 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / December 2006Fired for His Incompetence, Andrew Chung Plays the Race Card
Hey Earthquack, you were FIRED from your job because you're a moron, not because you're Chinese. Why are you so dishonest? ----- Yang a.a. #28 AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division The Bush 'balanced' budget: -2 trillion and worsening The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting The Bush Iraq lie: -2884 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting Having Bush f.ck up my country: Worthless newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's bullshit: rec.art.scifi.written sci.archaeology soc.history.what-if > Hey Earthquack Name-calling simply shows that you are lost: http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/dream.asp > , you were FIRED from your job because you're a moron Actually, it was for insubordination in refusing my employer's request that I falsify the medical records of my patients. > , not because you're Chinese. Correct. > Why are you so dishonest? It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully. This victory belongs to GOD, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength: http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/fear.asp Fear GOD and dread nothing that is of this world: http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/DreadNought Prepare the way for HIM: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/07bc99eb33ac3ec3? May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you unwisely choose to curse HIM as did psychologist Sigmund Freud when he died in excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear neighbor Yang whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love >> Hey Earthquack > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Actually, it was for insubordination in refusing my employer's request > that I falsify the medical records of my patients. Falsifying medical records constitutes malpractice and fraud. You are accusing the people who fired you of malpractice and fraud, correct? http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Falsifying medical records constitutes malpractice and fraud. No. Falsifying medical records is simply being untruthful. > You are accusing the people who fired you of malpractice and fraud, correct? No. It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully then and now. May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you unwisely choose to curse HIM as did psychologist Sigmund Freud when he died in excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear neighbor Kurt whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > No. f.ck! Remind me never to get ill in Florida. Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Remind me never to get ill in Florida. Would remind you to find a Christian doctor if you believe that untruthful doctors (ie non-Christian doctors) are malpracticing ones. "I am the way, the truth, and the life... " -- LORD Jesus Christ Amen ! Laus Deo ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! "Those who reject Christ Jesus as LORD have rejected the truth." -- Holy Spirit Amen. May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you unwisely choose to curse HIM as did psychologist Sigmund Freud when he died in excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear neighbor Kutchie whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > Would remind you to find a Christian doctor if you believe that > untruthful doctors (ie non-Christian doctors) are malpracticing ones. My doctor comes from Sri Lanka, so probably isn't a Christian. I neither know nor care what she believes in as long as she adheres to best medical practice, as is required by the law here in the civilised UK. Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > My doctor comes from Sri Lanka, so probably isn't a Christian. With GOD, it is possible that she is Christian. > I neither know nor care what she believes in as long as she adheres to > best medical practice, as is required by the law here in the civilised > UK. Without the truth, there will be only opinions about what is the best medical practice. "I am the way, the truth, and the life... " -- LORD Jesus Christ Amen ! Laus Deo ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you unwisely choose to curse HIM as did psychologist Sigmund Freud when he died in excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear neighbor Floyd whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > Without the truth, there will be only opinions about what is the best > medical practice. There are many truths in medicine, and, just as in the rest of life, the universe and everything, not one of them concerns supernatural entities. Faith "healers" kill people on a regular basis for this very reason. Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > There are many truths in medicine, and, just as in the rest of life Not for those with discerning hearts: http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/discern.asp May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you unwisely choose to curse HIM as did psychologist Sigmund Freud when he died in excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear neighbor Kutchie whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > Not for those with discerning hearts: *Especially* for those with discerning hearts. But this is impossible for Andrew to understand, because he has committed the unpardonable sin of blasheming the Holy Spirit. > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/discern.asp > > May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you unwisely choose > to curse HIM as did psychologist Sigmund Freud when he died in > excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear > neighbor Kutchie whom I love unconditionally. Again, the blasphemer Andrew cannot tell the truth. First, Sigmund Freud was not a psychologist; he was a physician and a neurologist. Second, Sigmund Freud's death included none of what Andrew has listed above. At 3:00 a.m. on September 23, 1939, Sigmund Freud died in London from an overdose of morphine, purposely administered to him (upon Freud's request) by his friend Max Schur. There was no pain, no anxiety, and no panic on the part of Dr. Freud when he died. One would think that a person with the MD/PhD distinction might know the effects of morphine upon the human brain. If Andrew does know this information, then he has