Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Capsaicin role in diabetes and cancer, IT'S NOT KILLING NERVES!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 19 Dec 2006 17:17 GMT
Earlier this year, researchers at UCLA were able to shrink prostate
tumors in mice 80% by using capsaicin.

And now researchers in Canada have reversed diabetes in mice using the
same compound.

In addition, Dr. William Wong has case histories of reversing Type 1
diabetes using proteolytic enzymes.

So what is the common element in all these cases? It's fibrin. Tumor
cells have 15 times as much fibrin around them as normal cells. Fibrin
is an inflammatory protein.

So it ought to be clear it's incorrect to attribute the mechanism of
action for reversing diabetes and prostate tumors in mice to killing
the nerves. It's preposterous to think that, in fact. Nerves are
required for normal function. Without them the beta cells would not
perform better but not at all! Properly functioning beta cells are
required for the production of insulin.

To put it plainly, it is stupid to think killing beta nerve cells helps
to produce insulin!

Quite simply, as was demonstrated by the UCLA study on cancer,
capsaicin affects the fibrin. It's not shrinking tumors by killing
nerve cells.

For people who are ignorant of the properties of protein enzymes, they
are able to differentiate between tissue damaged by fibrin and healthy
tissue. How? Chalk it up to the miracle of Mother Nature and ultimately
God.
Jeff - 19 Dec 2006 17:34 GMT
> Earlier this year, researchers at UCLA were able to shrink prostate
> tumors in mice 80% by using capsaicin.
>
> And now researchers in Canada have reversed diabetes in mice using the
> same compound.

No they didn't. They used capsaicin to kill the nerves in newborn mice (two
days old), but they used substance P to reverse diabetes.

> In addition, Dr. William Wong has case histories of reversing Type 1
> diabetes using proteolytic enzymes.

Which have virtually zero scientific validiy. These were on an advertising
site, not reported in any journal.

> So what is the common element in all these cases? It's fibrin. Tumor
> cells have 15 times as much fibrin around them as normal cells. Fibrin
> is an inflammatory protein.

Diabetes doesn't result from a tumor.

> So it ought to be clear it's incorrect to attribute the mechanism of
> action for reversing diabetes and prostate tumors in mice to killing
> the nerves.

Actually, I haven't read the papers for the prostate tumors, so I have no
comment.

For the diabetes, it is clear that they gave substance P to mice, the
diabetes was reversed.

> It's preposterous to think that, in fact. Nerves are
> required for normal function. Without them the beta cells would not
> perform better but not at all! Properly functioning beta cells are
> required for the production of insulin.

That's not true.  Pancreatic islets do function for a time when
transplanted. But there is no nerves involved. If you had bothered to read
the actual cell paper, you would have learned that the nerve fibers were
involved in modulating how the immune system works. They didn't directly
cause the beta cells to do their thing. Rather, they let the immune system
cells do their thing, that is, let the beta cells alone.

> To put it plainly, it is stupid to think killing beta nerve cells helps
> to produce insulin!

What are beta nerve cells? You can't even get the terminology right.

> Quite simply, as was demonstrated by the UCLA study on cancer,
> capsaicin affects the fibrin. It's not shrinking tumors by killing
> nerve cells.

Your logic totally suspect here. It is quite posible that  capsaicin has one
mechanism of action in one tissue and a totally different mechanism of
action in another tissue.

> For people who are ignorant of the properties of protein enzymes, they
> are able to differentiate between tissue damaged by fibrin and healthy
> tissue.

Ignorant people might think that.

> How? Chalk it up to the miracle of Mother Nature and ultimately
> God.

Chalking it up to a miracle is not a good form of science.  Proteolytic
enzymes have no brains or way of  knowing what is healthy and what isn't.

Have a good day.

Jeff
awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 19 Dec 2006 17:46 GMT
> > Earlier this year, researchers at UCLA were able to shrink prostate
> > tumors in mice 80% by using capsaicin.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Which have virtually zero scientific validity. These were on an advertising
> site, not reported in any journal.

He reported what happened. If advertising disqualifies him, then it
also disaqualifies every medical journal that accepts drug ads, and ads
for the latest ray gun for killing tissue.

