Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Good morning

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
pverburgh - 21 Nov 2005 11:39 GMT
Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of my
diabetes.

I have a book about Diabetes.  It is Called Diabetes for Canadians for
Dummies.  I find it is quite easy to understand and have learned quite a bit
from reading the book.

This morning, my b/s levels were 7.6 and I had oatmeal, but didn't eat it
all.  When I have oatmeal, I put cinnamon on top of it and 1% milk.  I don't
put sugar substitute on it at all.

With following what I should be doing, I am feeling much better than I have
had last week.  I had a couple of days where I didn't feel really great.
Not sure exactly why.  I have depression on top of the diabetes and also
cholesterol problems.

Jeannette
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 21 Nov 2005 11:45 GMT
> Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of my
> diabetes.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> This morning, my b/s levels were 7.6 and I had oatmeal, but didn't eat it
> all.  When I have oatmeal, I put cinnamon on top of it and 1% milk.

It would be wise to switch to skim since you write below that you have
cholesterol problems.

>  I don't
> put sugar substitute on it at all.
>
> With following what I should be doing, I am feeling much better than I have
> had last week.  I had a couple of days where I didn't feel really great.
> Not sure exactly why.

Would suggest you inform your doctor so that s/he can find out why.

> I have depression on top of the diabetes and also
> cholesterol problems.

May the LORD help you, in Jesus' most precious and holy name, dear
Jeannette.

Losing weight safely and permanently can cure type 2 diabetes in folks
who are overweight.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
pverburgh - 22 Nov 2005 14:30 GMT
Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.

Jeannette
>> Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of
>> my
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> Andrew
> http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Ma¢k - 22 Nov 2005 20:08 GMT
>Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
>
>Jeannette

that's because skim milk is higher in carbs than whole milk and
because of the lower milk fat content hits the blood stream faster as
well.  Plus "I" simply prefer the taste.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

troll references snipped

Alan S - 22 Nov 2005 21:43 GMT
<snip, re-arranged for clarity>

>>> This morning, my b/s levels were 7.6 and I had oatmeal, but didn't eat it
>>> all.  When I have oatmeal, I put cinnamon on top of it and 1% milk.
>>
>> It would be wise to switch to skim since you write below that you have
>> cholesterol problems.

>Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
>
>Jeannette

Hi Jeanette

One of the difficulties with the un-moderated world of
usenet is that you need to develop your skills in sifting
the good and bad info and the useful and dangerous posters.

Chung is a kook with two obsessions: his particular
interpretation of the Christian religion and the passionate
belief that eating less than two pounds of food (any food,
except, apparently, full-cream milk) is the cure for all
ills.

Unfortunately, even qualified physicians can develop mental
illness.

I'll assist him by providing a link to his "famous 2PD OMER"
in the confident assumption that reading that will help you
place him in your killfile:
http://www.karinya.com/diabetic.htm

Of course, maybe you'll show that I'm wrong, and prove that
his OMER works by giving it a try. That's your choice; but
I'd suggest that you choose your advisers carefully, because
experience can be an expensive teacher.

For those who use insulin who have never read Chung's stuff,
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this fascinating
excerpt:

" (3) Divide your current dose of insulin and/or other
diabetic medicines by the number of pounds on this "first"
day and this is 1 "med per pound". Record this in your
notepad. For example, you might find that you are presently
eating 10 lbs of food per day and you take 20 units of 70/30
insulin every morning and 10 units every evening. That's 2
units per pound in the morning and 1 unit per pound in the
evening for 1 "med per pound".

(4) Gradually, decrease the amount of food by 1 pound and
the amount of diabetes medicine by 1 "med per pound" every
day until you get to 2 pounds per day. For the above
example, you would decrease to 18 units of insulin in the
morning and 9 units in the evening on the first day when you
go from 10 to 9 lbs of food."

So, presumably, when you reach the recommended 2 pds, you
are limited to 2 and 1 units respectively regardless of
blood glucose levels.

This guy is very dangerous.

Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Ozgirl - 22 Nov 2005 21:58 GMT
> <snip, re-arranged for clarity>
>
>>>> This morning, my b/s levels were 7.6 and I had oatmeal, but didn't
>>>> eat it all.  When I have oatmeal, I put cinnamon on top
of it and
>>>> 1% milk.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> are limited to 2 and 1 units respectively regardless of
> blood glucose levels.

And presumably a cardiologist who suddenly has
endocrinologist accreditation can now advise on insulin
dosing, an outdated insulin at that. Surely there is a law
against providing medical advice outside your specialty
and/or over the internet?
Tiger Lily - 22 Nov 2005 23:39 GMT
that insulin advice is criminal Alan

it's the quantity of carbs that you match insulin
to

and everyone needs to balance that according to
their OWN insulin/carb ratios that we find out
about over time

the other issue not addressed is whether or not
the EXERCISE one has to do, and the basal insulin
one takes as one loses weight on the 'diet' has to
change

Chung is NOT qualified to give out insulin advice

maybe someone who lives in georgia can be given
this link from Chung's many link's so that some
reporting can be done about Chung......

sigh....... only Chung

> <snip, re-arranged for clarity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>
> Alan, T2, Australia.
Ma¢k - 23 Nov 2005 03:55 GMT
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:43:52 +1100, Alan S
<loralweightandcarbs@optusnet.com.au> Huffed and Puffed the following
into the madness of usenet:

><snip, re-arranged for clarity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>
>Alan, T2, Australia.

at that dose of insulin someone would be dead after serious and
painful DKA.

chung is totally whacked.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Ozgirl - 23 Nov 2005 07:14 GMT
> at that dose of insulin someone would be dead after serious and
> painful DKA.
>
> chung is totally whacked.