demonstrated that he is a liar. If he does not know this information, then he has demonstrated that either (a) he is incompetent, or (b) he is reaping a harvest of confusion from his recent rejection of the Holy Spirit. Such is the reward that blasphemers, such as Andrew, reap when the utterly reject the Holy Spirit: they will employ lies, and they will sink into despair and confusion. Let no one steal your hope! Especially not the blasphemer Andrew Chung. > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > > > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > is incompetent, or (b) he is reaping a harvest of confusion from his > recent rejection of the Holy Spirit. Or, he isn't who he says he is. Convicted false teacher MWPhelps wrote: > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: > > > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > *Especially* for those with discerning hearts. You would be the furthest from knowing: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? > Convicted false teacher MWPhelps wrote: > > > Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > You would be the furthest from knowing: Notice here that Andrew (in a desperate act of COWARDICE) has AGAIN snipped away the portion of the post which demonstrates one of three things: that he is (a) a liar, or (b) incompetent, or (c) reaping the confusion due him because of his utter rejection of the Holy Spirit. Here is that portion again (although Andrew has neither the courage nor the integrity to address it, as already demonstrated): <Second, Sigmund Freud's death included none of what Andrew has listed above. At 3:00 a.m. on September 23, 1939, Sigmund Freud died in London from an overdose of morphine, purposely administered to him (upon Freud's request) by his friend Max Schur. There was no pain, no anxiety, and no panic on the part of Dr. Freud when he died. One would think that a person with the MD/PhD distinction might know the effects of morphine upon the human brain. If Andrew does know this information, then he has demonstrated that he is a liar. If he does not know this information, then he has demonstrated that either (a) he is incompetent, or (b) he is reaping a harvest of confusion from his recent rejection of the Holy Spirit. Such is the reward that blasphemers, such as Andrew, reap when they utterly reject the Holy Spirit: they will employ lies, and they will sink into despair and confusion. Let no one steal your hope! Especially not the blasphemer Andrew Chung.> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? pastor who? >> Convicted neighbor Kutchie wrote: >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > entities. Faith "healers" kill people on a regular basis for this very > reason. > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Falsifying medical records is simply being untruthful. Bullshit. Medical records are important in terms of what has been done to the patient and what his medical problems are. Falsified records, unless the patient has died, may lead to doing or not doing something, that could result in harm. You are as full of sh.t about professional matters as you are about your religious fantasies. You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical jesus. > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Bullshit. Your use of profanity simply shows that you remain convicted. > Medical records are important in terms of what has been done to the patient > and what his medical problems are. Correct. > Falsified records, unless the patient has died, may lead to doing or not > doing something, that could result in harm. Correct. Until this harm happens, there is no malpractice. Truth is simple. Your embarrassing yourself is an adverse reaction to the awesome power of intercessory prayers made by the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ lifting up those whom have been convicted by the Holy Spirit: http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you unwisely choose to curse HIM as did psychologist Sigmund Freud when he died in excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear neighbor Cm whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Until this harm happens, there is no malpractice. Notice, dear readers, how this works for Andrew Chung: ethical code violations are irrelevant unless "malpractice" occurs. In other words, it's only unethical if it's caught. > Truth is simple. And yet Andrew cannot grasp the concept of medical ethics. > Your embarrassing yourself is an adverse reaction to the awesome power > of intercessory prayers made by the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > excruciating pain, overwhelming anxiety, and teeth gnashing panic) dear > neighbor Cm whom I love unconditionally. Again, the blasphemer Andrew cannot tell the truth. First, Sigmund Freud was not a psychologist; he was a physician and a neurologist. Second, Sigmund Freud's death included none of what Andrew has listed above. At 3:00 a.m. on September 23, 1939, Sigmund Freud died in London from an overdose of morphine, purposely administered to him (upon Freud's request) by his friend Max Schur. There was no pain, no anxiety, and no panic on the part of Dr. Freud when he died. One would think that a person with the MD/PhD distinction might know the effects of morphine upon the human brain. If Andrew does know this information, then he has demonstrated that he is a liar. If he does not know this information, then he has demonstrated that either (a) he is incompetent, or (b) he is reaping a harvest of confusion from his recent rejection of the Holy Spirit. Such is the reward that blasphemers, such as Andrew, reap when the utterly reject the Holy Spirit: they will employ lies, and they will sink into despair and confusion. Let no one steal your hope! Especially not the blasphemer Andrew Chung. Convicted false teacher MWPhelps wrote: > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > Notice, dear readers, how this works for Andrew Chung: ethical code > violations are irrelevant unless "malpractice" occurs. Accusing someone of malpractice when none has taken place is bearing false witness. Being false is something you have a demonstrated penchant for doing: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? > Convicted false teacher MWPhelps wrote: > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? As mentioned earlier: as far as Andrew Chung is concerned, ethical code violations are irrelevant unless "malpractice" occurs. Notice here that Andrew (in a desperate