Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What should my goal be?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Saxology - 12 Mar 2006 05:51 GMT
I keep reading but am now getting to the point that I am unsure of what my
BG levels should be, basically, my goal.  By FBG I assume that you are all
saying that this is the BG when you get up in the morning.  Please clarify
this for me.

When I started this trip just 7 weeks ago my BG's were over 500.  My doctor
said that I had to shoot myself up with insulin from 10 units to 30 units
depending upon my BG lever 2 hours after a meal.  The 10 units started at
200 and increased from there.
   Goal #1: Get all BG readings under 200 so that I can avoid the needle.

Then I read that I should keep my BG's between 60 and 160 to be in a
"normal" range.
   Goal #2: Range from 60 to 160

Then I read that a Diabetic in good control should be under 140.
   Goal #3: Range from 60 to 140

FBG, I was told, is unimportant.  The goal is to hit the numbers 2 hours
after the meal.  OK, I can accept that but I see the first stab of the day
to give me a "baseline" for the day.  Maybe I am wrong, but due to test
results years before diagnosis I see that my BG (fasting... I think) was
around 98-100.  Test result parameters show that range for FBG should be
75 - 100.
   Goal #4: FBG 75-100, other readings 60-140.

Then I see that a true "normal" non-diabetic person rarely sees a result
over 130 during the day.  Ok...
   Goal #5:  FBG 75-100 Other readings 60-130, normal being 60-120.

What is the answer I am looking for?  I want ZERO complications from this
disease.  Maybe not possible as my systems might crap out further over time
but I should attain it in the short term.

And, one more stupid thing, my FBG is dependent upon how hungry I am.  I can
be 95 at 7am and be at 105 by 9 am if I didn't eat anything.  So, what is
the fasting all about anyway?  It seems like fasting is just another state
of bad news.  When I am hungry, and I can tell when I am burning fat, my BG
is on the way up.  I have to eat to get it to go down.  Simple as that.

Now I see that people here are taking some small doses of insulin daily like
a maintenance drug.  They are able to achieve FBG's down in the 80's.  Is
this what I should try to do?  I have the vials of juice, which I am
basically not using, in the fridge.  Should I talk to my doctor and try this
if he agrees?

I hit high 80's sometimes, when conditions are right.  I am worried that
having FBG of 80 could mean that I hit a number like 60 if I try to get my
numbers too low.  Meter error of 10-20 could easily leave you in a "too low"
state.  Then, trouble strikes again.  Right now, driving the number down is
an inch by inch game.  A single dietary mistake can add 40 points onto a 100
BG reading so I seem very sensitive to going up but on a solid 96-100
foundation.

So, what should the goal be?  For now I settled on:
FBG: 80-100 (when not feeling too hungry)
Other times: 80-120
Given meter accuracy, an 80 could be as little as 64 and I think I should
stay above that.  Also, a 120 could be 144, with 140 being under good
control I would be very happy.

What do you think?  I don't want to over burden myself but also want to be
in "excellent" control with no complications.  Oh, and I ate out yesterday
at a place I didn't know and with a menu that had no nutritional
information, and spiked a 140!  I was really pissed.

Sorry this was long, but, I need to set goals. Reasonable goals, but not
necessarily arbitrarily easy goals.
Thanks,
-Sax
Diabetic - 12 Mar 2006 06:51 GMT
Hey Sax,

There are some important goals that you should strive for if you really
want to live a normal life with little or no complications.

First, the normal glucose level should range between 80-120. This is
especially true for a fasting blood sugar. When you check you BG 2
hours after you eat, you should try to keep it below 160. If you see it
rise above 180, then you should eat fewer carbohydrates or increase
your insulin 1 unit at a time until this measurement is at 160 or
below.

Second, one of the most important things that health care professionals
seldom tell you is that you need to develop exercise lifestyle that
consist of a daily routine. If you really want to maintain great
control, you should most likely exercise 5 or 6 days every week. By
exercise, I mean that you want to engage in some kind of aerobic
exercise that will really get your heart really pumping for the whold
time. A lot of excercise may increase the number of low blood sugars,
but that is to be expected.

Third, you really should check you blood sugar before and after every
meal and check it in the middle of your exercise routine to help you
learn to recognize hypoglycemia. Of course any time that your blood
sugar drops below 70, you will need to eat the equivalent of 15-20
grams of sugar and then continue with your exercise routine.

Fourth, make sure that your doctor will allow you to check your
hemoglobin A1c every three months. This lab test should always be less
than 7%; the A1c is a test that will tell you how well you have
controlled your diabetes during the last 3 months. All well informed
professions agree that maintaining an A1c less than 7% will most likely
ensure that you will not develop the complication during your lifetime.

There is no simple set of rules that will work for all diabetics. The
best course of action is to learn how your body handles different types
of food; how it responds to the insulin your take; how you diabetes
responds to exercise + food + insulin. Everything that you do in life
will impact your disease.

Remember that every 3 minutes somebody in American dies from the
complications of diabetes. Take care of yourself, and you will not
become one of these statistics.

Hope this helps.

Diabetic
> I keep reading but am now getting to the point that I am unsure of what my
> BG levels should be, basically, my goal.  By FBG I assume that you are all
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> Thanks,
> -Sax
Saxology - 12 Mar 2006 07:07 GMT
> Hey Sax,
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> Diabetic
<snip>

Thanks for the advice.  So far I have not had the low sugar problem.  I
can't get into the 70's.  Staying under 120 is a learning process.  I am
doing it but my diet is a bit restrictive.  Any blunder, no matter how
small, seems to shoot me up over 130.

So far, exercize seems to hold off and peaks that come from food that
follows without driving me into a low during th exercise.  I test right
after, not during.  I will try testing during and see what I find out.  I am
curious, naturally.