I like this excerpt (still in the diabetic section):

"For example, if you ate a half pound bowl of cereal plus
skim milk for breakfast and a half pound of tuna fish
sandwich for lunch, you're not to put more than a pound of
spaghetti and/or other stuff on your plate for dinner after
you are down to 2 pounds. Bring the notepad with you to
clinic visits so that your doctor can review your progress
and go over any problems."

Nice diabetic meals for a type 2. I know exactly what my
doctor would say if I presented him with this information.
Chris J. - 24 Nov 2005 03:15 GMT
>> at that dose of insulin someone would be dead after
>serious and
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Nice diabetic meals for a type 2. I know exactly what my
>doctor would say if I presented him with this information.

Sadly, that sounds like my hospital menu, which WAS the "diabetic
menu". Ugh.

I don't care one way or another about Chung's religious views or
behavior. I do however object most strongly to his dietary advice,
especially the frequency with which he pushes it.

Actually, I find his insulin advice even more objectionable, as it
could kill someone quickly.

I object even more that he does these things while coat-tailing on the
credibility that having an MD after your name usually conveys.

For these reasons, he was the first addition to my KF for this group.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 14:21 GMT
> > at that dose of insulin someone would be dead after
> serious and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Nice diabetic meals for a type 2.

"and/or other stuff" gives you the recommended choice of not altering
your current diet while using the 2PD-OMER Approach to eat less.

> I know exactly what my
> doctor would say if I presented him with this information.

Would be glad to field any questions from your doctor about the 2PD-OMER
Approach... probably already have...  your doctor is probably using the
2PD-OMER Approach if s/he is getting leaner/trimmer :-)

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
VBH - 23 Nov 2005 10:59 GMT
<big snip for brevity>

> This guy is very dangerous.
>
> Alan, T2, Australia.

I recently reinstalled both my PCs and had to set up newsgroup access on
both again.

Three names went straight into the killfile.  Top of the list was Chung.
 Since the others were Rich "Aspartame conspiracy" Murray and "iron is
the root of all evil" Doe, you can see where I am coming from I hope.

Killfile has filled out a bit since then, but I made sure I got rid of
the hardcore nutters first.

VBH
Ozgirl - 23 Nov 2005 11:11 GMT
> <big snip for brevity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Three names went straight into the killfile.  Top of the list was
>   Chung. Since the others were Rich "Aspartame conspiracy"
Murray and
> "iron is the root of all evil" Doe, you can see where I am
coming
> from I hope.
>
> Killfile has filled out a bit since then, but I made sure I got rid of
> the hardcore nutters first.

I see Murray nipped over to your UK group. You won't see him
of course but he is posting the large messages he had
promised not to write in here :( I am expecting the usual
hospitality given to people like him from the Brits.
Alan S - 23 Nov 2005 12:16 GMT
>> <big snip for brevity>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>promised not to write in here :( I am expecting the usual
>hospitality given to people like him from the Brits.

I've kfed Murray and doe but I leave Chung in the clear so I
can occasionally do what I just did for newbies.

Anyone with half a brain can see through Murray, and
eventually they'll also see through doe. But neither of them
are as directly dangerous in their advice or use the
supposed authority of an MD qualification.

I get sick of it occasionally and stick him back in. Others
here do the same, we seem to have an informal rotation:-)
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

VBH - 23 Nov 2005 12:19 GMT
>><big snip for brevity>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> promised not to write in here :( I am expecting the usual
> hospitality given to people like him from the Brits.

I hadn't thought about it when he cropped up.  I just killfiled him.
Might have to have some fun with him over there instead.  <EG>

VBH
RK - 23 Nov 2005 13:37 GMT
| <snip, re-arranged for clarity>
|
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
|
| Alan, T2, Australia.

Thats WHAT started me on the "Chung is a dung" -- first time
I'd seen his site a few years back I saw that... Bugs Bunny is
smarter then Chung is...

God must hate all of us to force us to endure Chungs stupidity.
or there really isn't a God after all... otherwise how can someone
be so STUPID? <all rhetorical>

RK (ooo am I still on his stalker page?)
Ma¢k - 23 Nov 2005 18:28 GMT
>Thats WHAT started me on the "Chung is a dung" -- first time
>I'd seen his site a few years back I saw that... Bugs Bunny is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>or there really isn't a God after all... otherwise how can someone
>be so STUPID? <all rhetorical>

actually it's just God's way of saying sorry this is what happens when
I make mistakes, you get chunged.

>RK (ooo am I still on his stalker page?)

you're probably still on his death wish page.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Ozgirl - 23 Nov 2005 20:05 GMT
>>Thats WHAT started me on the "Chung is a dung" -- first time
>>I'd seen his site a few years back I saw that... Bugs Bunny is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> actually it's just God's way of saying sorry this is what happens when
> I make mistakes, you get chunged.

Like getting punk'd?
RK - 23 Nov 2005 22:42 GMT
| > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:37:52 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com>
| Huffed and
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
|
| Like getting punk'd?

LOL :-)
Ma¢k - 24 Nov 2005 02:47 GMT
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:05:27 GMT, "Ozgirl"
<are_we_there_yet@maccas.com> Huffed and Puffed the following into the
madness of usenet:

>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:37:52 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com>
>Huffed and
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Like getting punk'd?

Yes, but while God was doing acid.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 14:21 GMT
> <snip, re-arranged for clarity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> except, apparently, full-cream milk) is the cure for all
> ills.

