 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / January 2008If you want to ban all semi-automatic machine guns, then you will vote for Barack Obama
http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm This is why Barack Obama is the man to vote for, as a young black man who grew up in the violent urban ghetto, he alone has a unique perspective regarding the violence perpetrated with illegal guns. Here are five points that Mr. Obama addresses at the link above and my endorsement of those positions. 1. Keeping all guns out of inner cities This is a no-brainer. Everyone who lives in such areas knows that gun violence is a way of life. Every city that has a population exceeding 100,000 loses nearly 1% of that population every year to illegal gunfire. IMO, this does not go far enough, an across the board ban is necessary to eliminate the skyrocketing gun violence crime rate that has been plaguing the United States. 2. Ban all forms of semi-automatic weapons There is no legitimate use for any gun that automatically chambers round after round so that you can fire as quickly as the finger can squeeze them out. All these military machine guns are good for is toting a bunch of them up into an observation tower and opening fire on innocent neighborhoods. Millions of these machine guns are sold every year to people who go on shooting rampages. Anyone who doesn't surrender their machine guns should be jailed, all their assets seized. We need to crack down hard on these violent people who disobey the law. 3. Increase restrictions on other firearms There should be a 100% tax on all new gun purchases as well as yearly licensing fees based on 100% of the original purchase price (or current assessed value) whichever is higher. This will force gun huggers to pay the price for their violence and the violence of their gun hugging buddies, the funds will be used to build prisons and supply dollars to legal funds for suing manufacturers and the families of criminals who commit gun crimes. A person applying for a gun permit should also be required to pay for their own background investigation and every new and seperate purchase needs to have a new and seperate background investigation followed by yearly followup investigations. 4. Require all guns to be child proofed If a gun cannot be effectively child proofed then it needs to be banned. One dead child is one too many, the ridiculous misinterpretation of the Second Amendment by gun huggers be damned. 5. Continue to insure that manufactures are sued for gun crime The levy that should be imposed under item number 3 should help fund lawsuits against gun manufacturers. When a company like Colt or Remington produce a gun, they know that there is a chance that gun could be used in a crime and that makes them complicit and an accessory. Every single time a gun crime is committed, the manufacturer should be sued, the gun lobby should be sued, and the family of the perpetrator should be sued. You can save yourselves the pain of all this now and relent to having guns banned. If there are no guns, there are no gun crimes, and there is no need to sue you for being a proponent of violence. Barack Obama '08 - no more guns in America > http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm > [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > > Barack Obama '08 - no more guns in America You and he will burn in HELL! >> http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm >> 1. Keeping all guns out of inner cities >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> necessary to eliminate the skyrocketing gun violence crime rate that >> has been plaguing the United States. This is for iching. Hey IDIOT, Washington DC has the worst murder record in the U.S. and guns are BANNED there. And their murder rate is 60 per one hundred thousand. About twenty times LESS than the idiocy you posted. Go learn math. What a line of pure hate filled this entire thread is and it has no place whatever in ASD. Not to get political but what i saw pre NH primary was similar to the harold ford TN election where the white candidate ran adds of a white woman saying in a sexy way "hi harold call me!" to the camera ignighting the old racial fears of a black man with a white woman..even though the ad was a lie..and so what if he did date a white woman?..but the ad worked..he lost. Well the day after barack won iowa the news channels spamed the so called obama girl every five minutes and hilary crying...so a moron who just stumbles across the news would get the subliminal message the naughty black man with his young trollip made tho old sad white woman cry.. The women who voted for hiliray were asked why and many said they did so because they felt barack was a bully and picking on hilary..which was far from true in fact was the reverse so we can see how the media can skew things. I personally felt her tears were in frustration that we all did step in line to her whims as shes used to..NOT because she so strong for change and the other candiates were not as she claimed. But that my opinion only..lol <shrug> KROM > What a line of pure hate filled this entire thread is and it has no > place whatever in