One question... the 15 - 20 grams of sugar... holy crap batman!  I am trying
to limit sugar to 1 or 2 grams per meal with the intent to hit 0-2 per day.
Some are just unavoidable in foods.  I would think 20 grams would shoot me
through the roof.  Did you, by chance, mean 1.5-2.0 grams?  Right now, I
carry no sugar with me anywhere.  I figure that 30 grams (120 calories)
might be equivalent to 1 12oz. can of soda?  Is that an acceptable saftey
valve?  Soda is everywhere, I know, I used to drink a ton of it every day
:-( .
Thanks,
Sax
Diabetic - 13 Mar 2006 04:45 GMT
> > Hey Sax,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> Thanks,
> Sax

Hey Sax,

It's me again. I know that the 15-20 grams sounds like a lot, but that
should be qualified. Generally, this amount of sugar is recommended
when an insulin dependent diabetic has a blood sugar that either drops
rapidly below the 60-70 range or an insulin dependent diabetic is
involved in strenuous exercise and their BG is dropping dramatically.
Since a diabetic has taken exogenous insulin, heavy exercise plus low
blood sugar could cause a serious case of disorientation with glucose.

I assume from your response above that you tend to eat high protein
diet as promoted by either Atkins or Barry Sears. I do the same, since
I believe that we have been mislead into eating far too much
carbohydrate. Also, it is normal for a non diabetic to have BGs that
rise above 130 and even up to 180 when they consume a regular meal. The
important difference is that a non diabetic will produce enough insulin
to bring it back to the normal range within 2 hours; whereas, you and I
have to take insulin to bring our BG back to normal.

Can you tell me if you have been diagnosed with Type I diabetes or Type
II? If you are a Type I diabetic, can you tell how much and how many
injections that you are taking each day? If you have Type II are you
taking both insulin and oral medications?

Anxious to hear.

Larry
Saxology - 13 Mar 2006 05:33 GMT
<snip>

> Hey Sax,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I assume from your response above that you tend to eat high protein
> diet as promoted by either Atkins or Barry Sears.

Actually, I am not doing based upon any recommendation at all.  Here is how
I think of it right now, I may change my thinking later:
1. All foods get converted to sugar, so, calories are important.
2. Each food you eat (calories) has a "digestion profile" which your body
follows converting it to sugar.
3. Carbs peak in 1-2 hours.  Proteins pein in 2-4 hours.  Fats peak in 4 to
6 hours.
4. Carbs and proteins are 4 cals per gm.  Fat is 9 cals per gm.

While this is not very exact, my belief is that the area under the curve for
the profile represents all the glucose your body gets from the food you ate.
Your body, produces insulin in a certain profile, which acts upon the
glucose profile in a subtractive way.  Like adding 2 curves together.

So, if I eat 100 calories of carbs, proteins, or fats I get the same amount
of sugar to have to have insulin to counteract.  It doesn't matter what
those calories came from.  So, based upon only this, we should eat fats.
Why? because they give your body a longer time to work on the sugar.  The
old "slow steady pace wins the race" idea.  The next best thing to eating
fats, eat proteins.  For the same reason.  Carbs generate the sugar too damn
fast form my system.  Proteins are better by far, Fats are the best.

Now, if I eat a 1kg of fat I create 9k calories.  If I eat 1kg of carbs or
protein, I create 4k calories.  So, if I want to eat a lot, Fats are bad
news.  I have to eat 1/2 of the amount compared to proteins or carbs.

Therefore, Proteins give me, I think, the right balance of caloric intake
per pound and time metered sugar production by the digestive tract.  If I
have to have a little of the other two, again, fats win out.

I don't advocate eating a pound of fat or only eating protein, etc.  What I
am pretty sure of thus far is that Carbs are out, protein seems to really
work for me, and I would take the fat over the carbs if I have to choose.

I need simple rules that make me make correct choices.  If atkins agrees,
then I agree.  I have never learned the atkins diet so I really am ignorant
on that count.

> I do the same, since
> I believe that we have been mislead into eating far too much
> carbohydrate.

I would go one further... the medical web sites I go to seem to be pushing
the "ultra low fat" or "no fat" idea as the only healthy way.  They are hard
on fats and then say "you can drink fruit juices but go easy".  Go easy?
Nope, don't go at all seems to be the answer my body wants.  They are not
wrong when they say that fats can be bad.  What I think they do is to
convince you that you need to eliminate fats, which leave you with protein
and carbs.  Unfortunately with food, it looks like carbs and fats get traded
off against each other.  No fat = high carbs, low carbs = high fat.  My
limited knowledge right now has me thinking No carbs, Protein when possible,
accept some fat when necessary to lose the carbs.

>Also, it is normal for a non diabetic to have BGs that
> rise above 130 and even up to 180 when they consume a regular meal. The
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> injections that you are taking each day? If you have Type II are you
> taking both insulin and oral medications?

I think I am type 2.  I started taking metformin 500mg x2 per day but went
up to 3x because I thought it helped with my food peaks.  I take it 15
minutes prior to a meal, if possible.  Insulin was used after measurement of
BG 2 hours after a meal.  So, I had a chance to use the needle 3 times per
day.  After 2.5 weeks I had my BG's under the 200 limit for the insulin
injection.  At 200 I took 5 units and it went up from there.  So, I had
incentive to get those numbers down.  So now I only take the Metformin.

I know a guy who takes 5-7 500mg Metformin per day and he weighs a lot less
than me.  So, I think I am in a reasonable quantity for that drug.

Foods that work for me:
1. Pork loin: At Sam's club I can get this for $1.68 - @.19 per pound and it
is all lean pork.  Roast it or slice it into chops for the grill.  Very
little fat (and you can trim almost 100% of it).  Had two nice chops tonight
and it drove me from 97 - 102 if memory serves me.
2. Lean round steak.  Grilled is best, a little tough but very little fat.
Just above $3 per pound.
3. Side salad at McD's with light italian dressing.  Get 2 of these but
throw away the tomatoes - 2 grams of sugar for each little grape tomatoe.
If it not enough food, get a double cheese burger and use one patty cut up
in each salad.  Thaw away the bun, ketchup, etc.  Hey, lunch out for $4 - 2
salads, burger, samll diet coke.  Save one of the salad dressings to use at
home but keep it refirgerated.
4. Hamburger patty, a big one.  Fried or grilled, drained well.  Add slice
of cheese if you must but try to pass.  Top with shredded lettuce, onion,
mustard.  I have a favorite mustard.
5. Sam's club has a low carb soft tortilla shell with 6 carbs per shell.
Use these with ham, turkey, hotdogs, etc.  I use shredded lettuce, onion,
and mustard.  On cold cuts you have to be careful as sometimes they inject
the meat with some flavoring (usually some type of salt/sugar mix).  I avoid
these.
6. Egg and well cooked suasage for b'fast seems to be fine too.