> > So what is the common element in all these cases? It's fibrin. Tumor
> > cells have 15 times as much fibrin around them as normal cells. Fibrin
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Actually, I haven't read the papers for the prostate tumors, so I have no
> comment.

Try using the brain God gave you. When a cell has 15 times the fibrin
content surrounding it, and the tumor shrinks, try to put on your
thinking cap.

> For the diabetes, it is clear that they gave substance P to mice, the
> diabetes was reversed.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> cause the beta cells to do their thing. Rather, they let the immune system
> cells do their thing, that is, let the beta cells alone.

It would take a person who thinks severing feet is better than $37 to
reverse the pathology in minutes to argue that dead nerve cells help
the body to produce insulin.

BTW, the researchers are surmising what they think happened. But that
part makes no sense...you don't produce insulin by killing nerve cells.
That's so obvious that a child could understand it. But if you perfer
the saw to sense, you'll argue anything.

> > To put it plainly, it is stupid to think killing beta nerve cells helps
> > to produce insulin!
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Jeff

Of course there is a chemical reason why porotein enzymes differentiate
between fibrosis and healthy tissue. Dr. Wong provides his reasoning at
his website.
Jeff - 19 Dec 2006 18:26 GMT
>> > Earlier this year, researchers at UCLA were able to shrink prostate
>> > tumors in mice 80% by using capsaicin.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> also disaqualifies every medical journal that accepts drug ads, and ads
> for the latest ray gun for killing tissue.

There is a large difference between a peer-reviewed journal like JAMA that
accepts advertising and testimonials on a website selling things.

>> > So what is the common element in all these cases? It's fibrin. Tumor
>> > cells have 15 times as much fibrin around them as normal cells. Fibrin
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> content surrounding it, and the tumor shrinks, try to put on your
> thinking cap.

Can you provide evidence that cells have fibrin around them? Fibrin is
primarily a protein in the blood that makes clots.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibrin None of the literature searches I did
showed fibrin acting outside of blood clotting.

Fifteen times zero is still zero.

>> For the diabetes, it is clear that they gave substance P to mice, the
>> diabetes was reversed.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> reverse the pathology in minutes to argue that dead nerve cells help
> the body to produce insulin.

I have never argued that dead nerve cells help the body.

The researchers found that killing off the nerve cells helped prevent the
inflammation that causes type I diabetes. And  that substance P restored a
more normal immune functioning in the pancreas.

If spending $37 reverses pathology, please prove it.

> BTW, the researchers are surmising what they think happened. But that
> part makes no sense...you don't produce insulin by killing nerve cells.

Of course you don't. Rather, you don't produce insulin by having an immune
system that attacks the pancreas (specifically the islets with the beta
cells). Somehow, the nerve cells contribute to this. By killing the nerver
cells in babies (two-day old mice) with capsaicin, you prevent the nerve
cells from stimulating the immune system or whatever the nerve cells do. In
addition, if you are able to restore a more  normal funcioning of the nerve
cell balance, as substance P does, you are able to reverse some of the
inflammation and help restore nerve cell function.

> That's so obvious that a child could understand it. But if you perfer
> the saw to sense, you'll argue anything.

I only aruge when I have evidence to back me up.

>> > To put it plainly, it is stupid to think killing beta nerve cells helps
>> > to produce insulin!
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> between fibrosis and healthy tissue. Dr. Wong provides his reasoning at
> his website.

And his reasoning is suspect. However, it is good enough to get people to
send him money for unproven treatments.

He hasn't shown that the enzymes are active in the human, are absorbed in
the human or the activity of the enzymes is useful

Until you are able to demonstrate anything useful, I will not reply to you
again in this thread.

Jeff

Jeff
awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 06:00 GMT
> >> > Earlier this year, researchers at UCLA were able to shrink prostate
> >> > tumors in mice 80% by using capsaicin.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>There is a large difference between a peer-reviewed journal like JAMA that
>accepts advertising and testimonials on a website selling things.

The LARGE DIFFERENCE is about a BILLION DOLLARS.

> >> > So what is the common element in all these cases? It's fibrin. Tumor
> >> > cells have 15 times as much fibrin around them as normal cells. Fibrin
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibrin None of the literature searches I did
> showed fibrin acting outside of blood clotting.