ASD. > http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm > > This is why Barack Obama is the man to vote for, as a young black man > who grew up in the violent urban ghetto, The closest he ever got to a violent urban ghetto was flying into LA. FOOL! How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine guns"? -c > How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine > guns"? > > -c Any rifle made to hold multiple rounds is easily converted to full automatic. All you need do is file off the sear. One touch to the trigger will fire all rounds in RAPID succession. Have fun.... >>How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >>guns"? > Any rifle made to hold multiple rounds is easily converted to full > automatic. Well, certainly not a Mauser 98K nor a 1903 Springfield. > All you need do is file off the sear. One touch to the trigger > will fire all rounds in RAPID succession. Have fun.... In theory, yes. In practice, highly doubtful. I won't go into the gory details but that approach is most unlikely to work for a number of reasons. Basically, you'll likely ruin a perfectly good gun. There is a reason why full auto weapons have an automatic sear. Having the hammer going forward at the same time the bolt is doesn't work. Or works sufficiently sporadically as to be practically useless. Peace and justice, >>>How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >>>guns"? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > In theory, yes. In practice, highly doubtful. Keep your theory if you like. I've done the practice. YMMV. > I won't go into the gory details but that approach is most unlikely to > work for a number of reasons. Basically, you'll likely ruin a perfectly > good gun. Or hear one looong Bang! > There is a reason why full auto weapons have an automatic sear. Having the > hammer going forward at the same time the bolt is doesn't work. Or works > sufficiently sporadically as to be practically useless. > > Peace and justice, >>>>How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >>>>guns"? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Keep your theory if you like. I've done the practice. YMMV. Ya' gotta be careful 'bout what you post ya' know. Unless you've got a license to manufacture machine guns, you could be getting a five year vacation at a federal institution for doing that sort of thing - if it would work. But it won't and you don't and you didn't. So you're safe from the ATG jackbooted thugs. >>I won't go into the gory details but that approach is most unlikely to >>work for a number of reasons. Basically, you'll likely ruin a perfectly >>good gun. > Or hear one looong Bang! Proally not that. >>There is a reason why full auto weapons have an automatic sear. Having the >>hammer going forward at the same time the bolt is doesn't work. Or works >>sufficiently sporadically as to be practically useless. Noting again, there IS a reason why fully automatic weapons have a second automatic sear. Filing off the regular trigger sear won't get you where you claim to have gone. Peace and justice, >>>>How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >>>>guns"? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Keep your theory if you like. I've done the practice. YMMV. Oh, thanks for that. Nothing like having an idiot admit to violating FEDERAL LAW. Care to post your current location? >> I won't go into the gory details but that approach is most unlikely to >> work for a number of reasons. Basically, you'll likely ruin a perfectly >> good gun. > >Or hear one looong Bang! Let me guess. You also like loading black powder into pipes with screw caps on both ends. >>>>> How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >>>>> guns"? [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Let me guess. You also like loading black powder into pipes with > screw caps on both ends. Seth uses a MIG welder to secure the caps. Threads are for sissies.  Signature******************* Michael R. McAfee Mesa, AZ ******************* >>>>>> How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic >>>>>> machine guns"? [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Seth uses a MIG welder to secure the caps. Threads are for sissies. 50 years or so ago, my friend Jerry built a black powder pipe bomb wrapped tightly in fine wire. He took it to the middle of a small lake/large pond and lowered it to the bottom, trailing detonation wire to shore. He set it off with a car battery. The resulting tidal wave damaged several boats on shore. Jerry had a police record at age 12. > 50 years or so ago, my friend Jerry built a black powder pipe bomb wrapped > tightly in fine wire. He took it to the middle of a small lake/large pond > and lowered it to the bottom, trailing detonation wire to shore. He set > it off with a car battery. The resulting tidal wave damaged several boats > on shore. Jerry had a police record at age 12. Marine EODs call that "Du Pont fishing." -c >> 50 years or so ago, my friend Jerry built a black powder pipe bomb >> wrapped tightly in fine wire. He took it to the middle of a small [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Marine EODs call that "Du Pont fishing." Calling fish by old wall phones is