, >spreadable, straight from the fridge margarines that were much higher >in trans fats. Er, define "much higher". If an oil is soft at refrigerator temperatures then it is largely unsaturated or monounsaturated. If it has trans fats or saturated fats they will be in a low proportion. I would be very surprised if any brand of margarine that is spreadable right out of the refrigerator has much more than 10% or 15% of it's fats in the form of trans or saturated fats. That's not a high concentration in my book, but then you might define "high" differently.
>We still have soft, spreadable, straight from the >fridge margarines with virtually no trans fat. Yes, and they all have higher levels of saturated fats in them to make them solid enough not to pour. Probably preferable to high levels of trans fats, of course, but if they are around 15% total I don't see this as "high" in trans fatty acids or saturated fatty acids.
>Your statement could >have detrimental effect on people in countries where trans fat isn't >on the labels. Some people would think that because it was soft and >spreadable it was safe. I did most certainly did *not* say or even imply that margarines with low levels of trans-fatty acids were safe. Even polyunsaturated fats and oils can be unsafe depending on how they are processed. So if people want to think that just because a particular brand of margarine is low in saturated fats or in trans-fats they are "safe" that is their opinion, not mine, and I don't see why I should feel in any way responsible for their bad reasoning.
Personally I avoid margarine altogether. If I'm going to spread fat on my bread I use butter. That's my personal choice and no one else is responsible for it or should be guided by it.
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 07:22 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:09:54 -0400, "Ira Jamison" <shrimplomaine@hotmail.com> wrote:
>And here is the most disturbing fact.... > >Margarine is but ONE MOLECULE from being PLASTIC...!!!! G'day G'day Ira,
What is most disturbing about this is that the statement is essentially meaningless.
Both butter and margarine are a mixture of molecules.
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Ed Seedhouse - 22 Sep 2003 16:29 GMT >>And here is the most disturbing fact....
>>Margarine is but ONE MOLECULE from being PLASTIC...!!!!
> What is most disturbing about this is that the statement is >essentially meaningless.
>Both butter and margarine are a mixture of molecules. As is everything else you see around you and the air you breath as well.
Heck, if we want to be alarmist - did you know that salt is only one *atom* from being a deadly poisonous gas? Does that scare you? If it does you are scientifically illiterate, as the person who made the absolutely silly nonsense claim above must certainly be as well.
Sleepyman - 22 Sep 2003 23:09 GMT I don't think the original post was supposed to be dead on serious.
JMO!
Sleepy
>>>And here is the most disturbing fact.... > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >does you are scientifically illiterate, as the person who made the >absolutely silly nonsense claim above must certainly be as well. ----------------------------------------------------------- Support bacteria. They're the only culture some people have -----------------------------------------------------------
Ozgirl - 23 Sep 2003 00:04 GMT > Heck, if we want to be alarmist - did you know that salt is only one > *atom* from being a deadly poisonous gas? Does that scare you? If it > does you are scientifically illiterate, as the person who made the > absolutely silly nonsense claim above must certainly be as well. Was that called for? Ira has posted information he has seen and Quentin has challenged one of the comments. I don't see anything alarmist in either of their posts.
Ed Seedhouse - 23 Sep 2003 01:00 GMT >> Heck, if we want to be alarmist - did you know that salt is only one >> *atom* from being a deadly poisonous gas? Does that scare you? If >> it does you are scientifically illiterate, as the person who made the >> absolutely silly nonsense claim above must certainly be as well.
>Was that called for? I thought it was, at the time. It still seems like perfectly fair comment to me.
>Ira has posted information he has seen and >Quentin has challenged one of the comments. I don't see anything >alarmist in either of their posts. I see saying that margarine is only "one molecule" away from being plastic to be very alarmist as well as misleading and, by the way, untrue.
Ed
Quentin Grady - 23 Sep 2003 04:56 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:00:38 GMT, Ed Seedhouse <eseedhouse@spamshaw.ca> wrote:
>I see saying that margarine is only "one molecule" away from being >plastic to be very alarmist as well as misleading and, by the way, >untrue. > >Ed G'day G'day Ed et al,
Although I happen to disagree with Ed on another point I whole heartedly agree with him on this point. This was not the only example of alarmist propaganda contained in the original post.
Let's say for one moment purely for arguments sake, that the following statements represented the balance of scientific consensus.
Ira> Increases the risk of cancers by up to five fold.
Ira> Lowers quality of breast milk. Decreases immune Ira> response. Decreases insulin response.
