Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Simvastatin reduces insulin sensitivity in people with high cholesterol

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Susan - 23 Apr 2008 15:02 GMT
Simvastatin Reduces Insulin Sensitivity in Patients With High Cholesterol
Although simvastatin improves flow-mediated dilation in
hypercholesterolemic patients, the drug reduces adiponectin levels and
insulin sensitivity, according to a report in the April issue of
Diabetes Care. These effects were not dose-dependent and also did not
relate to the magnitude of apolipoprotein B reduction.

In earlier studies, Dr. Kwang Kon Koh and colleagues had shown that
certain drugs, such as fenofibrate and candesartan, increase levels of
adiponectin, a cytokine secreted by fat cells, and enhance insulin
sensitivity. Conversely, in another study, the team found evidence that
simvastatin has exactly the opposite effect.

To explore this further, the researchers assessed adiponectin levels and
insulin sensitivity in 156 hypercholesterolemic patients who were
randomized to receive placebo or simvastatin at one of four doses (10,
20, 40 or 80 mg) during a 2-month period. In addition, flow-mediated
dilation was assessed in all subjects using standard measures.

As anticipated, simvastatin use reduced total cholesterol, LDL
cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels, Dr. Koh, from Gachon
University in Incheon, Korea, and colleagues note. In addition, the drug
improved flow-mediated dilation.
By contrast, relative to baseline or placebo, simvastatin reduced
adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity, independent of the dose or
the drop in apolipoprotein B level.

"Because of reciprocal relationships between endothelial dysfunction and
insulin resistance, we hypothesized that improvements in endothelial
dysfunction may be accompanied by simultaneous improvement in metabolic
parameters," the authors note. This, however, was not the case.

The findings "suggest that not all mechanisms for improving endothelial
dysfunction are tightly coupled to metabolic homeostasis," they add.

Diabetes Care 2008;31:776-782.
Julie Bove - 23 Apr 2008 16:28 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes

<read and snipped>

Could this be the reason why my control is worsening?
Susan - 23 Apr 2008 17:08 GMT
>>x-no-archive: yes
>
> <read and snipped>
>
> Could this be the reason why my control is worsening?

I don't know, Julie, but maybe it's possible.  Statins are adrenal
suppressive, and so are higher insulin levels.  My experience is that
when my adrenals are suppressed, they overreact by shooting out even
more cortisol, which shoots up my bg.

Susan
Julie Bove - 23 Apr 2008 20:21 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> my adrenals are suppressed, they overreact by shooting out even more
> cortisol, which shoots up my bg.

My numbers certainly did go up when I was put on it.  I remember fighting
not to be put on it because my overall cholesterol was not high, but I lost
that one with my Drs.
Nicky - 23 Apr 2008 20:25 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>not to be put on it because my overall cholesterol was not high, but I lost
>that one with my Drs.

Try again with the endo, when he bothers to show?

Nicky.
T2 dx 05/04 + underactive thyroid
D&E, 100ug thyroxine
Last A1c 5.6%  BMI 25
Julie Bove - 23 Apr 2008 20:38 GMT
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Try again with the endo, when he bothers to show?

He's the one that put me on it.  :(
Paul L - 23 Apr 2008 21:24 GMT
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> D&E, 100ug thyroxine
> Last A1c 5.6%  BMI 25

As a point of reference, I "win" every difference of opinion
I have with my docs.  They can't "make" me do anything   ;-)

cheers

Paul
Julie Bove - 23 Apr 2008 23:26 GMT
>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> As a point of reference, I "win" every difference of opinion
> I have with my docs.  They can't "make" me do anything   ;-)

But you're a guy.  Drs. seem not to listen to women.  I've even had women
Drs. who didn't want to listen.  If I bring  my husband in and have him do
the talking, they listen.  *sigh*
jacquie - 24 Apr 2008 04:02 GMT
That doesn't happen here..in fact when hubby was first diagnosed with cancer
he asked me to go to the surgeon with him...the surgeon spent all his time
talking to me and in turn I explained it to hubby:) Then after his surgery
he had me go to his urologist oncologist so I could get the chemo info and
explain it to hubby. I have come up to some surgeons that have the "God"
complex....they just piss me of :) When I was pregnant with my first, I
remember my OB told me to write questions down and bring them to him the
next visit and 18 year old me told him they would probably be stupid
questions..and he said there are no stupid questions..and he suggested that
when I went to any Dr to write questions down before I go, and if I could
speak them then just give the Dr the note. That advise has stayed with me
for over 38 years and I still write down questions...no it's because I would
probably forget them if I didn't write them down...LOL. Maybe you can do
that and present the note to your Dr. ...or give it to his nurse to give to
him for you before he comes into the room.
I found out today that tricare will now send your referrals to your
e-mail..well it really is e-mail that points you to the site where you pick
it up.
Jacquie

>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Drs. who didn't want to listen.  If I bring  my husband in and have him do
> the talking, they listen.  *sigh*
Julie Bove - 24 Apr 2008 04:27 GMT
> That doesn't happen here..in fact when hubby was first diagnosed with
> cancer he asked me to go to the surgeon with him...the surgeon spent all
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> e-mail..well it really is e-mail that points you to the site where you
> pick it up.

I don't have to get referrals with the type of Tricare I have.

As for the notes, I have tried that and was told by one Dr. not to do that.
Grrr...

