Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Urine testing

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Just - 13 Mar 2006 22:14 GMT
I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
testing at home.

Does anyone have experience with using Urine
testing as the regular monitoring system & blood
as an occasional one.

I tried to get info online but am getting confused.
What are diastixs? What are uristixs? what's the
different? What's better?
J.C. Hartmann - 13 Mar 2006 22:40 GMT
> I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
> testing at home.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> What are diastixs? What are uristixs? what's the
> different? What's better?

The common pharmacy urine strips measure glucose, ketones, or both. The
trade names for those strips manufactured by Bayer are Diastix,
Ketostix, and Ketodiastix.

More importantly, it is important to understand what the sticks are
telling you. The renal threshold for spilling glucose in the urine is
somewhere around 180mg% or 10.0 mmol/l. Therefore, the chemstrips are
useless at BG levels below this.

In addition, it takes a while for the kidneys to process blood into
urine, so the strips tell you approximately what your BG was 2-4 hours ago.

The lack of reliable quantitive measure, along with the inherent delay,
make urine strips pretty useless, except for gross screening purposes,
like a Type-1 looking to see if they are spilling ketones, or an Atkins
dieter.

Have your friend explore the Relion brand meter and sticks from Walmart.
They are the cheapest reliable BG products using capillary blood sampling.

Jim
Al - 13 Mar 2006 22:43 GMT
> I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
> testing at home.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> What are diastixs? What are uristixs? what's the
> different? What's better?

Urine ... and its contents ... could be as much as 5-6 hours old.
guy - 13 Mar 2006 22:59 GMT
>I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
>testing at home.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>What are diastixs? What are uristixs? what's the
>different? What's better?

Urine testing was my mainstay in my early diabetic
days.    It only detect the dumping of glucose
in the urine.   The threshold is somewhere around
150.   NOt much real use for close control.

The meters are almost a miracle to people like
me or all diabetics.  The strips seem to me to a
ripoff but we do need them.

My first sign of diabetes was gross urine output.
I had no knowledge of the meaning of the excess
output.   But on a job medical I found I had a plus
4 on the urine strip.

Then we used the cheap Tes-Tape which was a paper roll
of a paper like tape.  The urine turned it from
yellow to  going t black as the detected glucose worked.

For me the meters were a miracle.  The next miracle will be
a non invasive continuous glucometer that is not too expensive.

Trying to use the urine method may lead to complications.
Too high level of glucose.   Visit me to see the results of
long term excess glucose.  not exactly nice.

                                              Guy
                                                       
Julie Bove - 14 Mar 2006 01:28 GMT
> I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
> testing at home.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> What are diastixs? What are uristixs? what's the
> different? What's better?

That's an outdated form of testing.  Why?  Because by the time sugar reaches
your urine, your BG has ranged waaaay out of control.  They are still used
mainly by type 1 diabetics after they've done a blood test and realized that
their BG is way too high.  It is used to see if there is sugar in the urine.
I don't know what uristixs are.  So I can't answer that question.  Diastixs
are used to check for sugar in the urine.  And they are not cheap!

Signature

See my webpage:
http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm

Ma¢k - 14 Mar 2006 02:13 GMT
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:28:25 GMT, "Julie Bove"
<julienospambove@verizon.net> Huffed and Puffed the following into the
madness of usenet:

>> I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
>> testing at home.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>I don't know what uristixs are.  So I can't answer that question.  Diastixs
>are used to check for sugar in the urine.  And they are not cheap!

"keto"diastix are the correct name and they are fairly cheap and used
for testing for ketones.  Relying on urine strips for a glucose
reading is useless for anything other than diagnosing the disease.
Because by the time glucose shows up in the urine it is well beyond
the renal threshold into the BG range where damage occurs.  Use this
as a method for control and you will eventually end up with
complications of one sort or another as most of did who relied to long
on this method before home BG testing became available.

Signature

Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o ô)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
             ....Bilbo Baggins

Jesus never hated anyone.
           

Sarah - 14 Mar 2006 03:23 GMT
> "keto"diastix are the correct name and they are fairly cheap and used
> for testing for ketones.  Relying on urine strips for a glucose
> reading is useless for anything other than diagnosing the disease.
> Because by the time glucose shows up in the urine it is well beyond
> the renal threshold into the BG range where damage occurs.

