http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6933799.stm
Obese people underestimate the amount of sugar they eat, making
studies into the condition based on self-reporting very unreliable, UK
researchers say.
But a new urine test has been developed which can for the first time
work out how much sugar people have consumed.
In a study of hundreds of volunteers, researchers compared what people
said they ate with data from urine tests.
The findings appear in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and
Prevention.
"These results show what many have suspected for some time: obese
people are not able to tell us what they actually eat," said Professor
Sheila Bingham who led the team from the Medical Research Council and
University of Cambridge.
"If we are to tackle the scourge of obesity, both exercise and diet
need to be taken into account."
Studies have suggested that eating more sugar is not linked to
obesity.
But the report says these conclusion were based on studies which
relied on self-reporting and that their findings show these to be
inaccurate.
"The spot urine and blood tests established that obese people consume
more sugar and less Vitamin C than their thinner counterparts, but
this did not show up when asked," said Professor Bingham.
"Although obese people may have a less active lifestyle than people of
normal weight, reports about what they ate were less accurate than
those from their normal weight counterparts."
Dr Colin Waine of the National Obesity Forum said the tendency to
under-report food intake among the overweight was a major problem for
medical practitioners.
"Used sensitively, this test could be a great tool in helping patient
and practitioner work out what's going wrong and talk through what
could be done about it."
Diarmid - 14 Aug 2007 19:36 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6933799.stm
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/79272.php
Diet Or Exercise? New Study Finds Sugar Is Important In Obesity, UK
Scientists at the Medical Research Council have found that eating more
sugar is associated with obesity. Although this may seem obvious,
previous studies, which relied on self-reporting of diet, had not
shown that this was the case. But researchers from the Medical
Research Council and University of Cambridge looking into the links
between diet and cancer have developed a new way of objectively
measuring sugar consumption. This is important in establishing the
cause of the UK's epidemic of obesity: lack of exercise or over-
eating.
The team developed a new way of objectively measuring sugar
consumption. Their findings about how much sugar overweight people
consume are published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers
and Prevention.
Until now it had been very difficult to assess food intake,
particularly sugar consumption, in large populations. Data from
surveys seemed to show that as weight and body mass index increased,
people underestimated their total food intake, including the amount of
sugar they ate.
The team has developed a new urine test which allows them to work out
how much sugar large numbers of people are eating for the first time.
They measure the levels of urinary sucrose and fructose (two types of
sugar) in spot urine samples.
Using data from hundreds of volunteers from the European Prospective
Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) study, researchers have combined
information from diet self-reporting with data from the urine and
blood samples. They found that obese people underestimated the amount
of sugar they consumed, while overestimating the amount of vitamin C
they took in each day.
Professor Sheila Bingham, who led the study said: "The spot urine and
blood tests established that obese people consume more sugar and less
vitamin C than their thinner counterparts, but this did not show up
when asked. Although obese people may have a less active lifestyle
than people of normal weight, reports about what they ate were less
accurate than those from their normal weight counterparts."
The 20% of people tested who consumed the least sugar ate about 76g
per day but the 20% who ate the most took in an average 207g, nearly
three times as much.
Professor Bingham, from the MRC Dunn Human Nutrition Unit and EPIC
study continued: "These results show what many have suspected for some
time: obese people are not able to tell us what they actually eat. If
we are to tackle the scourge of obesity, both exercise and diet need
to be taken into account."
1. Publication details
Epidemiologic assessment of sugars consumption using biomarkers:
comparisons of obese and nonobese individuals in the European
Prospective Investigation of Cancer Norfolk. Sheila Bingham, Robert
Luben, Ailsa Welch, Natasa Tasevska, Nick Wareham and Kay Tee Khaw.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 16(8) August 2007.
2. Definitions
Sucrose and fructose are types of sugar. Sucrose is mostly found in
table sugar, sugar used in cooking, preserves, cakes, biscuits,
confectionary and soft drinks, while fructose is found in fruit and
fruit products.
3. Medical Research Council
The Medical Research Council is dedicated to improving human health
through excellent science. It invests on behalf of the UK taxpayer.
Its work ranges from molecular level science to public health
research, carried out in universities, hospitals and a network of its
own units and institutes. The MRC liaises with the Health Departments,
the National Health Service and industry to take account of the
public's needs. The results have led to some of the most significant
discoveries in medical science and benefited the health and wealth of
millions of people in the UK and around the world.
http://www.mrc.ac.uk
TC - 14 Aug 2007 21:43 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6933799.stm
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> and practitioner work out what's going wrong and talk through what
> could be done about it."
Does it detect the amount of sugar or the amounts of sugars from carbs
in general?
This may indicate an under reporting of carbs and a lack of
recognition that refined grains are no better than eating straight
sugars.
Remember a few years back when the diet mantra was less fats and more
carbs? How's that for blindness to the real problem?