Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Are you still going the low-fat route?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ozgirl - 07 Apr 2008 23:25 GMT
More and more research is showing that low or no fat is not the way to go
when trying to obtain maximum nutrition from the foods we eat:

http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/80/2/396

"Design: The subjects (n = 7) each consumed 3 salads consisting of
equivalent amounts of spinach, romaine lettuce, cherry tomatoes, and carrots
with salad dressings containing 0, 6, or 28 g canola oil. The salads were
consumed in random order separated by washout periods of 2 wk. Blood samples
were collected hourly from 0 to 12 h. Chylomicrons were isolated by
ultracentrifugation, and carotenoid absorption was analyzed by HPLC with
coulometric array detection.
Results: After ingestion of the salads with fat-free salad dressing, the
appearance of -carotene, ß-carotene, and lycopene in chylomicrons was
negligible. After ingestion of the salads with reduced-fat salad dressing,
the appearance of the carotenoids in plasma chylomicrons increased relative
to that after ingestion of the salads with fat-free salad dressing (P <
0.04). Similarly, the appearance of the carotenoids in plasma chylomicrons
was higher after the ingestion of salads with full-fat than with reduced-fat
salad dressing (P < 0.02).

Conclusions: High-sensitivity HPLC with coulometric array detection enabled
us to quantify the intestinal absorption of carotenoids ingested from a
single vegetable salad. Essentially no absorption of carotenoids was
observed when salads with fat-free salad dressing were consumed. A
substantially greater absorption of carotenoids was observed when salads
were consumed with full-fat than with reduced-fat salad dressing."
Julie Bove - 08 Apr 2008 00:45 GMT
> More and more research is showing that low or no fat is not the way to go
> when trying to obtain maximum nutrition from the foods we eat:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> substantially greater absorption of carotenoids was observed when salads
> were consumed with full-fat than with reduced-fat salad dressing."

When I was first diagnosed, I was eating pretty much extreme low fat.  I
wasn't eating any fake fats or "low fat" foods like salad dressing.  Just
mainly whole foods that were naturally low in fat.

The dieticians I saw told me to add fat to my food.  Say what?  They wanted
me to buy low fat or fat free cheese to eat and then add margarine to my
cooked vegetables.  Say what?  That just made no sense to me at all.  I
decided then to eat real cheese, real butter, not worry about using olive
oil in cooking, and stop pouring all the oil off of my peanut butter.  I did
still pour some of the oil off because frankly it was just too oily for me
otherwise.  I stopped air popping my popcorn and began popping it in oil.

Now I wouldn't say that my diet is overly high in fat.  In fact some days it
is still pretty low fat, simply because that's the stuff I prefer to eat.
For example, I like salad but I hate dressing.  And because of my food
allergies, I can no longer eat butter or margarine.  So the butter
substitute I use has no fat in it at all.  I am not cutting out fat on
purpose like I used to do though.
Ozgirl - 08 Apr 2008 01:55 GMT
>> More and more research is showing that low or no fat is not the way to go
>> when trying to obtain maximum nutrition from the foods we eat:
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> substitute I use has no fat in it at all.  I am not cutting out fat on
> purpose like I used to do though.

It doesn't have to be salad dressing, any of the mufa's in the same meal
would do. What is in marg that you can't have?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 08 Apr 2008 02:29 GMT
It remains smarter to simply eat less, down to the right amount:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart

A simple parable given in hopes of promoting understanding:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow

> More and more research is showing that low or no fat is not the way to go
> when trying to obtain maximum nutrition from the foods we eat:
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> `
> end
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.