Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Higher BG in a.m. WHY?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
SugarQueen - 12 Aug 2007 04:37 GMT
Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
(Andrew)BG higher in the morning after eating breakfast? His everyday
breakfast includes coffee, w/ heavy cream, stevia, veggies such as
zuccini, mushrooms, bell pepper, 4 egg white, 2 tablespoons blue
cheese, 2 tablespoons slivered almonds (basic almonds/no roasting or
anything else), and 4 stawberries. Please note 50 situps and 50 (man)
pushups are done before eating. He's not overweight. I'm not sure if I
need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
input. :)
jello5500 - 12 Aug 2007 04:45 GMT
> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
> input. :)

Coffee/caffeine with my breakfast makes me need more insulin to
balance the carbs (I use a pump).  There is also a possibility that
the exercise is causing the liver to release glucose, causing a rise
in blood sugars.
SugarQueen - 12 Aug 2007 04:51 GMT
He's type 2 no meds.

> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
> input. :)
Julie Bove - 12 Aug 2007 04:57 GMT
> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
> input. :)

The body is the most insulin resistant in the morning.
Alan S - 12 Aug 2007 04:58 GMT
>Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
>also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
>input. :)

What are the BG numbers and timing? Pre and post.


Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
SugarQueen - 12 Aug 2007 05:03 GMT
Before eating, first wake up--100-112 average
After eating--120-180 at one hour after finishing eating.

> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:37:38 -0700, SugarQueen
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforesthttp://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
> latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
Ozgirl - 12 Aug 2007 05:58 GMT
> Before eating, first wake up--100-112 average
> After eating--120-180 at one hour after finishing eating.

Ok, so he does start with some dawn phenomenon. I would be testing after the
exercise  to see if it went higher than the fasting. If so then the exercise
would be better done later in the day. Is he trying anything to get the
fasting bg down? Bed time snack etc.
Alan S - 12 Aug 2007 06:44 GMT
>> Before eating, first wake up--100-112 average
>> After eating--120-180 at one hour after finishing eating.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>would be better done later in the day. Is he trying anything to get the
>fasting bg down? Bed time snack etc.

I agree. Start the exercise about an hour after eating or do
it later in the day. Before that it may be exacerbating the
liver dump.

The meal doesn't look like too much carbs. I would have
problems with the strawberries - but others don't so YMMV
for those.

120-180? Is there anything different about that menu or
exercise timing for the 180?


Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/
latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
hoodyup@yahoo.com - 12 Aug 2007 08:41 GMT
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:58:48 +1000, "Ozgirl"
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforesthttp://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
> latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management

Um.  No.  Other than during the week with the 180 I was doing some
training for work which required me to be away from home for a week in
a hotel.  There was some stress, definitely, and my daily activities
were much less physical than during my normal work week.  So, yeah, I
guess you could chalk it up to a change in output (physical work done)
and a lack of change in input (the food I eat). I think, in general
that my liver is a little overactive in the mornings because I dread
waking up and starting my workday.  It is probably trying to kick me
out of bed.  I cut out the strawberries one of the days when I was
gone and it that day my numbers were down by 40 pts  (from 180 to
140).  I can average around 140 with strawberries with my normal
routine, but I think the lack of physical activity and the added
stress of being on a business trip just made the whole thing push my
BGs over the top.  In response to the bad numbers I did start jogging
at the end of the day during my trip.  By the end of the trip my BGs
were 127 after the same meal as before (without the strawberries).
I'm thinking I'm just carb intolerant in the morning, as others have
mentioned.  My wife was curious, as am I, with the actual mechanism
that causes the insulin resistance/carb intolerance in the mornings
verses other times during the day.  I will have to experiment with the
exercise after breakfast, although the timing will be all backwards
from what I'm used to.  Oh, well, in the name of Science.. Thanks for
all the help, guys..

Andrew T2 since 9/06
D&E, (Beer), ChickenSalads, Red Wine and Nookie
last A1c5.5 , next one coming out this week....
Nicky - 12 Aug 2007 09:42 GMT
> I will have to experiment with the
>exercise after breakfast, although the timing will be all backwards
>from what I'm used to.  Oh, well, in the name of Science.. Thanks for
>all the help, guys..