Still haven't heard back from my Endo.  I am going to give him the benefit
of the doubt and assume that his voice mail is broken or something.  Will
call back tomorrow.  Am feeling most unwell now having spent the past few
hours >300.  I don't get it.  Have eaten very little today, carbs or
otherwise.  Husband went hog wild on the food I *would* have eaten so there
wasn't much to eat until after I went to the store this evening.  Plenty of
food in the house.  Just not stuff that was suitable for me.
DonnaB shallotpeel - 24 Apr 2008 05:32 GMT
>But you're a guy.  Drs. seem not to listen to women.  I've even had women
>Drs. who didn't want to listen.  If I bring  my husband in and have him do
>the talking, they listen.  *sigh*

Personally I've never had a gender issue like that *but* I know it does
happen. I just learned a big lesson that I have to be an advocate for my own
health & if I am too sick to be, then someone else must be with me to be my
advocate.

Signature

DonnaB shallotpeel : ^> USA <*> new WIN Vista user
06-07-06 Diagnosis T2 HbA1c 8.1, D&E & Metformin 500mg
Current ................... HbA1c 6.3

Tree Pollen: 04/08-2655; 04/09-2787; 04/10-2805; 04/11-3238; 04/14-3327;
04/15-117; 04/16-149; 04/17-348; 04/18-694; 04/21-419

"You can never go too far." - Taglines for Donnie Darko (2001)

Michelle C - 24 Apr 2008 18:23 GMT
Hi Julie,

I know some docs don't like patients thinking for themselves, but what if
you did a trial and quit taking the simvastatin for a couple three weeks and
see what effect it has on your numbers?
Signature

Best regards,
Michelle C., T2
diet & exercise
BMI 21.5

>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Drs. who didn't want to listen.  If I bring  my husband in and have him do
> the talking, they listen.  *sigh*
Julie Bove - 24 Apr 2008 21:21 GMT
> Hi Julie,
>
> I know some docs don't like patients thinking for themselves, but what if
> you did a trial and quit taking the simvastatin for a couple three weeks
> and see what effect it has on your numbers?

How would I know?  They only test my cholesterol like once a year.
Susan - 24 Apr 2008 21:25 GMT
> How would I know?  They only test my cholesterol like once a year.

See if it changes other things, like your symptoms, how well you feel,
and, after a few weeks, maybe your bg patterns.  Lowering LDL makes less
available for the body to produce adrenal steroids, all of which are
made from LDL.  Your body may be reacting badly to that.

Susan
Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 00:16 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> available for the body to produce adrenal steroids, all of which are made
> from LDL.  Your body may be reacting badly to that.

I never had any symptoms before or after.  Might be affecting BG though.
DonnaB shallotpeel - 24 Apr 2008 21:38 GMT
>> Hi Julie,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>How would I know?  They only test my cholesterol like once a year.

You know what your daily/whatever BG numbers are. That's one comparison.

Signature

: ^> DonnaB Yahoo Msgr: shallotpeel <*>  http://tinyurl.co.uk/h193
http://tinyurl.co.uk/wdp8  http://tinyurl.co.uk/byv9

º Why isn't there another word for thesaurus?

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 00:18 GMT
>>> Hi Julie,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> You know what your daily/whatever BG numbers are. That's one comparison.

They are all over the map.  I don't think anyone could tell from that.  I
just tested before dinner and it was 367.  Not good.  But I am also having
hypos and normal numbers.  Oddly the numbers have gone up since starting the
lantus and stopping the Januvia.  I didn't think the Januvia was helping.
But maybe it was?
Nick Cramer - 25 Apr 2008 00:44 GMT
> "Michelle C" <bookbug1@frys.com> wrote in message

> > Hi Julie,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How would I know?  They only test my cholesterol like once a year.

That sucks! I see my Diabetician every three months. He does complete blood
tests on me each time and I get a copy. I see my Cardiologist annualy. He
does the same.

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 01:04 GMT
>> "Michelle C" <bookbug1@frys.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> tests on me each time and I get a copy. I see my Cardiologist annualy. He
> does the same.

Why would you need it done so frequently?
Susan - 25 Apr 2008 01:28 GMT
> Why would you need it done so frequently?

Lipids and HbA1c are typically checked every three months, Julie, for
monitoring control and treatment progress. And ALWAYS after a new med is
introduced, IME.

Susan
DonnaB shallotpeel - 25 Apr 2008 02:49 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>monitoring control and treatment progress. And ALWAYS after a new med is
>introduced, IME.

I really cannot imagine putting someone on a statin & then not checking their
lipids every quarter.

Signature

: ^> DonnaB Yahoo Msgr: shallotpeel <*>  http://tinyurl.co.uk/h193
http://tinyurl.co.uk/wdp8  http://tinyurl.co.uk/byv9

"Anytime I see a person fleeing from reason & into religion, I think to
myself, there goes a person who cannot stand being so goddamned lonely
anymore." - Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. [Nov 11, 1922-Apr 11, 2007]

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 05:06 GMT
>>x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> their
> lipids every quarter.

I was only checked after I was put on the med and then yearly.  Maybe that's
all my insurance will pay for?  Dunno.  I know they were getting annoyed
because I was having too many A1cs done.  My Endo. would do it and then a
couple of weeks later my GP would do it or vice versa.
Michelle C - 25 Apr 2008 20:10 GMT
>>x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> their
> lipids every quarter.

Not to mention their liver enzymes.
Signature

Best regards,
Michelle C., T2
diet & exercise
BMI 21.5

DonnaB shallotpeel - 26 Apr 2008 01:31 GMT
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Not to mention their liver enzymes.

