Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

T2 with MS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Frank - 26 Feb 2006 02:03 GMT
Anyone else here also have MS?

Establishing the correct diet for both T2 and MS seems to be nearly an
insurmountable task. Any advice out there?
Susan - 26 Feb 2006 02:10 GMT
> Anyone else here also have MS?
>
> Establishing the correct diet for both T2 and MS seems to be nearly an
> insurmountable task. Any advice out there?

Sorry you have so much to deal with, medically.

The diet that controls your bg should also reduce overall inflammation.

Susan
Loretta Eisenberg - 26 Feb 2006 03:14 GMT
I am so sorry to hear this Frank.  I dont know anyone in the group that
has ms also but there might be.  I hope someone can offer you some help.

Loretta

--
In tribute to the United States of America and the State
of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and
terrorism.
Russell Farris - 26 Feb 2006 07:56 GMT
Hi Frank. Both type 2 diabetes and multiple sclerosis have been linked to a
bacterium called Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae (CPN). There is a
website at http://www.cpnhelp.org that is dedicated to eradicating CPN
infections. Most of the people using the site have ms. Good luck. Russ
Farris    http://www.potbellysyndrome.com

> Anyone else here also have MS?
>
> Establishing the correct diet for both T2 and MS seems to be nearly an
> insurmountable task. Any advice out there?
Jenny - 26 Feb 2006 15:15 GMT
> Hi Frank. Both type 2 diabetes and multiple sclerosis have been linked to a
> bacterium called Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae (CPN). There is a
> website at http://www.cpnhelp.org that is dedicated to eradicating CPN
> infections. Most of the people using the site have ms. Good luck. Russ
> Farris    http://www.potbellysyndrome.com

Sheer nonsense.

--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control
Susan - 26 Feb 2006 15:42 GMT
>> Hi Frank. Both type 2 diabetes and multiple sclerosis have been linked
>> to a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
> Sugar Under Control

OTOH, quite a few cases diagnosed as MS or ALS do turn out to be
infectious.  Many times, the infection(s) are tick borne and antibiotic
treatment helps.

I developed MS like symptoms years ago before my TBDs were treated
adequately, severe enough that I hadn't the grip strength to open a
laundry soap bottle, and my legs weren't reliable enough to take stairs.
I have no such problems now, haven't for years.

Susan
Jenny - 26 Feb 2006 15:58 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> laundry soap bottle, and my legs weren't reliable enough to take stairs.
> I have no such problems now, haven't for years.

In the past they didn't have the diagnostic tools for diagnosis they
have now and it was diagnosed by ruling things out. But that has changed
with advanced brain imaging techniques. My friend, for example, got some
brain studies that clearly showed the loss of the myelin. To tell her
she can cure her problem with antibiotics would be a cruel hoax.

And Interstitial Cystitis is most definitely not due to chlamydia or any
other pathogen. I've been a dues-paying member of the Interstitial
Cystitis Association for 20 years and get summaries of all the research
on that condition. The bacterial/infective agent connection has been
well researched.  Treatment with a drug that targets chlamydia and
ureaplama is a very good first line approach to urethritis of unknown
origin or prostatitis, especially ones that won't culture, but if your
symptoms respond to the drug, by definition, you DON'T have IC. And they
do pretty comprehensive work ups for that now, too. (Which wasn't the
case when I was misdiagnosed 20 years ago.)

This site appears to have put all the miserable chronic incurable
conditions together in one place and gives desperate people who have
been diagnosed with them another false hope.

In the case of diabetes, a chlamydial infection might raise blood sugars
as will any infection but it doesn't CAUSE the diabetes and eliminating
the infection will not remove the diabetes.

--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control
Susan - 26 Feb 2006 19:38 GMT
> In the past they didn't have the diagnostic tools for diagnosis they
> have now and it was diagnosed by ruling things out. But that has changed
> with advanced brain imaging techniques. My friend, for example, got some
> brain studies that clearly showed the loss of the myelin. To tell her
> she can cure her problem with antibiotics would be a cruel hoax.

It's not in the past at all, Jenny.  Neuroborreliosis can cause
identical findings to MS.  This occurred in in the NIH intramural
chronic Lyme study using sophisticated MRI.  Antibiotics reversed the
apparent MS lesions and sx in one participant I personally know who
refused steroids for presumed MS.  The fact is that there are no
definitive tests for either.  I did not suggest cure, BTW.  I haven't
been able to cure my chronic TB infections.  Diagnsosis and treatment
doesn't equal cure.

