Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / February 2006
Metformin Results
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Alfred Kaufmann - 24 Feb 2006 04:23 GMT I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. That is not the result I want.
I have been reading some literature on the Internet that leads me to believe I should increase my dosage to 1500mg per day for a week and if that does not produce the desired results then go to 2000mg per day. According to the literature the maximum daily dose is 2250mg per day. If I don't notice any significant reduction in my blood glucose reading over the next 2 weeks then I really think I should get off Metformin.
If Metformin does not work for me maybe there is some other drug that will work for me?
I want to hear if I am doing something that I should not be doing. A lot of the Type II diabetes stuff, diet and exercise is trial and error done by yourself and I think this falls into that category. Please don't tell me to consult with my doctor, he is in Africa for 4 weeks and I do not want to wait that long. I can give him the graphs when he gets back.
Al
noneyabusiness - 24 Feb 2006 05:36 GMT >I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and >according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Al I think you've just barely given the metformin enough time to get started. If you've become used to it so far, maybe start taking 3 a day for a month THEN see where you are at.
It takes time.
I assume you ARE trying to keep your diet under control and are exercising, right?
...
Alfred Kaufmann - 24 Feb 2006 06:50 GMT >>I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and >>according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >I assume you ARE trying to keep your diet under control and are >exercising, right? Yes I am controlling my diet and I am exercising. I have cut down on food and doubled my exercise time. Right now my blood sugar is what I consider excellent for the night 5.8. Of course now I don't know if the increased Metformin dosage had anything to do with this.
Al
Alan S - 24 Feb 2006 08:30 GMT >>I assume you ARE trying to keep your diet under control and are >>exercising, right? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Al Exactly which food have you cut down on? Fats, Protein, Carbohydrates?
What was your reading an hour after breakfast this morning? I think you'll find this link very interesting: http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 2x500mg
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 21:53 GMT >>>I assume you ARE trying to keep your diet under control and are >>>exercising, right? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >Exactly which food have you cut down on? Fats, Protein, >Carbohydrates? I just eat less in general. I am not about to eat things I don't like or avoid foods I do like, although I have stopped buying some foods. I would rather exercise more.
>What was your reading an hour after breakfast this morning? Usually I only test before eating and before bedtime but you caught me at the correct time - 1 hour after breakfast it was 9.2. It tells me I had a good breakfast - 3 slices of bacon, 1 eggs, 1 slice of toast, small glass of orange juice and 2 cups of black coffee. By lunch time it will probably be just above 6.2.
>I think you'll find this link very interesting: >http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm Thanks for the link but I have been dieting and exercising for 10 years now, just newly on drugs.
Al
Ozgirl - 26 Feb 2006 00:17 GMT > Usually I only test before eating and before bedtime but you caught me > at the correct time - 1 hour after breakfast it was 9.2. It tells me > I had a good breakfast - 3 slices of bacon, 1 eggs, 1 slice of toast, > small glass of orange juice and 2 cups of black coffee. By lunch time > it will probably be just above 6.2. A good breakfast? A 9.2 after breakfast is a shocking number. You should have been less than the 6.2 after breakfast not before lunch.
>>I think you'll find this link very interesting: >>http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm > > Thanks for the link but I have been dieting and exercising for 10 > years now, just newly on drugs. From that breakfast, I hate to say it, but you haven't a real clue about diet. Expecting drugs to compensate for a diabetic unfriendly diet is pie in the sky. Nothing short of insulin is going to help you if you don't want to modify your diet. Some of the most serious complications start with blood sugars of 7.0. I am not blaming you, you have clearly been misinformed, but it is never too late to start learning. That above link would help both newly diagnosed AND longer term diabetics who have been misinformed.
At breakfast we are at our most insulin resistant (carb sensitive), the juice is a big no no. Juice is used to get someone out of hypo territory, fast! At breakfast a lot of us can't eat more than just protein. A rise to 9.2 (which could even have gone higher if you had kept testing) is just plain and simply way too high. What are your lab numbers. for cholesterol, triglycerides etc?
David - 26 Feb 2006 01:18 GMT > Usually I only test before eating and before bedtime but you caught me > at the correct time - 1 hour after breakfast it was 9.2. It tells me > I had a good breakfast - 3 slices of bacon, 1 eggs, 1 slice of toast, > small glass of orange juice and 2 cups of black coffee. By lunch time > it will probably be just above 6.2.
> Al [tough love "on"] You are "controlling" your diet AND YOU DRINK OJ? go back to the dietician and get retrained! You can't drink OJ and not expect your bg's to go UP! [Tough love off]
Dave
Alan S - 26 Feb 2006 04:31 GMT >>>>I assume you ARE trying to keep your diet under control and are >>>>exercising, right? [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > >Al Hi Alfred
"10 years now, just newly on drugs." What are your lipid numbers like? What is your BP?
It's your life mate. I accept that I may be a totally wrong alarmist. If I am, at worst I will prick myself a few times more than I really needed to for tests, and restrict my diet and lifestyle a little. If I'm not, I'm going to live a lot more complication free-years than I would have. That's the choice I've made.
When you say "I am not about to eat things I don't like or avoid foods I do like" you have made a personal choice. That's fair enough - we all have to make such choices in life.
But everything has a price. When we make choices, it's wise to have all the facts first, if you can.
Try adding this information to your knowledge base: http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/14045678.php I notice you don't actually read links, so I'll presume Jenny's permission and repeat a little bit from that: "These studies, some of which are not cited in the AACE guidelines, make a cogent case that post-meal blood sugars of 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) and higher and fasting blood sugars over 100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/L) cause permanent organ damage and cause diabetes to progress."
For example, if it was me, I wouldn't be complacently saying "1 hour after breakfast it was 9.2. It tells me I had a good breakfast".
