Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / August 2007
Diet Sodas
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Will, T2 - 06 Aug 2007 12:32 GMT Hello friends,
More bad news about diet sodas... Interesting video from ABC News on Yahoo.
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=49750&cl=3577574&ch=61492&src=news
Will, T2
Jeff - 06 Aug 2007 12:57 GMT > Hello friends, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Will, T2 Could it be that people who are at risk for metabolic syndrome?
Jeff
Jeff - 06 Aug 2007 12:58 GMT >> Hello friends, >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jeff sorry, I meant to say could it be that those who are higher risk for metabolic syndrome are more likely to drink diet soda?
Jeff
Will, T2 - 06 Aug 2007 13:02 GMT >sorry, I meant to say could it be that those who are higher risk for >metabolic syndrome are more likely to drink diet soda? Another question would be whether the preference for doet soda is more a result of personality and psychological factors, or whether there is something biological at work that makes those particular individuals have a pronounced preference and desire for diet soda, more so than other people who do not crave diet sodas.
Will, T2
Jeff - 06 Aug 2007 13:20 GMT >> sorry, I meant to say could it be that those who are higher risk for >> metabolic syndrome are more likely to drink diet soda? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Will, T2 Good points. When I had free access to Snapple (I mean I got it free from the cafeteria), I drank a lot of the sugary ones. And gained a lot of weight. Now I do the same with diet soda and diet Snapple. No weight gain.
If I kept at the sugary Snapple, you could use my stomach to smuggle truck tires by now.
Jeff
GysdeJongh - 07 Aug 2007 12:31 GMT >>> Hello friends,
> sorry, I meant to say could it be that those who are higher risk for > metabolic syndrome are more likely to drink diet soda? Hi Jeff, they corrected for that.Maybe you should give the people who make a carreer of investigating these matters a bit more credit.Read the article it's free and it's there.
We excluded individuals with baseline metabolic syndrome (n=2897 personobservations; metabolic syndrome as defined below) and those with any missing metabolic syndrome components on follow-up (n=61 person-observations).
Dietary behavior among individuals consuming soft drinks may account in part for the clustering of metabolic risk factors in these people.13 Individuals with greater intake of soft drinks also have a dietary pattern characterized by greater intake of calories and saturated and trans fats, lower consumption of fiber38 and dairy products,39 and a sedentary life.40 These observations were corroborated by the our findings of increased consumption of saturated and trans fat, lower consumption of dietary fiber, and higher rates of smoking in those with greater intake of soft drinks. Nonetheless, in the present investigation, we adjusted for saturated fat and trans fat intake, dietary fiber consumption, smoking, and physical activity in multivariable analyses and still observed a significant association of soft drink consumption with the risk of developing metabolic syndrome and its component traits.
Gys
Jeff - 08 Aug 2007 01:36 GMT >>>> Hello friends, > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Gys So that means that people who drink diet soda tend to have other risk factors and drinking diet soda may do nothing to contribute to metabolic syndrome, if I understand correctly.
Of course, the study can't answer that question, because the study was not designed to answer the question.
Thanks.
Jeff
Will, T2 - 08 Aug 2007 01:41 GMT >So that means that people who drink diet soda tend to have other risk >factors and drinking diet soda may do nothing to contribute to metabolic >syndrome, if I understand correctly. Hi Jeff,
I take the study to mean that people who drink a lot of sodas, diet or regular, are at greater risk... The study adjusted internally for differences in patterns of consumption.
Will, T2
Jeff - 08 Aug 2007 02:58 GMT >> So that means that people who drink diet soda tend to have other risk >> factors and drinking diet soda may do nothing to contribute to metabolic [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Will, T2 My point is that the diet drinks or drinking thereof doesn't cause metabolic syndrome.
Jeff
Alan S - 08 Aug 2007 04:32 GMT >>> So that means that people who drink diet soda tend to have other risk >>> factors and drinking diet soda may do nothing to contribute to metabolic [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >Jeff I agree. Even reading all of the adjustments (and one wonders exactly how they achieve that and what assumptions are made) I see that as ancillary; in the sense that people who are prone to metabolic syndrome are prone to like sodas - diet or otherwise.