act of COWARDICE) has AGAIN snipped away the portion of the post which demonstrates one of three things: that he is (a) a liar, or (b) incompetent, or (c) reaping the confusion due him because of his utter rejection of the Holy Spirit. Here is that portion again (although Andrew has neither the courage nor the integrity to address it, as already demonstrated): <Second, Sigmund Freud's death included none of what Andrew has listed above. At 3:00 a.m. on September 23, 1939, Sigmund Freud died in London from an overdose of morphine, purposely administered to him (upon Freud's request) by his friend Max Schur. There was no pain, no anxiety, and no panic on the part of Dr. Freud when he died. One would think that a person with the MD/PhD distinction might know the effects of morphine upon the human brain. If Andrew does know this information, then he has demonstrated that he is a liar. If he does not know this information, then he has demonstrated that either (a) he is incompetent, or (b) he is reaping a harvest of confusion from his recent rejection of the Holy Spirit. Such is the reward that blasphemers, such as Andrew, reap when they utterly reject the Holy Spirit: they will employ lies, and they will sink into despair and confusion. Let no one steal your hope! Especially not the blasphemer Andrew Chung.> > Convicted false teacher MWPhelps wrote: > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Being false is something you have a demonstrated penchant for doing: Notice also, dear readers, that Andrew's so-called "unconditional love" has apparently been withdrawn, as have his "prayers". This has been the case for some time now. Yet, Andrew consistently insists that "unconditional love, even for one's enemies" is a mark of those who are brethren of Christ. Thus, once again, by his own words Andrew highlights his own hypocrisy and further condemns himself. > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? <link left intact, since it further documents Andrew Chung's false teachings and blasphemy> >> > > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts I see I'm first on your stupid website. Again, you have snipped what I said and inserted superstitious idiocy. On 26 Oct 2006 16:56:46 -0700, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love12@thetruth.com> wrote: snip >Life on planet Earth is a "blink of an eye" compared to the rest of >eternity. Here's the post you snipped in the dishonest way of all christians. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES! Let's go there! A billion, trillion gazillion years isn't a nanosecond in your loving gods torture chamber for not loving it's pathetic a.s for being the worst monster conceivable. He's saying 'Love me. I am perfect'. If you don't, it's gas chamber time....; forever. Dung.... I wouldn't go with the moral thing. Your superstition doesn't even have common sense morals. Dogs that lick their balls are superior to christian morals. Please, don't respond. Let me flame you without hearing your Puppet reply. You know... Masturbating a scripture sh.t thing so your followers will suck your cock. Which brings me to something off topic. Considering your mental condition and inability to respond to normal human contact, does your wife suck your cock? I know, this may seem personal but sexual representation and religion are very close. Do you think of Jeebus during intercourse or when you Spank the Monkey? You know.. make one eyed Pete barf? I'm being a scientist here. I'm forming a hypothesis. I think, and have gathered tons of posts from a.a., that you guys would rather make love to Jeebus than your wife or girlfriend or mistress. So, admit it. Region is better than sex. Warlord Steve BAAWA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You're an ignorant fuckwit but I don't hate you as much as you hate me. You operate from programming. I operate from being a person. Warlord Steve BAAWA > Convicted false ...Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: You're a heartless, cruel, lying bastard, Chung. But I bet you've got a cute a.shole...such as it might be. > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > False teacher MWPhelps wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > You're a heartless, cruel, lying bastard, Chung. Name-calling simply shows that you are lost: http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/dream.asp May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we can love others a little bit more, dear neighbor whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > False teacher MWPhelps wrote: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Name-calling simply shows that you are lost: Indeed. As Andrew did just the other day, here: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6bb49cbcd5d75f10?hl=en& No more need be written here, since Andrew's own words convict him. >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >>> False teacher MWPhelps wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Andrew <>< Now you're into medical research quackery....heart disease and diabetes. "you have a heart.....I have none" >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >> > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love Convicted? What does that mean, Dung? Is that worse than a 666 or lost or vanquished? How many more of these 'judgment words are you going to use? I know you (ha ha) 'say' you don't judge, and all the mindless zombies that suck your dick believe you don't (ha ha). The problem is, everything you gibber to atheists is a judgment. You think you're god. You act and say exactly what the christian god would say.......... Nothing. Warlord Steve BAAWA > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > Convicted? Yes, you have been convicted by the Holy Spirit: http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts Awww! I didn't make the list. What do I need to do to get on it? Blaspheme?  