Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Insulin cost?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
2liberal - 27 Nov 2005 16:58 GMT
I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
but as we all know it is easier said than done. He asked me how I felt
about insulin and I was negative, wanting to avoid daily injections.  I
am starting to come around on this because this blood sugar is staying
too high even when I do eat better - not exactly "right" -  and
exercise.

I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?
Anon - 27 Nov 2005 20:38 GMT
Prices will vary from one pharmacy to another but this site will give you an
idea of the price range for insulin, syringes and other supplies. The price
of insulin depends on what type of insulin you will be using.
http://www.diabeticexpress.com/content/default.aspx

>I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
> has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
> this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?
Hound Dog - 27 Nov 2005 21:34 GMT
>I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
> has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
> this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?

I buy most of my medicines at: drugstore.com

They are, for most meds,  cheaper than any of  the local drug stores.
Jenny - 27 Nov 2005 21:49 GMT
>>I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
>>this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?

Depends on which insulin.

The newer prescription insulins including Lantus and Lispro seem to sell
for something like $84 a vial. How long a vial will last you depends on
how much you are taking, which depends, in turn, on your size and
insulin resistance. A lot of people seem to be able to get a month out
of a vial of Lantus, which is a basal insulin (i.e. used to keep your
fasting blood sugar flat, not to counter spikes caused by eating.)

The older insulins like NPH are a lot cheaper. Anywhere from $20-37
dollars per vial, but they may be more uneven in their effect on your
blood sugar.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
Vicki Beausoleil - 28 Nov 2005 00:44 GMT
> >>I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
> >>this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
> http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info

HOLY CRAP!

I pay CDN $31.96 a vial for Novolog. Even that's too expensive, when
regular is 19 bucks a bottle.

It'll be interesting to see how much Levemir retails for here. It's not
available yet except through the endo, but will be needed if the cat
outlives his stash of UL.

Vicki
RK - 27 Nov 2005 21:44 GMT
|I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
| has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
| I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
| this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?

Depends upon what insulin(s) you want or what you're prescribed.

Insulins requiring prescription are:

Novolog
Humalog
Lantus
-- not sure about Lev??

Insulins that can be bought OTC:
NPH
Regular
Used to be Ultra Lente but think that has been discont.

So, Regular would be the cheapest if you have no insurance.  IIRC it's like
$17 a vial
at Walmart.  You can always call around for cheapest cost.  Most states you
will also
need a prescription for syringes (IGNORE anything Ted might say, half the
time his
syringe info is bogus)  It's ALWAYS best to call your local pharmacy and see
what
YOUR states syringe law is.  If the pharmacist knows your a insulin using
diabetic
most times you wont need a prescription for it... but still best to always
check locally.

If you're going to go the insulin route, it's always best to make sure your
doctor is UP
to DATE on the newest insulins that help the best.  The "best" route would
be to go
Lantus and either humalog or novolog--- I find I do better with Novolog then
Humalog
some do better the other way around.

Lantus is a slow very flat insulin, it's not meant to lower your glucose in
any way.  If it
does, then you are taking way too much of it and you need to re-evaluate
dosage with
your doctor.  Lantus is a background insulin, which is made to keep our
glucose at a
steady level.  So, if you are running 300mg then Lantus should keep you at
300mg ---
that is where the faster acting insulins come into help.

Faster acting insulins such as Novolog and Humalog are made to help lower
your glucose
quickly when too high (ie: correction) or to take before your meal to help
keep your post-prandal
lower.  These are not insulins for a T2 who already has a VERY low A1C.
Your doctor will most
likely start you off at a very low dosage to help determine your correct
dosage.  Since T2's are
usually very Insulin Resistant they normally require double the amount of a
T1, sometimes even
triple the amount.  -- Thus this can start a serious issue with T2's.
Because you already have too
much insulin in your system not being utilzed correctly (ie: Insulin
Resistance) -- it's proven that
too much insulin will begin to cause damage to the heart over time.  So, the
more you take is not
really always the best route.  -- This is why taking insulin is not a
license to eat just whatever they
want.

A correct diet, coupled with daily exercise, along with STILL insulin
resistance oral medications
are the best route for a T2 who wishes to add insulin to their routine. --  
It's certainly not a bad thing
just have to be more cautious then T1's in some respects, with taking too
much insulin.

Just remember for a T2, once you start taking insulin, you can stop at any
time.  It also doesn't by
any means show you've failed control either.  T2 Diabetes is a progressive
disease... At some point
it's said, every T2 will be on insulin as well.. .it's just a matter of when
they progress to that point.

HTH

RK, t1, pumper
Jenny - 28 Nov 2005 13:23 GMT
> Lantus is a slow very flat insulin, it's not meant to lower your glucose in
> any way.  If it
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 300mg ---
> that is where the faster acting insulins come into help.

This may be true for type 1s (which is what RK is) but it is most
definitely false for type 2s.

For a type 2 Lantus is prescribed to bring down the fasting blood
sugar--both when you wake up and what you see 4 or 5 hours after a  meal.

It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2 because
 lowering the fasting blood sugar with Lantus will also lower the peaks
they get after a meal.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
RK - 28 Nov 2005 15:24 GMT
| > Lantus is a slow very flat insulin, it's not meant to lower your glucose in
| > any way.  If it
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
| This may be true for type 1s (which is what RK is) but it is most
| definitely false for type 2s.

perhaps for YOU it is false, but READ their website which I did 4yrs ago
when I FIRST took Lantus. (started taking it 1mon after it was released for
almost 2yrs prior to pumping)

| For a type 2 Lantus is prescribed to bring down the fasting blood
| sugar--both when you wake up and what you see 4 or 5 hours after a  meal.

Cite please from Lantus site.

| It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2 because
|  lowering the fasting blood sugar with Lantus will also lower the peaks
| they get after a meal.