It's a bit like discovering that Aussies like me who liked eating boiled prawns out of newspaper parcels (which I did) in the '50s and '60s are prone to melanomas (which I am). Investigating further may lead to the discovery that in that era that was the equivalent of fast food at Aussie beaches and that a "healthy tan" was considered a desirable asset by those who frequented the beach. But, of course, eating prawns or even contamination by newsprint has nothing to do with skin cancer. Lying semi-naked without SPF protection on a beach while eating them probably does.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/ latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
Will, T2 - 08 Aug 2007 13:03 GMT > I see that as ancillary; in the sense that people >who are prone to metabolic syndrome are prone to like sodas [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >with skin cancer. Lying semi-naked without SPF protection on >a beach while eating them probably does. Interesting...
Will, T2
GysdeJongh - 09 Aug 2007 23:15 GMT > It's a bit like discovering that Aussies like me who liked > eating boiled prawns out of newspaper parcels (which I did) [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > with skin cancer. Lying semi-naked without SPF protection on > a beach while eating them probably does. Hi Alan, the technique is called logistic regression To take your example 1)Take a large number of Alans 2)Ask how often they eat boiled prawns out of newspaper parcels 3)Ask how often they lie semi-naked without SPF protection on a beach 4)Count their number of melanoma's
Make categories of 2) and 3) eg category=1 for never eat praws , 2 1 to 3 times a week , 3 every day etc
Make a 3-D graph of Z=melanoma's , Y=prawns category , X=beach category The distance of a melanoma count above the plane drawn through X and Y is now the corrected value.So each melanoma count is now divided in 3 portions
: one for prawn eating , one for the beach and one for the rest effect.I hope you can imagine that the actual procedure is a bit more complicated and just involves mathematics.So it can be done with any number of "cofounders" not just for one or two.And thet it only works for a large number of Alans
hth Gys
Alan S - 09 Aug 2007 23:55 GMT >> It's a bit like discovering that Aussies like me who liked >> eating boiled prawns out of newspaper parcels (which I did) [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >hth >Gys Gys, the image of a multitude of Alans, some munching prawns, some clothed, some partially unclothed and all baking on beaches while attendants count and divide their melanomas is a mind-boggling one that even the Monty Python creators would have difficulty coping with. Shades of the terrible Alans who terrorised Europe in the fifth century.
And I'm still not convinced that those mathematicians got their sums right:-)
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/ latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
Will, T2 - 08 Aug 2007 13:01 GMT >My point is that the diet drinks or drinking thereof doesn't cause >metabolic syndrome. Well, according to the study, there is an association between drinking diet drinks and metabolic syndrome, just as there is the same association between sugar based soft drinks and metabolic syndrome.... If it is not something in the soft drinks, what is it that is "causing" metabolic synrome in such a strong associational way?
Will, T2
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 08 Aug 2007 13:09 GMT > >My point is that the diet drinks or drinking thereof doesn't cause > >metabolic syndrome. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > If it is not something in the soft drinks, what is it that is > "causing" metabolic synrome in such a strong associational way? Killing the hunger.
It is only when we are hungry (stomach singing and laughing) that our bodies get rid of the bad "inside" fat (visceral adipose tissue or VAT) that is causing the insulin resistance that undergirds type-2 diabetes:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Healing
Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/press.asp
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Cardiologist
Jeff - 08 Aug 2007 13:16 GMT >> My point is that the diet drinks or drinking thereof doesn't cause >> metabolic syndrome. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > If it is not something in the soft drinks, what is it that is > "causing" metabolic synrome in such a strong associational way? People who have or are likely to develop metabolic syndrome also like the taste of diet drinks and sugary drinks.
An association does not mean causation.
When there are more ice creams sold, there are also more rapes. It's not that ice cream sales cause people to rape each other, but rather, they both happen more frequently in the summer. No causation at all.