LOL, indeed!!

Signature

DonnaB shallotpeel : ^> USA <*> new WIN Vista user
06-07-06 Diagnosis T2 HbA1c 8.1, D&E & Metformin 500mg
Current ................... HbA1c 6.3

Trinkwasser - 26 Apr 2008 17:56 GMT
>>x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I really cannot imagine putting someone on a statin & then not checking their
>lipids every quarter.

The latest crap money-saving ploy here is that once you're on a statin
they never check your lipids again

I'm going to have to do some arm-twisting to get mine done at my next
annual check
(yes *annual* my control is too good to be checked out three or six
monthly - and it's all *your* fault, everyone here)
Alan S - 26 Apr 2008 21:37 GMT
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>(yes *annual* my control is too good to be checked out three or six
>monthly - and it's all *your* fault, everyone here)

I know you'd be too honest to drink a can of coke just
before your annual "fasting" glucose test or to add a full
English Breakfast to give some interesting gl,ucose and
lipid results that may qualify you for metformin, more
regular tests, other treatments etc...no, you'd never be sly
enough for that...

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Trinkwasser - 29 Apr 2008 21:37 GMT
>>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>regular tests, other treatments etc...no, you'd never be sly
>enough for that...

I just might now that they've started limiting repeat prescriptions.
So far they've forced mother to run out of her felodipine and now her
mesalazine <sigh> I was a bit surprised to find all my repeats ready
for me when I went down today since I'd ordered them a few days early.

I told her to make an emergency appointment but she doesn't want to
trouble the doctor. I just might want to trouble her on her behalf.

OTOH I quite like to be left alone to get on with stuff without
interruption, but if they're going to insist on treating us like
idiots anyway where's my motivation for not acting like one?
W. Baker - 30 Apr 2008 14:42 GMT
: I just might now that they've started limiting repeat prescriptions.
: So far they've forced mother to run out of her felodipine and now her
: mesalazine <sigh> I was a bit surprised to find all my repeats ready
: for me when I went down today since I'd ordered them a few days early.

: I told her to make an emergency appointment but she doesn't want to
: trouble the doctor. I just might want to trouble her on her behalf.

: OTOH I quite like to be left alone to get on with stuff without
: interruption, but if they're going to insist on treating us like
: idiots anyway where's my motivation for not acting like one?

Can't you call your (or your Mother's doctor's office to request new
prescriptions?  Here, in NYC , I can do that and a prescrption with
refills is good for a year.  

Wendy
Trinkwasser - 30 Apr 2008 20:57 GMT
>: I just might now that they've started limiting repeat prescriptions.
>: So far they've forced mother to run out of her felodipine and now her
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>prescriptions?  Here, in NYC , I can do that and a prescrption with
>refills is good for a year.  

No it doesn't work like that here, we get a "repeat prescription" for
monthly quantities and up until now all we do is drop the slip at the
pharmacy each month and go back about a week later to collect the
items - the pharmacy sends the slips to the doctor and gets the actual
prescription in return. This can go on in perpetuity but we are
supposed to go in annually for a "prescription review"

What's happening now is that the doctor - or clerk - decides when we
reorder too early they will either send only some or none of the items
or delay them until later, or cancel the repeat altogether, purely it
seems at random, which means we now have no clue what she has or has
not reordered (and the pharmacist now has to search the entire shelf
for each patient instead of simply picking up the bag, because there
may be half a dozen different items in half a dozen different bags
picked on half a dozen different days)

I could ring the doctor's secretary and get a callback (they set aside
so many slots per day for phone calls in between the patient consults)
but if they're going to annoy me and waste my time they're going to
get the same straight back

<fume>

I think she's getting a gout flare up again so I'll have to take her
in anyway before her booked appointment in three weeks time.

Bloody Deputy Chief Assistant Undermanagers, trust them to screw up a
system that has been working well for the last few years.
Nicky - 01 May 2008 08:35 GMT
>What's happening now is that the doctor - or clerk - decides when we
>reorder too early they will either send only some or none of the items
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>may be half a dozen different items in half a dozen different bags
>picked on half a dozen different days)

Make an appointment with the practice manager and discuss the process
breakdown with her. These people are usually managers rather than
medicos, so are often basing decisions on medical matters on incorrect
premises - like what an acceptable failure rate is. Understanding what
the impact of what's going on to you and your mother might be
completely new - and important - information to her. Also, you can
generally make an appointment in advance, rather than pratting around
the medisec's games.

Nicky.
T2 dx 05/04 + underactive thyroid
D&E, 100ug thyroxine
Last A1c 5.6%  BMI 25
Trinkwasser - 02 May 2008 20:42 GMT
>>What's happening now is that the doctor - or clerk - decides when we
>>reorder too early they will either send only some or none of the items
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>generally make an appointment in advance, rather than pratting around
>the medisec's games.