> And Interstitial Cystitis is most definitely not due to chlamydia or any
> other pathogen. I've been a dues-paying member of the Interstitial
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> do pretty comprehensive work ups for that now, too. (Which wasn't the
> case when I was misdiagnosed 20 years ago.)

I don't believe I addressed IC.

> This site appears to have put all the miserable chronic incurable
> conditions together in one place and gives desperate people who have
> been diagnosed with them another false hope.

I wasn't endorsing the site, just observing that often, diagnoses are
made due to rule process out when, in fact, there are no criteria or
tests that can make the case to do so.  I happen to have decades of
experience with tick borne diseases and had to research it the way
you've researched diabetes due to my child's yearslong undiagnosed
illness, and my own.  My child was cured with an empiric trial of
Mepron/Zithromax for an infection that no test picked up, despite
presence of all the symptoms.

> In the case of diabetes, a chlamydial infection might raise blood sugars
> as will any infection but it doesn't CAUSE the diabetes and eliminating
> the infection will not remove the diabetes.

Jenny, I have no opinion about chlamyidia.  I merely stated that there
are many cases of chronic CNS diseases that turn out to be infectious.
The most ubiquitous source of such infections is tick exposure.
Sometimes MS and ALS like sx turn out to be TBD.

BTDT, bought the lousy T shirt, been paying for it for decades.

Susan
Jenny - 26 Feb 2006 19:52 GMT
> I don't believe I addressed IC.

But the site did, suggesting that chlamydia was the cause of IC and a
related disorder, chronic prostatitis.

But what I'm responding to in the site is this statement:

"...started by patients who are undergoing antibiotic treatment for
diseases where Cpn has been implicated, including:
Multiple sclerosis, Chronic fatigue, Cardiac disease, Interstitial
cystitis, Prostatitis, Crohn's disease, Inflammatory bowel disease
Alzheimer's disease, Asthma, Arthritis, Fibromyalgia, Chronic refractory
sinusitis, Macular Degeneration, and others."

There is nothing saying "Possibly MISDIAGNOSED with ...." instead the
antibiotic is held out as a cure for the list of some of the most
relentless, depressing, painful, incurable diseases people can get.

As someone who was misdiagnosed with IC, and suffered years of
unnecessary pain and misery, I always tell people with urethritis that
won't culture who have been told they have IC to find a doctor who will
give them trials of antibiotics because they MAY have been misdiagnosed.
But to suggest that people who validly have these diagnoses can be cured
by antibiotics seems cruel.

 I happen to have decades of
> experience with tick borne diseases and had to research it the way
> you've researched diabetes due to my child's yearslong undiagnosed
> illness, and my own.  My child was cured with an empiric trial of
> Mepron/Zithromax for an infection that no test picked up, despite
> presence of all the symptoms.

Glad your kid was cured. The tick borne diseases are a nightmare, and
one I've read about a lot. My mom ended up in a wheelchair for a while
because of Lyme Disease (she lived in an area where it was endemic) and
it was she who noticed my bullseye rash and got me to get the
antibiotics before I developed more permanent symptoms.  I wouldn't
minimize the impact of any of them.  But as far as I've been able to
tell, Chlamydia is not tick borne.

--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control
Susan - 26 Feb 2006 20:04 GMT
>> I don't believe I addressed IC.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> But to suggest that people who validly have these diagnoses can be cured
> by antibiotics seems cruel.

Okay, we seem to be having two separate, tangential conversations.  I
agree that the web site was crap.  I was only addressing the infectious
connection to various neurological and presumed autoimmune diseases.

> Glad your kid was cured.

YEAH, if it had to be one of us...  it was after 3 1/2 years of hell,
and a lot of missed and wrong diagnoses.

 >The tick borne diseases are a nightmare, and
> one I've read about a lot. My mom ended up in a wheelchair for a while
> because of Lyme Disease (she lived in an area where it was endemic) and
> it was she who noticed my bullseye rash and got me to get the
> antibiotics before I developed more permanent symptoms.  I wouldn't
> minimize the impact of any of them.  But as far as I've been able to
> tell, Chlamydia is not tick borne.

It's endemic everywhere in the lower 48 states, some more than others,
but stats are skewed by the fact that docs don't diagnose what they're
told doesn't happen here.  They diagnose FMS, CFS, MS, ALS, instead, too
often.