The dairy lobby here would be jumping up and down shouting with glee. If these statements were established with sufficient scientific certainty that the man on the street would call them proven facts, politicians of every political persuasion would want a piece of the action. Some of them might take a bit of convincing given that many people subscribe to the notion that margarine reduces the incidence of CHD, but wait that is already covered.
Ira> Eating margarine can increase heart disease in women by 53% over Ira> eating the same amount of butter according to a recent Harvard Ira> Medical Study
As it happens the earthquake from down South of here a few weeks back appears to be entirely natural and not connected to any jumping up and down of dairy company executives or their tame politicians.
To me the position of the original poster holds water in the way a stack of sieves holds water. When one sieve doesn't hold water, another is stacked on top of it. The hope is that even though the reader will realise a particular statement doesn't hold water, they will buy into the notion that some other sieve does.
For those who take an interest in such thing one can see the purpose is not to present an argument but an emotive build up.
Cancer -> breast feeding and implied infant health -> eating plastic
Let's take one of the statements. With so many statements one has a free choice.
"Decreases immune response."
What many people don't realise is that one function of the immune response is to produce inflammation. When yuppie margarines are omega-3 enriched as many of them are here in New Zealand, they are anti-inflammatory. It sounds bad ... decreasing the immune response but unless one is troubled by parasites, insect bites etc decreasing inflammation is probably a good thing.
This doesn't mean all margarines are anti-inflammatory. It all depends on the omega-6:omega-3 ratio in the product.
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Wes Groleau - 23 Sep 2003 05:29 GMT > Heck, if we want to be alarmist - did you know that salt is only one > *atom* from being a deadly poisonous gas? Does that scare you? If it Did you know that hemoglobin is only one atom from being chlorophyl ?!?
Tony Stark is trying to turn us all into plants!
 Signature Wes Groleau ----------- Daily Hoax: http://www.snopes2.com/cgi-bin/random/random.asp
Quentin Grady - 23 Sep 2003 06:06 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:29:14 -0500, Wes Groleau <groleau@freeshell.org> wrote:
>> Heck, if we want to be alarmist - did you know that salt is only one >> *atom* from being a deadly poisonous gas? Does that scare you? If it [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Tony Stark is trying to turn us all into plants! ROTFL.
G'day G'day Wes,
Nice one.
FWIIW since the rains the snail population has boomed. Endeavoring to get some coriander and dill plants to last longer than over night I have used some eco safe snail pellets. They have Iron complexed with EDTA. As I understand it snail blood has a copper version of hemoglobin which makes their blood bluish. They don't like having the single atom change from copper to iron, not one little bit. It is tempting to think that the conversion would soup them up they would race around the garden but this thought seems to fail the reality evidential test.
Whatever. The dogs love the pellets despite what it says in the packet and if not watched will hunt for them like a treasure hunt in the garden.
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Annette - 24 Sep 2003 15:35 GMT > This post not CC'd by email (snipped - no chlorophyl in *my* blood please!)
> FWIIW since the rains the snail population has boomed. Endeavoring to > get some coriander and dill plants to last longer than over night I [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > -- > Quentin I spent years looking for a snail killer that my pets wouldn't sniff out and eat like dedicated addicts.
I finally found one, that they completely ignore. Snails still love it though.
It's made by Hortico (don't know if you have that in NZ), but it's darn hard to find in stores, and is somewhat more expensive than other brands. My tin says it contains the active ingredient 15g/kg of Metaldehyde. They DON'T say what the deterrent is though! It really seems to work. Only molluscs seem to like it, to the extent of eating just a crumb in preference to a tender little seedling right alongside. And their heamaphrodite relations are attracted to the dead snail, eat it, and die too!
It's nearly as good as the crunch of a snail under one's boot.
Annette
Pete - 24 Sep 2003 11:11 GMT >> This post not CC'd by email
>(snipped - no chlorophyl in *my* blood please!)
>> FWIIW since the rains the snail population has boomed. >Endeavoring to [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> and if not watched will hunt for them like a treasure hunt in the >> garden.
>> -- >> Quentin
>I spent years looking for a snail killer that my pets wouldn't sniff >out and eat like dedicated addicts. I have one for you but I have no idea how i would get it to you. Suggestions - see profile below.
>I finally found one, that they completely ignore. Snails still love >it though.
>It's made by Hortico (don't know if you have that in NZ), but it's >darn hard to find in stores, and is somewhat more expensive than [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >It's nearly as good as the crunch of a snail under one's boot. >Annette Percival the Snail destroyer.