To be honest, even a fatty steak likea ribeye seems to be fine for me.  Add
a slice of italian bread and I have to go find the insulin though...

> Anxious to hear.
>
> Larry

I am knee deep analyzing food to eliminate problems.  I am slowly expanding
what I eat.  I took a pretty hard line on this.
-Sax
Alan S - 13 Mar 2006 09:22 GMT
>3. Carbs peak in 1-2 hours.  Proteins pein in 2-4 hours.  Fats peak in 4 to
>6 hours.

I concur with part 1. From my own personal experiments I've
seen no evidence at all of 2 or 3.

I have seen evidence of modification of carb effects by fat
- and no effect at all of protein from my personal tests.

As it is at the core of your treatment - what do you base
this belief on?

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

J.C. Hartmann - 13 Mar 2006 09:39 GMT
> Actually, I am not doing based upon any recommendation at all.  Here is how
> I think of it right now, I may change my thinking later:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> of sugar to have to have insulin to counteract.  It doesn't matter what
> those calories came from.  

You almost have it figured out. A couple of comments:

Not all foods get converted to sugar, and those that do have differing
conversion efficiencies. Digestible carbs are converted efficiently and
fairly quickly. Protein needs to be broken down to amino acids and
transported to the liver to be converted to glucose, at about a 53%
efficiency. Fats never become glucose, but excess glucose becomes fat.

People tend to forget that few foods are pure examples of carb, fat, or
protein. Beefsteak is about 58% water and 14% fat. One ounce (28g) of
steak only contains approximately 8g of actual protein. That amount,
when converted to glucose, is only responsible for the equivalent of 4g
of glucose which can appear in the bloodstream approximately 4-6 hours
after ingestion.

While calories are important in the proper context, they are irrelevent
with regard to BG. Mixed content meals make the timing of glucose
appearance very complex. For example, 15g of dry toast will appear as
14+g of glucose within an hour or so. If you butter that toast, the fat
will shield the carbs from the quick conversion in the mouth and stomach
by the enzyme (amylase) that breaks down complex carbs to glucose. The
carbs must be converted lower down in the GI tract by amylase after
lipase has stripped the fats off the three intermediate sugars.

A good resource of additional information is:
http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/08366/index.htm

Jim
Alan S - 13 Mar 2006 12:41 GMT
>> Actually, I am not doing based upon any recommendation at all.  Here is how
>> I think of it right now, I may change my thinking later:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
>Jim

Thanks Jim

I like it when people confuse issues with facts.

Why can I only remember 10% of what I read? And that's on a
good day..

So I'd better read it daily for ten days:-)

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

oldal4865 - 13 Mar 2006 15:59 GMT
Saxology wrote in message ...
><snip>
. . .>While this is not very exact, my belief is that the area under the
curve for
>the profile represents all the glucose your body gets from the food you ate.
>Your body, produces insulin in a certain profile, which acts upon the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>fats, eat proteins.  For the same reason.  Carbs generate the sugar too damn
>fast form my system.  Proteins are better by far, Fats are the best.

.

>I would go one further... the medical web sites I go to seem to be pushing
>the "ultra low fat" or "no fat" idea as the only healthy way.  They are hard
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>I know a guy who takes 5-7 500mg Metformin per day and he weighs a lot less
>than me.  So, I think I am in a reasonable quantity for that drug.. .
.(snip). . .

>-Sax

  A few comments:

1.  The U.S. Physicians' Desk Reference asserts that 1500 mg/day Metformin
is the recommended "clinically effective maintenance dose" and the maximum
recommended is 2500-2550 mg/day.

2.  Metformin effects start slow,  build up over a period of weeks and decay
in a similar fashion when the drug is discontinued.

3.  Metformin often causes G.I. distress at the higher doses.    One way to
minimize that distress is to work to separate metformin and carb in your
gut.   The metformin inhibits the digestion of the carb which then ferments
and causes distress.    If you aren't having G.I. problems with your 3x
routine,  fine.    If G.I. problems appear,   think about the separation
technique.

4.  The insulin you are using,  70/30  is an odd,  mostly inconvenient
insulin.    It is only suitable as a supplemental insulin.

It is a mixture of 70% human NPH and 30% Insulin R.    The NPH peaks at
about 6 hours and has a tail out to 12+ hours.   The Insulin R peaks at
3.5-4 hours and has a tail out to 8 hours.   Using 70/30 as a "Corrective
Bolus" or even a pre-meal shot doesn't work too well.    You can experience
high sugars for a long time before the insulin really takes effect.   See
activity curves at:

http://www.lillydiabetes.com/using_insulin/what_types_of_insulin.jsp

A better way to look at 70/30 is the "iron pot" approach.    You dump a slow
insulin into the pot,   you dump your daily carb into the pot,  and you hope
that everything sort of balances out after 24 hours.    That means the user
can see very high sugars for a while followed by very low sugars as the
peaks hit.

The one convenient use is as a pre-meal shot of supplemental-insulin-only
such that the first peak sort of helps with the bG spike from the immediate
meal and the second peak sort of helps with the next meal.   That way,  you
take one injection to help with 2 meals.   That's "help" not "handle".

As a T2-still-making-a-lot-of-insulin,  you can get away with that because
you keep your 70/30 dose low,  i.e. a "helpful' dose.  An insulin-dependent
person would need a higher dose to "handle" the meals and could well
experience a soaring peak at 2 hours and a crashing low at 4 hours,  just
before his next meal.   (Umm. . .been there,  done that)

If you tried to use 70/30 as a bedtime shot so that the NPH component helps
with FbG,  you must somehow accommodate the 30% Insulin R portion of the
shot.    Most often,  that means eating something just before bed and hoping
everything balances out.    If it doesn't,  you can see a higher FbG or a
hypo at 3 a.m.