even easier. Rotenone also works well. >> Let me guess. You also like loading black powder into pipes with >> screw caps on both ends. WhoTF doesn't?! Baby food jars and those little 12-gram CO2 canisters are great too. >> How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >> guns"? > Any rifle made to hold multiple rounds is easily converted to full > automatic. All you need do is file off the sear. One touch to the > trigger will fire all rounds in RAPID succession. Have fun.... Yeah, but, how many "machine guns" are "semi-automatic?" I'm just sayin'... if the guy can name one, I might have a cause for concern. Otherwise, they can have my phasers when they pry them from my cold, dead, titanium Terminator hands. -c >>> How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic >>> machine guns"? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Otherwise, they can have my phasers when they pry them from my cold, dead, > titanium Terminator hands. The M-2 Carbine was not only selectable from full automatic to semi-automatic, it was also the US Army's fastest firing weapon in full auto. >> How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >> guns"? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >automatic. All you need do is file off the sear. One touch to the trigger >will fire all rounds in RAPID succession. Have fun.... Don't know sh.t about guns do you? Yah, filing off the sear will make the gun slam fire. Works OK on 22's. Once you pull the trigger, all the rounds come out. So you have in effect a single shot weapon that can't be aimed. Now, you try that with an AK or AR15, you will get an open bolt fire. Without the bolt being held in place, like it was DESIGNED, the bolt slams back, maybe thru the back of the receiver and into your face, if you were using the sights instead of firing "gangsta" style or the early ignition ignites the other rounds in the magazine. How many "gun conversions" aka machine guns, do cops and the feds ACTUALLY get in a year? Maybe 100 in the entire U.S.? Go prop up another straw man. > How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine > guns"? > > -c All Thompsons, Brens, most modern assault rifles, etc. >> How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >> guns"? >> >> -c > > All Thompsons, Brens, most modern assault rifles, etc. Those aren't "machine guns" though, are they? (A Thompson, for example, is a submachine gun.) -c >>> How many weapons would be outlawed if they banned "semi-automatic machine >>> guns"? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Those aren't "machine guns" though, are they? Not Gattling style anyway. > (A Thompson, for example, is a submachine gun.) > -c Fair definitive, but it functions similarly. >> http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > FOOL! "...flying into los angeles...bringing in a couple of keys..." >>> http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm >>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> FOOL! > "...flying into los angeles...bringing in a couple of keys..." mister don't check my luggage, please ... Is a "semi-automatic machine gun anything like a single shot repeating rifle? Signature******************* Michael R. McAfee Mesa, AZ ******************* > Is a "semi-automatic machine gun anything like a single shot repeating > rifle? "Phased-plasma rifle in the 40-watt range..." "Hey, just what you see, pal." -Terminator > Is a "semi-automatic machine gun anything like a single shot repeating > rifle? sh.t for brains hoplophobes don't know one gun from another. They've proven it over and over. Pay no attention to their wild maunderings - aside from laughing at them. >sh.t for brains hoplophobes don't know one gun from another. They've proven >it over and over. Clearly there are some gun fondlers who aren't aware that there are no "semi-automatic machine guns" either. >> sh.t for brains hoplophobes don't know one gun from another. They've proven >> it over and over. > > Clearly there are some gun fondlers who aren't aware that there are no > "semi-automatic machine guns" either. http://www.auto-ordnance.com/ > Is a "semi-automatic machine gun Dolt, it's a Thompson with no full auto - semi-auto only. If it's truly a Machine Gun, it's not semi-automatic. We now return you to your regular ranting, already in progress. > If it's truly a Machine Gun, it's not semi-automatic. http://www.auto-ordnance.com/ >> If it's truly a Machine Gun, it's not semi-automatic. > >http://www.auto-ordnance.com/ Thanks for posting the ad. Did you notice that all the RIFLES had 18 inch barrels? And they are SEMI-AUTOMATIC! Do you even know what that means? BTW, a registered 1927 Thompson SUBMACHINE gun sells for about $25,000. Think many gangsta's carry them? >>> If it's truly a Machine Gun, it's not semi-automatic. >> http://www.auto-ordnance.com/ > > Thanks for posting the ad. Did you notice that all the RIFLES had 18 > inch barrels? Yes. > And they are SEMI-AUTOMATIC! Do you even know what > that means? Mmm hmmm... > BTW, a registered 1927 Thompson SUBMACHINE gun sells for about > $25,000. Think many gangsta's carry them? Not likely. Wish I had one though. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.