Took me around 2 years, and a few months of metformin by that time,
before I could do any exercise beyond a short stroll before about
11am. It would guarantee a liver dump. I'm assuming I had a fatty
liver, which diet, exercise and metformin sorted out. Now I can do a
karate workout at 9:30 without a twitch - but for a long time, I could
only exercise energetically in the evenings.

Nicky.
T2 dx 05/04 + underactive thyroid
D&E, 100ug thyroxine
Last A1c 5.6%  BMI 25
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 12 Aug 2007 10:27 GMT
hood...@yahoo.com wrote:

> > >> Before eating, first wake up--100-112 average
> > >> After eating--120-180 at one hour after finishing eating.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> guess you could chalk it up to a change in output (physical work done)
> and a lack of change in input (the food I eat).

Without weighing meals, there may have been an inadvertant increase in
the amount eaten even if there is not a change in "the food I eat."

Moreover, cortisol levels are at their highest in the AM which
increases liver production of glucose (gluconeogesis).

Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist....
jackiepatti@gmail.com - 12 Aug 2007 12:48 GMT
> The meal doesn't look like too much carbs. I would have
> problems with the strawberries - but others don't so YMMV
> for those.

I can't eat berries or melon at breakfast, but am fine with them at
lunch or dinner.
KC - 12 Aug 2007 05:09 GMT
> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
> input. :)

It is quite common in type 2 to be much more resistant to insulin in the
morning, and therefore get higher blood glucose levels in the morning.

KC
Ozgirl - 12 Aug 2007 05:55 GMT
If you exercise before breaking the fast then you don't switch off the liver
function (preparing you for the morning). I do exercise before breakfast, 40
minute, jog/walk but I have a glass of tomato juice first.

When is he measuring the pre-breakfast bg (fasting bg)? If he is already
waking high, before brekky, then he needs to sort out the fasting bg and
break the fast before exercising. If he is waking normal and you are seeing
the rise after breakfast, try measuring the second time after exercise but
before brekky. See if there was a substantial rise form the exercise on
empty.  If that reading is normal then perhaps even the few carbs at
breakfast are still too many.

> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
> input. :)
rk - 12 Aug 2007 15:32 GMT
| Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
| also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
| need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
| input. :)

be very careful about responses you've received. a few are a bit
off course. being a T1, i've seen my glucose do some really funky
things. also testing at 1hr isn't really doing much good since most
times, digestion hasn't even peaked. testing at 2hrs is much more
telling and at 90mins or so to try to catch a peak. (just helps to
adjust food intake is all) anyhow, you claim he exercises prior to
eating, this is why he's higher after, because you have more then
likely a liver dump because of the exercise (body thinking it's outta
fuel) and then eating on top of the dump.  have him switch it around
exercise after he's eaten and then test glucose at 90min and 2hr, if
it's a higher fat meal, test again at 3 and 4hrs also. fat delays can be
quite nasty sometimes. also, as to someone's comment about your
hubby having dawn phenomenon, by the numbers you posted, it's
very very doubtful.. and just remember, none of us are doctors,
though, some here, get their rocks off trying to play one. :P technically
having dawn phen is having a glucose reading 50mg higher when
you wake then when you went to bed.  (taken from my dr's PDR
in her office... bored one day so did some reading while waiting)

take care

rk, t1 since 5/00
glutten for punishment on asd since 7/00
KC - 12 Aug 2007 19:38 GMT
> | Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> | also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> times, digestion hasn't even peaked. testing at 2hrs is much more
> telling and at 90mins or so to try to catch a peak.

I am not sure this is true.  In the diabetic pregnancy program they had us
all test at 1 hour after beginning to eat, and we were told that was when
the peak was.  Other pregnant diabetics on the internet that I chatted with
had endocrinologists who had them test at 1 or 2 hours.  My diabetic
pregnancy program had us stay below 120 at 1 hour.  The people with
endocrinologist care had them stay under 140 if they were testing at 1 hour
after eating and had them stay under 120 if they were testing at 2 hours
after eating.  The lower expected number at 2 hours tells me that they exect
the peak at 1 hour not at 2 hours.