What it tells me is that you ate a bloody terrible breakfast which spiked you to 9.2 mmol/L or 166 mg/dl. A number that was totally unnecessary and you've probably been getting similar numbers for ten years. I will absolutely guarantee you that simply by dropping the "small" orange juice you'll drop that by at least a mmol(18), probably more, for starters. However, I do accept that if you have no complications, no cardio-vascular problems and are in fine health - then you've proved in a scientific experiment on yourself that you, personally, can do that for ten years without harm.
The bacon and egg were fine - but the toast may not be. You could test to find out.
As I said, it's your choice to continue in the "ostrich" method of management or not. If you do, I have to wonder why you test at all if you aren't going to change anything when you see a bad result, or even accept that it WAS a bad result.
Again, I'll suggest that you read Jennifer's advice at http://jennifer.flyingrat.net/
I'll leave it at that, and honestly wish you the very best of health.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 2x500mg
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Nicky - 26 Feb 2006 11:58 GMT > Usually I only test before eating and before bedtime but you caught me > at the correct time - 1 hour after breakfast it was 9.2. It tells me > I had a good breakfast - 3 slices of bacon, 1 eggs, 1 slice of toast, > small glass of orange juice and 2 cups of black coffee. By lunch time > it will probably be just above 6.2. Good grief! It tells me you need to drop the OJ altogether (you do know it's pretty well the fastest way to treat a hypo? - your 15 min reading would probably have been even higher) and possibly throw the toast away too. You may get away with a lower carb bread?
My 1hr pp after a 2-egg and cheese omelette this morning was 5.6.
You start to damage yourself around the 7.8 mark. An occasional foray is probably OK - but you've likely been up that way for years.
If your doctor is telling you a 6+ A1c is OK, btw, he's behind the times. The American college of endocrinologists - AACE - moved the goalposts to 6- a couple of years ago.
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/5.4/<6 T2 DX 05/2004 1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine 95/74/72Kg
Slap - 26 Feb 2006 14:54 GMT > If your doctor is telling you a 6+ A1c is OK, btw, he's behind the times. > The American college of endocrinologists - AACE - moved the goalposts to 6- > a couple of years ago. > > Nicky. The AACE sounds like some kind of radical group. I call them "subtractors". You take well researched data pull a point or so off it and make the world a better place.
The CDA still says at least <7 (2005 Diabetes Report). A small quote from the 45 page report...
"Healthcare professionals are asked to get their patients with diabetes to the A1C target of 7 percent or lower as soon as possible.The best available research strongly indicates that A1C levels of lower than 7 percent significantly prevents the onset of serious complications, including heart attack, stroke, blindness, amputation or kidney disease."
Does the AACE have better research data than the CDA. Where does your Diabetes Association stand on this? What are they recommending?
-- Dave, T2, Canada
Alan S - 26 Feb 2006 20:59 GMT Was "Metformin Results"
>> If your doctor is telling you a 6+ A1c is OK, btw, he's behind the times. >> The American college of endocrinologists - AACE - moved the goalposts to [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >Does the AACE have better research data than the CDA. Where does your >Diabetes Association stand on this? What are they recommending? Hi Dave
The AACE is "some kind of radical group"? In that case we need more radicals.
You call them "subtractors"? I call them professionals - as against bureaucrats.
Their history page is at http://www.aace.com/org/history.php Some snippets:
"The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) was founded in 1991 by a visionary group of leaders to serve as the active voice for clinical endocrinologists."
"The impetus behind AACE's efforts has always been quality and cost-effective patient care for those with endocrine diseases and disorders. The need for AACE was evidenced by the phenomenal growth in membership in the first year with the receipt of 1,162 membership applications."
"Today, AACE has over 5200 members throughout the United States and in 84 foreign countries."
How many clinical endocrinologists do you think are actually involved in the decision-making process for setting the guidelines for the management of diabetes at the CDA, or the ADA, or Diabetes Australia or the NHS? Which organisations must remain most mindful of government policies and/or sponsor's wishes, and which is an organisation of specialist professionals? If I was forced to make a decision on which organisation I'd listen to first, it would be a no-brainer.
Incidentally - they all have sponsors, so form your own opinion there by comparing: AACE: http://www.aace.com/org/cap/capdirectory.php ADA: http://www.diabetes.org/support-the-cause/our-national-corporate-sponsors.jsp I couldn't find the list for the others - I'd be interested to see it if you can find it. I do know that the CEO of McDonalds was invited to the board of Diabetes Australia.
Now, on A1c, if you go to http://www.aace.com/public/awareness/stateofdiabetes/index.php and download the Adobe pdf fact sheet titled Facts About A1C http://www.aace.com/public/awareness/stateofdiabetes/FactsAboutA1C.pdf You'll find this in the detail:
"What is the target level for A1C? The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) recommends that people with type 2 diabetes reach an A1C goal of 6.5% or less. Achieving this goal is important, since every 1% increase above 6% elevates the risk of diabetes-related complications such as stroke, heart attack and loss of limbs. It is important, however, that people with type 2 diabetes speak with their doctor or other healthcare professional about setting their own personal A1C goal."
Those changes appeared after the AACE 14th Annual Meeting and Clinical Congress in May 2005.
Nicky may have prematurely moved the goalposts from 6.5% to 6% - but I'm sure that's only a matter of time too.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 2x500mg
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Slap - 26 Feb 2006 23:07 GMT > Was "Metformin Results" > [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > http://www.aace.com/org/cap/capdirectory.php > ADA: http://www.diabetes.org/support-the-cause/our-national-corporate-sponsors.jsp
> I couldn't find the list for the others - I'd be interested > to see it if you can find it. I do know that the CEO of [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > healthcare professional about setting their own personal A1C > goal." That sounds quite similiar to the CDA quote.