SignatureSteve O a.a. 2240 "Faith doesn't move mountains- it levels buildings" >>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >What do I need to do to get on it? >Blaspheme? Blaspheme against the physical manifestation of God currently known as Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD. Blaspheming against God under that name doesn't bother Andrew nearly as much as blaspheming against Andrew's own name. Signaturerukbat at optonline dot net Nothing so completely baffles one who is full of trick and duplicity himself, than straightforward and simple integrity in another. - Charles Caleb Colton, author and clergyman (1780-1832) (random sig, produced by SigChanger) > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I didn't make the list. > What do I need to do to get on it? Cut yourself on the sword that is coming out of the mouth of LORD Jesus Christ. > Blaspheme? That would be the unwise way of being removed from the prayer list as has happened to MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin) May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we can love others a little bit more, dear neighbor Steve whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > That would be the unwise way of being removed from the prayer list as > has happened to MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin) Here, Andrew again asserts that I am "CoonSkin". This is due to Andrew's having taken offense at being rebuked through me for name-calling. Because I was the instrument of that rebuke, Andrew employs his sinful mind and falsely asserts that I am the person who was the target of his venom. I am not "CoonSkin". Had Andrew not blasphemed the Holy Spirit, he would have known this. What is worse is that Andrew KNOWS that I am not "CoonSkin", and yet he chooses to maintain this falsehood. As it is, Andrew's own words continue to convict him as a blasphemer, a false prophet, and just plain untruthful. > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > That would be the unwise way of being removed from the prayer list as > has happened to MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin) So much for "As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17)." Andrew's own words mark him as NOT being one of the elect. >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Cut yourself on the sword that is coming out of the mouth of LORD Jesus > Christ. How long have you been having hallucinations about swords coming out of people's mouths? How on earth, Andrew, can I cut myself on some stupid imaginary sword that your particular deslusional beliefs have created? >> Blaspheme? > > That would be the unwise way of being removed from the prayer list as > has happened to MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin) You're threatening to remove an atheist from a prayer list, and you see that as some kind of threat? You really are final proof, Andrew, that religion is for the feeble minded. SignatureSteve O a.a. 2240 "Faith doesn't move mountains- it levels buildings" > May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we > can love others a little bit more, dear neighbor Steve whom I love [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love > Andrew,, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > How long have you been having hallucinations about swords coming out of > people's mouths? Your knowing that LORD Jesus Christ is a living flesh&blood person is progress. > How on earth, Andrew, can I cut myself on some stupid imaginary sword that > your particular deslusional beliefs have created? You can only do what GOD, Creator of heaven and earth, gives you the ability to do. > >> Blaspheme? > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > You're threatening to remove an atheist from a prayer list, and you see that > as some kind of threat? Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin) is reacting to this as a threat: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/97f270f8b1d7aa61? > You really are final proof, Andrew, that religion is for the feeble minded. Thankfully, I am not religious. May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we can love others a little bit more, dear neighbor Steve whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love [snip] Thankfully, I am not religious. Right. Pull the other one, it has got bells on it. > > Andrew,, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin) is reacting to this as a > threat: Were it not so tragic, Andrew's deterioration would be funny. However, it is tragic that Andrew can no longer control his compulsion to bear false witness and blaspheme. Andrew knows full well that I am neither "CoonSkin" nor an atheist. He also knows that I am not a false teacher, but he has chosen to label me as such because I have been used as a conduit for God's rebuke upon Andrew's life. Yet, Satan compels Andrew to write these lies because his (Andrew's) pride has been wounded by the Spirit's rebukes, given through me. Satan is incredibly prideful, and one who has given their life over to Satan --as Andrew has done-- cannot help but react when their own pride has been bruised. In addition to the rebukes, the Spirit leads me to refuse to acknowledge Andrew when he responds to me or refers to me. This, Andrew's pride cannot bear. He flails and screams, ineffectually slinging accusations and epithets. None of these has any impact upon me, a child of the Living God, as I know that my name is written on His hand and my very life is in Him. Indeed, the weilding of unfounded epithets --especially those which fly in the face of the evidence-- is a tactic of Satan and his minions such as Andrew Chung. The uncomplicated fact that Andrew KNOWS that ALL of his accusations are false, and yet he makes them anyway, is irrefutable proof of Andrew's lost and desperate condition. There is no more which need be written, for Andrew's own words testify against him. Andrew Chung is vanquished by Jesus Christ, and will remain so! <snip remainder of pagan Andrew's irrelevant babblings> Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin, CapMack, et al) wrote: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > Were it not so tragic Blessing others is not tragic. You, on the other hand, are most assuredly, without doubt, tragic: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? Blasphemer Andrew B. Chung incoherently blathered: > Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin, CapMack, et al) wrote: Andrew's tragic disintegration into paranoid despair continues. Such is the power of the Holy Spirit's rebuke upon those, such as Andrew, who blaspheme Him. There is no more which need be written, for Andrew's own words testify against him, and the power of the Holy Spirit is evident in Andrew's undoing. Andrew Chung is vanquished by Jesus Christ, and will remain so! <snip remainder of pagan Andrew's irrelevant babblings> >>>Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > How on earth, Andrew, can I cut myself on some stupid imaginary sword that > your particular deslusional beliefs have created? Oh, dear. My