Jeff
> Will, T2 Will, T2 - 08 Aug 2007 13:38 GMT >An association does not mean causation. I agree. Still, such studies are a valuable source of insight, and can lead to very useful knowledge in the area of prevention, especially when they point the way to future research.
Will, T2
Alice Faber - 08 Aug 2007 15:31 GMT > >My point is that the diet drinks or drinking thereof doesn't cause > >metabolic syndrome. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > If it is not something in the soft drinks, what is it that is > "causing" metabolic synrome in such a strong associational way? Couldn't it simply be that people who are getting a bit pudgy (or even heavier) are more likely to switch from regular to diet sodas, as it's an easy way to cut calories? Or is that too obvious?
 Signature "and the snark alert level has reached "fuschia"" ---zig zigalo homes in on the meat of the matter
Alan S - 08 Aug 2007 23:40 GMT >Couldn't it simply be that people who are getting a bit pudgy (or even >heavier) are more likely to switch from regular to diet sodas, as it's >an easy way to cut calories? Or is that too obvious? Only to us...
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/ latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
ted rosenberg - 09 Aug 2007 03:08 GMT > >> [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > NO Gy, it is FHS data - they "corrected" ancient questionnaires of dubious accuracy
Also, Diet Soda today is not the same as it was 40 years ago
Jeff - 09 Aug 2007 03:29 GMT >> >>> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > Also, Diet Soda today is not the same as it was 40 years ago Nor are the drinkers of diet soda. Forty years ago, when diet soda first came out (I remember the Fresca and Tab - still avialable if you look), I think around 35 years ago, I don't think that many people drank it. It was definitely more popular twenty years ago. I remember drinking lots of Diet Coke in college and grad school. But, I think 30 or 40 years ago, diet soda tended by drunk by people who were already overweight and trying to lose weight or those who were weight conscious (and thin) not trying to gain weight.
Since then, diet sodas have moved more into the mainstream.
Jeff
Will, T2 - 09 Aug 2007 03:44 GMT >Nor are the drinkers of diet soda. Forty years ago, when diet soda first >came out (I remember the Fresca and Tab - still avialable if you look), [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Jeff If the data are too old, or if there needs to be refinement in the method, perhaps now is the time to initiate a new study.... As I said, it could be valuable, if only it points the way to future research.
Will, T2
johnniemccoy@ - 09 Aug 2007 05:32 GMT >>Nor are the drinkers of diet soda. Forty years ago, when diet soda first >>came out (I remember the Fresca and Tab - still avialable if you look), [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Will, T2 My personal favorite - hearing somebody order Diet Coke and Jack. Gotta watch those calories, ya know.
John
Julie Bove - 09 Aug 2007 05:54 GMT > My personal favorite - hearing somebody order Diet Coke and Jack. Gotta > watch those calories, ya know. I don't drink, but if I were to order some drink with Coke in it, it would have to be diet. I can't stand regular soda of any kind. It's like syrup!
Jeff - 09 Aug 2007 12:55 GMT >> My personal favorite - hearing somebody order Diet Coke and Jack. Gotta >> watch those calories, ya know. > > I don't drink, but if I were to order some drink with Coke in it, it would > have to be diet. I can't stand regular soda of any kind. It's like syrup! The only things that bothers me about regular soda is that it feels like it is coating my teeth with sugar.
Jeff
ted rosenberg - 09 Aug 2007 08:28 GMT > >> Nor are the drinkers of diet soda. Forty years ago, when diet soda first [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Will, T2 > we HAVE lots of studies - but, what the heck - do another one.
