Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Are they real scientists?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
guy - 13 Apr 2007 05:41 GMT
A person may call themselves a scientist and be very
unproductive-- or--   Some will advocate false theories or
information.

When you see the word "scientist" use caution.

A few years ago I met an alleged scientist who gave me great
stories about his work "shining"Lasers on the moon.

The problem was he had no knowledge of diffraction
limiting.

One reason I take a lot of the PR with a grain of salt.

The person that found the structure of protein
had some questionable idea in later life.
shoppa@trailing-edge.com - 13 Apr 2007 13:41 GMT
> The person that found the structure of protein
> had some questionable idea in later life.

By definition, if you're pushing the edge of knowledge, sometimes
you're gonna fall over the edge and be wrong :-). I'm not saying that
when these famous guys go over edge into racism or advocating genocide
that they are anywhere near the edge, because clearly they're far past
it, but at the same time they are effectively gone.

Read _The Discovery of Insulin_ to find out how complicated it can be,
even in the obscure realms of Canadian Academia. Or read one of
Marshall McLuhan's biographies (esp. _The Medium and the Messenger_ )
for somebody who is over the edge of reality, but perhaps seeing
things more clearly than most!

Tim.
guys@consolidated.net - 13 Apr 2007 14:55 GMT
>> The person that found the structure of protein
>> had some questionable idea in later life.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Tim.

The discovery of insulin was a classic. Then if you
read further, you sill find the bickering and
alleged theft of credit.
Penicillin went through  a lot of
grabbing for the high productive strains.
The needs in WW2 probably was a factor in it final
mass production and Churchill's sickness did not hurt.

Serendipity seems to be a big item in major discoveries.
Plagiarism is so common.  It is not the clean TV thing.

                                  Guy
Loretta Eisenberg - 13 Apr 2007 13:47 GMT
Guy, I am so glad to see you posting.  I hope all is well with you.

Loretta
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.