> Those changes appeared after the AACE 14th Annual Meeting > and Clinical Congress in May 2005. > > Nicky may have prematurely moved the goalposts from 6.5% to > 6% - but I'm sure that's only a matter of time too. From your posted date above she also moved the time line by 1-1/2 years. The CDA report (December 7/05) suggests <7.
I'll have to read up on your supplied links but what I see...
The CDA gets together with ADA and all the other GOV. agencies. They probably pool their research and come up with some numbers.
What is a group such as the AACE supposed to do? They want to justify their existence... no? They want to be/appear better... such as a University that tightens up the criteria to gain entrance. A new town council has to do something so they make new laws, even tho the town has done great for the past 10 years.
Anyway there can't possibly be anything wrong with getting your A1C <6 (mines at 6.1) I just wonder why the numbers posted on this group by a dozen or so are always tightened up some what. We go from 2 hr. after meal testing to 1 hr. From testing 4 times a day to 8 or more times a day. Common sense (I guess that's OK) is often the reason given for tightening up these figures.
I live in Edmonton, Alberta Canada and we have a leading edge Diabetes Research Team here. I'll have to go see what they are up to but I can't see us being behind and in fact they are probably right up front.
-- Dave
TigerLily - 26 Feb 2006 23:16 GMT Dave....... i'm just south of you in Calgary, Alberta
my endo purports that 2 hour pp testing is required
my GP wants my A1c to be below 6.0
i'm sure we aren't that far off from each other...... it's just that our Dr's only Rx what they think we will reach for
my endo, does have a variation on the 10 times per day testing to still get the 2 hour pp readings........ with 4 to 6 tests per day
kate
 Signature Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/ http://www.diabetic-talk.org/freeveggies.htm I have no medical qualifications beyond my own experience. Choose your advisers carefully, because experience can be an expensive teacher.
"Slap" <> wrote in message o...
> Anyway there can't possibly be anything wrong with getting your A1C <6 > (mines at 6.1) I just wonder why the numbers posted on this group by a dozen [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > -- > Dave Slap - 26 Feb 2006 23:48 GMT > Dave....... i'm just south of you in Calgary, > Alberta [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > my GP wants my A1c to be below 6.0 I was just at the Clinical Practice Guidelines site. If you look at #3... well they suggest Nicky and Alan are with it.
Recommendations 1. Glycemic targets must be individualized; however, therapy in most patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes should be targeted to achieve an A1C ?7.0% in order to reduce the risk of microvascular [Grade A, Level 1A (1,3)] and macrovascular complications [Grade C, Level 3 (5)].
2. To achieve an A1C ?7.0%, patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes should aim for FPG or preprandial PG targets of 4.0 to 7.0 mmol/L and 2-hour postprandial PG targets of 5.0 to 10.0 mmol/L [Grade B, Level 2 (1-3)].
3. If it can be safely achieved, lowering PG targets toward the normal range should be considered [Grade C, Level 3 (4,5,8,10)]:
· A1C ?6.0% [Grade D, Consensus];
· FPG/preprandial PG: 4.0 to 6.0 mmol/L [Grade D, Consensus]; and
· 2-hour postprandial PG: 5.0 to 8.0 mmol/L [Grade D, Consensus].
Alan S - 27 Feb 2006 00:11 GMT >> Was "Metformin Results" >> [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] >Research Team here. I'll have to go see what they are up to but I can't see >us being behind and in fact they are probably right up front. Just on a couple of your points. I never implied that any of our countries are ahead or behind - we all have our good research people. I don't forget Banting and Best. A lot of cutting-edge research is happening in the smaller countries where there is sometimes more freedom to utilise areas like stem-cell research, and different emphasis because of local needs.
If you google you'll see a lot of previous discussions here on 2hr vs 1hr post-prandial. To put it simply, my view is that we should test for the peak spike, not the resting level, which for many of us is closer to one-hour than two. But that's another discussion.
And I don't think the AACE has any need to justify their existence - read that history page link.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 2x500mg
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Jennifer - 27 Feb 2006 01:18 GMT I guess I don't understand.
If you're not a T1 or insulin using T2 who is struggling with possibly dangerous hypos... why wouldn't you aim for non-diabetic numbers?
You may not get there, but if you reach that goal, it can only benefit your continued health.
Jennifer
>>Was "Metformin Results" >> [quoted text clipped - 141 lines] > -- > Dave Slap - 27 Feb 2006 01:28 GMT > I guess I don't understand. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Research Team here. I'll have to go see what they are up to but I can't see > > us being behind and in fact they are probably right up front. Yes, that's what I said.
Nicky - 27 Feb 2006 17:46 GMT > I live in Edmonton, Alberta Canada and we have a leading edge Diabetes > Research Team here. I'll have to go see what they are up to but I can't > see > us being behind and in fact they are probably right up front. They may well be, Dave - but how long before the general practitioner down the road catches up? What do your guys do, a 7-year training like ours? That's AFTER the research is accepted into the curriculum.
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/5.4/<6 T2 DX 05/2004 1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine 95/74/72Kg
Slap - 27 Feb 2006 18:29 GMT > > I live in Edmonton, Alberta Canada and we have a leading edge Diabetes > > Research Team here. I'll have to go see what they are up to but I can't [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Nicky. This is true.
I did check, and what they have being doing is the transplanting islet cells from 'baby' pigs.
In 2000 the Edmonton team pioneered islet cell transplants (from the pancreas of a dead body into the liver of a diabetic, where they take root and begin producing insulin). About 90 people have received this treatment at the U of A in Edmonton.
Back to the 'baby' pigs. Today's newspaper... "University of Alberta researchers Ray Rajotte and Greg Korbutt have just published a study showing that insulin-producing islet cells from 'baby' pigs can be successfully transplanted into diabetic macaque monkeys and cure their diabetes."