oh my.....Chung, the silly xian fuckwit, dreaming silly dreams. You're not interesting enough, I'm going to go to bed now. Prey for me, chung, my boy. >>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: >>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > How on earth, Andrew, can I cut myself on some stupid imaginary sword that > your particular deslusional beliefs have created? Must've eaten the brown acid. --------------------------- Bob, a.a. # 2261 http://www.jesusneverexisted.com > Convicted? > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >Warlord Steve >BAAWA I hope the christian baiters are correct. It will be hell if you are wrong. No, I am not a christian I get tired of the baiting game. It is an ignorant endeavor. We damn well better learn to be tolerant in the shrinking world. We will have to be tolerant to get along or we all lose. > I hope the christian baiters are correct. It will be hell if you are > wrong. No, I am not a christian I get tired of the baiting game. > It is an ignorant endeavor. We damn well better learn to be > tolerant in the shrinking world. We will have to be tolerant to get > along or we all lose. Hi Guy, It is great to see you posting again. We really missed you! Will, T2 >I hope the christian baiters are correct. It will be hell if you are >wrong. No, I am not a christian I get tired of the baiting game. >It is an ignorant endeavor. We damn well better learn to be >tolerant in the shrinking world. We will have to be tolerant to get >along or we all lose. Welcome back, even if it had to be in a C*ung thread. We were worried about you. Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1000mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/ latest: Pompeii, Amalfi, Bari Great to see you posting again Guy. I hope all is well with you and you're feeling a bit better. -- Cheri guy wrote in message <45719b28.14262765@news.consolidated.net>... >I hope the christian baiters are correct. It will be hell if you are >wrong. No, I am not a christian I get tired of the baiting game. >It is an ignorant endeavor. We damn well better learn to be >tolerant in the shrinking world. We will have to be tolerant to get >along or we all lose. >Great to see you posting again Guy. I hope all is well with you and >you're feeling a bit better. Thanks Cheri,I am still peeking once and a while. I just found out how stupid docs are in some areas, but the still collect obscene fees. I still have severe problems but hopeful. I am pretty old. Had a shock when my GP's nurse died. She was a long term diabetic but was only n her mid forties. She told her husband she was taking a nap. He went to check later and she was dead.. This should remind us that diabetes does kill even with good care. She had been on a pump and recently changed, I did not have a chance to discuss her condition recent;y. It was a shock that brought me back to reality. I expect to not be here long. I have lost so many peers. and my phone list gets shorter each year. We need to act like grown intelligent people. We do have a fatal disease that also can cause so much suffering. I do wish to thank the many that have helped and indulged me You know who you are. I do not fell like posting much. A few here can cause problems if you offend them. Thank you for being nice to me, even if I knock some books. I will mostly peek. Guy I'm sorry to hear about the nurses death Guy. It is always a shock, especially when you know somebody, and know their medical condition and being a young woman as well. It brings it home in a hurry that we should at least try to be civil to each other. You've never been anything but kind to me Guy, and even when we're "joshin" each other over the books, I so much enjoy your posts. I think they're full of wisdom, advice based on life experiences, and a pretty good joke here and there as well. I hope to see many more of your posts for a very long time. -- Cheri >I still have severe problems but hopeful. >I am pretty old. [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups >----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- >>Great to see you posting again Guy. I hope all is well with you and >>you're feeling a bit better. [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] >some books. I will mostly peek. > Guy I don't always understand you, mate - but I'm really pleased to see you again. Sorry to hear about your GP's nurse; a lesson there for all of us. Although, when I go - that's how I'd like to go. Having a nap. Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 1000mg, ezetrol 10mg Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter. -- http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/ http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/ latest: Pompeii, Amalfi, Bari >You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical jesus. I don't know about Chung's competence, but my first thought would be that someone recklessly dismissing, even existence of something as huge Jesus, would be the one with a credibility problem. Especially if they're found to be using childish tactics like, fowl/insolent speech, and demoting him from proper noun status by using a lower case j. Doesn't that seem a little silly? > >You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical jesus. > > I don't know about Chung's competence, but my first thought would > be that someone recklessly dismissing, even existence of something as > huge Jesus, would be the one with a credibility problem. No. The person claiming something's existence has to provide the evidence to support that claim. > Especially if > they're found to be using childish tactics like, fowl/insolent > speech, and demoting him from proper noun status by using a lower case > j. Doesn't that seem a little silly? In that case so does referring to Jesus as "something". You've just made lower-case jesus cry, you know! >>You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical >>jesus. > > I don't know about Chung's competence, but my first thought would > be that someone recklessly dismissing, even existence of something as > huge Jesus, Do you believe in Zeus, or the other gods of the pantheon that preceeded the ridiculous jesus myth? It is you who has a credibiltiy problem, for obvious reasons. >Do you believe in Zeus, or the other gods of the pantheon: No, of course not. >ridiculous jesus myth?: My first proof is the hostility against him. 2000 years and people hate him with unmatched intensity. >It is you who has a credibiltiy [sic] problem, for