False witness.

> Unfortunately, even qualified physicians can develop mental
> illness.

More false witness.

> I'll assist him by providing a link to his "famous 2PD OMER"
> in the confident assumption that reading that will help you
> place him in your killfile:
> http://www.karinya.com/diabetic.htm

Actually, the links to the 2PD-OMER Approach are here:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/wtloss.asp

> Of course, maybe you'll show that I'm wrong, and prove that
> his OMER works by giving it a try. That's your choice;

You've already been shown to be wrong, dear Alan.

> but
> I'd suggest that you choose your advisers carefully, because
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> are limited to 2 and 1 units respectively regardless of
> blood glucose levels.

That would depend on how much food you were eating at baseline for your
baseline amount of oral hypoglycemic medications.  Exactly how to lower
oral hypoglycemic medication with decreased food intake should be and is
left up to the supervising physician.

> This guy is very dangerous.

That has been and will continue to be said of the LORD Whom I serve.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 23 Nov 2005 18:43 GMT
> Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.

Such are the problems with diets which by definition change **what**
people are eating (ie from 2% milk to skim milk for a low fat diet).

Thankfully, the 2PD-OMER Approach does not change **what** folks are
eating but does help people reduce **how much** they are eating and is
therefore **not** a diet:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/wtloss.asp

Some folks find skim milk more palatable when thickening agents are
added.  These alternatives are called fat-free milk instead of skim
milk.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Jeff - 24 Nov 2005 00:04 GMT
>> Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> eating but does help people reduce **how much** they are eating and is
> therefore **not** a diet:

http://www2.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/mwmednlm?book=Medical&va=diet

says: " a regimen of eating and drinking sparingly so as to reduce one's
weight."

Jeff
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 04:44 GMT
> >> Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> says: " a regimen of eating and drinking sparingly so as to reduce one's
> weight."

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a regimen of eating and drinking sparingly
but one of eating and drinking an optimal amount to reach and maintain
an optimal weight.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Jeff - 24 Nov 2005 13:28 GMT
>> >> Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> but one of eating and drinking an optimal amount to reach and maintain
> an optimal weight.

Wrong. The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based on a
misintepretation of the Bible. It has virtually no scientific evidence to
show that it is in any way "optimal." Nor is there any scientific evidence
to show that two pounds of food is the "optimal" amount for everyone.

Jeff
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 14:21 GMT
> >> >> Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Wrong.

It seems you are trying to tell the author of the 2PD-OMER Approach that
he does not know what he has authored.

> The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based on a
> misintepretation of the Bible.

Actually, the 2PD-OMER Approach is as described here:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/wtloss.asp

> It has virtually no scientific evidence to
> show that it is in any way "optimal."

Actually, more than 625,550 people have had more than 5 years experience
of using the 2PD-OMER Approach.  There has been weight loss without
regain in every instance.

> Nor is there any scientific evidence
> to show that two pounds of food is the "optimal" amount for everyone.

Actually there is.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Jeff - 24 Nov 2005 16:50 GMT
>> >> >> Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
>> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> It seems you are trying to tell the author of the 2PD-OMER Approach that
> he does not know what he has authored.

Not at all. I dobeleive that you understand diet or nutrition very well,
however. And that you let your religion stand in the way of good judgement.
But that  is my opinion based on what you have written in the past.

>> The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based on a
>> misintepretation of the Bible.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> of using the 2PD-OMER Approach.  There has been weight loss without
> regain in every instance.

Irrelevent. This is a Biblical reference. It is not a scientifically valid
one. And it is not even a Biblically valid one. Omer is a measure of volume,
not weight or mass.

So my original statement that there is no scientifically valid evidence to
support your claim that 2 pounds a day is the optimal amount for everyone is
correct.

>> Nor is there any scientific evidence
>> to show that two pounds of food is the "optimal" amount for everyone.
>
> Actually there is.

Then post it here. I am afraid that I will be doing important things at the
time of your chat.

Jeff

(...)
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 17:13 GMT
> >> >> >> Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Not at all.

Now it seems you are doing some backpedalling.

> I dobeleive that you understand diet or nutrition very well,
> however.

Only the LORD knows better about what He has created through me.

> And that you let your religion stand in the way of good judgement.

The LORD's judgment by His very nature is automatically good.

> But that  is my opinion based on what you have written in the past.

Only the LORD's opinion actually matters.

> >> The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based on a
> >> misintepretation of the Bible.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Irrelevent.

In your opinion.

> This is a Biblical reference.

Actually, it is not.

> It is not a scientifically valid
> one.

Actually, it is.

> And it is not even a Biblically valid one.

Again, it is not a Biblical reference.

> Omer is a measure of volume,
> not weight or mass.

OMER is an acronym that stands for:

Original Method of Eating Reduction.

> So my original statement that there is no scientifically valid evidence to
> support your claim that 2 pounds a day is the optimal amount for everyone is
> correct.

Your statements remain false.

> >> Nor is there any scientific evidence
> >> to show that two pounds of food is the "optimal" amount for everyone.
> >
> > Actually there is.
>
> Then post it here.

Already have.

> I am afraid that I will be doing important things at the
> time of your chat.

Without the LORD, you will remain fearful.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Jeff - 25 Nov 2005 03:10 GMT
Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.

Jeff
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 25 Nov 2005 06:17 GMT
> Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.

Because your point was meaningless, it was no real feat.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Bob (this one) - 25 Nov 2005 08:57 GMT
>>Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.
>
> Because your point was meaningless, it was no real feat.