Actually I'm in the process of writing to the GP since she is so
comparatively reasonable, I'm putting in some stuff from my background
in stock/production control vis a vis the downside of just-in-time and
how it only works when you add just-in-case

I dunno if it's a local thing or a centralised thing that's being
rolled out here but from what the pharmacy staff have told me it's to
do with stopping patients "over-ordering", I'm making the point that
there may be a point in targeting the patients that are actually
guilty but assuming guilt and punishing the majority for the sins of
the minority will have consequences that should have been foreseen

(At the end of the day I've had this battle with pointy-haired
managers before, when done properly we were able to greatly reduce the
inventory by introducing a slick purchasing system but in another firm
when carried out to excess we lost customers and went from being a
world leader to an also-ran which changed hands about four times after
I left in disgust)
W. Baker - 03 May 2008 20:31 GMT
: Actually I'm in the process of writing to the GP since she is so
: comparatively reasonable, I'm putting in some stuff from my background
: in stock/production control vis a vis the downside of just-in-time and
: how it only works when you add just-in-case

: I dunno if it's a local thing or a centralised thing that's being
: rolled out here but from what the pharmacy staff have told me it's to
: do with stopping patients "over-ordering", I'm making the point that
: there may be a point in targeting the patients that are actually
: guilty but assuming guilt and punishing the majority for the sins of
: the minority will have consequences that should have been foreseen

: (At the end of the day I've had this battle with pointy-haired
: managers before, when done properly we were able to greatly reduce the
: inventory by introducing a slick purchasing system but in another firm
: when carried out to excess we lost customers and went from being a
: world leader to an also-ran which changed hands about four times after
: I left in disgust)

I deal with a mail-order  90 day company that my drug plan requires us to
deal with (Express scripts).  On each bottle, there is a reorder AFTER***
date, which is some two months plus from the date you are aild the med.  
This shoudl reduce over-ordering.  In fct, if you need the med sooner(say
you are ging on a vacation and need t have enough before you leave) it can
get difficult, with lots of phoning to get permission and exceptions.  
this, I suppose, is to prevent rouutine over-ordering.  Each persription
last for a year, so you get 3 refills after you get your first 90 day
supply sent

Wendy
Nick Cramer - 04 May 2008 09:39 GMT
> [ . . . ]
> I deal with a mail-order  90 day company that my drug plan requires us to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> last for a year, so you get 3 refills after you get your first 90 day
> supply sent

That's the way Cigna's Tel-Drug is. The only difference is that I have no
problem getting vacation over-rides if I have enough refills left.

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Trinkwasser - 04 May 2008 21:37 GMT
>: Actually I'm in the process of writing to the GP since she is so
>: comparatively reasonable, I'm putting in some stuff from my background
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>last for a year, so you get 3 refills after you get your first 90 day
>supply sent

This sounds like what they're trying to bring in, except the
prescriptions are per month, the problem is the reorder dates are too
close to the run out and panic dates, so not only are vacations a
problem but for people who can only get to the pharmacy at weekends
they are inevitable going to run out monthly.

Even going in twice a week instead of once a week is proving to be a
crapshoot.

Our BLOODY NHS is learning from your HMOs I'll swear, we're going to
end up with the worst of both systems.
Nick Cramer - 01 May 2008 10:40 GMT
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:42:38 +0000 (UTC), "W. Baker"
> > [ . . . ]
> I think she's getting a gout flare up again so I'll have to take her
> in anyway before her booked appointment in three weeks time.

Does your Mum take Allopurinol for the gout?

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Trinkwasser - 02 May 2008 20:44 GMT
>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:42:38 +0000 (UTC), "W. Baker"
>> > [ . . . ]
>> I think she's getting a gout flare up again so I'll have to take her
>> in anyway before her booked appointment in three weeks time.
>
>Does your Mum take Allopurinol for the gout?

She's just started. I can't remember if she had been on it before, but
until recently she hadn't had gout for years and then it was
drug-induced.

It's not impossible the Allopurinol is to blame, it can worsen the
symptoms initially.

On the other hand it may just be that she's wearing out . . .
Robert Miles - 03 May 2008 00:44 GMT
>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:42:38 +0000 (UTC), "W. Baker"
>>> > [ . . . ]
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> On the other hand it may just be that she's wearing out . . .

I saved a few web sites related to gout recently:

http://www.ukgoutsociety.org/

<http://www.britishdalmatianclub.org.uk/downloads/Purine%20Table%202003.htm>
Trinkwasser - 03 May 2008 19:01 GMT
>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:42:38 +0000 (UTC), "W. Baker"
>>>> > [ . . . ]
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
><http://www.britishdalmatianclub.org.uk/downloads/Purine%20Table%202003.htm>

Oh yes that purines table is good, I printed it out for mother, and
when I write to the GP I will point her to it.

(for some reason Firefox would only print out one page with the edge
clipped but I pasted it into Open Office and printed it in a large
friendly font)

I found a few more sites on gout then stopped as the information is
mostly similar from site to site, unlike with diabetes.
Nick Cramer - 04 May 2008 09:30 GMT
> <robertmiles@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote:
> >"Trinkwasser" <spam@devnull.com.invalid> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> clipped but I pasted it into Open Office and printed it in a large
> friendly font)

Trink, were you then able to print out the entire table?

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Trinkwasser - 04 May 2008 21:40 GMT
>> <robertmiles@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote:
>> >"Trinkwasser" <spam@devnull.com.invalid> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Trink, were you then able to print out the entire table?

Yes it copied and pasted OK, just needed some tidying up.

AFAICR ctrl-A ctrl-C then I pasted it into the spreadsheet and altered
the font and the column widths around to make it more aesthetically
pleasing. As you do.
Nick Cramer - 01 May 2008 05:43 GMT
> : I just might now that they've started limiting repeat prescriptions.
> : So far they've forced mother to run out of her felodipine and now her
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> prescriptions?  Here, in NYC , I can do that and a prescrption with
> refills is good for a year.