This is NOT the study published a week ago that was done at the University of Minnesota. They used 'adult' pigs in that study. 'Baby' cells could continue to produce more cells after transplant; adult cells won't do that.
Full story is here... http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=5bef8d1e-77f9-4d7d-8eaf -7abbba82319c
There is a bit to go but when Diabetes is beat, the Edmonton research team will be there in some way, shape or form.
-- Dave, T2, Canada
Nicky - 27 Feb 2006 18:37 GMT > Full story is here... > http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=5bef8d1e-77f9-4d7d-8eaf -7abbba82319c > > There is a bit to go but when Diabetes is beat, the Edmonton research team > will be there in some way, shape or form. Cool!
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/5.4/<6 T2 DX 05/2004 1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine 95/74/72Kg
Jefferson - 27 Feb 2006 22:55 GMT Dave:
> Back to the 'baby' pigs. Today's newspaper... > "University of Alberta researchers Ray Rajotte and Greg Korbutt have just [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > of Minnesota. They used 'adult' pigs in that study. 'Baby' cells could > continue to produce more cells after transplant; adult cells won't do that. Pig beta cells were transplanted into humans in Mexico by a former New Zealand doctor. The problem is communication of diseases between species.
Frank
Slap - 27 Feb 2006 23:26 GMT > Pig beta cells were transplanted into humans in Mexico by a former New > Zealand doctor. The problem is communication of diseases between species. > > Frank Not if you read the article... well to the monkeys anyway. Also in the article they are hoping for human stem cells but that is a touchy subject that may take years.
"Another important finding of the U of A study, Rajotte says, is that the transplants didn't transmit pig viruses into the monkeys."
http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=5bef8d1e-77f9-4d7d-8eaf -7abbba82319c
Priscilla H. Ballou - 24 Feb 2006 21:22 GMT > Yes I am controlling my diet and I am exercising. I have cut down on > food and doubled my exercise time. Right now my blood sugar is what I > consider excellent for the night 5.8. Of course now I don't know if > the increased Metformin dosage had anything to do with this. What is your BG at 1 hour and 2 hours post-prandial? That's a better gauge.
Priscilla
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 22:01 GMT >> Yes I am controlling my diet and I am exercising. I have cut down on >> food and doubled my exercise time. Right now my blood sugar is what I [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >What is your BG at 1 hour and 2 hours post-prandial? That's a better >gauge. I would think your blood sugar depends what you had to eat, how much you ate and what sort of activity you had. What would taking these reading 1 and 2 hours after eating tell you?
I do know which foods will cause my blood glucose to jump up and I try to cut down on them.
Al
Susan - 25 Feb 2006 22:05 GMT > I would think your blood sugar depends what you had to eat, how much > you ate and what sort of activity you had. True.
What would taking these
> reading 1 and 2 hours after eating tell you? It would tell you how well you're controlling your diabetes, whether you're spiking into the ranges that are known to cause cellular damage, and exactly which foods or meals are interfering with the kind of control that prevents diabetic complications.
Susan
Jennifer - 25 Feb 2006 23:03 GMT > I would think your blood sugar depends what you had to eat, how much > you ate and what sort of activity you had. What would taking these > reading 1 and 2 hours after eating tell you? It would tell you EXACTLY what you're saying.
Did what you ate, how much you ate, and what sort of activity you had keep your BG in line after your meal.
Or do you have to adjust that meal next time to acheive your goals.
It's like driving a car without looking at the speedometer. Sure you can look out the window and guess how quickly you're passing the trees... and you can assume that the headwinds you're traveling into are affecting your speed... but you can't really know unless you look at the numbers on your dash. Just as you can't REALLY know how the food you eat and the exercise you do is affecting your blood glucose unless you look at the numbers on your meter. After the meal.
If you really want to know if your new med is doing anything, you'll need to test a lot more often to see if it's having the affect your doctor is after.
Here's the advice I give those that want to see how their current treatment is working for them. Which, after reading your posts you seem to want to do.
You might want to try some experiments.
First: Eat whatever you've been currently eating... but write it all down. Test yourself at the following times:
Upon waking (fasting) 1 hour after each meal 2 hours after each meal At bedtime
That means 8 x each day. What you will discover by this is how long after a meal your highest reading comes... and how fast you return to "normal". Also, you may see that a meal that included bread, fruit or other carbs gives you a higher reading.
Then for the next few days, try to curb your carbs. Eliminate breads, cereals, rices, beans, any wheat products, potato, corn, fruit... get all your carbs from veggies. Test at the same schedule above.
If you try this for a few days, you may find some pretty damn good readings. It's worth a few days to discover.
Eventually you can slowly add back carbs until you see them affecting your meter.
The thing about this disease... though we share much in common and we need to follow certain guidelines... in the end, each of our bodies dictate our treatment and our success.
The closer we get to non-diabetic numbers, the greater chance we have of avoiding horrible complications. The key here is AIM... I know that everyone is at a different point in their disease... and it is progressive. But, if we aim for the best numbers and do our best, we give ourselves the best shot at heath we've got. That's all we can do.
Here's my opinion on what numbers to aim for, they are non-diabetic numbers.
FBG under 100 One hour after meals under 140 Two hours after meals under 120
or for those in the mmol parts of the world:
Fasting Under 6 One hour after meals Under 8 Two hours after meals Under 6.5
And an A1c of under 6.
Recent studies have indicated that the most important numbers are your "after meal" numbers. They may be the most indicative of future complications, especially heart problems.
Listen to your doctor, but you are the leader of your diabetic care team. While his /her advice is learned, it is not absolute. You will end up knowing much more about your body and how it's handling diabetes than your doctor will. Your meter is your best weapon.