Again, wrong, cite please from ONLY Lantus site.  I was JUST there, again
they profess it will NOT peak, it is not given for those wishing for a peak
insulin.

Stick to diet mumbo Jenny, insulin is OUT of your league.

| --Jenny
<non-doctor medical advise sites snipped for safety>
None Given - 28 Nov 2005 21:29 GMT
> | It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2 because
> |  lowering the fasting blood sugar with Lantus will also lower the peaks
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Stick to diet mumbo Jenny, insulin is OUT of your league.

The Lantus may not peak but the BGs still do.

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Jenny - 28 Nov 2005 22:31 GMT
>>| It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2 because
>>|  lowering the fasting blood sugar with Lantus will also lower the peaks
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>>Stick to diet mumbo Jenny, insulin is OUT of your league.

> The Lantus may not peak but the BGs still do.

RK,

You are seriously uninformed about Type 2.

You throw fits anytime a person with type 2 diabetes responds to a type
1, but that doesn't stop you from giving erroneous or confused
information to any newbie type 2 who posts here--when you aren't
screaming "troll" at them.

You misunderstood the information at the Lantus site--the insulin levels
in the blood don't spike with Lantus, but after eating a meal containing
carbs, the blood sugar of a person on lantus most definitely does.

However, for a type 2 who still produces insulin (which is almost every
newbie who has ever stopped here), because the basal blood sugar level
is lowered, the height of the post-meal spike is also lowered. So many
doctors only prescribe Lantus for type 2s, not meal boluses.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
RK - 29 Nov 2005 00:15 GMT
| >>| It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2 because
| >>|  lowering the fasting blood sugar with Lantus will also lower the peaks
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
|
| --Jenny

Nope you are WRONG.  Read Macks reply, I'd believe him over you any
day of the week.  Lantus does not create a drop in glucose it keeps it
steady
it is the T2's own insulin production that creates the drop.  Get your info
correct, misinformation is bad, BOB!
Jenny - 29 Nov 2005 14:32 GMT
> Nope you are WRONG.  Read Macks reply, I'd believe him over you any
> day of the week.  Lantus does not create a drop in glucose it keeps it
> steady
> it is the T2's own insulin production that creates the drop.  Get your info
> correct, misinformation is bad, BOB!

Go read the Prescribing Information. Lantus is designed so that once
injected, it is very slowly absorbed into the blood stream over a long
period. It has a very long half life, so that even 24 hours after it is
injected, half of it is still in the subcutaneous depot--which is why it
takes a couple days to judge its effect, since you may be getting Lantus
from your daily injection and the remains of the past two days injections.

The steady release causes a steady level of insulin in the blood stream
which (duh) removes blood sugar. However, since the level being released
is much lower than the amount needed to remove a large dose of glucose
from a meal, it isn't sufficient to counter post-meal blood sugar rises.

Once again, you are confusing the way that a Type 1's body works--where
there is no insulin being produced and the lack of insulin will cause
liver dumps, so a basal insulin is needed to keep blood sugars level,
with what happens in a Type 2 who still produces some insulin, but not
enough to keep fasting blood sugars in a healthy range.

Your statement that "it is the T2's own insulin production that creates
the drop" is confused, BTW. The total amount of circulating insulin in
the blood stream is what causes the drop. (Duh). The person's own
insulin added to the slowly released Lantus insulin is what causes the
drop.  But by supplementing the Type 2's failing insulin production,
there is less demand on the beta cells.

You can rely on Mack's posting, or you can read the Prescribing
Information and see how the stuff works. Do some googling for "Lantus
half life" to learn more. And note that the graph of the level of
insulin in the blood stream with Lantus shows that it has not dissipated
at 24 hours. So the second injection is additive to whatever hasn't been
released yet.

It would be nice if you'd back up your insulting responses with some
references that go beyond Mack's summary of a dumbed down
consumer-oriented site.

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
Mary - 29 Nov 2005 18:21 GMT
You're absolutely right, Jenny.  The correct dosage of Lantus will keep
the person's fasting levels within a normal range, and for some T2s and
all T1s a bolus insulin is needed for post-meal increases in bgs.
Lantus is similar to a pump--the first thing when starting on a pump is
to get the bgs at a normal fasting level with the correct basal rate.

The action of Lantus is the same for both types (it cannot distinguish
if you are a T1 or a T2!), but treatments may differ depending on what
is needed after meals.

>> Nope you are WRONG.  Read Macks reply, I'd believe him over you any
>> day of the week.  Lantus does not create a drop in glucose it keeps it
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
> http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
Ma¢k - 29 Nov 2005 19:02 GMT
>Go read the Prescribing Information. Lantus is designed so that once
>injected, it is very slowly absorbed into the blood stream over a long
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>drop.  But by supplementing the Type 2's failing insulin production,
>there is less demand on the beta cells.

none of this contradicts what I wrote previously.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

http://tinyurl.com/dgb3q

RK - 29 Nov 2005 19:49 GMT
| none of this contradicts what I wrote previously.

Bah, i'm just going to ignore her now... She's too busy off telling
lies about me in other threads... She's proven what type of person
she is... Sad, lying by saying it's my surgery that caused my chronic
pain.. when gee not what my blood work nor my doctors tell me --
but hey she's gotta be right! then lying by saying i've had TWO
surgerys... when gee when did I ever post that? -- then lying and
saying i'm "dependant" upon pain meds... funny, I've not had anything
for 2 days... OMG! no tramadol, no morphine and no percocet... yep
I'm real dependant... She's what women call a "Busybee" sticks her
nose in where it don't belong, lying to make others look bad...

Hope others see her for the vicious mean person she truely is!
David - 29 Nov 2005 20:04 GMT
> Hope others see her for the vicious mean person she truely is!

Ha! Ha!