Will, T2 - 09 Aug 2007 08:39 GMT >we HAVE lots of studies - but, what the heck - do another one. What the heck.... they give people something to do ;-)
Will, T2
GysdeJongh - 09 Aug 2007 22:59 GMT > On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:29:37 GMT, Jeff <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com>
> If the data are too old, or if there needs to be refinement in the > method, perhaps now is the time to initiate a new study.... As I said, > it could be valuable, if only it points the way to future research. > > Will, T2 Hi Will, don't bother these guys are just yelling instead of reading.They make noise instead of knowledge.I don't know their motives.The paper is just free for anyone who wants to read it......The data were not _ONLY_ collected in 1940.They were collected between 1998 and 2001.It was a very large study over years and even generations.Here is a description of which part of the data were used in this study :
Study Sample The Framingham Heart Study began in 1948 with the enrollment of 5209 participants into the original study cohort.17 In 1971, children of the original cohort participants and the spouses of the children were enrolled into the Framingham Offspring Study (n5124).18 Offspring study participants are evaluated approximately every 4 years. Information on daily consumption of soft drinks was collected via a physician-administered questionnaire at each study visit from the fourth (1987-1991) through the sixth (1995-1998) examination cycles. That examination questionnaire did not elicit information regarding consumption of regular versus diet soft drinks; however, such information was available from the self-administered food frequency questionnaires (FFQ; Willett questionnaire)19 completed by participants at the fifth (1992-1995) and sixth examination cycles (see below). For the present investigation, we selected offspring cohort participants who attended any 2 consecutive examinations from the fourth through the seventh (1998 -2001) examination cycles.
hth Gys
Will, T2 - 10 Aug 2007 02:14 GMT >Hi Will, >don't bother these guys are just yelling instead of reading.They make noise [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >over years and even generations.Here is a description of which part of the >data were used in this study : Thanks Gys,
Actually, I do respect Ted very much. On the other hand, I did read the study, and it seemed significant enough to post. As you say, the statistical methods of the researchers seem to allow for differences between types of sodas and the factors of time and shifting and succeeding generations.... Maybe some of the criticisms merit further study, but I thought this was a very significant finding...
Maybe it is only part of an overall lifestyle thing. Only time will tell. There seems to be something very unhealthy in the modern urban lifestyle of consumption of sodas and high carb living, but maybe that is just my opinion. How else shall we know, though, if there are not systematic studies of what is going on?
Will, T2
ted rosenberg - 10 Aug 2007 15:26 GMT > >> Hi Will, [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Will, T2 > We KNOW that there is a high correlation between diet soda and all the problems of obesity. That is a DUH We also know that the FHS has a TERRIBLE reputation, as do those who use it's data. I knew a professor once who used it as the primary example of bad experimental method,
That does not mean that the data or the conclusions are wrong - after all, a stopped clock is right twice a day, it just that when researchers using known questionable data arrive at a conclusion which is directly at odds with simple logic as to what is the cause and what is the effect.. then those conclusions should not be given much weight.
Did you know that the strike out average for the Washington Senators had a high correlation with the Dow Jones Industrial Average - and in that case the data was good.. Which was the cause and which was the effect?
ted rosenberg - 10 Aug 2007 15:10 GMT > >> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:29:37 GMT, Jeff <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > Gys > methodology of the "offspring" study was as bad as the methodology of the original study Most people think that the data should be printed on very soft paper so that it hyas a viable use.
> All this shows that te Julie Bove - 09 Aug 2007 03:59 GMT >> Also, Diet Soda today is not the same as it was 40 years ago > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Since then, diet sodas have moved more into the mainstream. I fondly remember Tab and its bitter aftertaste. I used to like Fresca too. Don't like it now, or Tab either. Both have been reformulated.
ted rosenberg - 09 Aug 2007 08:27 GMT >>> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > Jeff and the majority of the FHS data is 1945-1965
ted rosenberg - 06 Aug 2007 21:39 GMT >> Hello friends, >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jeff Mo, it is people who can't READ, and look at misleading headlines
It says that you can get addicted to caffeine DUH and somehow links that to diet drinks - coffee, tea, non-diet, or the new "energy" drinks have MUCH more caffeine
Will, T2 - 06 Aug 2007 21:50 GMT > t says that you can get addicted to caffeine > DUH > and somehow links that to diet drinks - coffee, tea, non-diet, or the > new "energy" drinks have MUCH more caffeine I tend to think the real force at work is caffeine addiction, also, Ted, but the way the video was presented, it made it sound like the culprit was diet sodas.... another thing I noticed last week in the abstract and article I posted about it, though, was some speculation that there was something about the caramel coloring in many sodas that was possibly and independent factor in contributing to metabolic syndrome.