Probably more than you wanted to know.    Sorry,  4 cups of tea will do
that.    However,  the more you learn about the therapies,  the better your
chances for a long life.

Regards
 Old Al
Saxology - 18 Mar 2006 01:48 GMT
<snip>

>   A few comments:
>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> Regards
>  Old Al

Thanks for those graphs.  That explains a lot of the early results, during
the days 0f 300 - 600 BG's.  I was taking the 70/30 2 hours after the meal.
This might have worked well for lunch and dinner (when eaten early) because
the more immediate effect aligns with the carb intake.  Breakfast post was
always high and the shot after B'fast really couldn't help that because it
was taken too late.  All I had working for me was the residual of the
previous day's shot.  For an early dinner this would have not been much
help, for a late dinner it would have been some modest help.  I wished I had
that graph a few weeks ago.  Also, the pre meal shot is something I wish the
doctor had mentioned to me.  Now, I will mention it to him!  His method gave
me the flattest "through out the day" insulin.  Maybe that was all he was
after until he got the first results back from testing.

I really thank you for the link to the graphs!
-Sax
Priscilla H. Ballou - 13 Mar 2006 20:20 GMT
> Actually, I am not doing based upon any recommendation at all.  Here is how
> I think of it right now, I may change my thinking later:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 6 hours.
> 4. Carbs and proteins are 4 cals per gm.  Fat is 9 cals per gm.

Fats are not converted to glucose.  About 58% of protein is converted.

Priscilla
Saxology - 18 Mar 2006 01:49 GMT
>> Actually, I am not doing based upon any recommendation at all.  Here is
>> how
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Priscilla

Since fat makes you fat, and glucose is stored as fat... well, where does
the fat go?  It makes us fat for sure, some how...
-Sax
Alan S - 12 Mar 2006 08:04 GMT
>What is the answer I am looking for?  I want ZERO complications from this
>disease.  Maybe not possible as my systems might crap out further over time
>but I should attain it in the short term.

Read this:
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

oldal4865 - 12 Mar 2006 14:55 GMT
Saxology wrote in message
<9NNQf.3086$sL2.1431@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
>I keep reading but am now getting to the point that I am unsure of what my
>BG levels should be, basically, my goal.  By FBG I assume that you are all
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>Thanks,
>-Sax

  Some more on Diabetic Complications:

1.   One of the often seen effects  (complications ? ? ) of Type 2 diabetes
is premature heart attack.   You didn't mention setting a "goal" for
reducing the Insulin Resistance which is associated with that high risk,
nor a goal for controlling the all too common "lousy lipids"  which usually
accompany Type 2 diabetes.

One could argue that premature heart attack ought to be your #1 concern.
Gruesome as it sounds,   dropping dead of a heart attack after 5 years is a
much worse effect than peripheral neuropathy at 10 years.     Don't panic.
"Often seen" is not the same as "Invariable" but we have no idea of what
your risk level is (which is why I bring up the question.)

Some lipid targets:

      Total Cholesterol/HDL Ratio  <  4
       LDL/HDL ratio < 3
       Triglycerides/HDL ratio < 3

Some hints:

     High HDL is a lifesaver.   One of the best techniques for long life is
picking grandparents with high HDL.

     High Insulin Resistance tends to produce high triglycerides and low
HDL.

     In folks with high Insulin Resistance,   a high carb diet produces
high triglycerides.

    Exercise helps raise HDL.    Daily is best.   Vigorous is best.

2.  Another common effect of Type 2 Diabetes is a steady loss of beta cell
capacity.    In fact,  that's how you were dragged into our Club.
Statistically,   the odds are that you have lost about 50% of your beta cell
capacity and will continue to lose more capacity as the years pass.    That
all too common steady loss means that bG control will become more and more
difficult until multiple daily injections of insulin  (MDI)  become
inevitable.    One could argue that taking steps to fight that loss of beta
cells ought to be your #2 goal.

You fight that loss by:

 a.  Giving the beta cells as much "rest" as possible

      i.   Low carb diet
     ii.   Reduce your Insulin Resistance
    iii.   Use supplemental insulin  (not MDI,  just supplemental)
     iv.  Avoid beta cell stimulators like Sulfonylureas or Meglitinides

 b.  Reducing your production of Free Fatty Acids  (which attack beta
cells)

       i.  Low carb diet
     ii.   Reduce your Insulin Resistance
    iii.   Lose abdominal fat

If you ponder Goals #1 and #2 a bit,  you'll notice that every weapon you
use in that fight will also knock down bG.

On Blood sugar control:

 ". . . And, one more stupid thing, my FBG is dependent upon how hungry I
am.  I can be 95 at 7am and be at 105 by 9 am if I didn't eat anything.  So,
what is the fasting all about anyway. . ."

FbG is controlled by morning hormone effects which prompt your liver to
release glucose and by the balance between your level of Insulin Resistance
and your reduced ability to produce insulin in order to handle the
hormone-induced glucose releases.    Mine is fierce and lasts from 4 a.m to
about 10:30 a.m.    See "Dawn Effect"   "Morning Effect".

" . . .I am worried that having FBG of 80 could mean that I hit a number
like 60 if I try to get my numbers too low. . ."

Both FbG (60 and 80) are considered "normal" in non-diabetics   though 60 is
much less common.    In any case,  you can't force your FbG much below 80
unless you supplement your natural morning insulin supplies somehow.   That
means using one of the beta stimulator pills or an insulin injection at
bedtime.