Pot

kettle

Black
Ma¢k - 29 Nov 2005 20:12 GMT
>| none of this contradicts what I wrote previously.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Hope others see her for the vicious mean person she truely is!

she should have known that making those comments in this forum of
people with chronic illnesses would not go over well with everyone.
but don't waste your time defending yourself against those false
statements.  trolls will pick up on it and keep it going.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

http://tinyurl.com/dgb3q

RK - 29 Nov 2005 20:23 GMT
| >| none of this contradicts what I wrote previously.
| >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
| but don't waste your time defending yourself against those false
| statements.  trolls will pick up on it and keep it going.

very true... why it's over on my part..

lol what's that song... "dust in the wind...."  <g>

thx mack

| "To announce that there must be no criticism of the
| President, or that we are to stand by the President
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
|
| http://tinyurl.com/dgb3q 
hayleedog - 30 Nov 2005 03:33 GMT
> | >| On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:32:40 -0500, Jenny
> <lottadatacarbs@hotmail.com>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> thx mack

no worries RK, those with half a brain know who's advice to follow ...and I
personally have been around you long enough over the past three years to
know without a doubt that you know what you're talking about.

I told you before, you missed your calling by not going into the medical
profession...and by that, I meant d-o-c-t-o-r  NOT  p-a-t-i-e-n-t *wink*

just chalk her up as another 'Timmy' ;)
David - 29 Nov 2005 18:00 GMT
> | >>| It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2
> because
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> it is the T2's own insulin production that creates the drop.  Get your info
> correct, misinformation is bad, BOB!

you are so wrong.  if Lantus didn't lower bg, it would be useless!
Imagine a diabetic who's bg's would be 400 every day.  then they go on
Lantus and find the correct dosage.  then their bg's run around 90-140
day and night.  HAS LANTUS FAILED TO LOWER THEIR BG'S??  All insulin
lowers bgs, the only difference between the types, is the ACTION (onset
and duration).

Stupidest thing you ever wrote, to date, RK.

dave
David - 29 Nov 2005 18:08 GMT
> | >>| It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2
> because
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> it is the T2's own insulin production that creates the drop.  Get your info
> correct, misinformation is bad, BOB!

Maybe if you stopped parroting Mack, you'd think for yourself, and maybe
once in a while say something that MADE SENSE.  D'ya think?  Nah...you
feel more secure riding on someone else's coattails, even if they are a
whack job.

Has it ever occurred to you that Mack keeps changing his address to
avoid killfiles?  A "normal" person would accept the fact that some
people don't care to read him, and would stick with ONE address.  He's
changed about 3 or 4 times since last year.  Just recently he's changed
his addy twice.  That's one of the definitions of a TROLL.  Learn to
pick your friends more carefully, as other posters (and lurkers) will
associate you with the troll.  I know I do!

Dave
RK - 29 Nov 2005 00:13 GMT
| > | It is often the first insulin prescribed for someone with Type 2 because
| > |  lowering the fasting blood sugar with Lantus will also lower the peaks
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
|
| The Lantus may not peak but the BGs still do.

It's exactly what Mack said it was.. It's NOT the lantus the peaks, it's the
T2's OWN insulin that creates the drop.. Jenny is PLAIN WRONG.
Ma¢k - 28 Nov 2005 20:42 GMT
>> Lantus is a slow very flat insulin, it's not meant to lower your glucose in
>> any way.  If it
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>--Jenny

that's because it works with the phase 2 insulin response that type 2s
still have with their own natural insulin.

If the type 2 was not still making their own insulin and having this
late phase 2 response, then the lantus would work in exactly the same
fashion as with a type 1.

I think you should both include that detail so as to be accurate about
this particular difference and not create confusion or
misunderstanding.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

RK - 29 Nov 2005 00:11 GMT
| >> Lantus is a slow very flat insulin, it's not meant to lower your glucose in
| >> any way.  If it
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
| this particular difference and not create confusion or
| misunderstanding.

Doesn't mention that at all on their site.  And I quote...

"LANTUS® is a clear, long-acting insulin with no pronounced peak. It
provides a consistent 24-hour basal insulin level in the blood. LANTUS®
cannot replace short-acting insulin such as Regular, Humalog® or Novolog®,
which provide a "bolus" at mealtime.

For people with type 2 diabetes, therapy may consist of a once-daily
long-acting insulin (LANTUS®) in combination with oral agents or with rapid-
or short-acting insulins.2"

http://www.lantus.com/consumer/learn_about_lantus/about_24hour_lantus/what_basal
bolus_regimen.do


RK, t1
Mimi - 29 Nov 2005 10:34 GMT
*snip*

> Faster acting insulins such as Novolog and Humalog are made to help lower
> your glucose
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> license to eat just whatever they
> want.
*snip*

Too much sugar vs too much insulin in your blood system....  I didn't know
that increased insulin caused damage to the heart over time. Can someone
please direct me to some articles that can show scientific proof regarding
this? I did some googling and found some article but it appears as if they
are from those who want to sell things.

Thank you,

Mimi
RK - 29 Nov 2005 11:13 GMT
heres several... happy reading.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=HYPERINSULINEMIA%2C+AND+CORONARY+HEART+DISEASE&
prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t&fl=0&x=wrt


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=HYPERINSULINEMIA+AND+CORONARY+HEART+DISEASE

Hyperinsulinemia refers to high insulin levels in the blood. The pancreas, a
gland behind the stomach, often produces excess insulin when tissues in the
body do not respond properly to insulin (insulin-resistant).
Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance usually are both early symptoms of
type 2 diabetes.
People who are overweight and take large doses of insulin or who take other
medications that interfere with the action of insulin also are at risk for
hyperinsulinemia.

Hyperinsulinemia may:

Be associated with the process of hardening of the arteries
(atherosclerosis), which decreases blood flow to the legs and organs, such
as the heart, brain, and kidneys. Atherosclerosis increases a person's risk
of heart attack and stroke.
Cause high blood pressure (hypertension).
Contribute to weight gain.
Increase blood cholesterol levels.

