Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sedentary Behavior Linked To High Blood Sugar

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kurt - 29 Mar 2007 19:58 GMT
http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=14742788&filename=20070328/r
euters20070328health00000021reutershealthewEDIT.xml


or

http://tinyurl.com/2jw77y

(excerpt)

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who tend to be sedentary -- as
indicated by the amount of time they spend watching television -- are
likely to have high levels of glucose in their blood, even though they
may not be diabetic.

Dr. David W. Dunstan, of the International Diabetes Institute,
Melbourne, Australia, and colleagues examined the association between
television viewing and blood glucose levels, measured after fasting
and after a glucose test-drink, in 3781 men and 4576 women in
Australia. All of the subjects were free of diabetes at the time.
Alan S - 30 Mar 2007 07:52 GMT
>http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=14742788&filename=20070328/r
euters20070328health00000021reutershealthewEDIT.xml

>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>and after a glucose test-drink, in 3781 men and 4576 women in
>Australia. All of the subjects were free of diabetes at the time.

I know he's an Aussie so I should be supportive, and the IDI
is an excellent organisation, but really?

We spent research money discovering this? Seriously?

It's like discovering that water runs downhill, or falling
off bikes causes gravel rash.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1000mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Epidaurus
Chris Malcolm - 30 Mar 2007 09:19 GMT
>>http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=14742788&filename=20070328/r
euters20070328health00000021reutershealthewEDIT.xml

>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>and after a glucose test-drink, in 3781 men and 4576 women in
>>Australia. All of the subjects were free of diabetes at the time.

> I know he's an Aussie so I should be supportive, and the IDI
> is an excellent organisation, but really?

> We spent research money discovering this? Seriously?

> It's like discovering that water runs downhill, or falling
> off bikes causes gravel rash.

According to the article the link only existed for women who sat
around, not men. Which at least to me was surprising.

Signature

Chris Malcolm        cam@infirmatics.ed.ac.uk              DoD #205
IPAB,  Informatics,  JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

Alan S - 30 Mar 2007 10:25 GMT
>>>http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=14742788&filename=20070328/r
euters20070328health00000021reutershealthewEDIT.xml

>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>According to the article the link only existed for women who sat
>around, not men. Which at least to me was surprising.

So there WAS some value in it! Something I can use to
justify watching the cricket when I get those "lazy bugger"
looks from SWMBO.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1000mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Epidaurus
shoppa@trailing-edge.com - 30 Mar 2007 14:28 GMT
> On 29 Mar 2007 11:58:02 -0700, "Kurt"
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> It's like discovering that water runs downhill, or falling
> off bikes causes gravel rash.

They didn't even go that far. They didn't prove that glucose
intolerance causes people to watch more TV, or that watching TV causes
glucose intolerance. They just showed that in one subgroup, watching
TV seems to be related to higher glucose intolerance.

It seems likely to me that neither is cause or effect, but both are
effects.

Tim.
GysdeJongh - 30 Mar 2007 12:31 GMT
> http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=14742788&filename=20070328/r
euters20070328health00000021reutershealthewEDIT.xml

>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2jw77y

Hi Kurt,
after testing 8,357 adults the chance that they detected something was still
marginal.As this chance depents on the number of subjects tested we may
safely asume that this research was a waste of time ..... Don't turn things
upside down : they did NOT prove that the relation does NOT hold in women
.Their sample size was simply not large enough to detect ANYTHING . NOT that
there was a relation , NOT that there was NO relation.

Seems an important difference to me
hth
Gys

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/516?maxtoshow=&HITS=1
0&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&author1=dunstan&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevan
ce&volume=30&firstpage=516&resourcetype=HWCIT


Association of Television Viewing With Fasting and 2-h Postchallenge Plasma
Glucose Levels in Adults Without Diagnosed Diabetes

David W. Dunstan, PHD1, Jo Salmon, PHD2, Genevieve N. Healy, MPH3, Jonathan
E. Shaw, MD1, Damien Jolley, MSC4, Paul Z. Zimmet, MD1, Neville Owen, PHD3
on behalf of the AusDiab Steering Committee

1 International Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
2 School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne,
Australia
3 Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, The
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
4 Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Melbourne, Australia

OBJECTIVE-We examined the associations of television viewing time with
fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose (2-h PG)
levels in Australian adults.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-A total of 8,357 adults aged >35 years who were
free from diagnosed diabetes and who attended a population-based
cross-sectional study (Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study
[AusDiab]) were evaluated. Measures of FPG and 2-h PG were obtained from an
oral glucose tolerance test. Self-reported television viewing time (in the
previous week) was assessed using an interviewer-administered questionnaire.
Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-%S) and
ß-cell function (HOMA-%B) were calculated based on fasting glucose and
insulin concentrations.

RESULTS-After adjustment for confounders and physical activity time, time
spent watching television in women was positively associated with 2-h PG,
log fasting insulin, and log HOMA-%B and inversely associated with log
HOMA-%S (P < 0.05) but not with FPG. No significant associations were
observed with glycemic measures in men. The ß-coefficients across categories
of average hours spent watching television per day (<1.0, 1.0-1.9, 2.0-2.9,
3.0-3.9, and 4.0) for 2-h PG in women were 0 (reference), 0.009, 0.047,
0.473, and 0.501, respectively (P for trend = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS-Our findings highlight the unique deleterious relationship of
sedentary behavior (indicated by television viewing time) and glycemic
measures independent of physical activity time and adiposity status. These
relationships differed according to sex and type of glucose measurement,
with the 2-h PG measure being more strongly associated with television
viewing. The findings suggest an important role for reducing sedentary
behavior in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease,
especially in women.

Abbreviations: 2-h PG, 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose . AusDiab,
Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study . FPG, fasting plasma
glucose . HOMA, homeostasis model assessment . HOMA-%B, HOMA of ß-cell
function . HOMA-%S, HOMA of insulin sensitivity
Gantlet - 30 Mar 2007 17:20 GMT
> http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=14742788&filename=20070328/r
euters20070328health00000021reutershealthewEDIT.xml

>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> and after a glucose test-drink, in 3781 men and 4576 women in
> Australia. All of the subjects were free of diabetes at the time.

So can you imagine what sedentary behavior does to us diabetics?
while like most if not all of the studies posted here.   the amount of
diabetics used is a very small small % of the total.
However posts like this just help motivate us to get off our a.ses and
become more active.  of course if you would rather sit around watching tv
there is another way to lower your blood sugar levels... eat less carbs.
however even that small amount of carbs would bring lower blood sugar levels
if you were more active and enjoyed life away from the computer and tv.

I liked the post.

Signature

Tom

www.TomsDiabeticDiary.com
Chat in peace with other diabetes at the American Diabetes Associations Web
Site.
http://community.diabetes.org/n/pfx/forum.aspx?nav=index&webtag=amdiabetesz&redi
rCnt=1


Information You Can "Trust" From Your American Diabetes Association
www.diabetes.org

Information on Specific Types of Fat.
http://www.diabetes.org/nutrition-and-recipes/nutrition/foodlabel/specific-fats.jsp

Kurt - 30 Mar 2007 18:00 GMT
> >http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=14742788&filename...
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> I liked the post.

Exactly why I posted it.  I thought the title alone was particularly
important in this "Carbotopia" newsgroup where exercise is treated
like a second class citizen.

Kurt

> --
> Tom
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Information on Specific Types of Fat.http://www.diabetes.org/nutrition-and-recipes/nutrition/foodlabel/spe
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.