Percival [Percy for short] weighs in at 1.5 kilo's and is a tad fatter than he ought to be for his age [guess only] He gives no quarter and any snail within half an acre of his beat is dead meat.
Percy is our pet hedgehog. Well I say pet - he isn't really. We just think he is cause he lives in our garden which he has declared his domain.
Since Percy's arrival, we have had the once prolific population of snails, decimated. Percy has a fetish for them. Sadly, the garden is now over grazed and there is little to sustain him so he has taken to wandering in search of more snails.
I cannot post him but reccommend encouraging one of his kind to take up residence. They need very little except that which you want rid of.
Alternatively - as an interim remedy: get a bowl and fill it with strong beer. Place a larger bowl over it. The snails slither in get pissed and cannot climb out. [If the sides are steep enough.] You could fabricate a type of containr that will let them in but not out. But beer is the key. Honestly.
HTH
Pete
JHEM - 24 Sep 2003 17:12 GMT > I spent years looking for a snail killer that my pets wouldn't sniff > out and eat like dedicated addicts. Try beer Annette! I _think_ you Aussies have heard of it! ;-)
Seriously, pour some beer into a saucer and cover with something that will allow the snails to gain access but prevent your pups from turning into a bunch of lushes. (*)
Actually, now that I think about it, you must already know all about this down under. You've been sending us liquid snail killer for years.
I'm pretty sure it's called Foster's! ;-)
Regards,
James the Elder
(* That brought a smile to my lips as I formed a mental picture of your pups in AL football jerseys knocking back a few of those liter cans of Foster's preparatory to the obligatory punch-up in the local!)
Julie Bove - 24 Sep 2003 18:46 GMT > I spent years looking for a snail killer that my pets wouldn't sniff > out and eat like dedicated addicts. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > It's nearly as good as the crunch of a snail under one's boot. Beer is by far the best snail and slug killer that I've ever used. You can use cheap beer, stale beer, or whatever kind you have. Simply pour it in a shallow container like a jar lid or something. Place in your flower beds or gardens every few feet. The snails and slugs crawl in there, then drown and can't get back out. Of course, I would advise this if you have pets who like to drink.
I used to have a little dog who got epilepsy as a result of scar tissue on the brain caused by slug bait. :( She lived to the ripe old age of 18, so I guess she wasn't too badly harmed. She was a wine drinker though. My parents once had a New Year's Eve party upstairs. I was in high school at the time and was having my own party downstairs with sparkling cider. People kept complaining that someone was drinking their wine. My friends and I got blamed for it, yet none of us had even been upstairs.
Then some time after midnight, Misty (our dog) came sort of rolling down the stairs, then tottered across the floor. One of my friends said "I think your dog is drunk!" At first I thought she was having an epileptic seizure, but her behavior was different. Turns out, some people were putting their glasses of wine on the floor and the dog was lapping it up out of the glasses. Never saw her drink any other form of liquor though.
 Signature Type 2 http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/
Colleen - 24 Sep 2003 18:55 GMT <snip>
> and I got blamed for it, yet none of us had even been upstairs. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > glasses of wine on the floor and the dog was lapping it up out of the > glasses. Never saw her drink any other form of liquor though. That's 'cause she hid the bottles. ;>)
 Signature c
website http://www.plazaearth.com/philo
Quentin Grady - 24 Sep 2003 19:37 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:35:26 +1000, "Annette" <acianthus@bigpond.com> wrote:
>I spent years looking for a snail killer that my pets wouldn't sniff >out and eat like dedicated addicts. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >right alongside. And their heamaphrodite relations are attracted to >the dead snail, eat it, and die too! G'day G'day Annette,
I think we get some Hortico products but not the snail bait. Metaldehyde is bad for dogs and mine don't seem to be discouraged in the slightest by the animal repellents in the locally available versions.
>It's nearly as good as the crunch of a snail under one's boot. That reminds me of two disgruntled bridge players returning home after a dismal night at cards. One of them stepped on a snail. As the crunching noise broke their silent fugue the other said, "And we thought we had a bad night."
It is one of those silly things one remembers. That brings back a laugh when all laughter seems lost.
>Annette I wonder what other little phrases people have that they say that cheers them up. Heaven knows with diabetes we need them.
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
JHEM - 24 Sep 2003 20:47 GMT > I wonder what other little phrases people have that they say that > cheers them up. Heaven knows with diabetes we need them. "Could be raining!". But you have to remember it in the original context from Gene Wilder's marvelous movie "Young Frankenstein".