Losing weight helps decrease hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance.

http://www.uhseast.com/172278.cfm

| *snip*
| >
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
|
| Mimi
Mimi - 29 Nov 2005 12:40 GMT
Thank you, RK.

Mimi

> heres several... happy reading.
>
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
> |
> | Mimi
RK - 29 Nov 2005 12:44 GMT
you're welcome Mimi

hth

rk
| Thank you, RK.
|
| Mimi
|
| > heres several... happy reading.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=HYPERINSULINEMIA%2C+AND+CORONARY+HEART+DISEASE&
prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t&fl=0&x=wrt


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=HYPERINSULINEMIA+AND+CORONARY+HEART+DISEASE

| > Hyperinsulinemia refers to high insulin levels in the blood. The pancreas,
| > a
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
| > |
| > | Mimi
Jenny - 29 Nov 2005 15:16 GMT
> *snip*
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>Because you already have too
>>much insulin in your system not being utilzed correctly (ie: Insulin

> Too much sugar vs too much insulin in your blood system....  I didn't know
> that increased insulin caused damage to the heart over time. Can someone
> please direct me to some articles that can show scientific proof regarding
> this? I did some googling and found some article but it appears as if they
> are from those who want to sell things.

Mimi,

About five years ago, everything I read  seemed to agree that high
insulin levels caused heart disease.  However, I have heard since then
that this might not be true.

The problem is that the studies that implicated high insulin levels may
not have distinguished t the effect of high insulin levels from the
effect of the high blood sugar levels that usually accompany them.

So the known fact that people with heart disease often have very high
insulin levels does not necessarily imply that these high insulin levels
CAUSE heart disease.

It may be the damage to the vasculature caused by the uncontrolled high
blood sugars that go along with insulin resistance that are to blame.

There is increasing evidence that the risk of heart disease rises in
close correlation to the A1c even in people who are at what have been
previously considered "normal" levels (A1c from 5% to 6%).

No one has yet tested whether reducing A1c in people whose results fall
into this level reduces heart disease. If it did, that might change the
way that this research is looked at.

So for now, this is an important question for anyone taking or thinking
about insulin, but for now, the whole answer is not known.  We know that
high insulin coupled with higher than normal blood sugars and, often,
the other components of metabolic syndrome most definitely go along with
cardiac disease, but the true role of insulin remains to be understood.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
Ozgirl - 29 Nov 2005 20:37 GMT
>> *snip*
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> Too much sugar vs too much insulin in your blood system....  I
>> didn't know that increased insulin caused damage to the
heart over
>> time. Can someone please direct me to some articles that
can show
>> scientific proof regarding this? I did some googling and
found some
>> article but it appears as if they are from those who want
to sell
>> things.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The problem is that the studies that implicated high insulin levels
> may not have distinguished t the effect of high insulin
levels from
> the effect of the high blood sugar levels that usually
accompany them.

> So the known fact that people with heart disease often have very high
> insulin levels does not necessarily imply that these high insulin
> levels CAUSE heart disease.
>
> It may be the damage to the vasculature caused by the uncontrolled
> high blood sugars that go along with insulin resistance
that are to
> blame.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> No one has yet tested whether reducing A1c in people whose results
> fall into this level reduces heart disease. If it did,
that might
> change the way that this research is looked at.
>
> So for now, this is an important question for anyone taking or
> thinking about insulin, but for now, the whole answer is
not known.
> We know that high insulin coupled with higher than normal
blood
> sugars and, often, the other components of metabolic
syndrome most
> definitely go along with cardiac disease, but the true
role of
> insulin remains to be understood.

Jenny, yesterday I did a similar search "hyperinsulinemia
coronary heart disease" and came up with a number of hits of
trials that showed evidence independent of high blood
glucose levels. From memory it was done on non diabetics
with insulin resistance. I have a migraine getting worse and
heading back to bed soon but I am sure you can get something
out of that search. The med speak was highly evident, too
much for my brain this morning ;) From memory one was a
Finnish study.
Susan - 29 Nov 2005 15:32 GMT
> Too much sugar vs too much insulin in your blood system....  I didn't know
> that increased insulin caused damage to the heart over time. Can someone
> please direct me to some articles that can show scientific proof regarding
> this? I did some googling and found some article but it appears as if they
> are from those who want to sell things.

Go to www.nlm.nih.gov and search on Pubmed for "hyperinsulinemia and
cardiovascular disease."

Susan
Richard Evans - 29 Nov 2005 15:48 GMT
>Too much sugar vs too much insulin in your blood system....  I didn't know
>that increased insulin caused damage to the heart over time. Can someone
>please direct me to some articles that can show scientific proof regarding
>this? I did some googling and found some article but it appears as if they
>are from those who want to sell things.

FWIW, this is my endo's philosophy and he's not selling anything. I'm
so insulin resistant I'd be taking a couple hundred units of long-term
insulin a day. My endo has said right from the start (started insulin
in '99) that that much is hard on the heart. Instead I've been taking
about 200 units of Humalog (recently switched to Apidra) which is
taken in smaller doses and doesn't hang around in my system.
Ozgirl - 29 Nov 2005 20:38 GMT
>>Too much sugar vs too much insulin in your blood system....  I didn't
>>know that increased insulin caused damage to the heart
over time. Can
>>someone please direct me to some articles that can show
scientific
>>proof regarding this? I did some googling and found some
article but
>>it appears as if they are from those who want to sell
things.

> FWIW, this is my endo's philosophy and he's not selling anything. I'm
> so insulin resistant I'd be taking a couple hundred units of long-term
> insulin a day. My endo has said right from the start (started insulin
> in '99) that that much is hard on the heart. Instead I've been taking
> about 200 units of Humalog (recently switched to Apidra) which is
> taken in smaller doses and doesn't hang around in my system.

Weight loss didn't lower the IR?
Richard Evans - 29 Nov 2005 21:44 GMT
>Weight loss didn't lower the IR?