Ditto in California, where my doctor sends me a three month Rx with three
refills.

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Jefferson - 27 Apr 2008 00:43 GMT
Hi Trinkwasser:

>>>>Why would you need it done so frequently?
>>>
>>>Lipids and HbA1c are typically checked every three months, Julie, for
>>>monitoring control and treatment progress. And ALWAYS after a new med is
>>>introduced, IME.

I suspect that the more general practice for newly diagnosed type 2
diabetics is to test A1c every quarter and after reduction below 7% to
test every 6 months.  My lipids and liver enzymes have been tested
regularly every 6 months. One doctor gave me an atypical lipidemia dx
and it seems to have sticked although my trigs have been under 60 mg/dl
and HDL >60 mg/dl for 6 years.

It seems as though regression in arterial plaque can occur with LDL <80
mg/dl.  I have tested at near or below that level a few times. Dr.
Steven Nissen et al, Cleveland Clinic have studied "High Prevalence of
Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Teenagers and Young Adults" -
http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/103/22/2705. "Although
patients with coronary artery disease typically become symptomatic after
age 40 years, necropsy studies have demonstrated that atherosclerotic
changes in the vessel wall begin early in life." We can be well on our
way to hardening of the arteries at a young age.

>>I really cannot imagine putting someone on a statin & then not checking their
>>lipids every quarter.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> (yes *annual* my control is too good to be checked out three or six
> monthly - and it's all *your* fault, everyone here)

It does take some arm-twisting to get some tests like the ApoA/ApoB ratio.

Frank
Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 05:04 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> monitoring control and treatment progress. And ALWAYS after a new med is
> introduced, IME.

From what I have read about lab tests they are usually only tested yearly.
DonnaB shallotpeel - 25 Apr 2008 05:24 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>From what I have read about lab tests they are usually only tested yearly.

About people who are taking a statin? Diabetic meds? Or who have any other
illness or disease or syndrome that calls for monitoring more than just an
annual physical? I've never read that, or experienced that.

Signature

: ^> DonnaB Yahoo Msgr: shallotpeel <*>  http://tinyurl.co.uk/h193
http://tinyurl.co.uk/wdp8  http://tinyurl.co.uk/byv9

"And, whether she fulfills her life's ambition or not,
she can already lay claim to being the first woman
ever considered a serious contender for the
presidency." - Christopher Andersen, AMERICAN EVITA,
Preface, 2nd line

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 07:36 GMT
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> illness or disease or syndrome that calls for monitoring more than just an
> annual physical? I've never read that, or experienced that.

In general, cholesterol tests are done yearly.  I think I just read it in
one of the diabetes books but I don't remember which one.
DonnaB shallotpeel - 25 Apr 2008 08:40 GMT
>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>In general, cholesterol tests are done yearly.  I think I just read it in
>one of the diabetes books but I don't remember which one.

In general, for people who are not on cholesterol meds or in the general
population with fine cholesterol?

Never heard it, of it, read it, etc. EXCEPT annually for people not being
treated for bad lipids.

Signature

DonnaB shallotpeel : ^> USA <*> new WIN Vista user
06-07-06 Diagnosis T2 HbA1c 8.1, D&E & Metformin 500mg
Current ................... HbA1c 6.3

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 08:44 GMT
>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Never heard it, of it, read it, etc. EXCEPT annually for people not being
> treated for bad lipids.

Hmmm...
Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 08:46 GMT
>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Never heard it, of it, read it, etc. EXCEPT annually for people not being
> treated for bad lipids.

http://cholesterol.about.com/cs/gettingtested/a/howoften.htm
Nick Cramer - 25 Apr 2008 11:02 GMT
> "DonnaB shallotpeel" <shallotpeel@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:36:26 GMT, "Julie Bove" <juliebove@verizon.net>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> http://cholesterol.about.com/cs/gettingtested/a/howoften.htm

Julie, the web site clearly says, "For individuals taking prescription
medications to control cholesterol levels, like statin drugs, may need to
get their cholesterol tested at least twice a year to not only check
cholesterol levels, but to also check liver function." . . . AT LEAST twice
a year! You have several other physical complications as well, so, at least
twice a year would not seem unreasonable.

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 15:48 GMT
>> "DonnaB shallotpeel" <shallotpeel@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:36:26 GMT, "Julie Bove" <juliebove@verizon.net>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> least
> twice a year would not seem unreasonable.

Oops!  I guess I missed that part.
Susan - 25 Apr 2008 15:10 GMT
> In general, cholesterol tests are done yearly.  I think I just read it in
> one of the diabetes books but I don't remember which one.

Julie, I think you're confusing screening tests to find problems, which
are yearly, with monitoring tests, to assess treatment results, which
are quarterly as a rule, same as A1c.

Susan
W. Baker - 25 Apr 2008 16:48 GMT
: >>> x-no-archive: yes
: >>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
: > illness or disease or syndrome that calls for monitoring more than just an
: > annual physical? I've never read that, or experienced that.

: In general, cholesterol tests are done yearly.  I think I just read it in
: one of the diabetes books but I don't remember which one.
Medicare permits them twice a year for diabetics.

Wendy
Susan - 25 Apr 2008 15:09 GMT
> From what I have read about lab tests they are usually only tested yearly.

Never in my experience in any medical office for decades, once
abnormalities showed up.

Always 3 mos. with any diet or med changes.