Just remember, we're not in a race or a competition with anyone but ourselves... Play around with your food plan... TEST TEST TEST. Learn what foods cause spikes, what foods cause cravings... Use your body as a science experiment.
Best of luck!
Jennifer
Julie Bove - 24 Feb 2006 21:34 GMT > Yes I am controlling my diet and I am exercising. I have cut down on > food and doubled my exercise time. Right now my blood sugar is what I > consider excellent for the night 5.8. Of course now I don't know if > the increased Metformin dosage had anything to do with this. "Cut down on food?" What does that mean? And what does "for the night" mean? When exactly are you testing your BG? And what are you eating? Can you give us a sample meal or two?
 Signature See my webpage: http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 22:14 GMT >> Yes I am controlling my diet and I am exercising. I have cut down on >> food and doubled my exercise time. Right now my blood sugar is what I >> consider excellent for the night 5.8. Of course now I don't know if >> the increased Metformin dosage had anything to do with this. > >"Cut down on food?" What does that mean? It means eating less in general.
> And what does "for the night" mean Before bedtime. If it is higher than 8 it means I will be exercising to get it down.
> When exactly are you testing your BG? Before meals and before bedtime.
> And what are you eating? Can >you give us a sample meal or two? Dinner last night was 4 slices of smoked ham wrapped around four pickles, 9 little pieces of sacchetti with emmental cheese covered with tomato pasta sauce and one glass of red wine.
The day before, large slice of meatloaf, potato, creamed spinach and one glass of red wine.
Al
Ozgirl - 24 Feb 2006 08:25 GMT > I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and > according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > I want to hear if I am doing something that I should not be doing. What is your current diet and exercise? No diabetic drug is a magic pill. It takes a combination of diet, exercise and meds. No one can say what you are doing wrong, if anything until you supply more information. How often do you eat, what do you eat (specifically carbs) what are your fasting numbers, your pre meal numbers, your post meal numbers. Are you overweight? Do you have high blood pressure and high cholesterol levels? Are you on any other meds?
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 22:22 GMT >What is your current diet I would have to write a book!
> and exercise? That is a bit easier, mainly fast walking 10,000 plus steps every second day. Now I try to get out everyday. On nice days I have no problem doing 25,000 plus steps.
> No diabetic drug is >a magic pill. It takes a combination of diet, exercise and [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >you overweight? Do you have high blood pressure and high >cholesterol levels? Are you on any other meds? A lot of questions and I did start three medications all at the same time. Metformin, a pill of high blood pressure and an anti-inflammatory.
I was on the anti-inflammatory for 9 days and I had to quit taking it because of the stomach problem it caused.
I have taken off 45 pound since I was first diagnosed which is what my doctor recommended at the time. For my height I have the correct weight but I would not feel bad if I could convert another 20 pounds of fat into muscle. :-)
Al
Ozgirl - 26 Feb 2006 00:23 GMT >>What is your current diet > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > time. Metformin, a pill of high blood pressure and an > anti-inflammatory. I just posted a message regarding your breakfast.
I was put on a BP med at diagnosis - 6 years ago, that has been the norm for quite a long time. I think I am getting a picture of your treatment by your docotr. It is archaic, old-fashioned, whatever. There has been a huge amount of research done in the past 10 years and most doctors are on the ball. Perhaps you haven't been to your doctor for a long time until recently?
> I was on the anti-inflammatory for 9 days and I had to quit taking it > because of the stomach problem it caused. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > weight but I would not feel bad if I could convert another 20 pounds > of fat into muscle. :-) That would be an enormous help. Weight loss and/or creating muscle does marvellous things to insulin resistance.
Slap - 24 Feb 2006 08:35 GMT > I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and > according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. > That is not the result I want. Others will be around to discuss your diet. Take the Metformin. It is good for you and your body. Remember that.
Also it's not really magic. Takes time and you can't, say, have a Metformin and a piece of choclate cake. Doesn't work that way. You could have a salad tho.
-- Dave, T2, Canada
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 22:24 GMT >> I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and >> according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >and a piece of choclate cake. Doesn't work that way. You could have a >salad tho. Just a piece of chocolate cake? :-( I do like salad too.
Al
Nicky - 24 Feb 2006 12:31 GMT >I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and > according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. > That is not the result I want. You could try increasing the metformin as you suggest. However, you don't sound like you're doing post-meal testing - have you read this link? I found it absolutely invaluable for controlling my diabetes. http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/5.4/<6 T2 DX 05/2004 1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine 95/74/72Kg
oldal4865 - 24 Feb 2006 12:37 GMT Alfred Kaufmann wrote in message ...
>I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and >according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Al The U.S. Physicians' Desk Reference recommends 1500 mg/day metformin as the clinical maintenance dose and 2550 mg/day as the maximum prudent dose but they also advice patients to "walk" the dose up to minimize G.I. problems. I agree with your take on that part (that 2250 maximum dose was a typo, right?)
However, but I disagree with some of your premises.
1. From your other post:
". . . .Right now my blood sugar is what I consider excellent for the night 5.8. . ."
Sorry, but if you are just checking fasting blood glucose (FbG), you are missing a major part of the picture. There is evidence that your 2-hour-after-eating blood glucose (2-hr-PP) are more important than your FbG. IMO, you cannot even start to evaluate the effectiveness of your metformin until you have had a few weeks/months of charting 2-hr-PP.
2. Another point of view that you haven't touched upon yet:
About 80-90% of newly diagnosed T2 diabetics have high Insulin Resistance
High Insulin Resistance is associated with premature death from heart attack
Metformin is an anti-Insulin Resistance Med
Metformin reduces the very high risk of premature heart attack suffered by many Type 2 diabetics.
IOW, you are judging Metformin solely by its effect on your FbG when you should also be very concerned about your risk of premature heart attack.