What weight loss? I gained 60 pounds the first year on insulin and
only took off 20 for a net gain of 40 since 2000.
ted rosenberg - 28 Nov 2005 01:09 GMT
> I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
> has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
> this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?

Regular insulin (Novo R, N, or mixes) costs $19 at WalMart.  Lily
Insulin, or Novo at places other than WalMart costs about $32.

The Analogs cost about $55-$60, and have a shorter shelf life.

There are also lots of penfil and prefill of various types which are
slightly easier to use, and more expensive
Jenny - 28 Nov 2005 13:26 GMT
> Regular insulin (Novo R, N, or mixes) costs $19 at WalMart.  Lily
> Insulin, or Novo at places other than WalMart costs about $32.
>
> The Analogs cost about $55-$60, and have a shorter shelf life.

Not in Western Massachusetts they don't. I called around for prices. U
and R were around $38 and the Lantus was in the 80s.

We don't have much competition in this rural area.
--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
Ma¢k - 28 Nov 2005 20:43 GMT
>> Regular insulin (Novo R, N, or mixes) costs $19 at WalMart.  Lily
>> Insulin, or Novo at places other than WalMart costs about $32.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>We don't have much competition in this rural area.
>--Jenny

do you have walmart?

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Jenny - 28 Nov 2005 22:16 GMT
>>We don't have much competition in this rural area.
>>--Jenny
>
> do you have walmart?

Mack,

We're the town that is featured in the movie about the town that kept
Wal-mart from moving in. So no, we don't have Walmart.

I can get to one, but it is a 40 minute drive.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
Ma¢k - 28 Nov 2005 23:03 GMT
>>>We don't have much competition in this rural area.
>>>--Jenny
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>--Jenny

so you shot yourselves in the foot on that one.  you do know you can
get the same price from walmart's online pharmacy.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Jenny - 28 Nov 2005 23:46 GMT
Jenny wrote
>>We're the town that is featured in the movie about the town that kept
>>Wal-mart from moving in. So no, we don't have Walmart.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> so you shot yourselves in the foot on that one.  you do know you can
> get the same price from walmart's online pharmacy.

Don't blame me. I didn't live here at the time, and besides I don't vote
in the town where the vote was held as I live in an iddy-biddy town to
the north.

I have drug coverage for now, so I don't have to mail order anything.
But my insurance copays are so high that I have started to check out the
prices before I fill a prescription, because sometimes the prescriptions
are cheaper without the insurance than with.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
Uncle Enrico - 28 Nov 2005 01:43 GMT
> I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
> has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
> this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?

I'm a Type II who uses insulin and Metformin. I need very little insulin
because I've lost 45 pounds, exercise daily, and strictly control carbs.
I avoid the starches and eat plenty of greens and lean proteins.

I get by nicely with OTC insulins: NPH and R.

A vial of either one costs me about $25.00 at Costco. One vial gives me
1000 units. I rarely, if ever, use more than 20 units a day. Many days,
I only need 12 units. So let's say I average 15 units a day. That gives
me 67 doses for $25.00, or 37 cents a dose. Each syringe costs 25 cents.
 So, for about 62 cents, I'm shooting insulin and keeping my blood
glucose well controlled. Last A1C was 5.3.

The NPH and R insulins have a long shelf life and seem to last months in
the fridge in light-tight containers. I keep them off the door so they
don't get jostled around.

The expensive insulins have a short shelf-life...30 days. I could use
these insulins with penlets and cartridges and avoid having to throw
away unused insulin older than 30 days, but I'm doing so well with the
NPH and R, I don't feel the need to pay more at this point.
Mimi - 28 Nov 2005 16:03 GMT
Uncle Enrico:

I did not know that insulin could be purchased without prescription. I
wonder if this would be beneficial to use (the NPH) for my live dump in the
morning. It seem like my am FBS is harder to control any more even though
I'm exercising and watching what I eat. It's been any where from 120's all
the way up into 160's. It's really disheartening especially when I feel like
I'm doing everything right.

At the moment I'm on Actos 30mg and Amaryl 4mg with regular insulin in the
morning to cover my high FBS.

Mimi

>> I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
>> has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> unused insulin older than 30 days, but I'm doing so well with the NPH and
> R, I don't feel the need to pay more at this point.
Suffix - 29 Nov 2005 17:37 GMT
> Uncle Enrico:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Mimi

I didn't start insulin until my doctor approved of it and I wouldn't
recommend anyone use insulin without a doctor's approval despite the
availability of OTC insulin.  For example, if your doctor approved your
starting insulin, he/she would likely change and/or discontinue some of
your meds.  Also, the choice of insulin to deal with your morning
numbers needs to be carefully considered.

There is considerable support among endos and doctors who treat
diabetics that insulin should be started much earlier in the disease
process to preserve the beta cells and achieve good control.

I began using insulin specifically to deal with my high morning numbers
which were not easily contolled with metformin and the bed time snack.

I have a somewhat unconventional approach to the liver dump problem by
using NPH and R. I wake up at 3 am for my morning bathroom run, and
afterwards inject 5 units of R and 5 of N and then go back to sleep. I
wake up two to three hours later around 95 to 100 instead of 130 to 150.
If I stay low carb the rest of the day, I only need Metformin. Dosages
are highly individualized and need to be determined, first by your
doctor and then by you and your meter as you become knowledgeable about
how your body works with the food you eat.

Most doctors will now recommend using Lantus to deal with the problem
because it is "peakless" and lasts about 24 hours. Unfortuntely, it
costs twice what my NPH and R cost and its shelf life is less than 50%
of the cheaper insulins.

Talk to your doctor.
oldal4865 - 28 Nov 2005 02:42 GMT
2liberal wrote in message
<1133110719.967824.163000@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...
>I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
>has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I am also looking at changing jobs.  How much does insulin cost for
>this scenario without a health plan that covers prescriptions?

