 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / April 2006Nixing the Need for the Needle
http://wired.com/news/technology/0,70508-0.html?tw=wn_index_3 For the first time ever, global spending on prescription drugs has topped $600 billion, even as growth slowed in Europe and North America. http://wired.com/news/technology/medtech/0,70363-0.html?tw=wn_index_2 New technology for delivering drugs is doing away with one of the most feared, yet enduring, symbols of modern medicine -- the hypodermic needle. Hi_There wrote: > http://wired.com/news/technology/0,70508-0.html?tw=wn_index_3 > For the first time ever, global spending on prescription drugs has [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > feared, yet enduring, symbols of modern medicine -- the hypodermic > needle. What is this? does Hi_there have stock in the company. This is the SECOND piece of crap promoting a commercial product. AND, neither puff piece mentions the dangers of inhaled insulin On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:44:08 -0500, ted rosenberg <tedrosenberg@iname.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the madness of usenet: >Hi_There wrote: >> http://wired.com/news/technology/0,70508-0.html?tw=wn_index_3 [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >crap promoting a commercial product. AND, neither puff piece mentions >the dangers of inhaled insulin you Hi_There doesn't, and is an actual diabetic who has been posting for a while now. Attack the message if you disagree with it. Attacking the diabetic without cause or proof of the accusation you made lowers your credibility all around.  SignatureMâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper Type 1 since 1975 http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org http://www.diabetic-talk.org http://www.insulin-pumpers.org "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." ...Theodore Roosevelt (o ô) --ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------------- "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." ....Bilbo Baggins Jesus never hated anyone. DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate... . > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:44:08 -0500, ted rosenberg > <tedrosenberg@iname.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > without cause or proof of the accusation you made lowers your > credibility all around. I know that Hi_there is a regular, but a regular who posts fraudulent crap is even MORE of a menace than a typical spammer. I didn't do my standard anti-scam attack. The FIRST time Hi_there posted this junk, I noted that it was puff, not real fact. The SECOND time Hi_there posted this crap, I began to question the motive. The question is Is Hi_there simply a blithering idiot, or does she have an ulterior motive? On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:09:06 -0500, ted rosenberg <tedrosenberg@iname.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the madness of usenet: >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:44:08 -0500, ted rosenberg >> <tedrosenberg@iname.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >I know that Hi_there is a regular, but a regular who posts fraudulent >crap is even MORE of a menace than a typical spammer. Ted this is a group that is more than capable of handling discussion on suspect items without having to kill the diabetic curious about the item being discussed. If you have proof the item being discussed is fraudulent, present it. >I didn't do my standard anti-scam attack. no you did your standard make a false accusation. >The FIRST time Hi_there posted this junk, I noted that it was puff, not >real fact. > >The SECOND time Hi_there posted this crap, I began to question the motive. who gives a f.ck. >The question is >Is Hi_there simply a blithering idiot, or does she have an ulterior motive? are you using false accusations in a failed attempt to moderate discussion. if you have proof, present it. if you do not have proof, this back fires on you, not the OP who is a known diabetic and regular poster. SignatureMâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper Type 1 since 1975 http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org http://www.diabetic-talk.org http://www.insulin-pumpers.org "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." ...Theodore Roosevelt (o ô) --ooO-(_)-Ooo-------------------- "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." ....Bilbo Baggins Jesus never hated anyone. DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate... . >Hi_There wrote: >> http://wired.com/news/technology/0,70508-0.html?tw=wn_index_3 [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> needle. >What is this? Man, you are a real piece of work, a true definition of a total FuckWit. Hey fuckhead, in case your IQ is below 3 or so, a lot of people may want to use inhaled insulin. Nor do many people enjoy using needles. Technology is moving away from using techniques that carve up the human body. If you desire to have your f.cking head up your a.s and continue to use century's old techniques for delivering meds, then that is your mucking business. Don't you stand there as the wholly grail and tell others what they must use to deliver meds. You are so mucked up in the head that you can't see the forest through the trees. Crawl back under your rock your sick bastard. >does Hi_there have stock in the company. This is the SECOND piece of >crap promoting a commercial product. AND, neither puff piece mentions >the dangers of inhaled insulin Inhaled insulin is another form of insulin. Use it if you want, if not, do not stand there and tell other people that they cannot use it. Your head is so mucked up that you have become to think that you are the rule of law or some kind of god or something similar. I am promoting the use of inhaled insulin............................Hey FUCKHEAD, the article is about inhaled insulin. Who the f.ck are you to stand there and tell me what the f.ck I can post? f.ck OFF a.shole. Crawl back under your f.cking rock a.shole. Ted Rosenberg, you are a real lunatic in need of mental care. I suggest you spend some quality time with a sheep or a goat. I doubt you are getting any tail, so enjoy and maybe the mooooooooooooment will rid you of your inner anger. <snip>>> > Man, you are a real piece of work, a true definition of a total > FuckWit. Hey fuckhead, in case your IQ is below 3 or so, a lot of [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > <snip> I think that answers my question Hi_there is behaving like someone who has a financial interest in the dangerous stuff she is pushing. And I thought she was just stupid. > <snip>>> > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > And I thought she was just stupid. I thought hi_there was someone named "Bruce"! they are female?? Dave >> <snip>>> >> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Dave I really don't know, in a message a few months ago, someone referred to Hi_there as "she" . I could be wrong as to gender, If I am, I apologize, the error was not intentional (if it was an error??) As to the meat of my complaint, anyone who follows diabetic meds knows that inhaled insulin was held off of the market for about 4 years because of concerns about safety and about difficulty in dosing. It finally made it out, but it is dangerous stuff, and MOST of us should stay away from it. Anyone who pops off like Hi_there did when confronted with FACTS is obviously a danger. [conflict of interest notice] 7 years ago, Lily gave me a cheap ball-point pen, and, I THINK, a plastic cup I only use Novolin Insulin, and Novo hasn't given me anything. >> And I thought she was just stupid. > I thought hi_there was someone named "Bruce"! they are female?? DIFFERENT POSTING NAME. Hi_Therre is how the person who posts here spells their handle. --Jenny http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control >>> And I thought she was just stupid. >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood > Sugar Under Control ok...you are saying there is one male with 2 "r"s and a female with one "r" in their screen name? I need a scorecard... Dave >>> And I thought she was just stupid. >> I thought hi_there was someone named "Bruce"! they are female?? [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood >Sugar Under Control Noted. The style and method of expressing anger is also different. Doesn't change my response to Ted - but thanks for the heads-up. Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 2x500mg SignatureEverything in Moderation - Except Laughter. >I think that answers my question >Hi_there is behaving like someone who has a financial interest in the >dangerous stuff she is pushing. > >And I thought she was just stupid. No Ted. Hi_Therre is justifiably angry because you made a mistake by jumping in boots and all without bothering to check your facts - as usual; then didn't have the balls to admit you were wrong and apologise. Read that again. Then read the thread. Have you got the guts to say sorry? Don't bother answering me, I'm not interested. If you're a man you can answer him with an apology. Alan, T2, Australia. >>I think that answers my question >>Hi_there is behaving like someone who has a financial interest in the [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Alan, T2, Australia. Alan, I did read BOTH threads of misinformation which the Hi_tere started I also noted that he/she/it is behaving more and more like I rained on it's parade. After the first post, I thought it just wasn't very bright, After the second post I KNEW it wasn't very bright, and had some doubts about motive NOW, I don't think that there is any doubt about motive ><snip>>> >> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >And I thought she was just stupid. FO a.shole We should rename this group alt.support.anger management |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.