obvious reasons. : I define credible as, one who is authoritive and honest. I'm honest and somewhat knowledgeable, what did I miss? If you will, please tell me what turned you off Jesus, you must have examined it a little. So my childish accusation goes unchallenged? >>Do you believe in Zeus, or the other gods of the pantheon: No, of course not. >>ridiculous jesus myth?: My first proof is the hostility against him. 2000 years and people hate him with unmatched intensity. > >>It is you who has a credibiltiy [sic] problem, for obvious reasons. : I define credible as, one who is authoritive and honest. I'm honest and somewhat knowledgeable, what did I miss? If you will, please tell me what turned you off Jesus, you must have examined it a little. > >So my childish accusation goes unchallenged? No, you still have to produce objective evidence that "Jesus" was anything more than a figment of Saul's imagination, and that your god is more than a figment of yours. Signaturerukbat at optonline dot net "Damn. Looks like all of usenet agrees that you don't have the logical faculties to prove the statement 'dogshit is not peanut butter' if we gave you a jar of each and a box of crackers" - John Hattan to Tichy (random sig, produced by SigChanger) Al Klein Congress shall make know law respecting the establishment of religion, ore prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ore abridging the freedom of speech, ore of the press; of the write of the people peaceably too assemble, and two petition the Government four a redress of grievances. Can ewe interpret four me what the First Amendment reely says$ Notice the words wall, separation, church, and state are nowhere to be found. The separation of church and state is a distortion of the writers intent. Can the press barge into my house any time they want. Dew ewe knead the original authors$ Can you tell me what I am saying to you now? What if their is a typo; ewe can still understand and can still convey what eye reely mean to someone else$ Nothing has ever been written that didn't need to be interpreted. Some people have a better understanding, and can use their own words to help explain. Do you disagree with my interpretation of Mat 5:22 tell me in words so I can interpret what you really said. You know as well as I do that saying the word fool doesn't mean he was calling them a fool. Help me understand the following. (Pay close attention to where he asks for guidance, and again.) 2 Peter 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. Acts 8:30-35 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest? And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him. The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth: In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth. And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man? Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus. Isiaih, written in 700 BC, never mentioned Jesus, but he mentioned Jesus a lot. (Isaiah 7:11-14)( Isaiah 53) "If anyone comes to me, and does not hate his father, mother, wife, brothers, and sisters and even himself, he cannot be my disciple." Luke 14:26 John 8:43-45 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Al Klein No, you still have to produce objective evidence that "Jesus" was anything more than a figment of Saul's imagination, and that your god is more than a figment of yours. Sorry, I don't understand which question you are answering. Maybe a third person will help me understand you. I never agreed any of that, but does this count? My first proof is the hostility against him. Since you agree Saul is reel person, his change of heart will be my second. If you really do want proof the book "The Case For Christ" by Lee Strobel is exactly what you're looking for. http://www.leestrobel.com/ http://www.josh.org/download/pdf/Arguments_for_Gods_Existence.pdf >Congress shall make know law respecting the establishment of religion, >ore prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ore abridging the freedom of [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Can ewe interpret four me what the First Amendment reely says$ Notice >the words wall, separation, church, and state are nowhere to be found. To make it simple, it says "Congress shall make no laws about religion." >The separation of church and state is a distortion of the writers >intent. It's a distortion BY ONE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS of the founding fathers' intent - which is meaningless. How can one distort one's own intent? (The Constitution wasn't written by committee.) >Help me understand the following. (Pay close attention to where he asks >for guidance, and again.) The Bible was written, rewritten, edited and reedited many, many times. What the original intent was is lost to antiquity. The Bible we currently have was intended to be what Helena wanted - a single, all-encompassing religion, with everyone being forced to believe what she believed. Plus or minus a few hundred mistranslations. Signaturerukbat at optonline dot net "If we really know Truth, we do not fear hearing falsehoods or half-truths; if we are not sure of the truth - we shudder and try to shout down every utterance." - A. J. Mims (random sig, produced by SigChanger) Al So you are going to quit hiding behind that "can't interpret" stuff. T/F >To make it simple, it says "Congress shall make no laws about >religion." They put the words respecting, and establishment for decoration. T/F Free exercise means Los "Angels" can't have crosses in it's seal. T/F >It's a distortion BY ONE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS of the founding >fathers' intent - which is meaningless. How can one distort one's own >intent? (The Constitution wasn't written by committee.) The constitution was written at the constitutional convention by committee. T/F It is a distortion. T/F (Jefferson?) coined the phrase in a private letter to the (Danbury?) Baptists. T/F Jefferson was telling a preacher to take heart, the gov't can't meddle in your affairs. T/F Christians are forbidden from gov't. T/F Christian officials can govern according to their beliefs. T/F >Help me understand the following. (Pay close attention to where he asks >for guidance, and again.) You dodged it. T/F That's a cop-out. T/F If monkeys typed it you could find what I was referring to. T/F >The Bible was written, rewritten, edited and reedited many, many >times. What the original intent was is lost to antiquity. You didn't square that with the Dead Sea