Susan
Nick Cramer - 25 Apr 2008 04:10 GMT
> "Nick Cramer" <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> >> "Michelle C" <bookbug1@frys.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Why would you need it done so frequently?

I'm 73. I've got HBP, heart disease, liver and kidney impairment. He's very
proactive. "Nip it in the bud!", "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound
of cure!", etc. When he suspects a problem, he orders additional tests,
sends me to a specialist, etc.

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 05:22 GMT
>> "Nick Cramer" <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>> >> "Michelle C" <bookbug1@frys.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> of cure!", etc. When he suspects a problem, he orders additional tests,
> sends me to a specialist, etc.

I see.  In your case it might be warranted then.
Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 08:53 GMT
>> I'm 73. I've got HBP, heart disease, liver and kidney impairment. He's
>> very
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>I see.  In your case it might be warranted then.

It may also be warranted for someone who has wild BG
fluctuations and is on a statin, among other things - or who
may even possibly have Orthorexia Nervosa:-)

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Nick Cramer - 25 Apr 2008 09:48 GMT
> "Nick Cramer" <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> >> "Nick Cramer" <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> I see.  In your case it might be warranted then.

Yup! I'm goal oriented. I've been married for 18 years and I wanna be
around for my 50th Anniversary in 2040! ;-D

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Michelle C - 25 Apr 2008 20:08 GMT
>> Hi Julie,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How would I know?  They only test my cholesterol like once a year.
Hi Julie,

I was actually referring to your glucose numbers; not the cholesterol
numbers.
Signature

Best regards,
Michelle C., T2
diet & exercise
BMI 21.5

Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 20:28 GMT
>>> Hi Julie,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I was actually referring to your glucose numbers; not the cholesterol
> numbers.

They're all aver the place.
Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 08:47 GMT
>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>Drs. who didn't want to listen.  If I bring  my husband in and have him do
>the talking, they listen.  *sigh*

What method does he employ to force the pills down your
throat? A large funnel? A water hose?

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 08:59 GMT
>>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> What method does he employ to force the pills down your
> throat? A large funnel? A water hose?

He doesn't do that.  He is just very firm when handing me the prescription
and tells me to take them.  I have stopped taking allergy pills and have no
qualms in doing that.  I don't consider them necessary.  I don't feel this
is the same thing though.
Susan - 23 Apr 2008 22:02 GMT
 I remember fighting
> not to be put on it because my overall cholesterol was not high, but I lost
> that one with my Drs.

How is it possible to lose, just say no and don't take it if you don't
want to.

Susan
Julie Bove - 23 Apr 2008 23:27 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> How is it possible to lose, just say no and don't take it if you don't
> want to.

I suppose I could have done that but then I would run the risk of him not
being my Dr. any more.  My former GP said not to come back if I refused to
get a mammogram.
Susan - 24 Apr 2008 04:40 GMT
> I suppose I could have done that but then I would run the risk of him not
> being my Dr. any more.  My former GP said not to come back if I refused to
> get a mammogram.

Julie, anyone who demands that you abandon your role as decision maker
in your own health care does not have your best interests at heart.

Susan
Nick Cramer - 24 Apr 2008 05:24 GMT
> > I suppose I could have done that but then I would run the risk of him
> > not being my Dr. any more.  My former GP said not to come back if I
> > refused to get a mammogram.
> >
> Julie, anyone who demands that you abandon your role as decision maker
> in your own health care does not have your best interests at heart.

Susan, I totally agree! While screening for breast cancer is important (I
think there's a more accurate and less uncomfortable way than mammograms,
now), you weigh the reasons for and against every action in your life.

Every time I see my Diabetician, he tells me to stop drinking C2H5OH and
stop smoking. I thank him for his concern and advice. He shrugs and says,
"Well. It's your life!"

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

DonnaB shallotpeel - 24 Apr 2008 05:28 GMT
>While screening for breast cancer is important (I
>think there's a more accurate and less uncomfortable way than mammograms,
>now), you weigh the reasons for and against every action in your life.

What is that method? I just hate them.

Signature

: ^> DonnaB Yahoo Msgr: shallotpeel <*>  http://tinyurl.co.uk/h193
http://tinyurl.co.uk/wdp8  http://tinyurl.co.uk/byv9

"You cannot compromise an artist's vision." - Ed Wood

Nick Cramer - 24 Apr 2008 08:24 GMT
> On 24 Apr 2008 04:24:34 GMT, Nick Cramer <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net>

> >While screening for breast cancer is important (I
> >think there's a more accurate and less uncomfortable way than
> >mammograms, now), you weigh the reasons for and against every action in
> >your life.
>
> What is that method? I just hate them.

Jun hates them, too, Donna. At 60, she puts up with the annual discomfort.
The best site I've found, Googling on 'breast cancer screening' is

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/breast-cancer/DS00328/DSECTION=6

HTH

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Trinkwasser - 26 Apr 2008 17:56 GMT
>> > I suppose I could have done that but then I would run the risk of him
>> > not being my Dr. any more.  My former GP said not to come back if I
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>stop smoking. I thank him for his concern and advice. He shrugs and says,
>"Well. It's your life!"

Definition of an alcoholic: someone who drinks more than their doctor
Nick Cramer - 27 Apr 2008 01:38 GMT
> On 24 Apr 2008 04:24:34 GMT, Nick Cramer <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net>
> >> [ . . . ]
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Definition of an alcoholic: someone who drinks more than their doctor

LMAO Thanks, Trink. I'll drink to that!