Some remarks:

  a.  "You have to eat to stop that rise".    Yes,  but you don't have to
eat carb.

  b.   You can also slow or stop that rise via a small shot of rapid
insulin  (Insulin R,  Novolog,  Humalog) as soon as you wake up.    Novolog
or Humalog will work better than Insulin R.    However, note that an
increase form 95 to 105 over 2 hr is not considered a "rise" by most of us.
I have seen a 100 go to 150 and even 200 in that situation.

  c.   If you wish to control pure FbG (immediately upon awakening bG) via
insulin injection,  you must use long-lasting insulin the night before.
Some examples:   NPH,  Lantus,  Levemir.   I suspect that you don't have any
of these in your refrigerator.

  d.  Of course,  the most healthful way of controlling FbG is to reduce
your Insulin Resistance.   That gives your weakened beta cells a fighting
chance to knock your FbG down into the 80-90 range that normal beta cells
"aim for".

  e.  I interpret the wording of your post to mean that you only inject
insulin at 2 hours after a meal if your bG is too high.    Using that tool,
a  "Corrective Bolus",  is a  fine idea.   However, note that many T2 using
insulin will check their before-meal bG and if too high,  inject before the
meal so they don't spike to 200 after the meal.

". . .Goal #1: . . . .avoid the needle. . ."

Folks dragged into our Club should note that insulin is the 800-lb gorilla
of bG control.   It always works.   It can be the diabetic's best friend.
Don't ever avoid turning to it in need.

Stress or illness can double your insulin needs and for many/ most T2,
insulin is the only reliable technique for bG control in those
circumstances.     e.g.   I had major surgery in November.   I peaked at 300
mg/dL in the operating room (surgery is stress).    They gave me insulin and
"knocked it down" to 268.   (Whoopee)   It took me 4 hours of aggressive,
self-directed insulin use to knock my bG down into normal ranges.

My neighbor down the street had major surgery 3 days earlier.    He spent a
whole week mostly above 200 because the dingbats wouldn't use aggressive
insulin therapy on him.

Regards
 Old Al
Saxology - 12 Mar 2006 18:29 GMT
<snip>

>   Some more on Diabetic Complications:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>        LDL/HDL ratio < 3
>        Triglycerides/HDL ratio < 3

Thanks for these numbers.  I'll see what my tests come back with and set
some goals for myself.

> Some hints:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> high triglycerides.
>     Exercise helps raise HDL.    Daily is best.   Vigorous is best.

Exercise started.... hard to fit in with travel but I am determined to find
a way.

> 2.  Another common effect of Type 2 Diabetes is a steady loss of beta cell
> capacity.    In fact,  that's how you were dragged into our Club.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>     iii.   Use supplemental insulin  (not MDI,  just supplemental)
>      iv.  Avoid beta cell stimulators like Sulfonylureas or Meglitinides

Ok, what are Sulfonylureas or Meglitinides?  Where do I find them?

>  b.  Reducing your production of Free Fatty Acids  (which attack beta
> cells)
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> means using one of the beta stimulator pills or an insulin injection at
> bedtime.

Good news there.  I do seem to feel like there is a "basement" level that is
hard to go below.  Up?  No problem, fast and nasty.  Down?  seems like a
firm ground.

> Some remarks:
>
>   a.  "You have to eat to stop that rise".    Yes,  but you don't have to
> eat carb.

I am really staying away from carbs as much as possible.  Beef, it's what's
for dinner!  The medical community isn't much help on this.  They have a
"avoid fats" campaign that is strong.  If you eliminate fats and carbs you
aren't left with much else but proteins.  So far, if I have a choice, fats
are better than carbs.  They take longer to digest and impact me less.
Carbs seem immediate.

>   b.   You can also slow or stop that rise via a small shot of rapid
> insulin  (Insulin R,  Novolog,  Humalog) as soon as you wake up.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> us.
> I have seen a 100 go to 150 and even 200 in that situation.

That makes me feel better.  I needed to know that 10 points isn't really a
concern, 50 is.  Thanks.

>   c.   If you wish to control pure FbG (immediately upon awakening bG) via
> insulin injection,  you must use long-lasting insulin the night before.
> Some examples:   NPH,  Lantus,  Levemir.   I suspect that you don't have
> any
> of these in your refrigerator.

You are right there.  I have the 70/30.  I guess that I really don't need
these right now but I might in the future.

>   d.  Of course,  the most healthful way of controlling FbG is to reduce
> your Insulin Resistance.   That gives your weakened beta cells a fighting
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the
> meal so they don't spike to 200 after the meal.

This is true.  Note that I have not seen 200 in quite a few weeks so I have
been "needle free".  My 14 day average is 108 and the 30 day average is 123.
I had 3 weeks to get things "in range" and have been free of insulin for the
last approximate 4 weeks.  Other than a few restaurant blunders, I have been
under some control.  Travel is a challenge.  I can beat that one with
education.

> ". . .Goal #1: . . . .avoid the needle. . ."
>
> Folks dragged into our Club should note that insulin is the 800-lb gorilla
> of bG control.   It always works.   It can be the diabetic's best friend.
> Don't ever avoid turning to it in need.

The real reason for goal#1 is needle phobia.  Worse than that, needling
myself... The testing thing is no problem.  I love data, graphs, tables,
etc.  I test approximately 5 times per day.  Natural curiosity is driving
me.

> Stress or illness can double your insulin needs and for many/ most T2,
> insulin is the only reliable technique for bG control in those
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Regards
>  Old Al

Thanks Old Al!
oldal4865 - 12 Mar 2006 20:55 GMT
Saxology wrote in message ...
><snip>
>>. . . .  (snip). . .One could argue that taking steps to fight that
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>. . .(snip). . .

Sulfonylureas and Meglitinides are prescription meds.    Sulfonylureas at
one time were the only med for T2.   Meglitinides came a bit later.  Both
types force your beta cells to more or less pour out insulin.   The metaphor
many of us prefer is "Whip your tired beta cells".

Sulfonylureas:    Glucotrol,  Glyburide,   Gliclazide,  Amaryl,  etc,  etc
     (and combination meds such as Glucovance,  a single pill containing
both metformin and a sulfonylurea)

Meglitinides:    Prandin and  Starlix

FWIW:  Metformin is about the nearest thing to a T2 "Wonder Drug" available,
i.e. mostly mild side effects and a host of very favorable primary effects,
e.g.

    a.   Orders the liver to stop releasing glucose at inconvenient times
(a big problem for all diabetics)

    b.   Reduces Insulin Resistance  (and all the other stuff that goes
with reducing I.R. such as reduces mortality,  heart attack risk,
triglycerides,  etc,  etc)

BTW:   Nobody in this thread really jumped on the Blood Pressure issue.   T2
Diabetes is associated with elevated blood pressure which is associated with
premature heart attack and kidney failure.    Most of us aggressive
diabetics have memorized our lipid panels and current b.p. and pester our
docs if we don't like what we see.

