Preston Rich wrote in message
<3226e388.0310311019.77b4892d@posting.google.com>...
>Since elevated postprandial glucose levels seem a better marker for
>eventual CAD than HbA1c levels in the T2 diabetic, how significant a
>marker may such postprandial levels be in the patient presenting with
>the am fasting syndrome (highest daily glocuse in the preprandial
>morning)?
AFAIK, post-prandial glucose is a better marker than Fasting bG (FbG)
because for most people, as they lose beta cells during the standard T2
Diabetic Progression, post-prandial bG become abnormally high before FbG
become abnormally high.
Doesn't have to apply to all people; it depends on your diet. Folks
who eat diabetic-friendly diets for non-diabetic reasons can reveal
diabetes via abnormal FbG before abnormal post-prandial appears.
The literal answer to your question is "either is sufficient" to reveal
diabetes. Whether either is sufficient to "diagnose" diabetes is a
political question.
Regards
Old Al