How long is it necessary to go without eating to get a good FBG reading?
When I went for a blood test I was told to fast for 12-14 hours, but I think
that was necessary for the triglyceride test rather than the FBG test. For
the FBG test I've seen 6, 8 and 8-12 hours quoted. Is there a definitive
answer anywhere. and if there is, what's the rationale for it?
TIA
Peter
Cheri - 20 Mar 2006 01:08 GMT
I think the answer would be what your doctor tells you. My lab
instructions have always been 12 hours for FBG.
--
Cheri
Peter wrote in message ...
>How long is it necessary to go without eating to get a good FBG reading?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Peter
Saxology - 20 Mar 2006 01:12 GMT
> How long is it necessary to go without eating to get a good FBG reading?
<snip>
> Peter
They say "no eating after midnight". I think that is true, but not
sufficient. I think you need to be hungry when you get up. I say this
because of an event I just had where I ate a beef patty late at night. In
my opinion I got insufficient sleep (4 - 5 hours) and checked my BG upon
getting up. It was 20 points high. I didn't feel hungry either. Skipped
B'fast, got a 20 point high reading still. Then 4-6 hours later I was back
to "normal". (if there is such a thing) I believe that the burger was
eaten "out of synch" with how I usually eat and wasn't really digested until
the next day. When I woke up, my organs finished the job started the night
before. I ate a late dinner one other time (a social thing) and I was up
the next day until lunch time. Bottom line, I feel your system finishes the
job when you let it finish. Eat too much too late and fasting has been
accomplished after that food has been processed, next day is necessary.
Therefore, if you are hungry when you awake, and fasted since 12am, most
likely you are in a "fasting" state. I am interest in what others think
about this...
-Sax
Alan S - 20 Mar 2006 02:49 GMT
>They say "no eating after midnight".
I work on 12 hours, because my lab tests cover a wide range
of different fields - some want 8 hrs, some less , some
more.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg

Signature
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
David - 20 Mar 2006 02:53 GMT
> How long is it necessary to go without eating to get a good FBG reading?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Peter
8 hours. You aren't supposed to eat after midnight and the labs open at
8 AM, right??
Dave
Peter - 20 Mar 2006 17:47 GMT
> How long is it necessary to go without eating to get a good FBG reading?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> TIA
Thanks for the responses, but it still seems a little vague. Who chose 8
hours and not 4 or 5 and why? Does everyone's blood sugar stabilise by 8
hours? What happens if you fast for 16 hours, or 20? Do you suffer a
liver dump if you fast too long? What exactly is FBG attempting to measure?
Peter
Susan - 20 Mar 2006 17:58 GMT
> Thanks for the responses, but it still seems a little vague. Who chose 8
> hours and not 4 or 5 and why? Does everyone's blood sugar stabilise by 8
> hours? What happens if you fast for 16 hours, or 20? Do you suffer a
> liver dump if you fast too long? What exactly is FBG attempting to measure?
Fasting tests measure your metabolism, rather than the food you recently
ate. For lipid tests, 12-14 hours is recommended for accuracy. FBG can
be done after 8 hours. 4-5 hours will likely be affected by food
intake, rather than metabolic action.
Susan
David - 20 Mar 2006 17:59 GMT
>>How long is it necessary to go without eating to get a good FBG reading?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Peter
A FBG is attempting to measure your blood sugar level in the morning.
If the DX of DM hasn't been made yet, a number out of range can produce
a diagnosis. if you are DM it shows your control. It may show that you
have DP.
dave