Will, T2
Jeff - 06 Aug 2007 22:27 GMT >>> Hello friends, >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > and somehow links that to diet drinks - coffee, tea, non-diet, or the > new "energy" drinks have MUCH more caffeine And if you read beyond the headlines, they say that people who drink diet drinks are more likely to develop metabolic syndrome. There is more to the main story than the headlines.
Ted, if don't have anything useful to say in this thread, I won't be responding to you.
Jeff
ted rosenberg - 07 Aug 2007 02:45 GMT >>>> Hello friends, >>>> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Jeff No Jeff, we KNOW that people who have metabolic syndrome are more likely to drink diet drinks agaim a DUH
can't you tell the difference between cause and effect?
johnniemccoy@ - 06 Aug 2007 22:39 GMT >>> Hello friends, >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > and somehow links that to diet drinks - coffee, tea, non-diet, or the new > "energy" drinks have MUCH more caffeine When you first heard the term "fitness water" did you moan and roll your eyes back like I did?
John
bud - 06 Aug 2007 16:33 GMT > Hello friends, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Will, T2 Seems like they are talking more about the caffeine in the diet soda. The article is called caffeine nation. I wouldn't be to concerned about it. Just another study. There will be another study next week or next month telling you something else is bad or something else is good for you.
Cheri - 06 Aug 2007 16:54 GMT bud wrote in message ...
>Seems like they are talking more about the caffeine in the diet soda. The >article is called caffeine nation. I wouldn't be to concerned about it. Just >another study. There will be another study next week or next month telling >you something else is bad or something else is good for you. Ain't it the truth. :-)
Cheri
Michelle C. - 06 Aug 2007 20:20 GMT > > Hello friends, > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > another study. There will be another study next week or next month telling > you something else is bad or something else is good for you. Yes, I just read an article that stated in rats that had access to caffeine and exercise had much less chance of developing skin cancer than the rats that had neither or only one. Go figure. Of course who knows if it applies to people? Hey, but the rats are in good shape. ;-)
http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/07/30/caffeine-skincancer.html?ref=rss
Best regards, Michelle C., T2 diet & exercise
johnniemccoy@ - 06 Aug 2007 22:42 GMT >> > Hello friends, >> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Michelle C., T2 > diet & exercise According to all the research papers I've read, there are some great new rat medicines coming out soon.
John
johnniemccoy@ - 06 Aug 2007 22:40 GMT >> Hello friends, >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Just another study. There will be another study next week or next month > telling you something else is bad or something else is good for you. If you read every article that comes down the pike you'll soon be on a diet of asparagus tips and distilled water.... until they start on the asparagus tips.
John
Cheri - 06 Aug 2007 22:47 GMT johnniemccoy@ wrote in message ...
>If you read every article that comes down the pike you'll soon be on a diet >of asparagus tips and distilled water.... until they start on the asparagus >tips. > >John And you know they would. :-) I don't mind reading the articles, but I don't take them too seriously.
Cheri
Will, T2 - 06 Aug 2007 23:16 GMT >If you read every article that comes down the pike you'll soon be on a diet >of asparagus tips and distilled water.... until they start on the asparagus >tips. > >John Asparagus makes your pee smell funny...
Will, T2
johnniemccoy@ - 06 Aug 2007 23:20 GMT >>If you read every article that comes down the pike you'll soon be on a >>diet [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Will, T2 hahahahahha John
Alan S - 07 Aug 2007 00:30 GMT >>If you read every article that comes down the pike you'll soon be on a diet >>of asparagus tips and distilled water.... until they start on the asparagus [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Will, T2 How do you know what his pee smells like? Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Will, T2 - 07 Aug 2007 02:21 GMT >How do you know what his pee smells like? It was really meant as a joke....