You're lucky there *was* a rash; most folks never see a tick or a rash,
and almost no one knows that the bullseye is the least common rash in
cases of infection with Lyme.  During the vaccine trials, that was
discovered, yet hasn't made public awareness.  There were vesicles in
clusters, streaks, rectangles, all different colors and types of rashes
that cultured + for B.b during the trials, the least common the
bullseye.  And no clinically reliable diagnostic tests.

Susan
Jenny - 26 Feb 2006 20:38 GMT
> It's endemic everywhere in the lower 48 states, some more than others,
> but stats are skewed by the fact that docs don't diagnose what they're
> told doesn't happen here.  They diagnose FMS, CFS, MS, ALS, instead, too
> often.

Well, my mom lived in one of the very first places that Lyme was
identified in the early 80s and where it was in the news all the time.
She tested positive on the titre test. Deer used to wander right through
the high grass near her clothesline, so it was clear where she got it.
I probably got mine from deer that wandered through the back field where
my kids used to fly kites. For me it manifested as intense back pain
which would not get better and only resolved after the antibiotic
treatment. I often wonder if my subsequent disc rupture had anything to
do with that, though disc ruptures do run in my father's family, so it
might not.

Signature

--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control

Susan - 26 Feb 2006 20:59 GMT
> Well, my mom lived in one of the very first places that Lyme was
> identified in the early 80s and where it was in the news all the time.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> do with that, though disc ruptures do run in my father's family, so it
> might not.

IIRC, I've seen abstracts about disc damage with Lyme, as well as tendon
problems.  There is no part of the body or CNS that is safe from it, and
the illness manifests in each person in a different way.  It's more
common than not to get multiple infections from a single tick bite, so
the variation in manifestations can be due to host immunity or to
disease mix.

I tested positive for 3 different TBDs at one point, after I'd been ill
for years, and even after years of antibiotic treatment.  The CDC
approved protocol didn't diagnose any of my infections.

Susan
Alan S - 26 Feb 2006 21:46 GMT
>Okay, we seem to be having two separate, tangential conversations.  I
>agree that the web site was crap.  I was only addressing the infectious
>connection to various neurological and presumed autoimmune diseases.

I responded before seeing that. Unfortunately, people out to
promote their "discoveries" will take their support where
they can find it, and edit out the niceties. If Jenny found
it ambiguous, others may, particularly if you are
selectively quoted.

We see them so often here - a new or sporadic poster with an
"I've found the secret" book or theory. Some are kooks -
ironjustice, Rich Murray etc, and some are after the cash
like the MLMers for diabeticine etc. All will take any
support you offer and then quote you elsewhere if you give
them half a chance.

Russell may have some intelligent things to add to our
conversations, but it's all tainted by his basic premises.

The only reason he's not in my kf is the need to be aware of
what he's saying to newbies.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Susan - 26 Feb 2006 22:52 GMT
> I responded before seeing that.

I responded before I saw this.  :-)

 Susan
Frank - 27 Feb 2006 10:38 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>  Susan
Thanks for your efforts. I reviewed the bacterial information around the
 web. It seems somewhat plausible, but there is nothing definitive. I
found a pretty good MS diet site at http://www.msrc.co.uk but it appears
to run somewhat counter to what I've learned about T2 diets. It looks
like this is going to be a "challenge" if I want to deal with both of
these little problems.
Alan S - 26 Feb 2006 21:36 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>Susan

Have you read his pot-belly site Susan?
Do that, then think about whether you want to continue
implied support for his hypothesis. This bacterium drivel
appears to be the basis for his entire book.

At the risk of advertising his nonsense, this is the intro:

"There is growing evidence that obesity, type 2 diabetes,
and heart disease are all caused by germs, not by our bad
habits. In The Potbelly Syndrome, Dr. Mårin and I explain:

   * How common, slow-acting germs trigger the release of a
stress hormone called cortisol.
   * How the extra cortisol gradually causes obesity,
hypertension, and type 2 diabetes--the main symptoms of
"potbelly syndrome" (PBS).
   * Why we feel tired and achy for years as the germs
slowly spread through our bodies.
   * How some of the same germs that cause PBS also cause
heart disease (that's why PBS and heart disease are usually
found together).
   * How you and your doctor can fight back against the
germs that cause PBS and heart disease."

I think Jenny's answer was succinct and accurate.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Susan - 26 Feb 2006 22:51 GMT
> Have you read his pot-belly site Susan?
> Do that, then think about whether you want to continue
> implied support for his hypothesis. This bacterium drivel
> appears to be the basis for his entire book.

