 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / December 2007Diabetes group backs low-carb diets
A diabetes group (ADA) backs low-carb diets: http://www.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=611009 It remains wiser to eat less, down to the optimal amount, in order to become healthier (hungrier) in order to lose the VAT, cure the insulin resistance (IR/MetS) and possibly also cure type-2 diabetes: http://HeartMDPhD.com/EatLess Illustrative case example: http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Healing This completely free Approach comes with free cardiologist support via usenet plus an unprecedented two million dollar guarantee whose details have been freely posted and discussed on sci.med.cardiology as archived by Google: http://HeartMDPhD.com/Guarantee Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed: http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthy Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords. > A diabetes group (ADA) backs low-carb diets: > > http://www.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=611009 See: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/browse_thread/thread/62ffd3c0b 9d7247c/05695702c16bd4f7#05695702c16bd4f7 Chung has no shame or decency http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Rebukesatan <>< May everyone else have a blessedly wonderful New Years ... ... by being hungrier: http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD Hunger is wonderful :-) It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good. Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve paid for with their and our immortal lives. However, there are crazy folks, who have rejected this knowledge and are perishing as predicted by the prophecy of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11... http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed: http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed "Blessed are you who hunger NOW... ... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21) Amen. :-))) On Dec 28, 7:53 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote: > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Rebukesatan > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > :-))) Pathetic repetitive response. You either do not understand what you did or do not have the decency to apologize. http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Rebukesatan <>< May everyone else have a blessedly wonderful New Years ... ... by being hungrier: http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD Hunger is wonderful :-) It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good. Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve paid for with their and our immortal lives. However, there are crazy folks, who have rejected this knowledge and are perishing as predicted by the prophecy of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11... http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed: http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed "Blessed are you who hunger NOW... ... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21) Amen. :-))) > http://[blah, blah, blah] > > May everyone else have a blessedly wonderful New Years ... This is what you call a 'bot' boys and girls. It's programmed to generate a selected (repetitive) response whenever people on the troll's convicted/demon list post anything. It's a favorite tool of the troll trade. satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Rebukesatan > > This is what you call a 'bot' boys and girls. No. This is simply a rebuke, satan. Bottom line: You remain a liar. <>< http://TruthRUS.org/BeRight > Bottom line: > > You remain a liar. Bottom line: You remain a troll. On Dec 29, 7:13 pm, "R. Preston, PhD > Bottom line: > > You remain a troll. If the first one did not stop a troll like Chung, this one should. > http://[blah, blah, blah] > > May everyone else have a blessedly wonderful New Years ... This is what you call a 'bot' boys and girls. It's programmed to generate a selected (repetitive) response whenever people on the troll's convicted/demon list post anything. It's a favorite tool of the troll trade. >A diabetes group (ADA) backs low-carb diets: > >http://www.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=611009 So where the heck is it on the ADA site? I took 8 clicks to give up... The blogs are fun this morning - Regina Wiltshire links to a few. Nicky. T2 dx 05/04 + underactive thyroid D&E, 100ug thyroxine Last A1c 5.6% BMI 25 > So where the heck is it on the ADA site? I took 8 clicks to give up... The 2008 Standards of Care are not posted yet--it is a supplement to the Jan 2008 issue of Diabetes Care, available at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/31/Supplement_1/S12 with a $30 subscription or a $12 per article fee. The 2007 Standards are the ones available on the ADA site--click on the button "For Health Professionals and Scientists." Unclear when that will be updated, although we have asked on the ADA board for that information. One interesting thing in the reports about this change is that they refer to a low carb diet being a good choice, as is a low calorie diet, for losing weight. But they do not explicitly mention the relation between low carb diets and blood glucose levels. Whether that is a weakness of the press release or the Standards of Care themselves can only be answered by looking carefully at the paper itself. Anyone who has a sub can read it now--if that is you, can you let us know what it says? Morris On Dec 28, 4:42�pm, "Robert Miles" <robertmi...@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote: > A diabetes group (ADA) backs low-carb diets: > > http://www.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=611009 The article, and the ADA position, pretty much says what some of us have been saying in this newsgroup about not being bullied into any weight loss plan, but to work with your health care team to find a plan that is best suited to your individual needs. "The evidence is clear that both low-carbohydrate and low-fat calorie restricted diets result in similar weight loss at one year. We're not endorsing either of these weight-loss plans over any other method of losing weight. What we want health-care providers to know is that it's important for patients to choose a plan that works for them, and that the health-care team support their patients' weight-loss efforts and provide appropriate monitoring of patients' health." It also addresses the need for exercise and weight loss for all people who put themselves at risk for diabetes: "Being overweight and physically inactive both increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, according to the ADA. Being overweight or obese also make the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes more difficult. The 2008 recommendations state that all adults who are overweight and have an additional risk factor for diabetes should be tested for diabetes or pre-diabetes. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, people who have pre-diabetes can avoid diabetes if they lose 7 percent of their body weight and get more than 150 minutes of activity a week." Good article, Robert. Thanks for posting it. Although the title of the article is a bit misleading (not your fault) the information contained in it drives home important points. Kurt |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.