You can monitor that risk somewhat by following your cholesterol profiles. High Insulin Resistance very often causes high triglycerides and low HDL values in T2 Lipid panels. That's a recipe for heart attack. Metformin improves those values.
Your Targets: triglycerides/HDL ratio less than 3.0 in the U.S. mg/dL system, 1.3 in the Rest-of-the-World mmol/L system
LDL/HDL ratio less than 4 (the lower the better)
Total Cholesterol/HDL less than 4, (the lower the better)
(Umm. . . prudent diabetics keep records of their HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol profiles).
3. If you want to add another diabetes med to your therapy, by all means negotiate with your doctor. However, don't stop taking metformin until you are certain you have your Insulin Resistance in check.
Also, note that there is mounting evidence that the beta cell insulin stimulators (Glucotrol, Glicizide, Amaryl, Starlix, Prandin) tend to damage beta cells and ultimately intensify the severity of the disease down the road. Not too big a problem if you're 75, but not something to embrace if you're 55.
There is also evidence that the sulfonylurea types of beta cell insulin stimulators increase your risk of heart attack.
4. While you're about it, consider that certain lifestyle changes themselves count almost as a "Miracle Drug" for Type 2 diabetics, i.e.
a. Lose fat lb b. Gain muscle lb (ugh. . .weight lifting) c. Exercise every day, the more vigorously the better d. Ration your carbohydrate, eat slowly-digesting carb, spread your daily carb over several small meals
Regards Old Al
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 22:40 GMT >Alfred Kaufmann wrote in message ... >>I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] >Regards > Old Al Thanks for the detailed information. I hardly ever test fasting blood glucose but do test before my meals and bedtime.
My A1c is 6.3% (below target) Cholesterol LDL is 2.44 (below target) HDL is 4.1 (slightly above target) and my blood pressure systolic is 160 but I have white coat syndrome :-) , at home it tests below 130.
Right now I am taking 1500mg Metformin and I will keep that up for just over a month and then I go in to get all these test done again.
I figure that by taking Metformin I should see some results. If I can't see any results then I have to question why I am on it.
Al
Ozgirl - 26 Feb 2006 00:26 GMT > My A1c is 6.3% (below target) Cholesterol LDL is 2.44 (below target) > HDL is 4.1 (slightly above target) and my blood pressure systolic is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I figure that by taking Metformin I should see some results. If I > can't see any results then I have to question why I am on it. A better target is to be below 6% A1c. Your doctor must have seen a problem to prescribe Metformin. What is your at home diastolic?
Alan S - 26 Feb 2006 04:38 GMT >Thanks for the detailed information. I hardly ever test fasting blood >glucose but do test before my meals and bedtime. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Al I think that may be a transcription error Alfred, try HDL 1.4 - which is still quite good. What are the trigs?
From the other posts you've made mentioning your menu and diet - I suspect that breakfast is your only real problem. You asked what a one-hour test will tell you? Simply whether the meal you ate, and the exercise since, kept your BGs in reasonable territory. If not you change something next time. Simple as that.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 2x500mg
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Larry - 26 Feb 2006 16:47 GMT Hello Oldal: Just wondering about Avandia as an insulin sensitizer. Does this mean it is not an anti-Insulin Resistance drug like metformin is? Is insulin sensitization and IR two different concepts and measured in different ways? Thanks for an answer.
Larry
> Alfred Kaufmann wrote in message ... > >I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] > Regards > Old Al Loretta Eisenberg - 24 Feb 2006 13:32 GMT Al, every doctor has a doctor covering for him. I would not advise you to self medicate. We cant fool around with drugs. Metformin may not be enough for you and you might need to add another drug. Or you might need a change of meds altogether.
I dont know what you are eating. Metformin takes time to build up in the body.
Loretta
-- In tribute to the United States of America and the State of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and terrorism.
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 22:51 GMT >Al, every doctor has a doctor covering for him. Yes but I have found that I need to tell them what I want.
When I first moved to this little town I asked a doctor for a prescription which I had gotten previously in the big city. It wasn't until the third time that I was asked what I am using it for.
> I would not advise you >to self medicate. We cant fool around with drugs. Metformin may not be [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >I dont know what you are eating. Metformin takes time to build up in >the body. Sometime self medicating is the smart options. For example my doctor put me on blood pressure medication even after I told him I have white coat syndrome. A month later he doubled the dosage and again I told him I test fine at home.
I know that high blood pressure can cause stroke but what happens when blood pressure gets too low?
Al
Susan - 25 Feb 2006 22:56 GMT > Sometime self medicating is the smart options. [snip] I agree. Unfortunately, you don't have enough information to do so wisely. You need to know what your post meal numbers are, most importantly. You also need to read up on how much CVD risk increases with each point above 5%; your target is rather high and outdated. You need to know what the peaks and valleys are that are adding up to that HbA1c. You need to know which foods cause them and which foods keep you in a narrower, lower range.
Susan
Vicki Beausoleil - 26 Feb 2006 02:53 GMT >>Al, every doctor has a doctor covering for him. > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Al Blood pressure meds (ACE inhibitors or ARBs) do more for the diabetic than just lower blood pressure. They also protect the kidneys and heart, by a process my endo calls 'arterial modification'. Keeps the artery walls supple and helps prevent kidney damage.
My endo's standard for bp is 120/70 or less for a diabetic regardless of type. She believes diabetics should be treated as if they've already had a heart attack.
Vicki
Jenny - 24 Feb 2006 13:50 GMT > I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and > according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > reading over the next 2 weeks then I really think I should get off > Metformin. If you are taking Metformin ER, the max dose is 2000 per day. The higher dose is for the plain stuff.