I suppose the assumption was that the kidneys and livers of most human creatures work relatively the same (which may not be completely true)... and that asparagus is well known to produce a characteristic odor of the urine, due to the asparagusic acid (alpha-aminodimethyl-gamma-butyrothetin) that is naturally found in asparagus. It is estimated that as many as 40% of the population of the UK produce odiferous urine after eating asparagus... The French population also has a significant proportion of people producing the unique smelling pee, after eating asparagus.
Believe it or not, there have been serious scientific studies touching upon this curious area of biochemistry and toxicology, as it concerns pee.
Here is a link to an abstract of an article appearing in the April, 2001, issue of Drug Metabolism and Disposition, produced under the auspices of the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
http://tinyurl.com/25zlow
For those who do not get links very well, here is a relevant re-cap of a portion of the article, detailing the history of asparagus and early documented evidence that the phenomenon of smelly pee was observed as long ago as the 18th century.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pointers From History. Whether or not asparagus was known in the ancient Egyptian world, or earlier, is unclear. Mythological mention of the vegetable occurs during the perilous walk of Theseus via the Saronic Gulf wearing his father's sword and sandals to claim the heirdom of the Athenian throne. At the Isthmus of Corinth he was accosted by the marauder Sinis but managed to outwit and kill him. He then discovered the brigand's daughter, Perigune, hiding in a dense clump of asparagus, vowing never to burn or uproot the plant if it would only protect her. Alas, to no avail. She bore Theseus a son, Melanippus, whose descendants, the Ionians inhabiting Caria, protected the plant by severe laws out of respect for their ancestors. Asparagus is also mentioned in the writings of such Greek scholars as Antiphon (480-411 B.C.), Theopompus (380-? B.C.), and Theophrastes (372-287 B.C.), but cultivated asparagus seems to have been unknown, and all of these may have been referring to a wild plant of another species.
However, the Romans at the time of Cato the Elder (234-149 B.C.) were well acquainted with asparagus, and detailed instructions for its cultivation are given in Cato's surviving treatise, On Agriculture (De Agri Cultura). Other authors, including Dioscorides (ca. 40-90 A.D.) in his De Materia Medica, Pliny the Elder (23-79 A.D.) in his epic Historia Naturalis, and Apicus (De Re Coquinarasometimes credited to Caelius) and Columella (De Re Rustica), who both lived under the rule of Tiberius (14-37 A.D.) during the early part of the first century, also described the plant and its cultivation, and it appears that their asparagus was the same as we enjoy today.
Even though asparagus was well known in England by the 10th century A.D. a resurgence in interest occurred throughout Europe during the 1500s. John Gerard(e) (1545-1612), who wrote in 1597, was the first English author to mention asparagus, deriving the name from the Latin "asparagi " which he translated to signify "the first sprig or sprout of every plant, especially when it be tender". Meager, in his English Gardener, informs us that in his time (1670) the London markets were well supplied with forced asparagus, and Louis XIV (the Sun King) (1638-1715) popularized asparagus among the French nation when he built Versailles. By the late 1600s herbalists and horticulturists had made asparagus familiar all over Europe (M'Intosh, 1855; Hedrick, 1919).
Despite its long usage over 2000 years, it appears that it wasn't until the turn of the 18th century that reports linking its ingestion with the production of odorous urine began to emerge. John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), a Scottish mathematician and physician to Queen Anne, noted in a book on foods first published in 1731 that "asparagus... affects the urine with a foetid smell (especially if cut when they are white) and therefore have been suspected by some physicians as not friendly to the kidneys; when they are older, and begin to ramify, they lose this quality; but then they are not so agreeable" (Arbuthnot, 1735). Samuel Johnson (1709-1784), in the first edition of his Dictionary of the English Language (1755), quotes Arbuthnot's passage, although Charles Knight (1791-1873) in his English Cyclopaedia (1859) does not mention the odiferous property; perhaps it was not yet common (Johnson, 1755; Knight, 1859). However, by 1866, Pierre Larousse in the Grand Dictionnaire Universel assures us that "tout le monde connaît l'odeur fétide qu'elle communique à l'urine" (Larousse, 1866).