  This is a situation which allows you work harder,   "go the extra mile"
and save some money.

Lantus is a premium-priced insulin which is extremely convenient to use.
For most T2,  a single shot a day does a lot of good.   However, it has
about the worst stability of all the insulins so you may end up opening a
new vial every month  (~$65 at a "good" store)

NPH can be substituted for Lantus at somewhere around 1/4 to 1/3 the cost. .
. .BUT  you have to take several small shots spaced through the day to get
the same effect.

NPH is very stable.   You can use almost all of a vial.     I exploit this
effect with my current slow insulin,  Ultralente,  and end up paying about
25% the cost of equivalent Lantus.

I suppose the mail order places have good prices but I haven't seen any that
beat our local Wal-Mart.    Shop around with great diligence if you can't
find a Wal-Mart.    The differences in insulin prices from store to store
are reprehensible.    Stores that brag about their "discount" prices scr*w
diabetics.

The above argument can be repeated in a comparison between the "before-meal"
insulins Humalog and "Regular".    Humalog is very convenient;  you shoot
just before each meal and it works almost as if by magic.    Regular takes
several hours to reach maximum effect so you must shoot perhaps as much as
an hour (or more) before each meal and do some guessing about exactly when
and how much you will eat.    However,  Wal-Mart Regular is less than 1/3
the cost of Humalog.    Novolog is about a 1:1 substitute for Humalog in
price and action.

Regards
 Old Al
Uncle - 30 Nov 2005 04:37 GMT
.

> NPH is very stable.   You can use almost all of a vial.     I exploit this
> effect with my current slow insulin,  Ultralente,  and end up paying about
> 25% the cost of equivalent Lantus.

Are you still able to buy Ultralente? I thought it was discontinued???
None Given - 28 Nov 2005 04:56 GMT
> I have been using metaformin for 5 yrs now and recently my blood sugar
> has been staying higher.  My doctor has been after me to lose weight
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> too high even when I do eat better - not exactly "right" -  and
> exercise.

Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Alan S - 28 Nov 2005 07:57 GMT
>Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
>http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm

Wow!

A year ago it was 23lbs. And then you had joined the 5%
club. That's wonderful!

C O N G R A T U L A T I O N S!!!!!

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Peter G. (Bigbird) - 28 Nov 2005 08:21 GMT
>>Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
>>http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.

Same here. I've also been loosing weight for the last 23 months coincident
to getting my bg in control. I *know* that kind of weight loss isn't easy.
Way to go! Congratulations!

Peter G.
Chris J. - 28 Nov 2005 14:23 GMT
>>Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
>>http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.

I missed the original post, so thanks Alan for pointing this out!

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Congratulations, NG!!! Way to go!!!!
None Given - 28 Nov 2005 21:35 GMT
> >Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
> >http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> C O N G R A T U L A T I O N S!!!!!

Thanks, I was at the dr's again a little while ago, it's now 88 pounds.
The MRI showed my problem between L4&L5, I am supposed to see a neurosurgeon
next.  This worries me I don't think I want to be cut on.  Isn't there some
kind of physical therapy or chiropractor or something, I can try first?

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Priscilla H. Ballou - 28 Nov 2005 22:21 GMT
> > >Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
> > >http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> next.  This worries me I don't think I want to be cut on.  Isn't there some
> kind of physical therapy or chiropractor or something, I can try first?

If all you see is a neurosurgeon, then all you'll hear about will be
surgery.  Find a good chiro and get a consult.

Priscilla
Ma¢k - 28 Nov 2005 23:09 GMT
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:21:33 -0500, "Priscilla H. Ballou"
<vze23t8n@verizon.net> Huffed and Puffed the following into the
madness of usenet:

>> > >Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
>> > >http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Priscilla

be very wary of chiropractors, many have been investigated and busted
for fraud and instructing patients on how to commit insurance fraud.
Many will sell supplement scams and profess to have cures for diseases
there are no cures for.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

None Given - 28 Nov 2005 23:41 GMT
> > Thanks, I was at the dr's again a little while ago, it's now 88 pounds.
> > The MRI showed my problem between L4&L5, I am supposed to see a neurosurgeon
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If all you see is a neurosurgeon, then all you'll hear about will be
> surgery.  Find a good chiro and get a consult.

How do I find a good one?

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Mary - 29 Nov 2005 00:07 GMT
I would first consult a pain management doctor or a physiatrist.  A
surgeon will want to do surgery first, but your problem may be
manageable with epidural injections.  I've done this and it's worked
wonders for me.

>>>Thanks, I was at the dr's again a little while ago, it's now 88 pounds.
>>>The MRI showed my problem between L4&L5, I am supposed to see a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> How do I find a good one?
Jenny - 29 Nov 2005 00:17 GMT
>>If all you see is a neurosurgeon, then all you'll hear about will be
>>surgery.  Find a good chiro and get a consult.

> How do I find a good one?

How you DON'T find a good one is getting referrals from friends who have
minor aches and pains who tell you how wonderful their chiropractor is.
That was what I did, and what a mistake it was!

This is true about finding doctors too. If you ask people who are rarely
sick and who don't have a chronic disease, they'll often tell you that
their doctor is "wonderful" based on his friendliness.

The best source of referrals is people who work in hospitals and know
the local doctors. Nurses, in particular. They know, as they say, "Where
the bodies are buried." <G>

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
bj - 28 Nov 2005 22:49 GMT
> Thanks, I was at the dr's again a little while ago, it's now 88 pounds.
> The MRI showed my problem between L4&L5, I am supposed to see a
> neurosurgeon next.  This worries me I don't think I want to be cut on.
> Isn't there some kind of physical therapy or chiropractor or something, I
> can try first?

What exactly is the problem? What kind of doctor(s) have you already seen
about it? And did you already ask them if there are alternatives to surgery?
Emphasize your desire to try other (reasonable, not crackpot) approaches
first. Ask why surgery is the only (or even the best) option (if that's what
they say it is).