Regards
 Old Al
Alan S - 13 Mar 2006 00:08 GMT
>My 14 day average is 108 and the 30 day average is 123.

Average of what? Fasting? 1hr post-prandial? 2hr
post-prandial? All of the above?

That's like saying that the average speed of a Ferrari is
2mph when it is doing 200 on the race track for one hour and
0 in the garage for 100 hours preparation.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Saxology - 13 Mar 2006 01:15 GMT
>>My 14 day average is 108 and the 30 day average is 123.
>
> Average of what? Fasting? 1hr post-prandial? 2hr
> post-prandial? All of the above?
<snip>

Average of all readings, FBG, before food, after food, bed time, anytime I
think I "need to know".  All of them.  I would estimate my FBG to be 99-100,
just looking at the data.  The 30 day average is reaching back into a bit of
the "bad time" data.  Todays data:
Wake up: 103
Post B'fast: 111
Post Lunch: 105
Pre Dinner: 97
Post Dinner:  none yet

I had a late supper yesterday, though I had lost my meter and testing
supplies out of town, and felt a bit off in the AM.  Therefore I had a higer
number in the morning than usual.  Plus, I took it after I was up for 45
minutes.  Hey, I'm nor perfect, but close!
-Sax
Alan S - 13 Mar 2006 02:18 GMT
>>>My 14 day average is 108 and the 30 day average is 123.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>minutes.  Hey, I'm nor perfect, but close!
>-Sax

Hey - I'm not even close:-)

Good numbers. What timing, after you finished eating, were
those "posts"?

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Saxology - 13 Mar 2006 05:55 GMT
>>>>My 14 day average is 108 and the 30 day average is 123.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Hey - I'm not even close:-)

Close is a relative thing.  The key for me is the trend.  If I go up, don't
do that again.  Therefore, down is the trend.  Pretty hard nosed about it
too.  I went to a restaurant and ordered a salad with "light italian"
dressing.  The waiter didn't seem confident in the fact that the italian was
light.  I blew a 140 on the meter 2 hours later.  I know it wasn't light
now.  It might have been fat free and sugar loaded.  I blundered, won't do
that again.  That 40 points ruined my day.  But, next day, I was back to my
95-125 game.  Live and learn I guess.

My numbers are getting less volitile as well.  This is do to, I think,
better decision making at meals.  Plus, I just get mad until I find
something to eat that I believe won't ruin my numbers.  Also, as my numbers
have hit around 100-110 I find that down is hard, up is easy.  So I really
don't think about going lower anymore, just fighting not to spike up.

And, eating some nuts prior to bed time.... don't know why... but it works
for me.  I learned that on this news group.  As long as I have a small dish
of mixed nuts, 95-99 in the morning.  If I eat too late and dream, 100 - 110
in the morning.  All I can tell you is to keep learning and trending.  Right
now, that's all I can handle.  As I learn more I will get better at this and
it will get worse against me.  I am going to fight the good fight, and lose
some weight too.

> Good numbers. What timing, after you finished eating, were
> those "posts"?

I use 2 hours after, sometime I miss.  I can tell you that if I eat protein
I get curious and test again after 4 hours.  I did that tonight:
2 hours post dinner: 102
4 hours post: 110
I had protein so i think it peaked later.  8 points is within meter error
and finger stick variations but I think if I test enough i will see the
trend and then make adjustments.  Plus, I had 2 golf ball sized potatoes,
boiled.  It wasn't enough to make me happy so I might skip that next time.
   I don't eat like I used to.  I generally feel good and I am in good
spirits.  A bit short fused but that is nothing new for me.  Everything is
realtive, just set a few goals, analyze things, be honest with yourself, and
trend downward.  Right now, for me, this is possible.  Later in life, who
knows, worry about that when it comes, if it comes.

> Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
> d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Alan S - 13 Mar 2006 09:25 GMT
>> Good numbers. What timing, after you finished eating, were
>> those "posts"?
>
>I use 2 hours after, sometime I miss.

Try finding your peak spike time. Mine is one hour, you
could start there. I suspect you'll get some surprises.

Incidentally, in this country "light" refers only to fat.
I've found that it almost always means higher sugars (not
just carbs) and a higher total calories.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Saxology - 18 Mar 2006 01:53 GMT
>>> Good numbers. What timing, after you finished eating, were
>>> those "posts"?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I've found that it almost always means higher sugars (not
> just carbs) and a higher total calories.

I am on the same page with that.  I never believe "light" is good or that
"low fat" or "baked" is good.  As nuts as it makes me look to others, I have
to read the label to decide.  My wife bought low carb pasta that had more
carbs and sugars than regular pasta.  Just a bunch of crap.  I only trust
the data.  And, carbs get traded for fat a lot.  More or less a good trade
but you can't be "fat stupid" either.
-Sax

> Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
> d&e, metformin 2x500mg
W. Baker - 13 Mar 2006 15:44 GMT
: Close is a relative thing.  The key for me is the trend.  If I go up,
don't : do that again.  Therefore, down is the trend.  Pretty hard nosed
about it : too.  I went to a restaurant and ordered a salad with "light
italian" : dressing.  The waiter didn't seem confident in the fact that
the italian was : light.  I blew a 140 on the meter 2 hours later.  I know
it wasn't light : now.  It might have been fat free and sugar loaded.  I
blundered, won't do : that again.  That 40 points ruined my day.  But,
next day, I was back to my : 95-125 game.  Live and learn I guess.

Just a quick tip here.  Don't trust light dressings, which mean low fat,
and often high carbs, as you found out.  In a restaurant aks for just oli
and vinegar adn make yur own dressign right on the salad, adding salt and
peper to taste.  Much safer and here in the US t least, even fairly simle
restaurant (not fast food places) will have these cruets or bottles of oil
and vinegar (of varying quality) foryou to use.  