Read all about it, Chung demonstrates meaninglessness better than anyone
else.

Pastorio
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 25 Nov 2005 11:20 GMT
> >>Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.
> >
> > Because your point was meaningless, it was no real feat.
>
> Read all about it, Chung demonstrates meaninglessness better than anyone
> else.

If that were true, there would be no controversy.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Bob (this one) - 25 Nov 2005 20:24 GMT
>>>>Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> If that were true, there would be no controversy.

There is no controversy. Only in your static-filled mind is virtually
universal condemnation of your fakery, snide malice and ego-driven
combat ever to be seen as controversy.

Your fake diet discredits itself. Your fraudulent reference to 625,500
people discredits itself. Your slimy evasions about having posted the
names of the obviously phony restaurant and the URL for your chat
archives discredit you. Your relentless insistence that it's your "open
Christianity" rather than your wacko, over-the-top hyperreligious
ranting shows you to be the creator of this "controversy" by not
recognizing that anyone else's ideas have merit.

There's no controversy, only your insane insistence on baiting,
trolling, lying, distorting and otherwise generating the heated discourse.

There's only controversy in your enfeebeled mind. For anyone else
watching, it's just more demented raving from the Master of Lies - Chung.

Have a lovely day.

Pastorio
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 25 Nov 2005 23:17 GMT
> >>>>Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> There is no controversy.

And yet, here you are.

> Only in your static-filled mind is virtually
> universal condemnation of your fakery, snide malice and ego-driven
> combat ever to be seen as controversy.

Wow!  Thankfully, the LORD shields as well as heals :-)

> Your fake diet discredits itself. Your fraudulent reference to 625,500
> people discredits itself.

Actually my reference remains **more** than 625,550 persons with
**more** than 5 years experience with the 2PD-OMER Approach.

> Your slimy evasions about having posted the
> names of the obviously phony restaurant

The restaurant is here in the metropolitan Atlanta area, has only one
name, and serves wonderful food that remains reasonably priced because
it weighs customer meals thereby reducing waste.  How does that make the
restaurant phony?

> and the URL for your chat
> archives discredit you.

The URL is to an article about on-line chats with yours truly and not to
chat archives.  If the author of the article wants to call these posts
"chats" that is his/her perogative.  It really does not bother me to
continue "chatting" with you dear Bob about why this bothers you.

> Your relentless insistence that it's your "open
> Christianity" rather than your wacko, over-the-top hyperreligious
> ranting shows you to be the creator of this "controversy" by not
> recognizing that anyone else's ideas have merit.

Being openly Christian is a choice rather than a new "open Christianity"
denomination.

> There's no controversy, only your insane insistence on baiting,
> trolling, lying, distorting and otherwise generating the heated discourse.

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.  Sorry if my choice
bothers you.

> There's only controversy in your enfeebeled mind.

And yet you keep returning.

> For anyone else
> watching, it's just more demented raving from the Master of Lies

Those who walk with the master of lies, walk under his curse of eternal
despair as a consequence of eternal separation from GOD.

> - Chung.
> Have a lovely day.

When walking with the LORD, every day is lovely.  Would suggest you try
it some time.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Bob (this one) - 26 Nov 2005 01:41 GMT
>>>>>>Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> And yet, here you are.

Non sequitur.

>>Only in your static-filled mind is virtually
>>universal condemnation of your fakery, snide malice and ego-driven
>>combat ever to be seen as controversy.
>
> Wow!  Thankfully, the LORD shields as well as heals :-)

Non sequitur.

>>Your fake diet discredits itself. Your fraudulent reference to 625,500
>>people discredits itself.
>
> Actually my reference remains **more** than 625,550 persons with
> **more** than 5 years experience with the 2PD-OMER Approach.

Yes, as you have said on many occasions with that smarmy implication
that they're modern people. The plain fact is that the wanderers ate
manna and cooked (baked and seethed) foods beyond manna. They each could
have had an omer of miraculous manna of unknown composition daily in
addition to anything else they ate. That omer was a volume measure of
1/10th of an ephah, a volume measure.

>>Your slimy evasions about having posted the
>>names of the obviously phony restaurant
>
> The restaurant is here in the metropolitan Atlanta area, has only one
> name, and serves wonderful food that remains reasonably priced because
> it weighs customer meals thereby reducing waste.

You clearly have no idea of how restaurants operate. Shown repeatedly in
your comments.

> How does that make the restaurant phony?

If there is such a restaurant, it would be a blessing for you to mention
it. For people who live in that area who could avail themselves of it
and for the owners who would prosper from the new customers.

The fact that you made extravagant claims about the place (lobster,
shrimp, meats - for around $5) that are plainly unbelievable and refuse
to name the place when it can only benefit everyone points to its being
make-believe. There's no good reason for you not to name it. No damage
accruing to anyone for you to mention it.

The logical conclusion in the context of your having lied about so many
other things is that the restaurant is a figment of your imagination. A
fake. A phony. Another lie from Chung - The Master of Lies.

>>and the URL for your chat
>>archives discredit you.
>
> The URL is to an article about on-line chats

Newsgroup posts are not chats. Those words already have meanings, not
the ones you're trying to force. It's plainly a matter of your lying. Again.

> with yours truly and not to
> chat archives.  If the author of the article wants to call these posts
> "chats" that is his/her perogative.

And if truth isn't important, that "author" (Bwah...) may say whatever.
Nothing new from yo... um, the "author."

> It really does not bother me to
> continue "chatting" with you dear Bob about why this bothers you.