Alan, you're confused.  I never supported his hypothesis.

Susan
Jenny - 26 Feb 2006 15:13 GMT
> Anyone else here also have MS?
>
> Establishing the correct diet for both T2 and MS seems to be nearly an
> insurmountable task. Any advice out there?
Frank,

So sorry to hear you have to deal with two such overwhelming disorders!

I have a dear friend who was diagnosed with MS some years ago, and since
she knows I like to do research about medical conditions, she had me do
some research for her. What I found was that diet plays little or no
role in the control of MS and that most of the dietary recommendations
for MS are speculative rather than borne out with research. The truth
seems to be that MS is a very difficult disease where there isn't all
that much you can do to influence the outcome and your best hope lies in
new drug treatments.

In contrast, there's very clear evidence that diet can have a huge,
positive impact on controlling type 2 diabetes. This is one of the few
diseases where the results of dietary control can be shown in research
study after research study.

So it seems to me that if you have to deal with both disorders, it would
make the most sense to adopt the diet which controls the disease you can
control--the diabetes.

It's also pretty clear that if you don't control the diabetes very
tightly you  mess up your nerves in ways that could easily be confused
with MS. And more attacks on the nerves seem like the last thing you
need. So again, keeping blood sugars in normal range to avoid further
nerve damage seems like something you really want to do for yourself.
I've documented the blood sugar relationship to nerve damage on my web
site below (on the page titled "Research Connecting Organ Damage with
Blood Sugar Level")

Good luck!!!!!!

--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control
Gerry - 26 Feb 2006 16:04 GMT
>> Anyone else here also have MS?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>that much you can do to influence the outcome and your best hope lies in
>new drug treatments.

My son was diagnosed with MS last summer so I've spent a fair bit of
time researching the possible effect of diet on the progress of MS and
discussed it at length with my cousin who is a neurologist who
specializes in MS treatment. Although diet may play a role, research
is very difficult because the progress of MS is so unpredictible. In
some patients the disease progresses rapidly in others there may be a
period of 10 years of remission before the next attack. Unless you are
doing a very carefully controlled experiment with hundreds or even
thousands of patients you can never be sure whether the effects you
see are the result of your treatment or the natural variation in the
progress of the disease. As a result, experiments are costly and are
only done when there is a significant monetary incentive - like the
licensing of a new drug.

In many ways T2 is much easier to deal with. You can use your trusty
meter to telly you immediately what effects that last meal you ate is
having on your BG and modify your diet accordingly. With MS you can
follow a strict dietary regime and find that you go 2 years between
episodes. However, you will never know if you had made a change you
might have gone 5 years between episodes. Terribly frustrating.

Luckily my son hasn't had a serious episode since last summer and is
symptom free at this point. He's seen the specialists ot our
provincial MS clinic but so far he isn't taking any of the new
expensive medications ($16,000 - $80,000/yr). As a young verile male
who works on construction, he good at denial.

>In contrast, there's very clear evidence that diet can have a huge,
>positive impact on controlling type 2 diabetes. This is one of the few
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>make the most sense to adopt the diet which controls the disease you can
>control--the diabetes.

I agree with Jenifer. A low-carb approach that controls your BG levels
is the best way to go. It probably will not have any negative effect
on your MS and may well have a positive one.

Good luck!

Gerry
Diagnosed as Type 2 in December, 2004
Controlled through diet and exercise
Latest H1AC 5.9
Jenny - 26 Feb 2006 16:31 GMT
> I agree with Jenifer. A low-carb approach that controls your BG levels
> is the best way to go. It probably will not have any negative effect
> on your MS and may well have a positive one.

Just want to point out that "Jennifer" is the name used by another, very
helpful, regular on this newsgroup. The person,(Me) who posts under the
name "Jenny" is a different person.

The confusion is understandable.

--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control
Alan S - 26 Feb 2006 21:47 GMT
>Just want to point out that "Jennifer" is the name used by another, very
>helpful, regular on this newsgroup. The person,(Me) who posts under the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>--Jenny

Maybe one of you should post as Guinevere?

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 2x500mg
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Jenny - 26 Feb 2006 22:38 GMT
>>Just want to point out that "Jennifer" is the name used by another, very
>>helpful, regular on this newsgroup. The person,(Me) who posts under the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Maybe one of you should post as Guinevere?

Only if you post as "Arthur" . <G>
--Jenny

http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes  Diabetes Info

http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood
Sugar Under Control
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.