Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Legislation, veggies and low carb

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
sphynx.red@gmail.com - 02 Mar 2008 07:15 GMT
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/opinion/01hedin.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

In the NY Times today, Jack Heden writes a column "My Forbidden Fruits
(and Vegetables)".  He's a vegetable farmer.  He writes about the
governmental restrictions that disfavor the local growing (in the USA)
of fruits and vegetables.   If farmers rent corn-field land to him to
grow veggies, they face severe economic penalties.

Interestingly, none of these penalties are triggered if he were to
grow  wheat, rice, soybeans or cotton instead of corn.    Cotton's
edible part is mostly oil, but the others are the BIG feeders of the
high-glycemic Standard American Diet.

From what I see, highly refined carb is THE major contributor to
diabetes II in the USA.  Many, many people eat that way because it's
cheaper  (in the short term) than eating fruits and vegetables.
Heden's column sheds light on why this is so.

Adam Becker Sr
Quentin Grady - 02 Mar 2008 22:44 GMT
>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/opinion/01hedin.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Adam Becker Sr

G'day G'day Adam,

  Yesterday I went to the Farmers' Market.  It was absolutely
crowded.  Despite being outside amongst giant trees in large
delightful grounds where an old homestead once stood it almost
standing room only.  It was the day after the Mission concert
featuring Jimmy Barnes and Tom Jones and this brought many out of
towners.  Now this Farmers' Market started as an act of rebellion. The
supermarkets did everything possible to exploit the local vegetable
growers forcing down the prices paid to them and trucking in massive
amounts of vegetables from other provinces.  When the market started
the supermarkets promptly threatened the local newspapers with removal
of their advertising if they ran any adverts what so ever for the
market.  The papers acquiesced and no adverts were run in the papers
for the market.  Still the market survived.   I was one of their early
customers.  Their survival somehow became symbolic for my own
survival.  Some years it was a near run thing.  In the last couple of
years though things have changed.  The market is doing more than
surviving. It is absolutely thriving.  A year or so ago its success
was so remarkable a Canadian university sent out a research team to
find out why it had survived.  Along with the market's success has
been the phenomenal success of organically grown vegetables.  There
are now three stalls that are either organic or as good as organic.
(One grower is organic by default.  He finds sprays too expensive
given the wide range of produce he carries.)  To give an idea of its
success think in terms of one tonne of kale sold each week to local
customers.  This is just one item amongst many others.  Those out of
towners who come from the big cities are amazed to find the range or
exotic tomatoes eg orange Roma low acid,  green banana,  pale yellow,
an American deep orange heirloom whose name escapes me at the moment
though the divine taste sure as heck doesn't.   My point is that where
there is a will and enough people combine to bring that will to
successful fruition, a way will be found to thwart these hidden
controllers who would stop good things happening.

In the instance you mention it is easy to see that the result might
well be unintentional,  a result of subsidies.   Sadly as you've
pointed out all too often those subsidies support foods that
accentuate the bulge.  

New Zealand used to have many farming subsidies.  Years ago European
countries in a cunning move to thwart cheaper imports from countries
like Australia and NZ raised monstrous tariffs on any produce that had
been produced as a result of subsidies.  Never mind that their own
farmers received subsidies.  At first this seemed like a death blow to
NZ farmers.  They moaned and they groaned.  The government bit the
bullet and removed subsidies not only on farming but also on all
manner of other items.  Shoe and clothing manufacturers went to the
wall.  In this respect I believe they were unwise as we now become
dependent on countries like China and their policies.  The
transformation was described as the biggest social revolution to have
occurred in a country without guns in the streets.

Whatever.  The results have been remarkable.  Farmers have adapted and
discovered how to produce much more economically.  Exports have grown.
However, food in NZ used to be a fraction of what it was say in
England.  Now it isn't.   We can still export economically there and
to the US.   It is tougher for us food wise.  A friend of mine who is
retiring plans to put a considerable amount of land into vegetable
growing because food cost have risen steeply.  Milk is no longer
subsidized.  It now sells at prices determined by international
markets.   Good food that keeps me healthy certainly takes a
considerable portion of our budget.  While I have fruit trees and can
trade some damsons etc I don't have the room for basic vegetables.

Best wishes,
Signature

Quentin Grady       ^  ^  /
New Zealand,       >#,#< [
                   / \ /\    
"... and the blind dog was leading."

http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Trinkwasser - 06 Mar 2008 18:34 GMT
>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/opinion/01hedin.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
>>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>successful fruition, a way will be found to thwart these hidden
>controllers who would stop good things happening.

We have a proper market and also a farmer's market here.

We also have proper old fashioned shops.

We do have one supermarket, owned by the Co-Op.

Now Tescos are about to build a new one.

Normally what happens when Tescos moves into or near a town is that
they undercut everyone else and the local shops and other outlets are
forced to close.

Talking to many folks here, they have every intention of *avoiding*
Tescos and continuing to use the local shops.

Not only that but one neighbour reckons the Tescos may even have a net
benefit in that people currently driving miles to the nearest Tescos
or other "superstore" will be tempted to stay in town and may also
patronise the local shops.

It remains to be seen what the actual outcome will be . . .

>In the instance you mention it is easy to see that the result might
>well be unintentional,  a result of subsidies.   Sadly as you've
>pointed out all too often those subsidies support foods that
>accentuate the bulge.  

Aslo tescos (I don't know if any of your stores have similar habits)
when they put stuff on special promotion ie. two for the price of one,
actually pay the producers *half* of the normal underpayment for the
crop. So once again the producer loses and the middleman does not.

As a farmer pointed out a while back, he can only sell his milk for
the price the store tells him they will pay. Yet if he went into a
garage and said "I'm buying that car and this is what I will pay for
it" they would laugh and send him away.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 02 Mar 2008 22:57 GMT
It remains smarter to simply eat less, down to the right amount:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthy

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Swordbearer for the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Sword

sphynx....@gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/opinion/01hedin.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Adam Becker Sr
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.