We aren't "chatting," Chung. We're posting to a newsgroup. Those terms
already have meanings. They've already been well-defined.

>>Your relentless insistence that it's your "open
>>Christianity" rather than your wacko, over-the-top hyperreligious
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Being openly Christian is a choice rather than a new "open Christianity"
> denomination.

Non sequitur.

>>There's no controversy, only your insane insistence on baiting,
>>trolling, lying, distorting and otherwise generating the heated discourse.
>
> It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.  Sorry if my choice
> bothers you.

Non sequitur and another lie.

>>There's only controversy in your enfeebeled mind.
>
> And yet you keep returning.

Non sequitur.

>>For anyone else
>>watching, it's just more demented raving from the Master of Lies
>
> Those who walk with the master of lies, walk under his curse of eternal
> despair as a consequence of eternal separation from GOD.

See, you've finally figured it out.

Now to watch you change...

Pastorio
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 26 Nov 2005 07:14 GMT
> >>>>>>Thanks Chung. You demonstrate my point far better than I could.
> >>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 102 lines]
>
> Non sequitur.

Only to the non-discerning.

> >>For anyone else
> >>watching, it's just more demented raving from the Master of Lies
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> See, you've finally figured it out.

The despair in you has been noted for some time now in all your written
laughter.

> Now to watch you change...

... as the LORD reshapes me according to His will and purpose.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Vicki Beausoleil - 26 Nov 2005 19:58 GMT
snip
> >>Your slimy evasions about having posted the
> >>names of the obviously phony restaurant
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> it. For people who live in that area who could avail themselves of it
> and for the owners who would prosper from the new customers.

snip

> Pastorio

There is no such restaurant. Chung beleives he is the only one
cross-posting to these 3 newsgroups that resides in Atlanta. IF there
was such a restaurant, they would be known by other Atlanta residents,
of which we have several here in ASD. Restaurants advertise, restaurants
have websites and they are listed in dining guides for their cities.
Even tiny mom & pop operations make their presence known.

You, Chung, are a liar.

Don't bother answering, you are the sole resident in my killfile.

Vicki
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 26 Nov 2005 22:02 GMT
> snip
> > >>Your slimy evasions about having posted the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> There is no such restaurant.

Actually, there is.

> Chung beleives he is the only one
> cross-posting to these 3 newsgroups that resides in Atlanta.

Hardly.

> IF there
> was such a restaurant, they would be known by other Atlanta residents,
> of which we have several here in ASD.

This restaurant is known by other Atlanta residents.

> Restaurants advertise, restaurants
> have websites and they are listed in dining guides for their cities.

They do.

> Even tiny mom & pop operations make their presence known.

Correct.

> You, Chung, are a liar.

It is your choice to bear false witness.

> Don't bother answering, you are the sole resident in my killfile.

It is my choice to respond:

"A false witness will not go unpunished ... " (Proverbs 19:5 and 19:9)

> Vicki

May the LORD forgive you for you know not what you were doing.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Bob (this one) - 24 Nov 2005 16:51 GMT
>>>>>>Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> It seems you are trying to tell the author of the 2PD-OMER Approach that
> he does not know what he has authored.

Exactly. And that he has the grasp on language of a semi-literate fool.

>>The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based on a
>>misintepretation of the Bible.
>
> Actually, the 2PD-OMER Approach is as described here:
> http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/wtloss.asp

Yes, it is. And it's still a pseudoreligious diet based on a
misinterpretation of the bible. And a prior misinterpretations of what
Mt. Everest climbers eat. The whole diet is based on a rather stupid
lack of consideration of and investigation of his impressions of an IMAX
movie.

>>It has virtually no scientific evidence to
>>show that it is in any way "optimal."
>
> Actually, more than 625,550 people have had more than 5 years experience
> of using the 2PD-OMER Approach.  There has been weight loss without
> regain in every instance.

Actually, that's anecdotal and not even accurate. Extrapolations based
only on his fevered wishful thinking.

<LOL> This is a group of folks the bible; not any sort of controlled
study. Chung has contorted and distorted the bible to suit his wacko
interpretations. He says that an omer is a unit of weight when every
reliable authority says it's a unit of volume.  Not just any unit of
weight, though. It's two pounds. Imagine the coincidence with his diet.
<LOL> This is very funny.

And somehow Chung knows that grown men and women and freshly born
children and aged slight people and young robust laborers all ate 2
pounds of food a day, despite his being shown that they were given an
omer of manna (which they may or may not have eaten) *and* other foods
as well, each eating according to his desires.

>>Nor is there any scientific evidence
>>to show that two pounds of food is the "optimal" amount for everyone.
>
> Actually there is.

Sure there is - not. And maybe some proof that isn't some fundamentalist
wacko revision of the bible would be good. But Chung *never* backs up
his assertions. He won't this time, either...

Sick, sick man Chung...

Pastorio
TC - 24 Nov 2005 17:12 GMT
> >>>>>>Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
> >>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>
> Pastorio

An omer is 2.114344 liters. I wonder how that translates to 2 lbs of
food.

TC
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 18:13 GMT
> > >>>>>>Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
> > >>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>
> An omer is 2.114344 liters.

Actually, omer is a Hebrew word that means "a certain weight."

> I wonder how that translates to 2 lbs of
> food.

It translates to one amount of food for everyone.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 17:13 GMT
> >>>>>>Only problem is that none of us likes skim milk.
> >>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Exactly. And that he has the grasp on language of a semi-literate fool.

Now you are bearing false witness with regards to Jeff.