It is coincidental that the odor-producing phenomenon was not observed until the use of sulfur, sulfate, and organic sulfur materials as fertilizers to improve asparagus flavor had become prevalent from the late 17th century onwards. It is probable, therefore, that the urine odor was associated with a sulfur-containing component of asparagus. During this century it has been conclusively demonstrated that onions and garlic grown in the presence of low levels of sulfur have a very weak flavor and lose lachrymatory properties; increased flavor strength, typical of the Alliums, is associated with higher levels of sulfur compounds, mainly sulfate, within the soil (Platenius, 1941; Kumar and Sahay, 1954; Freeman and Mossadeghi, 1970, 1971).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
And thus, my remark that "asparagus makes your pee smell funny" ;-)
Will, T2
Alan S - 07 Aug 2007 03:50 GMT >>How do you know what his pee smells like? > >It was really meant as a joke.... So was the response...:-) Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/ latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
ted rosenberg - 07 Aug 2007 02:47 GMT > >> If you read every article that comes down the pike you'll soon be on a diet [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Will, T2 > No Will, it makes SOME of us smell funny. It is a genetic situation. We don't break down Asparagene
Will, T2 - 07 Aug 2007 02:56 GMT >No Will, it makes SOME of us smell funny. It is a genetic situation. >We don't break down Asparagene Yes, Ted, I would agree.... and that seems to be one of the conclusions of that study in England that I cited. What strikes me as odd is that apparently no one noticed the phenomenon until the 18th Century.... Of course, that could have been due to emerging techniques of fertilization, and agriculture.
Will, T2
ted rosenberg - 09 Aug 2007 03:06 GMT > >> No Will, it makes SOME of us smell funny. It is a genetic situation. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Will, T2 > Thats very interesting - I collect anomalies like that
Alan S - 07 Aug 2007 00:29 GMT >> Hello friends, >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >another study. There will be another study next week or next month telling >you something else is bad or something else is good for you. It's not a study - just a "news" item.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/ latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
Alan S - 07 Aug 2007 00:28 GMT >Hello friends, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Will, T2 I've listend to it three times.
It's a beat-up.
In the opening statement she slips from the links between soda (not diet soda) and metabolic syndrome to diet soda as though they are the same thing.
Fairly early on is this statement: "There's no major study that says drinking diet soda is bad for you" then this qualifier "but health experts say there may be health effects down the road".
From that point on there are lots of "mays" and no "wills". There is a scare push on caffeine addiction without any supportive evidence or comment on levels of caffeine ingestion needed to become addicted, and a comment on bone problems that "may" occur.
Drivel to support all the advertising surrounding it.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraltraveloz.blogspot.com/ latest: Mossman Gorge in the Daintree Rainforest http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ latest: Self-Testing and Type 2 Management
Will, T2 - 07 Aug 2007 02:46 GMT >Hello friends, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Will, T2 Here is a reposting of what I believe was the study out of which the video report by ABC News emerged.... I posted this here last week, on July 24, 2007, in a thread entitled "Hold the Sodas"
http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.689935v1
Will, T2
Will, T2 - 07 Aug 2007 02:53 GMT >Here is a reposting of what I believe was the study out of which the >video report by ABC News emerged.... I posted this here last week, on [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Will, T2 I think this is an instance of the ABC reporters choosing to sensationalize the news by focusing upon diet sodas.... The study was not specific to diet sodas, but found significant association relative to all types of sodas. What caught my eye was the "speculation" that there could be another factor, such as the caramel coloring.... but there was not any data as to that possible factor in this study.
To my mind, the"addictive" quality of almost all sodas derives from their caffeine content, and is probably not related to metabolic syndrome, per se. Of course, I could be wrong, but I don't think so, right now...