Exterior shot of the graveyard. Freddy and Igor are waist deep in a grave as they excavate a coffin.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: What a filthy job. Igor: Could be worse. Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: How? How could it possibly be worse? Igor: Could be raining
Regards,
James the Elder
Quentin Grady - 25 Sep 2003 02:10 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:47:51 GMT, "JHEM" <James@ESAD_SPAMMERS.thinkpads.com> wrote:
>> I wonder what other little phrases people have that they say that >> cheers them up. Heaven knows with diabetes we need them. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >James the Elder G'day G'day James,
That works. The phrase triggers up a vividly graphic picture of what it would be like. Almost has the sound effects of howling night.
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 07:33 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:09:54 -0400, "Ira Jamison" <shrimplomaine@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Increases total and LDL ( this is the bad cholesterol). Lowers HDL >cholesterol and this is the good one. G'day G'day Ira,
You would appear to be referring to the effects of trans fats. One of the good things that comes out of posts like this is the opportunity it provides to revisit some subjects. In this instance there is a startling admission that trans fats produce the nasty small dense LDL. I have taken the liberty of reformatting the abstract for easier reading. Notice how margarine is NOT a single product and trans fat content increase with the degree of hardening.
1: Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3):370-5.
Effect of different forms of dietary hydrogenated fats on LDL particle size.
Mauger JF, Lichtenstein AH, Ausman LM, Jalbert SM, Jauhiainen M, Ehnholm C, Lamarche B.
Institute on Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
BACKGROUND: Dietary trans fatty acids (FAs), which are formed during the process of hydrogenating vegetable oil, are known to increase plasma LDL-cholesterol concentrations. However, their effect on LDL particle size has yet to be investigated.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of trans FA consumption on the electrophoretic characteristics of LDL particles.
DESIGN: Eighteen women and 18 men each consumed 5 experimental diets in random order for 35-d periods. Fat represented 30% of total energy intake in each diet, with two-thirds of the fat in the form of semiliquid margarine (0.6 g trans FAs/100 g fat), soft margarine (9.4 g trans FAs/100 g fat), shortening (13.6 g trans FAs/100 g fat), stick margarine (26.1 g trans FAs/100 g fat), or butter, which was low in trans FAs (2.6 g trans FAs/100 g fat) but rich in saturated fat.
LDL particle size and distribution were characterized by nondenaturing, 2-16% polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis.
RESULTS: Relative to the LDL particle size observed after consumption of the butter-enriched diet, LDL particle size decreased significantly and in a dose-dependent fashion with increasing amounts of dietary trans FAs (P < 0.001).
Cholesterol concentrations in large (> 260 A) and medium-sized (255-260 A) LDL particles also increased proportionately to the amount of trans FAs in the diet.
CONCLUSION: Consumption of dietary trans FAs is associated with a deleterious increase in small, dense LDL, which further reinforces the importance of promoting diets low in trans FAs to favorably affect the lipoprotein profile.
PMID: 12936917 [PubMed - in process]
Best wishes,
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 08:23 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:09:54 -0400, "Ira Jamison" <shrimplomaine@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Eating butter increases the absorption of many other nutrients >in other foods. Butter has many nutritional benefits where >margarine has a few only because they are added. G'day G'day Ira,
For the moment it is unclear what these many nutritional benefits for butter might be but it is apparent you are suggesting absorption from OTHER foods. Let's take a look at this hypothesis. Here is some research that looks at uptake of calcium from dairy products when margarine replaces butter. Unfortunately for your hypothesis, uptake of calcium and vit D is improved by using margarine.
1: Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2002 Oct;108(4):953-8.
[Increased serum levels of vitamin D and calcium in young men after replacement of butter with soft margarine in usual diet]
[Article in Polish]
Kozlowska-Wojciechowska M, Makarewicz-Wujec M, Nowicka G.
Zaklad Upowszechniania Wiedzy o Zywnosci i Zywieniu Instytutu Zywnosci i Zywienia.