> >>The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based on a
> >>misintepretation of the Bible.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Yes, it is. And it's still a pseudoreligious diet based on a
> misinterpretation of the bible.

In your opinion.

> And a prior misinterpretations of what
> Mt. Everest climbers eat.

More opinion.

> The whole diet is based on a rather stupid
> lack of consideration of and investigation of his impressions of an IMAX
> movie.

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.

> >>It has virtually no scientific evidence to
> >>show that it is in any way "optimal."
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Actually, that's anecdotal and not even accurate. Extrapolations based
> only on his fevered wishful thinking.

It remains my choice to continue to write truthfully.

> <LOL>

"Written laughter is silent despair."

> This is a group of folks the bible; not any sort of controlled
> study. Chung has contorted and distorted the bible to suit his wacko
> interpretations. He says that an omer is a unit of weight when every
> reliable authority says it's a unit of volume.  Not just any unit of
> weight, though. It's two pounds. Imagine the coincidence with his diet.

Again, the 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.

Second, there is no such thing as coincidence:

Proverbs 16:33

> <LOL> This is very funny.

Then why are you in despair ??

> And somehow Chung knows that grown men and women and freshly born
> children and aged slight people and young robust laborers all ate 2
> pounds of food a day, despite his being shown that they were given an
> omer of manna (which they may or may not have eaten) *and* other foods
> as well, each eating according to his desires.

The LORD remains omniscient.  It remains my choice to continue to walk
with LORD Jesus Christ, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind, and
strength :-)

> >>Nor is there any scientific evidence
> >>to show that two pounds of food is the "optimal" amount for everyone.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Sure there is - not. And maybe some proof that isn't some fundamentalist
> wacko revision of the bible would be good.

"Absence of proof is not proof of absence."

" But Chung *never* backs up
> his assertions. He won't this time, either...

False witness.

> Sick, sick man Chung...

You remain the stricken one, dear Bob.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Michael - 25 Nov 2005 03:15 GMT
>>Wrong.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Actually there is.

Andrew, since I'm supposed to be praying about whether or not I should
be starting this diet, could you provide citations as to this assertion?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 25 Nov 2005 06:17 GMT
> >>Wrong.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Andrew, since I'm supposed to be praying about whether or not I should
> be starting this diet, could you provide citations as to this assertion?

Yes, when the time is right to those who are able to discern that the
2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Michael - 27 Nov 2005 06:38 GMT
>>>>Wrong.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Yes, when the time is right to those who are able to discern that the
> 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.

And what do I discern from the fact that you didn't answer my question
but tried to redirect my question around a misused word?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 27 Nov 2005 07:03 GMT
> >>>>Wrong.
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> And what do I discern from the fact that you didn't answer my question
> but tried to redirect my question around a misused word?

In truth, I answered your question with the word "Yes."

Moreover, I answered the **unasked** question "When will you provide
citations?" with the words "when the time is right to those who are able
to discern that the 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet."

"The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge; the ears of the wise
seek it out." (Proverbs 18:15)

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Michael - 28 Nov 2005 00:56 GMT
>>>>>>Wrong.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> In truth, I answered your question with the word "Yes."

Okay, you're right.  I didn't ask for the citations, I asked only if you
could provide them.

> Moreover, I answered the **unasked** question "When will you provide
> citations?" with the words "when the time is right to those who are able
> to discern that the 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet."

who is to determine when the time is right?
why are you obfuscating the truth about the 2PD-OMER Approach?
(you are choosing to not disclose facts, and the lack of disclosure, in
my opinion, qualifies as obfuscation.)

mt
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 28 Nov 2005 03:43 GMT
<snip>

> > In truth, I answered your question with the word "Yes."
>
> Okay, you're right.

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.  It is the LORD Who
is kind, just, and **right**.

> I didn't ask for the citations, I asked only if you
> could provide them.

Correct.

> > Moreover, I answered the **unasked** question "When will you provide
> > citations?" with the words "when the time is right to those who are able
> > to discern that the 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet."
>
> who is to determine when the time is right?

The LORD.

> why are you obfuscating the truth about the 2PD-OMER Approach?
> (you are choosing to not disclose facts, and the lack of disclosure, in
> my opinion, qualifies as obfuscation.)

The LORD guides me in all that I say, do, and write.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Doug Freese - 27 Nov 2005 22:41 GMT
> Actually, more than 625,550 people have had more than 5 years
> experience
> of using the 2PD-OMER Approach.  There has been weight loss without
> regain in every instance.

In "every" instance? You must think we were all born last night.

-DF
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 28 Nov 2005 00:26 GMT
> > Actually, more than 625,550 people have had more than 5 years
> > experience
> > of using the 2PD-OMER Approach.  There has been weight loss without
> > regain in every instance.
>
> In "every" instance?

Yes.

> You must think we were all born last night.

No.
 
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Orbe - 30 Nov 2005 01:20 GMT
>>>Actually, more than 625,550 people have had more than 5 years
>>>experience
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Yes.
<snip>

http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.cardiology/browse_thread/thread/748f6f
de898147e9/ff81c582d24dd91f?q=%22looking+for+sanity%22&rnum=1#ff81c582d24dd91f

dr_ernie_primeau@yahoo.ca - 30 Nov 2005 08:00 GMT
http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.cardiology/browse_thread/thread/748f6f
de898147e9/ff81c582d24dd91f?q=%22looking+for+sanity%22&rnum=1#ff81c582d24dd91f


http://tinyurl.com/aw4mh

Fascinating.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 30 Nov 2005 10:40 GMT
> >>>Actually, more than 625,550 people have had more than 5 years
> >>>experience
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.med.cardiology/browse_thread/thread/748f6f
de898147e9/ff81c582d24dd91f?q=%22looking+for+sanity%22&rnum=1#ff81c582d24dd91f

It would be my choice to help you with the truth:

http://tinyurl.com/9z2ow

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Ozgirl - 24 Nov 2005 20:34 GMT
> Wrong. The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based on a
> misintepretation of the Bible. It has virtually no scientific
> evidence to show that it is in any way "optimal."