Scrolls. T/F You examined proof of significant corruption. T/F The Bible we currently have was intended to be what Helena wanted - a single, all-encompassing religion, with everyone being forced to believe what she believed. Plus or minus a few hundred mistranslations. Atheism is a religion. T/F You want everybody to be Atheists. T/F Unity is necessary. T/F Kingdom divided against it self can stand. T/F Earth is a kingdom. T/F You have a right to my opinion. T You have a right to your opinion. T/F Hitler has a right to his opinion. T/F >shout down every utterance." You do similarly by dismissing peoples arguments. T/F >>You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical jesus. > > I don't know about Chung's competence, but my first thought would > be that someone recklessly dismissing, even existence of something as > huge Jesus, would be the one with a credibility problem. Especially if > they're found to be using childish tactics like, fowl You bird-brain. > /insolent > speech, and demoting him from proper noun status by using a lower case > j. Doesn't that seem a little silly? Naw, just annoying.....to? > >>You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical jesus. > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Naw, just annoying.....to? Why the ellipses, I need help with the inturpretation. > I don't know about Chung's competence, but my first thought would > be that someone recklessly dismissing, even existence of something as > huge Jesus, would be the one with a credibility problem. Especially if > they're found to be using childish tactics like, fowl/insolent > speech, and demoting him from proper noun status by using a lower case > j. Doesn't that seem a little silly? "Fowl" speech?! Is that like taking "cheep" shots? > > I don't know about Chung's competence, but my first thought would > > be that someone recklessly dismissing, even existence of something as [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Is that like taking "cheep" shots? I am embarrassed Your comment was clever. >> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > Medical records are important in terms of what has been done to the > patient and what his medical problems are. Even if the patient has died, medical records can be important. For example, it is part of the family's medical history and may have health implications for other family members and the general public. Needless to say, medical records of dead people can have legal implications. > Falsified records, unless the patient has died, may lead to doing or not > doing something, that could result in harm. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical > jesus. I actually work in the medical profession in Canada. Although I am NOT a doctor, I can tell you there here, as well as in the USA, a medical record is considered a legal document and therefore, falsifying it IS considered fraud. I'm not sure that it's considered malpractice though. Dianne >>> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts >>> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] >> You are an incompetent idiot - that's why you grovel to your mythical >> jesus. >I actually work in the medical profession in Canada. Although I am NOT a >doctor, I can tell you there here, as well as in the USA, a medical record >is considered a legal document and therefore, falsifying it IS considered >fraud. I'm not sure that it's considered malpractice though. It's not, but it could be used to cover malpractice, and it's certainly a red flag for someone to look into malpractice if they find altered records. Signaturerukbat at optonline dot net Imagine the people who believe such things and who are not ashamed to ignore totally all the patient findings of thinking minds through all the centuries since the Bible was written. And it is these ignorant people, the most uneducated, the most unimaginative, the most unthinking among us who would make themselves the guides and leaders of us all, who would force their feeble and childish beliefs on us, who would invade our schools and libraries and homes. - Isaac Asimov (random sig, produced by SigChanger) >>> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts >>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > Needless to say, medical records of dead people can have legal > implications. If I remember right, you're an MD, yourself. Do you think falsifying medical records constitutes malpractice and / or fraud? > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully then and now. "But anyone who says 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell." (Jesus) Mat 5:22 "You fools!" (Jesus) Luke 11:40 "You blind fools!" (Jesus) Mat 23:17 "How foolish you are" (Jesus) Luke 24:25 "But God said to him, 'You fool!' " (Jesus) Luke 12:20 "You foolish Galatians!" (St. Paul) Galatians 3:1 "You foolish man" James 2:20 >"But anyone who says 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell." >(Jesus) Mat 5:22 Good try Dave, but you're looking at the letter of the word and not the point it is trying to get across. It is possible say certain words and have them mean the opposite of what was said. (Sarcasm) In this case he was saying don't put people down. This morning I said to my mom, that was dumb to vacuum the other day. (Because she new she would be decorating and getting tinsel all over.) I could have said, you are dumb for...She would know I wasn't trying to hurt her. It can get pretty hairy but, saying you fool, doesn't mean you fool. Thanks for listening my very good friend, I hate you. See? Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. (Exodus 20:16) And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord? (Acts 13:10) For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ. (2 Corinthians 2:17) He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. (John 12:48) > >"But anyone who says 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell." >>(Jesus) Mat 5:22 [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last > day. (John 12:48) a.. John 1:18 "No man hath seen God at any time." b.. Exodus 33:20 "Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live." c.. I John 4:12 "No man hath seen God at any time." > > >"But anyone who says 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell." > >>(Jesus) Mat 5:22 [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > me, and live." > c.. I John 4:12 "No man hath seen God at any time." "Because you know ME, you now know My Father who sent ME." -- LORD Jesus Christ Amen ! Laus Deo ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we can love others a little bit more, dear Dave whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love Dave Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. Jesus saith unto him, have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: but he that doeth evil hath not seen God. Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him. Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear. Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes. And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will. John 12:48, Acts 13:10, Galatians 1:7, Exodus 20:16, 2 Corinthians 2:17, John 1:18, John 14:9, 3 John 1:11, Jude 1:9, Luke 17:3, 1 Timothy 5:20, 2 Timothy 4:2-4, Titus 1:13-14, 2 Timothy 2:23-26 [...] > a.. John 1:18 "No man hath seen God at any time." > b.. Exodus 33:20 "Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see > me, and live." > c.. I John 4:12 "No man hath seen God at any time." Not true. He showed his a.s to Moses. See the Old Testament and your item "b" for details. > [...] > > a.. John 1:18 "No man hath seen God at any time." [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Not true. He showed his a.s to Moses. See the Old Testament and your > item "b" for details. jls Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Exodus 33:18-23 And he said, I beseech thee, shew me thy glory. And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee,... And he said, Thou canst not see my "face:" for there shall no man see me, and live....And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by,...and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by: And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my "back parts:" but my "face shall not be seen." Exodus 34:6 And the Lord passed by before him,... am*phi*bol*o*gy An ambiguous phrase or sentence. am*big*u*ous 2. An expression or statement that can be variously interpreted. Acts 13:10 And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord? Join me in shunning this person. Cast your vote here. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.abortion/browse_frm/thread/7c76bb9a2e774ff6?hl=en >>"But anyone who says 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell." >>(Jesus) Mat 5:22 > >Good try Dave, but you're looking at the letter of the word Which is all we have since, not only is the author not around to explain what he meant, we don't even know who the author was. Attempting to tell others what the Bible "really" means is dishonesty of the highest order. Signaturerukbat at optonline dot net "If anyone comes to me, and does not hate his father, mother, wife, brothers, and sisters and even himself, he cannot be my disciple." Luke 14:26 (random sig, produced by SigChanger) Al Klein I'll try to get back to you Monday. >>http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts >> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > "You foolish Galatians!" (St. Paul) Galatians 3:1 > "You foolish man" James 2:20 D'oh! I, Earl Sinclair, have this to say.......I am a very stupid dinosaur, and my name is Chung. > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Falsifying medical records is simply being untruthful. Well, not exactly. Falsifying medical records is, among other things, dishonest. If it is done to avoid tort liability or to embellish medical records to charge for services not rendered, it is fraud. Otherwise, why would your employer require you to falsify medical records? No one would ask you to alter records without some corrupt motive. > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Well, not exactly. Exactly for those who choose to refrain from judging others per the kind and helpful suggestion of LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 7:1-2) May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we can love others a little bit more and HIM a lot more, dear neighbor jls whom I love unconditionally. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love Andrew B. Chung, servant of the accuser of the Brethren, wrote: > Exactly for those who choose to refrain from judging others per the > kind and helpful suggestion of LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 7:1-2) Our Lord's words in Matthew 7:1-2 do not constitute a "suggestion". Christ Jesus gave a direct command there, and continues to give that command to those with ears to hear. Praise God for allowing Andrew to reveal the depth of his disdain, even hatred, for the words of Christ, thus showing all whose servant he really is. Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin, CapMack et al) wrote: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > Exactly for those who choose to refrain from judging others per the > > kind and helpful suggestion of LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 7:1-2) > > Our Lord's words in Matthew 7:1-2 do not constitute a "suggestion". In the Holy Spirit, I know that LORD Jesus Christ has issued only two commands to HIS brethren. Matthew 7:1-2 is not one of these two commands. Clearly you are not one of the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ and remain condemned: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? Atheist and animist Andrew B. Chung wrote: > Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin, CapMack et al) wrote: > > Andrew, clearly demon-possessed, arrogantly wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > In the Holy Spirit, I know that LORD Jesus Christ has issued only two > commands to HIS brethren. Andrew Chung should stick to what he knows. As it is, he is now clearly guilty of heresy. > Matthew 7:1-2 is not one of these two commands. Andrew Chung continually lies, in the hope of causing somebody--ANYBODY--to neglect the revealed Word of the Living God. > Clearly you are not one of the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ and remain > condemned: > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? Andrew's blasphemy against me is forgiven, as far as I am concerned. Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin, CapMack et al) wrote: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > Atheist false teacher MWPhelps (aka CoonSkin, CapMack et al) wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Andrew Chung should stick to what he knows. In the Holy Spirit, I know that you remain eternally condemned: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b2ec2d7e3d655a7e? |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message