Also, don't get too spastic aobut being at 140 an hor after a meal adn 120
at 2 hours, these are good numbers to shoot for adn even if you usually
get lower , like many of us, those numbers won't be causing you problems.  

Also, on the beta cell pushers.  Strlix and prandidn are short acting
pushers and can be useful when you have to eat in places where you can't
control the content of the foor, like restaurants, other people's houses,
etc adn micht have hidden carbs in soem foods, and for holiday dinners,
when you are at a higher level of temptation to ,at least, taste a few of
your old favorites.  

Don't flog yourself for occasional lapses, adn don't worry too much about
a range a bit higher than you have been having.  I thik your numbers are
abslutely terrific and many on this list woudl love to have them.  

Also, and this may be important, how long since your diagnoses?  Hve you
had a fully dilated eye exam with an opthamologist?  Eye damage can be
handles and, often stopped or reversed , before it actually affects your
vision, so have it checked ASAP.

Wendy
Diabetic - 14 Mar 2006 07:01 GMT
Hey Sax,

I'm back again. Your message has generated a great amount of good
information. If I may, I would like to offer a mixed bag of information
and strong recommendation from my history with diabetes.

I was diagnosed with Type I diabetes in 1968 at age 16. In those days,
there were no glucometers and the choice of insulin was limited to U40
regular, NPH, and a couple of Lente variations. Worse than the lack of
technological help, there were extremely few health care providers that
possessed any useful information for us. In fact, most of the advice
that was given was extremely poor and the life expectancy for insulin
dependent diabetics was only 20-30 years if they were lucky. Due to the
general ignorance of managing this disease I began to mold my own
treatment routine and have survived for 38 years with only minor
complications that were totally stabilized with the introduction of my
first glucometer. Since 1968 I would estimate that 6-7 million
Americans have died from the complications of diabetes. This number is
probably much higher, but we did not rate our own mortality category
until the late 1980's.

Since you have Type II diabetes, you have the opportunity to truly
manage your life and in all probability live a completely normal life.
Another scary statistic is that 3/4 of most of the deaths related to
diabetes are caused by some form of cardiovascular disease (CVD). With
that in mind, I would recommend one practice that I have that I believe
has keep me alive all these years.

EXERCISE!!  This concept seems to be a four-letter word to most health
care professionals. I can honestly say that in 4 decades no health care
pro has recommended anything more than "exercise regularly".  Welllll,
that's a pretty weak qualitative recommendation. Personally, I think
that these professionals should be ashamed of their total lack of
understanding of real exercise and their inability to prescribe a
quantitative exercise routine. Let me describe the summer routine that
I practice at our local park during each week.

Fast pace walk 20 miles
Sprint 90 flights of stairs up and down
1,200 push-ups
7,000 crunches

I spread this routine over 5 or 6 days depending on the weather. In the
winter, I alter this routine and substitute an exercise bike, treadmill
and weight training. The total time involved in 6-8 hours per week. The
more aerobic exercise, the better. Remember that I am in my mid 50's
now and I still show no indication of heart disease. Only ten years ago
I took up kickboxing and Jujitsu and that same year I earned the state
championship in the senior super heavy weight division. This is
somewhat deceiving since I only weigh 225.

All of my great health care professionals will tell you that I create
an extreme risk to myself with hypoglycemia, but this is a symptom that
simply requires paying attention to what your body is telling you.
Again, remember that hypoglycemia in a type I diabetic can be far more
serious than a Type II diabetic that is not taking insulin.
But!......hypoglycemia is very easy to recognize, very easy to manage
and a lot of fun to treat!

The reason I strongly, strongly recommend an aerobic routine is as
follows: Diabetic men are twice as likely to develop cardiovascular
diseases (CVD); diabetic women are 4 times as likely to develop CVD.
Where I believe that tight control of BG is extremely important, I also
believe that a lifestyle of aerobic conditioning is the icing on the
cake.

Here is another stat that should be a little depressing:  Every year
approximately 45,000 women die from breast cancer (this includes
immediate members of my own family). For every 1 person that dies from
breast cancer, 5 people die from the complications of diabetes. If
diabetes awareness was as publicized as breast cancer awareness, just
think of how many people we could save in this world.

With that in mind, please take care of yourself and exercise your rear
end off!

Larry
Kurt - 14 Mar 2006 07:35 GMT
> Hey Sax,
>
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> With that in mind, please take care of yourself and exercise your rear
> end off!

Great post, Larry and spot on.  Exercise is the natural drug that is
free to all, regardless of their medical insurance:)  I also make it an
important part of my diabetes management.  I wish insurance companies
would cover things like personal trainers and memberships to the gym
since the results of those "procedures" would save them a lot of money
down the road on one of their insured members.  But, luckily, it is
also free if you want to go for a long walk, do stairs, aerobics, yoga,
or just your basic gym class calisthenics.

Speaking of awareness, they are starting to run a commercial showing a
kid eating really bad food and has a voice over of a guy who laments
the fact that he didn't eat better growing up because he has diabetes.
The message is aimed at parents and alerting them to the fact of their
responsibility with what their child eats and the newset (finally
recognized) epidemic of diabetes.

Best,
Kurt
Saxology - 18 Mar 2006 02:05 GMT
> Hey Sax,
>
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>
> Larry

I will work on the exercise routine.  I use to do a lot but then "got out of
the habbit".  Now I am getting back into it.  Personally, I have to lose
some weight.  I would say that I need to lose 100 lbs.  I have dropped about
60 so far, and this includes some loss during the "hell weeks" that
preceeded diagnosis.  In fact, I hate to admit it, one of the reasons I
delayed going to the doctor initially was because I was losing weight!  When
you start to head to your goal you don't want to ruin that.  But, the
non-stop drinking and peeing made it impossible to leave the fridge and
water tap and bathroom so I finally had no choice!  Kind of stupid looking
back at it, but sometimes we all do "the big stupid".
-Sax
Saxology - 18 Mar 2006 01:57 GMT
> : Close is a relative thing.  The key for me is the trend.  If I go up,
> don't : do that again.  Therefore, down is the trend.  Pretty hard nosed
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Wendy

I was diagnosed about 8 weeks ago now.  I clamped down on my eating quickly.
My diet is a bit limited and I chose not to eat over making unknown choices,
but, sometimes you "gots to eats"!!  I slip up once every 1.5 weeks or so.
Usually when travelling or during events where I have to "go outside" my
dietary knowns.