The same could be said for BG testing. By the time you test at 2 hours, you
have already exceeded your goal maximum BG. The information received by
testing is used to change future eating habits.

Use this
> as a method for control and you will eventually end up with
> complications of one sort or another as most of did who relied to long
> on this method before home BG testing became available.

I would never suggest that anyone replace BG testing with urine testing. BG
testing is far supier to urine testing for the reasons outlined in other
posts. If a person cannot afford to test often, urine testing could be used
to supplement BG testing.

Urine testing tests for glucose in the urine in the bladder. This urine
would have accumulated since the last void. If you void before eating and
test urine 2-3 hours later, the presence of any glucose would indicate that
you had exceeded your renel threshold during that period. The average renel
threshold is 180, but is varilable from one person to another. If you can
only afford to test after one meal a day, you could at least use urine
testing for the other meals. Urine testing used this way is better than no
testing at all. Changing eating habits to keep your postprandial BG under
your renel threshold is far better than no control at all.

Urine testing is very cheap, less than .10 per strip from some sources. It
can be made even cheaper by cutting the test strips in half.

Sarah
Just - 14 Mar 2006 03:44 GMT
> I would never suggest that anyone replace BG testing with urine
> testing. BG testing is far supier to urine testing for the reasons
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> sources. It can be made even cheaper by cutting the test strips in
> half.

Thank you, Sarah. Excellent info.

I didn't realise unlike blood sugar, urine sugar won't go
away unless you pee.
Sarah - 14 Mar 2006 04:11 GMT
>> I would never suggest that anyone replace BG testing with urine
>> testing. BG testing is far supier to urine testing for the reasons
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I didn't realise unlike blood sugar, urine sugar won't go
> away unless you pee.

Sorry about all the spelling errors and not using the spell checker. My only
defense, other than simple mindedness, is I just worked a 14 hour shift.

One more thing, it is important not to wait too long after eating to test
the urine. If the urine in the bladder is diluted with enough glucose free
urine, it might not show up on the test strip. When using this method, the
percentage of glucose in the urine is of no importance, any glucose (even a
trace) would indicate an excursion of BG above the renal threshold.

Sarah
Just - 14 Mar 2006 04:24 GMT
>> Thank you, Sarah. Excellent info.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> importance, any glucose (even a trace) would indicate an excursion of
> BG above the renal threshold.

So what do you recommend? One hour after the first bite?
One after completion of meal? Or earlier or later?
Alan S - 14 Mar 2006 05:05 GMT
>So what do you recommend? One hour after the first bite?
>One after completion of meal? Or earlier or later?

Apologies to asd.uk readers. Repeating myself.

Hi All

It's not one hour, or two, or 90 minutes. It's when you
consistently find is the timing of your personal peak spike
in my opinion.

You may have to test at all of those times to find that out.
You will also find that some foods, usually high GI without
fat, will spike earlier and some, usually low-GI or with a
higher fat content, will spike later. But you will find from
trial and error that you are reasonably consistent in your
post-prandial peak time.

Mine is about an hour after my last bite. At two hours I am
usually back to "rest" under 6. Others find it is up to two
hours or somewhere between. Some time it from the first
bite.

It doesn't really matter - find yours.

Use http://jennifer.flyingrat.net/ to do that.

I tend to recommend tests at one and two hours to newbies -
simply to find that peak. Once they know it, they can drop
the extra test. If they can only afford one test
post-prandially, that's when I recommend 90 minutes.

Cheers Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

I have no medical qualifications beyond my own experience.
Choose your advisers carefully, because experience can be
an expensive teacher.

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Just - 14 Mar 2006 05:35 GMT
>> So what do you recommend? One hour after the first bite?
>> One after completion of meal? Or earlier or later?
>>
> Apologies to asd.uk readers. Repeating myself.
>
> Hi All

[snip stuff]

It's a good idea to read the post(s) before replying.
We are talking about urine testing not blood testing.
Alan S - 14 Mar 2006 08:37 GMT
>It's a good idea to read the post(s) before replying.
>We are talking about urine testing not blood testing.

Fair enough.  I stand corrected.