You mean the exodus folk can't be used as proof? What's the
world coming to :)
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 22:40 GMT
> > Wrong. The 2PD-OMER Approach is pseduoreligious diet based
> on a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You mean the exodus folk can't be used as proof?

In truth, the Exodus folks are not being used as proof.

> What's the
> world coming to :)

To LORD Jesus Christ:

http://tinyurl.com/bgdch

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
BessieBee - 24 Nov 2005 17:41 GMT
<snip>

>The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a regimen of eating and drinking sparingly
>but one of eating and drinking an optimal amount to reach and maintain
>an optimal weight.

Andrew:  For those of us who may need just a bit more direction,
please publish a typical week's menu for you and your family using the
2PD-OMER approach.  

Thank you.

BessieBee
---
OF Damnit!  :-)
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 18:13 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> please publish a typical week's menu for you and your family using the
> 2PD-OMER approach.

Diets can and should vary though the amount should not exceed 32 ounces
(ie 2 lbs).

> Thank you.

You are welcome.

All praises belong to the LORD, Whom I love with all my heart, soul,
mind, and strength :-)


Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
BessieBee - 24 Nov 2005 18:40 GMT
>> Andrew:  For those of us who may need just a bit more direction,
>> please publish a typical week's menu for you and your family using the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>You are welcome.

OK, *Doctor,* let me be just a bit more specific here.

I am a 53 year old female with type 2 diabetes and CAD (coronary
artery disease).  I am within a few pounds of my "optimal weight,"
although my cholesterol is high, and recently I've been finding it
harder and harder to maintain good BG control with diet, exercise and
meds.

So, I'll ask again.  What is a typical menu for you and your family
using the 2PD-OMER approach?

BessieBee
---
OF Damnit!  :-)
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Nov 2005 20:30 GMT
> >> Andrew:  For those of us who may need just a bit more direction,
> >> please publish a typical week's menu for you and your family using the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I am a 53 year old female with type 2 diabetes and CAD (coronary
> artery disease).

Then your diet should be low fat/cholesterol with avoidance of sugars.

>  I am within a few pounds of my "optimal weight,"
> although my cholesterol is high, and recently I've been finding it
> harder and harder to maintain good BG control with diet, exercise and
> meds.

If you have type 2 diabetes, your becoming leaner and trimmer should
help you regain better conrol of your BG.

> So, I'll ask again.  What is a typical menu for you and your family
> using the 2PD-OMER approach?

Because no one in my household has either diabetes or CAD, our diets
should be of no concern to you.  Suffice it to say that nothing has been
off limits.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Jeff - 25 Nov 2005 03:15 GMT
>>> Andrew:  For those of us who may need just a bit more direction,
>>> please publish a typical week's menu for you and your family using the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> So, I'll ask again.  What is a typical menu for you and your family
> using the 2PD-OMER approach?

Excellent question. Andrew, what exactly do you and your family eat in a
week?

Jeff
> BessieBee
> ---
> OF Damnit!  :-)
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 25 Nov 2005 06:17 GMT
> >>> Andrew:  For those of us who may need just a bit more direction,
> >>> please publish a typical week's menu for you and your family using the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Excellent question. Andrew, what exactly do you and your family eat in a
> week?

Food that has been blessed by the LORD.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
Alan S - 21 Nov 2005 12:16 GMT
>This morning, my b/s levels were 7.6 and I had oatmeal, but didn't eat it
>all.  When I have oatmeal, I put cinnamon on top of it and 1% milk.  I don't
>put sugar substitute on it at all.

I presume that 7.6(135) was your fasting number. I've
forgotten your earlier numbers, so I hope it was an
improvement.

Do you remember posting this a few weeks ago:
"One of you nice people asked me about testing after having
oatmeal.  I never tried that before and I should, just to
see what happens.
Haven't been checking b/s levels either, but I need to start
to do that. Especially where my AC1 numbers were up a
little. "

What was the test result an hour after that oatmeal this
morning?

Now that you're back, try reading this again:
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

pverburgh - 22 Nov 2005 14:31 GMT
Didn't to the testing after that one.  I mean after eating the oatmeal.

Jeannette

>>This morning, my b/s levels were 7.6 and I had oatmeal, but didn't eat it
>>all.  When I have oatmeal, I put cinnamon on top of it and 1% milk.  I
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Alan S - 22 Nov 2005 21:48 GMT
>Didn't to the testing after that one.  I mean after eating the oatmeal.
>
>Jeannette

Try tomorrow an hour after breakfast? Please?

Just for a couple of days, stop worrying about fats and
concentrate on the carbs and your post-meal meter results.
Then, when you start to see what is happening there, you can
review the types of fat in your diet - some are good, some
(not all) are bad.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Ma¢k - 21 Nov 2005 16:12 GMT
>Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of my
>diabetes.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Jeannette

Depression either caused as a result of difficulties dealing with
being diabetic or from something totally unrelated to diabetes will
complicate diabetes management.  I hope you are getting the
appropriate professional help for it.  It's nothing to be embarrassed
about or ashamed of, many have or are dealing with it in this
newsgroup.  It's best described as a catch 22 situation.  Depression
aggravates your BG levels, raising them or causing wild swings.  This
in turn causes the depression to worsen, both physically and
emotionally.