> If Metformin does not work for me maybe there is some other drug that > will work for me? Insulin. When I took metformin, I saw a mild decrease in my post meal spikes but no change in the too-high fasting blood sugar that had started creeping up, and it continued creeping up. On the plus side, my weight became easy to manage, but on the minus side after a year my A1c had not changed even by 1% at the top dose.
Turns out, that in my case, though I apparently had some mild IR which it corrected, with it I am very insulin sensitive, but my insulin is not able to control my blood sugar. Only by adding a basal insulin to my regimen was I able to make a significant change in my overall blood sugar status.
So if raising your metformin dose to 2000 mg/day does not improve things, you need to consider whether, in fact, your problem is not Insulin Resistance, but Insulin Deficiency.
--Jenny
http:www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control
Larry - 24 Feb 2006 16:19 GMT Jenny: I like your idea about "Insulin Deficiency". I even talked my Doc into doing an fasting "insulin level". It came back normal. I heard somewhere that a "stimulated insulin level" ie. after meal is more revealing. I propose that docs start thinking more about subcategories of T2 patients as diabetes is a hetergeneous disease..right ?
Larry
> > I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and > > according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood > Sugar Under Control Jenny - 24 Feb 2006 17:23 GMT > Jenny: I like your idea about "Insulin Deficiency". I even talked my > Doc into doing an fasting "insulin level". It came back normal. I > heard somewhere that a "stimulated insulin level" ie. after meal is > more revealing. I propose that docs start thinking more about > subcategories of T2 patients as diabetes is a hetergeneous > disease..right ? "Insulin deficiency" is well understood by researchers who work with type 2 diabetes. Check out John Gerich's articles on what causes type 2 diabetes.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gerich%20Diabetes%20insulin%20deficiency
It would be wonderful if doctors thought about subcategories, but they are very busy and if 98% of their diabetes patients appear to fit into the obvious categories, and respond to common treatments, they don't have the time to worry about that other 2%.
And because so much of what doctors "know" is driven by what drug companies tell them, there has been an overemphasis on insulin resistance being the central defect in Type 2 diabetes--because there are some expensive patented drugs being very heavily promoted to doctors--drugs that fight insulin resistance.
Now that we are getting the incretin hormone mimics, we'll start seeing doctors attributing type 2 also to problems with those hormones. My doctor has already started doing that.
But no one is putting money into educating doctors that there are all kinds of other reasons why insulin might not be produced or if produced, might not work properly, so doctors don't think of that until everything else doesn't work. Except when they have a patient, like me, who demands that they if nothing else, give me the tests and tools to figure out what is going on.
Mostly, though, by the time a lot of doctors get to where they have an established practice, their curiosity about what is going on in disease and the use of treatments beyond the Drug of the Day seems to have been completely stamped out. <sigh> --Jenny
http:www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control
Nicky - 24 Feb 2006 22:27 GMT > http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info Oo! Very smart : ) Made me go off for a re-read, thanks.
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/5.4/<6 T2 DX 05/2004 1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine 95/74/72Kg
Jenny - 24 Feb 2006 22:40 GMT >>http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info > > Oo! Very smart : ) Made me go off for a re-read, thanks. > > Nicky. Thanks! The Phlaunt.com gallery is so much easier to maintain and pretty up than the geocities site was, and the annoying ads are gone.
But the geocities site has such good Google search placement on relevant searches like "blood sugar targets", that I hope the move doesn't mess that up. The geocities site still has all it's content but people who visit the old site get wafted to the new one as soon as they click on anything.
Any topics you'd like to see discussed there in future pages?
--Jenny
http:www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control
Nicky - 24 Feb 2006 23:15 GMT > Any topics you'd like to see discussed there in future pages? Well, I think we need some info on speed of control, as soon as Chris's eye doc comes up with something : ) Also perhaps something on all the new types, with their implications for treatment? A good links page, maybe? - although they're always such a pain to maintain.
> http:www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info You need to fix the link in your sig, btw.
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/5.4/<6 T2 DX 05/2004 1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine 95/74/72Kg
Alan S - 25 Feb 2006 02:16 GMT Was Metformin Results
>>>http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >--Jenny Hi Jenny
Looks good. I keep promoting your http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/moreresearch.htm on the ADA forum - should I be using http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/14045678.php instead?
I'm still browsing through the new format - impressive. You've done a lot of good work there. One minor point - I'm not sure that Jennifer's asd testing advice is an FAQ, but http://www.faqs.org/faqs/diabetes/faq/ certainly is - is there a link to those that I missed?
For those who don't know what I'm talking about - start here: http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/
Brilliant job Jenny - I keep learning from you (pity that I can't remember it all:-)
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. d&e, metformin 2x500mg
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Susan - 25 Feb 2006 02:33 GMT > For those who don't know what I'm talking about - start > here: http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/ > > Brilliant job Jenny - I keep learning from you (pity that I > can't remember it all:-) I couldn't open it earlier today, but WOW, Jenny, brilliant it is.
You're an incredible asset and resource.
Susan
Jenny - 25 Feb 2006 14:43 GMT > I couldn't open it earlier today, but WOW, Jenny, brilliant it is. > > You're an incredible asset and resource. > > Susan Thanks!
--Jenny
http:www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control
Robert Miles - 25 Feb 2006 16:33 GMT > > I couldn't open it earlier today, but WOW, Jenny, brilliant it is. > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http:www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info Some of us find our software works better if you make it:
http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes
Jenny - 25 Feb 2006 17:38 GMT Robert Miles wrote:>
>>--Jenny >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Thanks! Nothing like a typo in the URL, eh? It's fixed.
 Signature --Jenny
http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control
Jenny - 25 Feb 2006 14:21 GMT > Looks good. I keep promoting your > http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/moreresearch.htm on the > ADA forum - should I be using > http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/14045678.php instead? Yes. While I am maintaining the old site, because it has such good Google placement, the new site is what I'll be updating.