Thanks for the gracious reminder.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Ma¢k - 14 Mar 2006 20:44 GMT
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:23:48 -0800, "Sarah"
<sarahpa1980nospam@yahoo.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the
madness of usenet:

>> "keto"diastix are the correct name and they are fairly cheap and used
>> for testing for ketones.  Relying on urine strips for a glucose
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>have already exceeded your goal maximum BG. The information received by
>testing is used to change future eating habits.

No.  Unless you are a type 2 controlled diet and exercise alone.

>Use this
>> as a method for control and you will eventually end up with
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>Sarah

so of they only get their BG down to say 160 it most likely won't show
in the urine tests.  However if the 1 BG test per day or every few
days is at a time when the BG is below 140 for a short time, then all
the collected data the individual is relying is worthless.

Signature

Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o ô)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
             ....Bilbo Baggins

Jesus never hated anyone.
           

Sarah - 14 Mar 2006 22:27 GMT
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:23:48 -0800, "Sarah"
> <sarahpa1980nospam@yahoo.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> days is at a time when the BG is below 140 for a short time, then all
> the collected data the individual is relying is worthless.

Mack, I had thought the OP was referring to a friend that was a T2. After
reading it again, this was not made clear.

My only point was that if done right, urine testing was better than not
testing at all; for a T2.

It is a shame that in the US a person would not be able to manage their
disease because of cost.  The government squanders billions on foolishness
that only benefit a few of their insiders. It is so depressing to see
hundreds of illegals being given free treatment while citizens are literally
dying for lack of health care. It is as though the government don't care
about its own citizens.

Sarah
Ma¢k - 14 Mar 2006 22:43 GMT
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:27:44 -0800, "Sarah"
<sarahpa1980nospam@yahoo.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the
madness of usenet:

>Mack, I had thought the OP was referring to a friend that was a T2. After
>reading it again, this was not made clear.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Sarah

I think you are finally getting an idea of what it's like in the so
called wealthiest nation in the world.

Signature

Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o ô)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
             ....Bilbo Baggins

Jesus never hated anyone.

DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me
offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it.
If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to
me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
.

           

Julie Bove - 14 Mar 2006 22:49 GMT
> Mack, I had thought the OP was referring to a friend that was a T2. After
> reading it again, this was not made clear.
>
> My only point was that if done right, urine testing was better than not
> testing at all; for a T2.

Huh?  How?  I'm a type 2.  I've tested my urine many times when my BG was
higher than it should be.  The urine tests did not indicate a problem.  So
if that was all I was doing, I'd be in deep doo doo!

> It is a shame that in the US a person would not be able to manage their
> disease because of cost.  The government squanders billions on foolishness
> that only benefit a few of their insiders. It is so depressing to see
> hundreds of illegals being given free treatment while citizens are literally
> dying for lack of health care. It is as though the government don't care
> about its own citizens.

True.
Signature

See my webpage:
http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm

Kurt - 14 Mar 2006 02:38 GMT
> I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
> testing at home.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> What are diastixs? What are uristixs? what's the
> different? What's better?

When I was first diagnosed over 20 years ago I used something called
"Keto-Diastix" and they would change colors based on how much sugar and
ketone was in the urine. Even then it seemd a bit archaic and within a
couple of weeks I had a meter which was big and clunky, but it worked.
I only used up the rest of the stix when I was sick and wanted to just
test for ketone.

Not sure about all meters now, but the One Touch will prompt you to
check and see if you have ketones if your bg reading is over a certain
number (I think it's 250 but I'm not sure off hand.)

Best,
Kurt
Alan S - 14 Mar 2006 05:16 GMT
>> I know someone isn't able to afford regular blood
>> testing at home.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>Best,
>Kurt

Kurt, did you read the excellent David Mendosa article on
the history of meters?

The link was posted a couple of days ago by Jennifer:
http://www.mendosa.com/history.htm

It is long but fascinating read.

It is directly relevant to what you just posted, but is also
related to so much that is cause for debate here.

In that history you will start to see some of the reasons
behind present ADA attitudes, some background on the
pioneers of self-testing and the developing need for
experimenters like us. I think those here who have opinions
on Richard Bernstein will also be surprised when they read
it in full.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Owlyn - 14 Mar 2006 15:14 GMT
There may be programs that can supply someone who can't afford a bg
meter and strips. Check with some of the meter companies.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.