(just helps to
> adjust food intake is all) anyhow, you claim he exercises prior to
> eating, this is why he's higher after, because you have more then
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> you wake then when you went to bed.  (taken from my dr's PDR
> in her office... bored one day so did some reading while waiting)

I definitely have that then.  Without 44 units of NPH at night, I would be
over 100 mg/dl higher than when I went to bed.

KC
Nicky - 12 Aug 2007 21:21 GMT
>> be very careful about responses you've received. a few are a bit
>> off course. being a T1, i've seen my glucose do some really funky
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>all test at 1 hour after beginning to eat, and we were told that was when
>the peak was.  

Easy to check when yours is - just test a lot... mine is around 40
mins now; it was about 70 mins at dx. I'm taking that to mean that I'm
regaining something of a Phase 1 response. Reisa's a T1 - they're a
different beast...

Nicky.
T2 dx 05/04 + underactive thyroid
D&E, 100ug thyroxine
Last A1c 5.6%  BMI 25
hoodyup@yahoo.com - 12 Aug 2007 22:36 GMT
Ok, folks...thanks for all you're advice.  The consensus was "exercise
after eating, not immediately after waking up" and so I did just
that.  I woke up, tested: FBS 97.  Ate my normal breakfast (weighed
the veggies 9 oz).  that was 2 mushrooms, a bit of zucchini, some red
onion and some broccoli plus 4 egg whites, 6 whole almonds, and a tbs
of butter.   BGs at 1 hour 129.  Then I did my quickie exercise of 50
pushups and 50 situps.  BG afterward 119.  Now, this was possible
because it is my day off, I'm not sure how the timing will work on
days when I get up at 5am and have to leave out the door by 6:30.  I
already don't get as much sleep as I should during the week.  6 hours
is the most i usually can get, with 5 being more likely.  I work 4 10
hour days with a 1 hour commute each way.  Exercise after work is not
really feasible, as I am exhausted by then.  So if I get up at 4:30
instead of 5, I may be able to fit in all the exercise I need in the
morning (shhheeesh).  I will definitely need a new bedtime to do
that.  Just not enough hours in the day to manage all the things that
are priorities.  My wife has been very helpful in helping with meals
and household responsibilities so that I don't get too stressed during
the week.  And on the weekends I sleep in as long as it takes to "deep
cycle" my batteries.  Gotta do what ya gotta do, I guess.  But this
little experiment has been helpful in getting to the bottom of my
higher morning numbers and ways to offset it.  News flash, I just
reached my ideal weight today (165).  Before my DX I was at my highest
weight ever (215).  Advice from this forum helped alot to keep me on
the right track and fine tune my DM management.  Thanks again,
everyone!

Andrew, T2 (42 yr old)
D&E, low-carb "Zonish" food, red wine, nookie and Science
last A1c 5.5, anxiously awaiting the next one
Nicky - 13 Aug 2007 08:20 GMT
> Exercise after work is not
>really feasible, as I am exhausted by then.

Nah - try it and see - exercise GIVES you energy, not takes it away.
Starting is the biggest hurdle; then it's self-perpetuating. Stick
some music with a good beat on an MP3 player, and you're away.

Nicky.
T2 dx 05/04 + underactive thyroid
D&E, 100ug thyroxine
Last A1c 5.6%  BMI 25
hoodyup@yahoo.com - 13 Aug 2007 23:16 GMT
> > Exercise after work is not
> >really feasible, as I am exhausted by then.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> D&E, 100ug thyroxine
> Last A1c 5.6%  BMI 25

Ok, I'll try it.  I was the "just do it" guy last week and here I am
whining about "I'm tooo tired after work--wahhh".  In fairness, I am
on my feet 10 hours a day and by 7:30 when I get home my dogs don't
wanna go for a walk.  I do think I'd benefit most from the exercise in
the AM, since those are the numbers I am chasing.  I saw the results
firsthand--higher numbers when I'd exercise on an empty stomach, lower
when I'd eat first.  It's just a matter of timing to get it to work.
I'm not really adding anything except a small wait after eating before
exercising.  I'd really like to go for that bike ride before work, get
myself pumped up for the day, etc.  I could eat slightly less, and
snack earlier in my workday so I am not too full to exercise without
waiting too long and being late for work.  (But Boss, my Diabetes made
me late...)  It's all about adapting and not getting stuck in one
particular mode, if that mode isn't working...Thanks for the kick in
the butt!

