http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=13925713&filename=20061204/r
euters20061204health00000020reutershealthewEDIT.xml
or
http://tinyurl.com/yyzf4h
oldal4865 - 05 Dec 2006 20:54 GMT
Kurt wrote in message
<1165351457.414561.208710@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>...
>http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=13925713&filename=20061204/r
euters20061204health00000020reutershealthewEDIT.xml
>
>or
>
>http://tinyurl.com/yyzf4h
". . . . .
oldal4865 - 05 Dec 2006 20:56 GMT
Kurt wrote in message
<1165351457.414561.208710@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>...
>http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=13925713&filename=20061204/r
euters20061204health00000020reutershealthewEDIT.xml
>
>or
>
>http://tinyurl.com/yyzf4h
Well, I would hope so.
". . . .The study included 81 children and 81 adults, who had adhered to
intensified insulin treatment, but still had . . . .HbA1c of 8.1 percent or
greater. . . ."
Regards
Old Al
Alexander Arnakis - 05 Dec 2006 22:14 GMT
>http://diabetes.org/diabetesnewsarticle.jsp?storyId=13925713&filename=20061204/r
euters20061204health00000020reutershealthewEDIT.xml
>
>or
>
>http://tinyurl.com/yyzf4h
Sure, a continuous glucose monitor would theoretically be a vast
improvement over what we have now. (In fact, it's the crucial "missing
piece," that, tied into an insulin pump, would result in the
long-sought "artificial pancreas.") But the technology hasn't really
advanced beyond the experimental stage. I understand that certain
glucose monitor/insulin pump combinations can provide up to 36 hours
"hands-free" operation. Big deal. If they can stretch this to 36
*days*, I'd be interested.