Will, T2
ted rosenberg - 09 Aug 2007 03:04 GMT > >> Hello friends, [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Will, T2 > PLEASE read the dreck before posting it it is from the infamous Framingham heart Study 1) OLD data - The data was collected many years ago 2) INACCURATE DATA 3) POOR data collection
People have hoped to mine the huge collection of data for years \ a) The participants never authorized these uses B) ALL the "studies" which try to draw conclusions from the FHS data have been shown to be wrong- time after time after time -
Will, T2 - 09 Aug 2007 03:09 GMT >PLEASE read the dreck before posting it >it is from the infamous Framingham heart Study [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >B) ALL the "studies" which try to draw conclusions from the FHS data >have been shown to be wrong- time after time after time - Could be, Ted, but maybe there is some significance... Timie will tell.
Will, T2
ted rosenberg - 09 Aug 2007 08:26 GMT > >> PLEASE read the dreck before posting it [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Will, T2 > No - it has pretty well been proven that this stuff is worthless The big part of the data is from 1945 to 1965.
In the early 40s someone got the bright idea of a long study on heart attacks in women. They picked a large town near Boston and sent questionnaires to the nurses. They repeated that for many years. No, diet soda wasn't even on the MARKET then, and the questions were limited and not well designed. Over the years, the original participants all moved away and were replaced with others.. Medical Ethicists are QUITE upset about the use of the data for things that it was never authorized, but the facts are that idiots keep trying to mine the data buy adjusting" it, and they keep coming to o conclusions which turn out to be WRONG. The data is truly infamous as a source of chaos where you can get any result you want by "adjusting" it. Framingham is famous for two studies 1) This piece of crap and the old AT&T studies on efficiency at their plant there. Other than that, it is a suburb of Boston
GysdeJongh - 07 Aug 2007 13:05 GMT > Hello friends, Hi Will, thank you very much for the links ( I reposted them for convenience :)
Amazing article and amazing conclusions :
"Consumption of soda's increases your risk on the metabolic syndrome".
Not because of the sugar or the caffein nor is the relation reversed as they included also baseline values.A time ago I thought that chewing gum , zero calories with xillitol , would help me to loose weight.It did not ! After a few weeks I found myself consuming 4-5 packs of chewing gum/day , eating more because of cravings and actually gaining weight.So nomore chewing gum for me.
The investigators looked at a few thousend people over years , corrected for everything I could dream of and still found a significant association :
http://circ.ahajournals.org:80/cgi/content/abstract/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.689935v1 Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):480-8. Soft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community. PMID: 17646581 http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=49750&cl=3577574&ch=61492&src=news
Additionally, we evaluated whether metabolic risk varied on the basis of consumption of sugar-sweetened ("regular") versus artificially sweetened ("diet") soft drinks.
Assessment of Soft Drink Consumption and Dietary Intake of Other Foods At the index examinations, participants reported the average number of 12-oz servings of soft drinks (Coke, Pepsi, Sprite, or other carbonated soft drinks, separately categorized into caffeinated or decaffeinated drinks) consumed per day in the year preceding the examination. The responses to the questions were entered as integers (0 or more) separately for caffeinated and decaffeinated soft drinks.
Additionally, we repeated analyses to examine the association between consumption of caffeinated and decaffeinated soft drinks, considered separately, and incidence of the metabolic syndrome.After stratification of analyses by caffeinated versus decaffeinated drinks, results were consistent with the primary analyses; consumption of 1 soft drink per day was associated with incident metabolic syndrome for both types of beverages
Thanks again Will Gys
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 08 Aug 2007 03:41 GMT > Hello friends, > > More bad news about diet sodas... Interesting video from ABC News on > Yahoo. > > http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=49750&cl=3577574&ch=61492&src=news Yet another example of something that "satisfies" (kills hunger) being harmful.
It is truly only when we are hungry (healthy) from eating less down to the optimal amount that our bodies get rid of the bad "inside" fat (visceral adipose tissue or VAT) that causes insulin resistance (metabolic syndrome or MetS):
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Healing
Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/PressRelease
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Cardiologist
|
|
|