Fibrin is present just about anywhere there's excess inflammation.

> Fifteen times zero is still zero.

Zero is the number of diabetics you've cured.

> >> For the diabetes, it is clear that they gave substance P to mice, the
> >> diabetes was reversed.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> I have never argued that dead nerve cells help the body.

And severed feet don't cure diabetes either.

> The researchers found that killing off the nerve cells helped prevent the
> inflammation that causes type I diabetes. And  that substance P restored a
> more normal immune functioning in the pancreas.

Wrong. The researchers SURMISED that the capsaicin killed off nerve
cells.

> If spending $37 reverses pathology, please prove it.

How stupid is that question! Your question is akin to saying that the
sun didn't rise today because it was not published in a peer review
journal. Meanwhile the customer's gastric paralysis no longer bothers
her, and she is able to control her severe neuropathy with sublingual
B-12 (5,000 mcg 2x day.)

> > BTW, the researchers are surmising what they think happened. But that
> > part makes no sense...you don't produce insulin by killing nerve cells.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> cell balance, as substance P does, you are able to reverse some of the
> inflammation and help restore nerve cell function.

Compound surmising does not total one fact.

> > That's so obvious that a child could understand it. But if you prefer
> > the saw to sense, you'll argue anything.
>
> I only aruge when I have evidence to back me up.

> >> > To put it plainly, it is stupid to think killing beta nerve cells helps
> >> > to produce insulin!
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> And his reasoning is suspect. However, it is good enough to get people to
> send him money for unproven treatments.

Anyone can "suspect." It means nothing to say something is suspect. All
it means is you doubt it. Big effing deal. No one cares about your
doubts. They do care when someone gets results. Wong got unexpected
results, which he has written down.

When you get results other than "Here's your wheel chair, now that I've
cut off your legs" come talk to me.

> He hasn't shown that the enzymes are active in the human, are absorbed in
> the human or the activity of the enzymes is useful

My gawd you're dense. Dr. Wong said the results were unexpected. He
never thought the results that took place could take place. He's
relating case histories where all the answers are known yet.

Meanwhile, he's got two Type 1 Diabetics who are doing extraordinarily
well, including one whose disease is gone...after 50 years...

Tell us oh wise one, how did this happen?

> Until you are able to demonstrate anything useful, I will not reply to you
> again in this thread.

You won't be missed.

> Jeff
Ma¢k - 19 Dec 2006 23:03 GMT
[Default] On 19 Dec 2006 09:17:53 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
into the madness of usenet:

researchers have cured diabetes and many others diseases in mice for
decades using many different treatments.  The thing is, in the case of
diabetes, not one mouse cure has ever cured a human.  Cure a human and
give us real hope, some of us are just plane over the hype.

this message not cross posted to non diabetic groups.

Signature

Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
http://www.pandora.com  enter "Jason & Demarco"

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o ô)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
             ....Bilbo Baggins

DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me
offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it.
If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to
me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
.

awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 20 Dec 2006 06:04 GMT
> [Default] On 19 Dec 2006 09:17:53 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
> into the madness of usenet:
>
> researchers have cured diabetes and many others diseases in mice for
> decades using many different treatments.  The thing is, in the case of
> diabetes, not one mouse cure has ever cured a human.

You'll never see a cure so long as they try to make drug instead of
using the natural substances that do cure diabetes every day.

>Cure a human and
> give us real hope, some of us are just plane over the hype.

You obviously missed the link to Dr. Wong's results. He DID cure a
human!

> this message not cross posted to non diabetic groups.
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
> .
Ma¢k - 20 Dec 2006 06:51 GMT
[Default] On 19 Dec 2006 22:04:18 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
into the madness of usenet:

>> [Default] On 19 Dec 2006 09:17:53 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
>> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>You'll never see a cure so long as they try to make drug instead of
>using the natural substances that do cure diabetes every day.

and yet after 30+ years being type 1, I've never seen, met or read of
one actually cured.

your ;lie is noted.