(My orthopedic surgeon has *never* suggested surgery as the first thing to
try for my various problems with ankles, knees, back, shoulders, elbows,
wrist..... though I did end up needing surgery for both torn rotator cuffs.)
And good luck.
bj
None Given - 28 Nov 2005 23:48 GMT
> What exactly is the problem? What kind of doctor(s) have you already seen
> about it? And did you already ask them if there are alternatives to surgery?
> Emphasize your desire to try other (reasonable, not crackpot) approaches
> first. Ask why surgery is the only (or even the best) option (if that's what
> they say it is).

I have a pain in my hip that shoots down my leg, it started after I had a
spasm in my back, but it didn't get better like it has before it just moved
into my hip instead.  My regular dr took xrays and said it is sciatica then
sent me for the MRI.  She said it shows I have the problem at L4-L5 and my
muscle in that area is in spasm but I don't feel a spasm, I just feel the
pain in my hip and leg.  If I go to a surgeon is it certain that he will say
I need surgery or is he supposed to see if he thinks it will help or not?
Do surgeons do more tests for stuff or what?

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Jenny - 29 Nov 2005 00:14 GMT
> I have a pain in my hip that shoots down my leg, it started after I had a
> spasm in my back, but it didn't get better like it has before it just moved
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I need surgery or is he supposed to see if he thinks it will help or not?
> Do surgeons do more tests for stuff or what?

If you don't have an actual rupture visible on MRI, the problem may very
well be a muscle spasm, in which case, acupuncture might be exactly what
you need. It is extremely good at releasing muscles that have locked up.

I had a shoulder that was excruciating for over 6 months, which did not
respond to cortisone or physical therapy, which became completely normal
after two acupuncture treatments. The acupuncturist said that it was a
case where the original injury that had caused the muscles to lock up
around my shoulder had healed, but the muscles continued to be in spasm
around the damaged area. Acupuncture can fix that. So of that's really
what is going on in your back, it might be worth a try.

I'd be very careful with the surgeon. Some that I've met are very honest
and will say, "this isn't a good thing to operate on." Others will try
to push you into surgery.

The guy who ended up NOT doing my surgery told me that I'd never recover
 feeling in my leg and that without immediate surgery (like in two
days!) my paralyzed leg muscle would get worse. Even with surgery he
said I'd never get feeling back, and he wouldn't promise that I would
not end up in pain after the surgery.

My family doctor told me that I didn't need to have the surgery in any
two days, and that it would be fine to wait a week or two. I did, and
within the two weeks, the feeling came back into my leg--which the
surgeon said would never happen. Within a few more weeks I could push up
on my toes again on my right leg, which had been impossible before. That
undercut my feeling of confidence in him, and reinforced the feeling I'd
gotten from several things he'd said at the appointment that he was Dr.
Happy Knife.

A surgeon should give you a bunch of neurological tests, hit you with
little hammers, make you walk around, stand on one leg, stand on your
toes, etc, to evaluate your neurological function, and he should spend a
bunch of time looking at your MRI.

If he tells you surgery will help, be sure to ask a lot of questions
about what he thinks is wrong, why, and what kind of surgery he wants to
do.  Talk it over with the family doctor before making a decision. Mine
was very helpful when I went through this.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
RK - 29 Nov 2005 00:25 GMT
what you described is very much what I have on a moment to moment
basis... steriod injections in the back help, muscle relaxers help... but I
think it would do you good to get a blood test for a HBL-A27 marker.

what you described is how AS begins in many.

| > What exactly is the problem? What kind of doctor(s) have you already seen
| > about it? And did you already ask them if there are alternatives to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
| I need surgery or is he supposed to see if he thinks it will help or not?
| Do surgeons do more tests for stuff or what?
2liberal - 29 Nov 2005 03:58 GMT
thanks for the responses, i got what I was asking for and quite a bit
more. If i steer clear of carbs my levels is about 120-140. With any
carbs such as whole wheat bread i spike up to 200 and stay there for
awhile.  It looks like I have gone to a new stage as my level used to
drop down to 70 at times when I ate right but that is not happening
lately.
Jenny - 28 Nov 2005 23:40 GMT
> Thanks, I was at the dr's again a little while ago, it's now 88 pounds.
> The MRI showed my problem between L4&L5, I am supposed to see a neurosurgeon
> next.  This worries me I don't think I want to be cut on.  Isn't there some
> kind of physical therapy or chiropractor or something, I can try first?

My ruptured disc was L4/L5. I didn't have the surgery because I knew
several people who had very poor outcomes, one them a much-loved
professor who had to retire early because he was in so much pain.

The chiropractor I saw made things worse. Much worse. I would caution
you to avoid chiropractors if you have a serious back injury.

The physical therapist my doctor sent me to didn't do anything that
caused improvement and gave me a list of "off the shelf" exercises which
made my particular injury worse, not better.

I tried acupuncture, which I have found very helpful for other problems.
The acupuncturist (much more honest than the Chiropractor) told me that
I should be able to tell within two treatments if acupuncture would help
the back injury. He said it sometimes did, but mostly it didn't, which
was the case for me.

So after trying all these things, I just waited it out since the
numbness cleared up and then the pain very slowly started to abate. When
I got back to where I could walk, I did as much gentle walking as I could.

I got a lot of flak from the family for not having the surgery, because
it took so long for me to get back to any kind of half-decent shape. But
over time the people who did have the surgery ended up back in the
hospital, and one of them came back out in very bad shape, so finally, I
stopped getting the "Why didn't you have surgery like So-and-so" and
instead I was hearing, "I'm really glad you DIDN'T have the surgery like
So-and-so."

My pain levels subsided from life-changing to minor-annoyance in time.
But it took over a year to get my mobility back and my back it is still
far from 100%--I can't carry anything heavy at all and I can't twist,
which means I can't swim or do any other sport that is fun.
On the plus side, I don't have scar tissue growing up through my spinal
nerves making my life pure, living hell, which is what happened to my
uncle.