Eye doctor is next week.  I have to schedule the ped guy as well.
-Sax
Alan S - 13 Mar 2006 00:09 GMT
>Ok, what are Sulfonylureas or Meglitinides?  Where do I find them?

Al has explained what they are in a later post; you find
them by discussing them with your doctor.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Beav - 12 Mar 2006 15:20 GMT
>I keep reading but am now getting to the point that I am unsure of what my
>BG levels should be, basically, my goal.  By FBG I assume that you are all
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> doctor said that I had to shoot myself up with insulin from 10 units to 30
> units depending upon my BG lever 2 hours after a meal.

This seems to be a VERY retroactive "approach" (in inverted comma's because
it's not so much an approach as a "drive-by"). We need to use a very
PROactive approach for good BG control.

You should test BEFORE you eat (anything) and inject before you eat, or at
least immediately after you've eaten. Not at the 2 hours post meal mark.
You're WAY too late with the insulin if that's when you're shooting the
stuff in. Of course, you SHOULD test at the 2 hour point, but that's more a
check to see that you got your dose/food ratio correct. If you're high at
the 2 hour mark, then for sure an injection is useful, but it should only
need to be a small one and next time you eat you should use slightly more
insulin or eat slightly less food.

Of course, this is very tedious and not strictly 100% accurate, but it's the
best we can do. Test, eat, inject, test at 2 hours, adjust. Eventually it
all becomes 2nd nature and requires little thinking aobut.

Signature

Beav
OMF#19
VN 750
Zed Thou

mail is beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com (with the obvious changes)

Saxology - 12 Mar 2006 18:36 GMT
<snip>

> You should test BEFORE you eat (anything) and inject before you eat, or at
> least immediately after you've eaten. Not at the 2 hours post meal mark.
> You're WAY too late with the insulin if that's when you're shooting the
> stuff in. <snip>

Seems like common sense.  I may have misinterpreted the doctor on this.  He
said "test 2 hours after a meal".  He said "inject xx for a bg of yy".  The
needle toy has 3 slots for needle accessory storage.  I figured that to mean
eat, test, shoot.  I like your appraoch better.  Makes real sense.

I found that the pharmacy thought that more than 3 test strips per day was
crazy.  They made me sign a paper that I would be testing 5 times per day,
like it was out of the ordinary.  Truth is, some days I only hit 4 times but
usually I want to know at least: wake up, after 3 meals, plus 1 other for
anomolies.  Add in a bad strip or a test strip or two and I think 5 per day
is a bare minimum.  You would advocate 7 to 8.  Since I am, more or less, in
control I think 5 might be fine but if I get more wild on the numbers I will
ask for more.

Thanks for your view on this Beav.
-Sax
Loretta Eisenberg - 12 Mar 2006 15:35 GMT
Sax. my goals are between 75 and under 120 at two hours post prandial.

I test when I wake up and then two hours after breakfast and before
lunch and two hours after lunch and the same for dinner.

As a newby, you might want to test at the one hour period also to see if
your numbers are under 140.  

over 160 is when complications set in.  They have yet full discovered if
a quick spike that goes right down does any damage.  At least that is
what my endo calls me.

Every three months your doctor will want an A1c test to see how you have
done.  Ideally, an a1c under 6 is in a non diabetic stage.  under 5.5 is
even better.  

You have only been at this for seven weeks.  It takes time to get into
control.  It is life changing.

Are you seeing an endo.or a gp

Diabetes is a work in progress .  You might find that once you are in
control, you wll say you have never felt better or been healthier. odd
as that may sound.

Loretta

--
In tribute to the United States of America and the State
of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and
terrorism.
Saxology - 12 Mar 2006 18:40 GMT
<snip>

> Are you seeing an endo.or a gp
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Loretta

I see an internist.  He is pretty sharp but can be a PITA because I know him
personally to well.  A smart guy who will fight for me and what I need.  A
bit of an ego though...

Oddly enough, I feel better already.... more energy, head seems to be more
clear.  Temper is a bit shorter (was alread too short).  Anxiety is a
problem but I will live with it until this Diabetes thing is under control.

Thanks,
Sax
Jenny - 12 Mar 2006 15:49 GMT
You've gotten a lot of very good answers here, so I'll just add one
point worth keeping in mind.

The reason many of us focus on the post-meal number rather than the
fasting number, is that it is by lowering the post-meal number that many
of us are able to lower the fasting number.

When you have high post-meal blood sugars, your beta cells exhaust
themselves pumping out what insulin they can make to bring them back
down. This means they don't have much capacity left to take care of the
background "basal" blood sugar level.

Taking the stress off by avoiding stress allows the insulin you still
make to address the background level.

If you normalize your post meal numbers for a while and still can't get
into a normal range with your fasting blood sugar that is a good sign
that your beta cells are in very rough shape and may need some outside
help.

Quite a lot of recently diagnosed Type 2s are able to get back into the
entirely normal range just by cutting carbs down to where they don't
cause spikes.

> I keep reading but am now getting to the point that I am unsure of what my
> BG levels should be, basically, my goal.  By FBG I assume that you are all
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> Thanks,
> -Sax

Signature

--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control

Saxology - 12 Mar 2006 18:45 GMT
> You've gotten a lot of very good answers here, so I'll just add one point
> worth keeping in mind.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> entirely normal range just by cutting carbs down to where they don't cause
> spikes.
<snip>
> --Jenny

I seem to fit that norm.  my FBG's wre the first thing to return to normal.
As my daily numbers reduced, the FBG led the way.  My old goal was to try to
get "near" that days FBG as I felt it created the starting for  the next
day.  Basically, where I ended one day seemed to predict if I would start
lower the next day.  So, I chased that.  The low number of the previous day
really predicted the next day's success.
-Sax
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.