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Julie Bove - 24 Apr 2008 05:27 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Julie, anyone who demands that you abandon your role as decision maker in
> your own health care does not have your best interests at heart.

I have heard of many Drs. who are this way.
Susan - 24 Apr 2008 14:12 GMT
> I have heard of many Drs. who are this way.

So have I.  They're all on my list of those to avoid at all costs.

You're a health consumer, not a subject.

Susan
Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 08:54 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>being my Dr. any more.  My former GP said not to come back if I refused to
>get a mammogram.

Considering the other things you have reported about this
doctor that sounds like a very acceptable risk.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 09:08 GMT
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Considering the other things you have reported about this
> doctor that sounds like a very acceptable risk.

He's gone.  I don't know what happened to him.
Trinkwasser - 26 Apr 2008 17:56 GMT
>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>He's gone.  I don't know what happened to him.

Died unexpectedly?

(that happened to one of my clueless ones, good advertisement)
Nick Cramer - 24 Apr 2008 04:58 GMT
> "Susan" <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in message
> >> "Susan" <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in message
> >> <read and snipped>

> My numbers certainly did go up when I was put on it.  I remember fighting
> not to be put on it because my overall cholesterol was not high, but I
> lost that one with my Drs.

When my former GP gave me a scrip for some medicine for my leg cramps, I
looked up the side effects and interactions and never filled the scrip!
Google is my friend.

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 08:45 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>not to be put on it because my overall cholesterol was not high, but I lost
>that one with my Drs.

Fight? Lost?

Not terms I use for my medical advisors. My doctor is my
advisor. Not my boss. I employ him, not the other way
around. Advice may, or may not, be accepted or acted on by
the advisee.

I simply told my doc I would not be taking lipitor again and
asked his advice on alternatives. He didn't offer much, but
a few people I spoke to suggested Zetia. I tried it. It
didn't reduce my LDL as much as lipitor, but it is
acceptable to me because my trigs/HDL is <1, and I am much
more comfortable without the statin.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Julie Bove - 25 Apr 2008 08:57 GMT
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> acceptable to me because my trigs/HDL is <1, and I am much
> more comfortable without the statin.

This was not just one Dr. but two.  I told my GP I didn't want to take a
statin so he said, "Well...  Lets' just see what Dr. ____ says!"  Then he
wrote a note to my Endo.  That's when I was put on the statin.
Susan - 25 Apr 2008 15:12 GMT
> I simply told my doc I would not be taking lipitor again and
> asked his advice on alternatives. He didn't offer much, but
> a few people I spoke to suggested Zetia. I tried it. It
> didn't reduce my LDL as much as lipitor, but it is
> acceptable to me because my trigs/HDL is <1, and I am much
> more comfortable without the statin.

Have you continued to take it despite the news that it does no good?

Susan
Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 22:31 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Susan

Still taking it. It did reduce my LDL without having a
significant effect on my HDL or trigs. Just not as much as
Lipitor. And, while I'm comfortable with that LDL even
though my doc is uneasy about it I would be less comfortable
at the higher level.

For some people, including those I discussed this with,
Zetia has a significant effect. For others not as much or
zero.

Which news are you referring to?

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Susan - 25 Apr 2008 22:44 GMT
> Still taking it. It did reduce my LDL without having a
> significant effect on my HDL or trigs. Just not as much as
> Lipitor. And, while I'm comfortable with that LDL even
> though my doc is uneasy about it I would be less comfortable
> at the higher level.

Lowering LDL is not a proven benefit, though.

> For some people, including those I discussed this with,
> Zetia has a significant effect. For others not as much or
> zero.
>
> Which news are you referring to?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/business/14cnd-drug.html?_r=1&ref=health&oref=
slogin


Susan
Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 23:40 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Lowering LDL is not a proven benefit, though.

Agreed. However, the jury is still out and I've not seen any
reports of major problem side-effects from Zetia nor have I
experienced any, so I'll continue for the moment.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Susan - 26 Apr 2008 02:31 GMT
> Agreed. However, the jury is still out and I've not seen any
> reports of major problem side-effects from Zetia nor have I
> experienced any, so I'll continue for the moment.

Here's the thing, Alan.  It may not be a wash, it may well be doing
considerable harm, by suppressing your adrenal function.  NIH has just
undertaken a study to see how strong this effect is.  LDL is what all of
our endogenous steroids, including sex hormones, are made from.

I'm pretty sure the jury is not still out on LDL as the least effective
target and least predictive lipid in terms of CVD.  The pan Asian study
made that very clear, and even the drug manufacturers are now saying
"some other action" of statins is probably responsible for any benefits,
not LDL lowering.

So you're taking a risk with a drug that has proven to be of no use in
preventing heart disease and that may be injuring your HPA axis, which,
in terms of health and longevity, is the whole enchilada.

Susan
Alan S - 26 Apr 2008 04:16 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>Susan

I'll keep it in mind, thanks.

I suspect that my good numbers for lipids, BG's and other
things may have been skewed by seven weeks of variable diets
and highly variable vegetable input. It's hard to keep
eating right when salads and unpeeled fruits are off the
menu and the many veges in many Asian foods are served mixed
with rice or noodles. I broke my rules twice for salads and
unpeeled fruits. I ate an apple in Hong Kong and spent the
first hour of the following morning in contemplation in the
smallest room attached to my hotel room. I ate a chicken
salad bought in the Irving Mall in Dallas and repeated the
Hong Kong experience the next morning. Incidentally I am
eternally grateful to my doctor for prescribing Norfloxacin
for this situation. One pill and it was over in two hours.
Magic. I risked the possible interaction with metformin
without incident.