If you ever feel the need to talk about, there are plenty here who
know what it's like and plenty who can point you to the right doctors
and possible therapies to discuss with the doctors.  Plus they can
share their own personal experiences with the issues.  And they will
if asked.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

pverburgh - 22 Nov 2005 14:33 GMT
You mean that depression can affect my b/s levels too? I guess everything
can, right?

Jeannette

>>Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of my
>>diabetes.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> share their own personal experiences with the issues.  And they will
> if asked.
Ma¢k - 22 Nov 2005 20:20 GMT
>You mean that depression can affect my b/s levels too? I guess everything
>can, right?
>
>Jeannette

yep.  how you feel emotionally can and will effect your blood sugar.
Negative emotions tend to spike our BGs.  Positive emotions tend to
level them out.  

swinging BG levels will distort our emotions making us irritable or
complicating depression, making the BG swings harder to get under
control.

Clinical depression cannot be treated by chung quackery.

That being said, clinical depression even though complicated by out of
control BG swings can be managed with the help of the right
professionals and when necessary antidepressants(not always necessary
but not a bad thing to have if needed) and with the help of a smart
endo/diabetes specialist familiar with depression in diabetics.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Grandpa Chuck - 21 Nov 2005 17:29 GMT
>Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of my
>diabetes.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Jeannette

Howdy Jeanette,

You don't say what size the serving of oatmeal was. I eat hot cereal
once in awhile for breakfast, but only a small amount. My morning
numbers usually run high until about noon regardless of what I have
for breakfast, but high carb food such as a large bowl (formerly
normal sized bowl) of any cereal is out.

My normal breakfast is one thin slice of cinnamon/raisin toast with
peanut butter, Crystal Lite to wash the pills down and a cup of coffee
with creamer and Equal.

Signature

Grandpa Chuck
-ô¿ô-
 ~
A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle, and twice the brightness can then be shared by all.
Love is giving all with no conditions. Love is expecting nothing in return.
A religious person is trying to avoid hell; a spiritual person has already been there.
================================================================
The following information is given with the utmost respect
for the armed forces and civilians who have died in the
current war in Iraq. According to http://icasualties.org/oif/
The number of Americans killed in Iraq as of Nov. 20, 2005 is 2,096.
United Kingdom = 98 Other = 103

pverburgh - 22 Nov 2005 14:34 GMT
I don't necessary measure my oatmeal out, but I know that I should.

Chuck, you put creamer into your coffee?  Isn't creamer a lot of fat?  Just
wondering.

Jeannette

>>Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of my
>>diabetes.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> peanut butter, Crystal Lite to wash the pills down and a cup of coffee
> with creamer and Equal.
Ma¢k - 22 Nov 2005 20:25 GMT
>I don't necessary measure my oatmeal out, but I know that I should.
>
>Chuck, you put creamer into your coffee?  Isn't creamer a lot of fat?  Just
>wondering.
>
>Jeannette

I personally don't know how much real cream will effect a type 2s BG
levels, but it has little effect on mine.  and I use real cream in my
coffee.  The fat content slows down the absorption of milk carbs
(lactose).  It does not stop it it simply slows it down.

the consumption of milk fat and meat fats has little if any effect on
weight loss.  When I decided to lose a few pounds, didn't much being
as I was only a few over weight.  I simply reduced the amount of carbs
I was eating, not the amount of dietary fat.

Now the type of fats you eat does play a role in a healthy lifestyle
and diet.  Just eat the types of fat.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Grandpa Chuck - 22 Nov 2005 22:09 GMT
>I don't necessary measure my oatmeal out, but I know that I should.
>
>Chuck, you put creamer into your coffee?  Isn't creamer a lot of fat?  Just
>wondering.

I use about 2 teaspoons which equal 1.0 g of fat. I wouldn't call that
a lot of fat at all. To tell you the truth I didn't know either until
you asked and I looked at the label on the jar.
Signature

Grandpa Chuck
-ô¿ô-
 ~
A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle, and twice the brightness can then be shared by all.
Love is giving all with no conditions. Love is expecting nothing in return.
A religious person is trying to avoid hell; a spiritual person has already been there.
================================================================
The following information is given with the utmost respect
for the armed forces and civilians who have died in the
current war in Iraq. According to http://icasualties.org/oif/
The number of Americans killed in Iraq as of Nov. 21, 2005 is 2,097.
United Kingdom = 98 Other = 103

Nicky - 21 Nov 2005 18:39 GMT
> Sorry for not posting for a little bit.  Am back on track in the way of my
> diabetes.

Hi, Jeanette - nice to see you back.

> I have a book about Diabetes.  It is Called Diabetes for Canadians for
> Dummies.  I find it is quite easy to understand and have learned quite a
> bit from reading the book.

Yes, I like the British version too.

> This morning, my b/s levels were 7.6 and I had oatmeal,

What were you like at 1 hour? If you're like me and can't eat oatmeal
without dangerous spikes, you might like to try flaxseed porridge. I think
it's nicer than oatmeal.

Depression and diabetes are often found together - especially with high
blood sugars. Mine went away once I'd gotten control; if yours doesn't,
please get it treated.

Nicky.

Signature

A1c 10.5/5.6/<6  T2 DX 05/2004
1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine
95/73/72Kg