This post not CC'd by email
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:47:30 -0500, Susan <nevermind@nomail.com>
wrote:
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Susan
G'day G'day Susan,
I think it is fabulous that we have had access to both articles.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/512071
and
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/514211
Thank goodness anyone who fills out the registration can have free
access to Medscape. It is seems like only a few years ago such
informed opinion would have been hidden away in expensive medical
journals accessible only to medical specialists and doctors.
Best wishes,

Signature
Quentin Grady ^ ^ /
New Zealand, >#,#< [
/ \ /\
"... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
Susan - 02 Nov 2005 23:26 GMT
> G'day G'day Susan,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> informed opinion would have been hidden away in expensive medical
> journals accessible only to medical specialists and doctors.
Medscape is wonderful; not only is registration free, but you can create
a list of medical topics you're interested in, and they email you all
the new abstracts and articles in those areas as they're published.
Susan
Ozgirl - 03 Nov 2005 01:58 GMT
"Susan" <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in message
> Medscape is wonderful; not only is registration free, but you can create
> a list of medical topics you're interested in, and they email you all
> the new abstracts and articles in those areas as they're published.
Which is why we all flood the newsgroup with Medscape
articles on certain days of the week ;) I think I subscribed
to endocrinology, cardiology, pediatrics, neurology and the
daily news.
Susan - 03 Nov 2005 02:14 GMT
ed.
> Which is why we all flood the newsgroup with Medscape
> articles on certain days of the week ;)
Do we really? I always check before I post them, and no one else has
done so. Maybe I'm just not being observant?
Susan
Ozgirl - 03 Nov 2005 02:28 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Do we really? I always check before I post them, and no one else has
> done so. Maybe I'm just not being observant?
I check too which is probably why we don't get double ups
very often.
Susan - 03 Nov 2005 02:33 GMT
> I check too which is probably why we don't get double ups
> very often.
How smart are we?? ;-)
Susan
Ozgirl - 03 Nov 2005 02:42 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> > I check too which is probably why we don't get double ups
> > very often.
>
> How smart are we?? ;-)
Lol, there was a time when I didn't always read the Medscape
articles that came in email and weeks or months down the
track I would read something, post it and get cried down for
reporting "old" news ;)
Ma¢k - 03 Nov 2005 05:09 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Susan
must resist, must not answer, must resist the power of the dark
side......

Signature
Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt
(o o)
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------
"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
Jesus never hated anyone.
Susan - 03 Nov 2005 14:16 GMT
> must resist, must not answer, must resist the power of the dark
> side......
Only if you want to live another day. ;-)
Susan