Osteoporosis features include reduction of bone mass and increased predisposition to fractures. Osteoporosis is considered as one of frequent diseases developing in menopausal women and old men. The values of peak bone mass are the determinant of osteoporosis development. It is estimated that the peak bone mass is reached at the age between 16 and 30 years. (NIH Consensus, 2001). Insufficient intake of calcium and vitamin D in diet, with reduced sun exposure, low physical activity, low body weight are well documented risk factors for this disease in human. For that reason, in osteoporosis prevention it should be tried to ensure adequate supply of calcium in diet from early life, with adequate supply of vitamin D, as factors determining adequate mineralization of osseous tissue. The study was carried out for assessing changes of the levels of calcium and 25-OH cholecalciferol in serum replacing butter in usual diet with margarine enriched with vitamin D. After a period of diet stabilization the study group received first diet with butter, followed by diet with margarine in place of butter. Throughout the whole experiment the diet contained unchanged amounts of dairy products as a source of alimentary calcium. In the experiment 41 young healthy men aged 22.6 +/- 1.2 years participated. Every subject consumed in a period of 4 weeks 30 g of butter daily, and during the following 4 weeks margarine 30 g daily. Substitution of margarine for butter in usual diet raised 25-OH cholecalciferol level in serum by 5.56 ng/ml, that is 32.4% (p < 0.001), with consequent 0.12 mg (5%) rise of serum calcium level (p < 0.05). The intake of calcium with diet from dairy products was unchanged throughout the experiment 576-581 mg daily, that is 72% of the recommended intake. The obtained results suggest that independently of the amount of vitamin D intake with food and calcium with diet substitution of margarine enriched with vitamin D for butter was beneficial raising serum vitamin D level, and at the same time increasing calcium absorption from food. It can be accepted that the obtained results could support the opinion on beneficial effects of the consumption of high-quality margarine in daily diet as prevention of the development not only of atherosclerosis but also osteoporosis.
PMID: 12642939 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Quentin Grady - 22 Sep 2003 09:40 GMT This post not CC'd by email On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:09:54 -0400, "Ira Jamison" <shrimplomaine@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Now for Margarine... Very high in Trans Fatty Acids. >Triple risk of Coronary Heart Disease > >Increases total and LDL ( this is the bad cholesterol). Lowers HDL >cholesterol and this is the good one. G'day G'day,
In all things one must be careful to make necessary distinctions.
What happens with low trans fat margarine? Does it represent the same risk factors as high trans fat margarine? The margarine is only "novel" if you live in the US where the dairy lobbying was less effective than the soy/canola/corn/sunflower lobbies. While this piece of research shows lowering of the blood levels of LDL cholesterol with the use of trans free margarine, don't rush to the conclusion that this necessarily means lower arteriosclerosis risk. There are other factors eg the inflammatory response. That will depend on the relative quantities of omega-3 and omega-6 in the margarine amongst other things.
1: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2001 Oct;11(5):320-6.
Serum cholesterol response to replacing butter with a new trans-free margarine in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
Tonstad S, Strom EC, Bergei CS, Ose L, Christophersen B.
Lipid Clinic, Medical Department A, National Hospital, Oslo, Norway. serena.tonstad@ulleval.no
Margarine leads to lower total and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels than butter but may contain trans fatty acids that increase atherogenic lipids. A food company has used data concerning the cholesterolemic effects of individual fatty acids, including trans fatty acids, to develop a commercially available and virtually trans-free margarine.
OBJECTIVE: The effect of this novel margarine on serum lipids and lipoproteins was compared with that of butter in free-living, hypercholesterolemic subjects.
DESIGN AND SETTING: A two-period, outpatient cross-over trial at a university hospital lipid clinic.
SUBJECTS: The study involved 77 subjects, and was completed by 53 men and 19 women aged 35-65 years with total serum cholesterol levels of between 6.0 and 7.9 mmol/L.
INTERVENTION: Two 23-day regimens, separated by a 4-week washout period, included individualised dietary prescriptions supplemented with butter or margarine designed to provide 15% of total dietary energy.
RESULTS:
In comparison with butter, margarine intake lowered total and LDL-C ^^^^^^^ levels by respectively 11.1% (99% CI: 8.1-14.1) and 11.3% (99% CI: 7.6-15.1).
The reduction in LDL-C was < 3% in nearly one-fifth of the subjects despite appropriate changes in serum triglyceride fatty acids. Of the tested clinical and demographic variables, only the percentage of energy obtained from saturated fat during the margarine intake period was associated with dietary responsiveness (explaining 12% of the variation; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a margarine designed to meet nutritional recommendations for hypercholesterolemia is more efficacious than butter in reducing atherogenic lipid levels in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
Publication Types: Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 11887429 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 Signature Quentin Grady ^ ^ / New Zealand, >#,#< [ / \ /\ "... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Ira Jamison - 02 Oct 2003 07:15 GMT I still like my butter please!!!! My wife even makes butter from time to time.
Ira T2
> This post not CC'd by email > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:09:54 -0400, "Ira Jamison" [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] > > http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
|
|
|