>>Cure a human and
>> give us real hope, some of us are just plane over the hype.
>
>You obviously missed the link to Dr. Wong's results. He DID cure a
>human!

he lied.  and so did you in that you claimed he cured more than one,
now you claim one.  but neither of can prove it.

you've permanently labeled yourself a net kook, spammer and liar.

Signature

Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
http://www.pandora.com  enter "Jason & Demarco"

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o ô)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
             ....Bilbo Baggins

DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me
offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it.
If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to
me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
.

awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 22 Dec 2006 17:17 GMT
> [Default] On 19 Dec 2006 22:04:18 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> he lied.  and so did you in that you claimed he cured more than one,
> now you claim one.  but neither of can prove it.

You have NO evidence that Dr. Wong lied, so you've made a reckless
charge with no basis.

If you keep thinking that anyone who reports a cure is lying, you'll
continue to mistakenly think there is no cure.

> you've permanently labeled yourself a net kook, spammer and liar.

You've permantently condemned yourself to no cure with your attitude.

> --
> Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
> .
Hi_Therre - 22 Dec 2006 21:32 GMT
>> [Default] On 19 Dec 2006 22:04:18 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
>> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
>You've permantently condemned yourself to no cure with your attitude.

Spammer.
awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 23 Dec 2006 02:14 GMT
> >> [Default] On 19 Dec 2006 22:04:18 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
> >> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Spammer.

You woudn't know what internet spam was if it was served to you between
two pieces of white bread. In most cases, if not all, I haven't even
provided a link to Dr. Wong's site.
Hi_Therre - 23 Dec 2006 15:21 GMT
>> >> [Default] On 19 Dec 2006 22:04:18 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
>> >> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>two pieces of white bread. In most cases, if not all, I haven't even
>provided a link to Dr. Wong's site.

Spammer
Ma¢k - 26 Dec 2006 09:43 GMT
[Default] On 22 Dec 2006 09:17:48 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
into the madness of usenet:

get this through your tiny little lying scamming head, you are a liar
and a fraud and no one in any medical support newsgroup believes any
of your bullshit.

scammers like you are a penny a ton.

Signature

Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
http://www.pandora.com  enter "Jason & Demarco"

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o ô)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
             ....Bilbo Baggins

DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me
offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it.
If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to
me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
.

awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 27 Dec 2006 04:51 GMT
> [Default] On 22 Dec 2006 09:17:48 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
> into the madness of usenet:
>
> get this through your tiny little lying scamming head, you are a liar
> and a fraud and no one in any medical support newsgroup believes any
> of your bullshit.

Diabetics come to my store daily. Over and over again I hear them tell
me how they've been helped in reducing or eliminating their diabetes
medications.

But you know better. You 'KNOW' your disease has no cure. So you're
stuck with your "NO-ledge." You have the freedom of choice...the
downside for you is that you'll reap the negative rewards of your
choice.

> scammers like you are a penny a ton.

And dead diabetics who listened to their doctors fill grave yards
across this nation. And then there are the blind, dialysis dependent,
diabetic Alzheimer victims, and amputated diabetics who also followed
their doctors' advice.

> Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
> Type 1 since 1975
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
> .
Ma¢k - 27 Dec 2006 05:36 GMT
[Default] On 26 Dec 2006 20:51:24 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
into the madness of usenet:

>> [Default] On 22 Dec 2006 09:17:48 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
>> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>diabetic Alzheimer victims, and amputated diabetics who also followed
>their doctors' advice.

you have admitted to committing fraud, you have been reported.

Signature

Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
http://www.pandora.com  enter "Jason & Demarco"

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o ô)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
             ....Bilbo Baggins

DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me
offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it.
If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to
me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
.

awthrawthr@yahoo.com - 28 Dec 2006 02:00 GMT
> [Default] On 26 Dec 2006 20:51:24 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> you have admitted to committing fraud, you have been reported.

?? Diabetes isn't your only sickness. There is no fraud, only insanity
on your end

> --
> Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
> .
Hi_Therre - 27 Dec 2006 14:31 GMT
>> [Default] On 22 Dec 2006 09:17:48 -0800, awthrawthr@yahoo.com Giggled
>> into the madness of usenet:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>diabetic Alzheimer victims, and amputated diabetics who also followed
>their doctors' advice.

Spammer.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.