Andrew
Gantlet - 12 Aug 2007 16:46 GMT
> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
> input. :)

I would try the exercise after eating. 50 sits up and 50 push ups everyday
is fantastic.  if you can get him to include some cardio or build up to
doing cardio that
would also help.
has he reached his goals or is he still adding sit ups and pushups?
I dont know how old he is but sounds like he is doing great.

Tom
J.C. Hartmann - 12 Aug 2007 17:23 GMT
> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> need to supply any further info. about him here. Thanks for any
> input. :)

He's already experiencing dawn phenomenon. Then his body needs even more
glucose for the exercise, so it goes into even greater sugar production
mode. When the food arrives, it isn't turning off the DP, so the extra
sugar only makes the problem worse.

Have him eat first, wait 30 mins., then exercise. I'll bet his numbers
go down.

Jim
doob@webtv.net - 12 Aug 2007 17:39 GMT
Jim is probably right on.

It's Liver dump.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 12 Aug 2007 17:58 GMT
d...@webtv.net wrote:

> Jim is probably right on.
>
> It's Liver dump.

No such thing.

Glucose, the monosaccharide, is not stored by any organ to be dumped
much less by the liver.

Instead, there is the synthesis of and breakdown of glycogen (aka body
starch).  The latter is a controlled process (glycogenolysis) to
produce glucose rather than uncontrolled dumping of glucose.  The BG
elevation is happening because of insulin resistance combined with
higher cortisol levels in the AM.

Moreover, for those who have been low-carbing so that there is
essentially no glycogen stores, the process of glucose production by
the liver is gluconeogenesis and happens by the breakdown of muscle to
produce the amino acids that are utilized.

Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist
randy@val.com - 13 Aug 2007 06:49 GMT
> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
> (Andrew)BG higher in the morning after eating breakfast?

Here's a great study in an A/V format that looks at "normal" subjects
with continous glucose monitoring for a few weeks.
Interestingly, even normal folks have a hard time with a high carb
breakfast as opposed to high carb at other meals.

Christiansen, Prof. J. S., On the occasion of the Annual Meeting of
the EASD, Copenhagen, 13-Sep-06
What is Normal Glucose? - Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data from
Healthy Subjects
www.diabetes-symposium.org/index.php?menu=view&chart=4&id=322

Also have a look at http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/17561156.php for
more info on this topic.

Regards
Randy
Jackie Patti - 13 Aug 2007 07:26 GMT
> Here's a great study in an A/V format that looks at "normal" subjects
> with continous glucose monitoring for a few weeks.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Healthy Subjects
> www.diabetes-symposium.org/index.php?menu=view&chart=4&id=322

I just ran across that the other day, and yes, it surprised me that
nondiabetics seem to have DP too!

Signature

http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 13 Aug 2007 12:22 GMT
> > Here's a great study in an A/V format that looks at "normal" subjects
> > with continous glucose monitoring for a few weeks.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I just ran across that the other day, and yes, it surprised me that
> nondiabetics seem to have DP too!

Many (most) nondiabetics have insulin resistance (IR/MetS) because of
having bad "inside" fat (visceral adipose tissue or VAT).

It is only when we are hungry from eating less, down to the optimal
amount, that our bodies get rid of the VAT to cure the IR/MetS and
possibly also cure type-2 diabetes:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Healing

This completely free Approach comes with free cardiologist support via
usenet plus an unprecedented million-dollar guarantee:

http://TruthRUS.org/Guarantee

Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist
Susan - 13 Aug 2007 14:24 GMT
>> Here's a great study in an A/V format that looks at "normal" subjects
>> with continous glucose monitoring for a few weeks.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I just ran across that the other day, and yes, it surprised me that
> nondiabetics seem to have DP too!

