On Jan 9, 9:25 pm, georgeching2...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm
> 1. Keeping all guns out of inner cities
Are you saying black people can't be trusted with firearms? Isn't
this a tad ... "racist"?
> 2. Ban all forms of semi-automatic weapons
Just like we banned drugs. Yep, here's a sure fire winning idea, eh?
> 3. Increase restrictions on other firearms
You guys can't let the peasants resist, let alone have any say, in
what's about to be done to them.
> 4. Require all guns to be child proofed
Are you going to ban pools? Bicycles? Trampolines? Any other items
that can kill kids, or just guns? Just guns, eh? Sounds like there's
a plan in the works you people know we won't like but don't want us to
resist. What would that be? Certainly not freedom.
> 5. Continue to insure that manufactures are sued for gun crime
Then let's sue Ford and Chevrolet for drunk driving accidents. Let's
sue Toyota for speeding problems. We'll also get rid of pencil makers
as a way to keep people from making spelling mistakes.
> You can save yourselves the pain of all this now and relent to having
> guns banned. If there are no guns, there are no gun crimes, and there
> is no need to sue you for being a proponent of violence.
"Relent"? You actually used this word in a discussion with free men?
No guns = no rights = no sh.t.
> Barack Obama '08 - no more guns in America
Thank you for a post that is a exquisite example of the liberal
fascism about to rammed down our throats.
Time for another case of .308.
> 2. Ban all forms of semi-automatic weapons
>
> There is no legitimate use for any gun that automatically chambers
> round after round so that you can fire as quickly as the finger can
> squeeze them out.
A revolver also can "fire as quickly as the finger can squeeze them out".
Should revolvers be banned as well?