Best wishes for whatever solution you go for!

--Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
None Given - 28 Nov 2005 23:56 GMT
> The chiropractor I saw made things worse. Much worse. I would caution
> you to avoid chiropractors if you have a serious back injury.

What serious back injury, it started when I sneezed, there has to be
something I can do, right?  Does walking help?  I notice after I have to go
shopping where I end up walking a lot my hip feels really sore.  Should I
just wait, for how long, it's been 5 months, so far?

> My pain levels subsided from life-changing to minor-annoyance in time.
> But it took over a year to get my mobility back and my back it is still
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> nerves making my life pure, living hell, which is what happened to my
> uncle.
Jenny - 29 Nov 2005 14:21 GMT
>>The chiropractor I saw made things worse. Much worse. I would caution
>>you to avoid chiropractors if you have a serious back injury.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>nerves making my life pure, living hell, which is what happened to my
>>uncle.

None Given,

Sneezing yourself into a back mess is a sign of chronic back injury, the
kind that isn't as responsive to surgery. Mine was apparently caused by
limping  many miles for a couple weeks after taking a flying leap while
dancing and tearing a muscle in my calf. Unfortunately, we had a hiking
vacation scheduled and I toughed it out. Bad move. It turns out that an
uneven gait stresses an already marginal back.

Five months is a long time. Did the doctor mention "piriformis syndrome"
when talking about muscle spasm?  This is something that physical
therapists treat with stretches, muscles somewhere in the hip/butt
region clamp down around the sciatic nerve. It can occur the follow up
to an injury to the back or can result from postural stresses. This
might be something that does respond to physical therapy or cortisone.

If you haven't tried acupuncture or physical therapy, they could be
worth a look, particularly if the MRI does not show damaged discs, which
sounds like the case if your doctor says the problem is muscular in origin.

If you have an appointment to see a surgeon, go, just be wary about
promises of cure. The problem with "successful" surgeries, is that the
method of evaluating a surgery as successful is to look at the patient
in 6 weeks and see how they are doing.  So a doctor who claims that 95%
of his surgeries are successful may not know that in 5 years half his
patients have had a second surgery and are in bad shape.

Another problem that I've seen happen is that the surgery is declared a
success and when you need the second surgery on the same area the
doctors insist it is for a different problem. Doctors tend to protect
each other and won't tell you that a previous operation wasn't as
successful as you were told. Or that the problem is caused by scar
tissue built up around the first, "successful" operation.

Re RK's response:
Notice how RK, who gets furious when people suggest contacting a doctor
about a possible side effect from Metformin, saying that they are
"playing doctor" plays surgeon here and assures you that a non-trivial
surgery is safe. After what examination????

Notice, too, that like most people who rave about how great their
surgery was, she ended up with a second surgery that has left her in
chronic pain and dependent on powerful painkillers.

And as is so often the case, she is wrong about disc rupture being a
sentence to a lifetime on ineffective painkillers. My disc ruptured
completely (which is why I'm almost an inch shorter than I used to be)
but the extruded material (highly visible on MRI) shrank or was
reabsorbed by my body (which is what happens) and, as mentioned before,
my back pain is mostly in the "aches and pains" category, not the
"dependent on powerful painkillers" category.

Signature

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info

RK - 29 Nov 2005 14:50 GMT
| Re RK's response:
| Notice how RK, who gets furious when people suggest contacting a doctor
| about a possible side effect from Metformin, saying that they are
| "playing doctor" plays surgeon here and assures you that a non-trivial
| surgery is safe. After what examination????

lol... can't stand it when i'm right.. you have a severe complex of needing
to be top dog... sorry you just don't cut the mustard.

| Notice, too, that like most people who rave about how great their
| surgery was, she ended up with a second surgery that has left her in
| chronic pain and dependent on powerful painkillers.

Excuse me? more of your trivial lying there Jenny? I've never stated I've
had 2 surgeries, I've had ONE.  My chronic pain isn't from my back surgery
at all... and I'm not dependant on any pain medication.  I happen to enjoy
NOT hurting 24/7.  As for my chronic pain, I have OS along with AS which
are both arthritis and one is genetic along with being auto-immune.  So get
your lies straight next time.

| And as is so often the case, she is wrong about disc rupture being a
| sentence to a lifetime on ineffective painkillers. My disc ruptured
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
| my back pain is mostly in the "aches and pains" category, not the
| "dependent on powerful painkillers" category.

Then it's doubtful that you had a ruptured disk at all, perhaps mildly
herniated.
A ruptured disk would have resulted in the complete loss of disk material
between
the disks therefore leaving very painful bone on bone rubbing until natural
scar
tissue had built up.  Again, get some new material, because you're very
boring
with your misinformation.
RK - 29 Nov 2005 00:22 GMT
| > >Try this first, 81 pounds lost so far.
| > >http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
| next.  This worries me I don't think I want to be cut on.  Isn't there some
| kind of physical therapy or chiropractor or something, I can try first?

congrats on the weight loss.

the diskectomy and lamectomy was the best thing I ever did for myself.
being nearly 5yrs "almost" painfree was a blessing.  my neurosurgeon told
me a chiro would only cripple me more in the end, which I was stupid and
went to one ONCE... and I was in bed unable to move to do sensation loss
because of how they "twisted" me.  diskectomy's are very common now and
are done mostly laproscopic, which reduces recovery quite a bit.  mine took
8 months for the 217 stitches and 7 layers of muscles inside to heal.

don't screw around with it, if the disk ruptures completely, you'll risk
ending
up having a lamectomy which is what took me to so long to recover from, it
screws up the vertebrea ... that then is bone on bone.. and believe me it
hurts
far worse then what you feel now.

there are days I seek death if only for a hour or two to gain relief.

best of luck.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.