Diurnal cortisol rhythm.  Cortisol peaks between 6-8 a.m. and hits its
nadir at midnight.

Cortisol raises bg.

Susan
Chris Malcolm - 14 Aug 2007 10:49 GMT
>> Here's a great study in an A/V format that looks at "normal" subjects
>> with continous glucose monitoring for a few weeks.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> Healthy Subjects
>> www.diabetes-symposium.org/index.php?menu=view&chart=4&id=322

> I just ran across that the other day, and yes, it surprised me that
> nondiabetics seem to have DP too!

There are large numbers of diabetics in the general population who
haven't yet been diagnosed, and an even larger number of non-diabetics
are people with damaged and degenerating BG control who are simply not
diabetic *yet*.

Signature

Chris Malcolm        cam@infirmatics.ed.ac.uk              DoD #205
IPAB,  Informatics,  JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

Jackie Patti - 14 Aug 2007 11:01 GMT
>>> Christiansen, Prof. J. S., On the occasion of the Annual Meeting of
>>> the EASD, Copenhagen, 13-Sep-06
>>> What is Normal Glucose? - Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data from
>>> Healthy Subjects
>>> www.diabetes-symposium.org/index.php?menu=view&chart=4&id=322

> There are large numbers of diabetics in the general population who
> haven't yet been diagnosed, and an even larger number of non-diabetics
> are people with damaged and degenerating BG control who are simply not
> diabetic *yet*.

Yeah, but... did you LOOK at it?  They didn't just report averages, they
showed graphs of individual's readings.

I don't rememebr exactly, but the nondiabetics were mostly young people
with A1c's in the 4.5-5.5 range or so.  Sure, the high end of that range
may be prediabetic, but some of them looked darned normal to me.

But they *all* had larger spikes after breakfast than lunch and dinner.

Signature

http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 14 Aug 2007 12:18 GMT
> >>> Christiansen, Prof. J. S., On the occasion of the Annual Meeting of
> >>> the EASD, Copenhagen, 13-Sep-06
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> But they *all* had larger spikes after breakfast than lunch and dinner.

It is likely that all the subjects had bad "inside" fat (visceral
adipose tissue or VAT) from overeating (eating until stomachs are
stretched thereby killing hunger via GLP-1).

Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist
truth@is-best.com - 14 Aug 2007 16:14 GMT
"It is likely that all the subjects had bad "inside" fat (visceral
adipose tissue or VAT) from overeating (eating until stomachs are
stretched thereby killing hunger via GLP-1)."

Thank you for the compliment, imitation is said to be the highest form
and now you repeat my point about glp-1.  But sadly you got it wrong,
the right hormone for the wrong reason.

It becomes crystal clear when one does not keep up with the literature
in this area.

The two pound diet,aka 2 pd etc., is trash science.

God bless.
Chris Malcolm - 14 Aug 2007 10:43 GMT
>> Now here's where I'd like to know opinions and theories. Science is
>> also welcome. Factual science is even better. Why is my husband's
>> (Andrew)BG higher in the morning after eating breakfast?

> Here's a great study in an A/V format that looks at "normal" subjects
> with continous glucose monitoring for a few weeks.
> Interestingly, even normal folks have a hard time with a high carb
> breakfast as opposed to high carb at other meals.

> Christiansen, Prof. J. S., On the occasion of the Annual Meeting of
> the EASD, Copenhagen, 13-Sep-06
> What is Normal Glucose? - Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data from
> Healthy Subjects
> www.diabetes-symposium.org/index.php?menu=view&chart=4&id=322

Not all the "normal" subjects had a hard time with high carb
breakfasts. One questions the wisdom of describing people's BG
metabolism as "normal" when what they mean is "have not been diagnosed
with diabetes" :-)

> Also have a look at http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/17561156.php for
> more info on this topic.

Signature

Chris Malcolm        cam@infirmatics.ed.ac.uk              DoD #205
IPAB,  Informatics,  JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.