It has none of those annoying ads. It's very fast, extremely easy to update, and it provides a lot of features for customizing the page's visual look. I'm not visual (heck, I can barely see), but most site visitors are, and the block-o'-print look of the old site was daunting to a lot of people.
> I'm still browsing through the new format - impressive. > You've done a lot of good work there. One minor point - I'm > not sure that Jennifer's asd testing advice is an FAQ, but > http://www.faqs.org/faqs/diabetes/faq/ certainly is - is > there a link to those that I missed? I guess it isn't, technically an FAQ as defined in newsgroup-speak. I'll have to think of a better term for what it is. OTOH, it does answer the most important Type 2 diabetes FAQ.
> For those who don't know what I'm talking about - start > here: http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/ > > Brilliant job Jenny - I keep learning from you (pity that I > can't remember it all:-) I can't remember it all either, which is why it is nice to be able to keep the information in a central place. My memory is such that it is only a matter of time until I'll be searching Google for my car keys. <g>
To repeat my question to Nicky, can you think of any other topics that should be discussed there?
--Jenny
http:www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control
Frank Roy - 25 Feb 2006 18:16 GMT Hi Jenny:
> Yes. While I am maintaining the old site, because it has such good > Google placement, the new site is what I'll be updating. I know that Google is more sophisticated in it's placements than the old search engines. What are you doing to address this issue? I looked at the page source code of your new site and your old one. You have put a "link" html in the old page.
Frank
Jenny - 25 Feb 2006 19:14 GMT > I know that Google is more sophisticated in it's placements than the old > search engines. What are you doing to address this issue? I looked at > the page source code of your new site and your old one. You have put a > "link" html in the old page. All I've ever done to ensure excellent Google placement on any web site I've built is to put up meaty pages full of content. It takes at least a year until anything happens, then one day the pages float up to the top of the relevant Google searches.
I don't believe you can influence Google index placement with the kinds of tricks that used to work on Alta Vista et. al. eight years ago though a lot of people still make money convincing people they can do just that.
--Jenny
http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood Sugar Under Control
W.M.McKee - 25 Feb 2006 14:24 GMT >Was Metformin Results > >>>>http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes Diabetes Info Jenny, you are an amazing lady.... What a great site!
Will, T2
Larry - 24 Feb 2006 22:52 GMT Jenny: I agree with your assessment. Thanks for the nice review article by John Gerich.
Larry
> > Jenny: I like your idea about "Insulin Deficiency". I even talked my > > Doc into doing an fasting "insulin level". It came back normal. I [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/newlydiagnosed.htm Get Your Blood > Sugar Under Control Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 22:58 GMT >> I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and >> according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] >things, you need to consider whether, in fact, your problem is not >Insulin Resistance, but Insulin Deficiency. I'll give Metformin another month or two and then I will discuss "basal insulin" with my doctor. Does this fall into the same category as homeopathic insulin?
Al
Priscilla H. Ballou - 24 Feb 2006 21:19 GMT > I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and > according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > weeks and I do not want to wait that long. I can give him the graphs > when he gets back. What are you eating?
Priscilla
Julie Bove - 24 Feb 2006 21:29 GMT > I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and > according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > weeks and I do not want to wait that long. I can give him the graphs > when he gets back. Metformin takes several weeks to kick in. It's not a fast acting drug. And once kicked in, it can take several more weeks to get the dose adjusted. It's also possible that this drug won't work for you or that you might need an additional drug along with it. Just curious why you'd want to give him a graph though. The Drs. I've seen have wanted to see my log book. Never a graph.
 Signature See my webpage: http://mysite.verizon.net/juliebove/index.htm
Susan - 24 Feb 2006 21:31 GMT > Metformin takes several weeks to kick in. It's not a fast acting drug. And in my case, about 5 months!
Susan
Nicky - 24 Feb 2006 22:33 GMT > Just curious why you'd want to give him a > graph though. The Drs. I've seen have wanted to see my log book. Never a > graph. I'd put money on him only testing fasting. Nice and easy to graph, tells the doc if he's progressing, but does nothing to allow him to control it himself.
Nicky.
 Signature A1c 10.5/5.4/<6 T2 DX 05/2004 1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine 95/74/72Kg
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 23:08 GMT >> Just curious why you'd want to give him a >> graph though. The Drs. I've seen have wanted to see my log book. Never a >> graph. > >I'd put money on him only testing fasting. You would have lost that bet. I almost never test fasting, I leave that to the clinic.
> Nice and easy to graph, tells the >doc if he's progressing, but does nothing to allow him to control it >himself. My computer reads my meter and then at the touch of a button I can get reports and pretty graphs. It can't get any easier.
Al
Hi_Therre - 24 Feb 2006 23:51 GMT >> I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and >> according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >graph though. The Drs. I've seen have wanted to see my log book. Never a >graph. Graphs are much easier to interpret. Raw data is almost impossible to correlate. _____________________________________________ http://www.healthdiabeticsoftware.com/ Free
Alfred Kaufmann - 25 Feb 2006 23:06 GMT >> I have been taking 2 500mg metformin tablets daily for a month now and >> according to my glucose meter my trend over that period is going up. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >graph though. The Drs. I've seen have wanted to see my log book. Never a >graph. The graph is produced by One Touch software and is easier to see how you are doing. The log would be the next page. :-)
I am giving it another 8 weeks to kick in.
Al
Susan - 25 Feb 2006 23:07 GMT > The graph is produced by One Touch software and is easier to see how > you are doing. The log would be the next page. :-) [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Al > Al, it took 5 months for it to really kick in for me, I was very severely insulin resistant. When it did kick in, the results were very obvious and sudden.
Susan
|
|
|