So I'm delaying making any significant changes until I've
had two quarterly CBC's, starting in a month. Thanks for the
info and I'll keep it in mind when assessing the numbers
then.

As I've noted my LDL is still higher than the doc likes but
the trigs and HDL are OK, so I'm not treating it as a matter
of urgency at the moment.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Susan - 26 Apr 2008 04:32 GMT
> I'll keep it in mind, thanks.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Magic. I risked the possible interaction with metformin
> without incident.

I'm glad you got speedy relief!  I am always able to pick the meat and
veggies out of the noodles if need be.  One challenge is getting Thai
food that isn't sweetened with loads of sugar, though.

> So I'm delaying making any significant changes until I've
> had two quarterly CBC's, starting in a month. Thanks for the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the trigs and HDL are OK, so I'm not treating it as a matter
> of urgency at the moment.

Alan, you've often posted very knowledgably about lipids in the past, so
I'm very puzzled by your acceptance of an LDL lowering goal as if it's
an appropriate target.  Docs are being misled into accepting these
targets but they're not even proven safe yet, and LDL has proven, time
and again, to be a meaningless target for reduction.

Susan
Nick Cramer - 26 Apr 2008 04:39 GMT
> [ . . . ]
> I'm glad you got speedy relief!  I am always able to pick the meat and
> veggies out of the noodles if need be.  One challenge is getting Thai
> food that isn't sweetened with loads of sugar, though.

My Thai wife is now using Splenda® instead of sugar in my food and has cut
my rice down to 2 Tbs, or about twice that much noodles.

[ . . . ]

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Nick Cramer - 26 Apr 2008 04:40 GMT
> [ . . . ]
> I'm glad you got speedy relief!  I am always able to pick the meat and
> veggies out of the noodles if need be.  One challenge is getting Thai
> food that isn't sweetened with loads of sugar, though.

My Thai wife is now using onion instead of sugar in my food and has cut
my rice down to 2 Tbs, or about twice that much noodles.

[ . . . ]

Signature

Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! !             ~Semper Fi~

Cheri - 25 Apr 2008 18:41 GMT
Alan S wrote in message ...

>Fight? Lost?
>
>Not terms I use for my medical advisors. My doctor is my
>advisor. Not my boss. I employ him, not the other way
>around. Advice may, or may not, be accepted or acted on by
>the advisee.

+10

Cheri
John - 24 Apr 2008 14:30 GMT
> <read and snipped>
>
> Could this be the reason why my control is worsening?

I've been on Simvastatin for a year now and have gotten my BG levels
to near normal levels e.g. A1c 5.5, fastings in the 90s and rarely see
anything over 130 at 1 or 2 hours PP. I guess it goes to show that
everyone's different.

John C.
Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 08:57 GMT
>> <read and snipped>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>John C.

You may not have realised the ambiguity in your comment.
What did you do apart from Simvastatin? Surely you're not
suggesting it led to those results?

Presumably you meant it did not worsen your BGs.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
John - 25 Apr 2008 13:57 GMT
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:30:06 -0700 (PDT), John
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Presumably you meant it did not worsen your BGs.

Yes...sorry if I wasn't clear.

Actually, I think my dietary/exercise/lifestyle changes are
responsible for my normal BG numbers.

Since I started on a statin the day after my heart attack, the same
day I was Dx'd with T2, it's really impossible to know what effect, if
any, the statin DOES have on my BGs.

BTW, nice to see you posting again. I hope you had fun!

John C.
Alan S - 25 Apr 2008 22:32 GMT
>> <jcarne...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >> "Susan" <neverm...@nomail.com> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
>John C.

Thanks for the clarification. And yes, lots:-)

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
Latest:Valderee, Valderah. Or, I love To Go A-wandering...
Johnnie McCoy - 25 Apr 2008 05:54 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Simvastatin Reduces Insulin Sensitivity in Patients With High Cholesterol

I wonder if the same could be true of Antara. I was going to tell him, next
visit, if I was going to take a statin, then how about a generic one
(simvastatin) that doesn't cost so much. I'm getting a little tired of every
pill he gives me costing an arm and a leg. I'm wondering, what did people
take for the same condition the day before Antara became available.

John
Oleg Lego - 25 Apr 2008 06:17 GMT
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>pill he gives me costing an arm and a leg. I'm wondering, what did people
>take for the same condition the day before Antara became available.

Embalming fluid.

Signature

Larry, T2, Saskatchewan, Canada.
DX 24 Aug 07. D&E
Metformin 2000mg, Ramipril, Simvastatin
Dx A1c 8.1 : Latest 5.1 (4 Mar 08)

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 25 Apr 2008 09:13 GMT
> Simvastatin Reduces Insulin Sensitivity in Patients With High Cholesterol
> Although simvastatin improves flow-mediated dilation in
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Diabetes Care 2008;31:776-782.

Without measuring and controlling for intake amounts, it remains
possible that it is not direct effect of the simvastatin but rather a
consequence of improved endothelial function --> increased hunger -->
overeating --> more black fat (VAT) --> reduced insulin sensitivity.
This would explain the suspicious absence of a simvastatin dose
response for the decrease in insulin sensitivity.

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.