Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

BG and keytones

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nitch Simple - 31 Oct 2005 20:28 GMT
Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?

Signature

.

Tiger Lily - 31 Oct 2005 20:29 GMT
yes........ that means you are loosing a lot of
weight when that happens

kate
Signature

Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet
/server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk
More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/
http://www.diabetic-talk.org/freeveggies.htm
I have no medical qualifications beyond my own
experience.
Choose your advisers carefully, because experience
can be
an expensive teacher.

> Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?
David - 31 Oct 2005 20:35 GMT
> yes........ that means you are loosing[sic] a lot of
> weight when that happens
>
> kate
no it doesn't.  it means you might.

dave
Tiger Lily - 31 Oct 2005 20:37 GMT
> yes........ that means you are losing a lot of
> weight when that happens
>
> kate
> > Is it possible to have normal BG levels and
> still have high keytones?
David - 31 Oct 2005 20:35 GMT
> Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?

yes. and it's KETONES.

Dave
Simple - 31 Oct 2005 20:46 GMT
What are signs of  high ketones?

Signature

.

> > Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?
> >
> yes. and it's KETONES.
>
> Dave
David - 31 Oct 2005 21:18 GMT
> What are signs of  high ketones?

before we continue, I want you to know that having ketones is NOT the
same thing as ketoacidosis (DKA).

fruity breath is ONE observable symptom of having ketones (ok, I listed
ONE sign already)

more to follow

Dave
Simple - 31 Oct 2005 22:51 GMT
I thought they were one in the same

Signature

.

> > What are signs of  high ketones?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Dave
Priscilla H. Ballou - 31 Oct 2005 22:55 GMT
> I thought they were one in the same

> > > What are signs of  high ketones?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >
> > Dave

Nope.  Diabetic ketoacidosis is very dangerous, but ketones in and of
themselves can be benign and even desireable.  If one is eating
low-carb, they indicate that one is burning fat for fuel.  Many
low-carbers try to stay in ketosis (the state of burning fat for fuel
rather than carbs).

Priscilla
Beav - 01 Nov 2005 02:11 GMT
>I thought they were one in the same

You're not the first one to assume that. However, they're not.

Ketoacidosis is a condition reached when there isn't enough insulin in your
system. If you're T2, it's not going to happen and if you're a T1 shoving in
sh.t loads of insulin but eating like a pig, it's STILL not going to happen.

Signature

Beav

Reply to "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com" (with the obvious
changes)

oldal4865 - 31 Oct 2005 21:44 GMT
Simple wrote in message ...
>What are signs of  high ketones?

  One of the more reliable tests is a ketone-in-urine strip.     The
low-carb diets have made the strips more popular since some of the weight
loss gurus recommend starting weight loss diets by  reducing your carb
intake until ketones show up in your urine.

Most pharmacies carry the strips.

Regards
 Old Al
Chief - 02 Nov 2005 23:15 GMT
"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
@individual.net:

> Simple wrote in message ...
>>What are signs of  high ketones?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Regards
>   Old Al

Isn't that the truth.

 Maybe if some 'expert'  published in some woman's magazine that frequent
sex  and daisy dukes shorts were essential to losing weight the world would
be a better place - at least for the men. Come to think of it maybe it's
time for a detailed study?  
Mary - 02 Nov 2005 23:26 GMT
> "oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
> @individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> be a better place - at least for the men. Come to think of it maybe it's
> time for a detailed study?  
You sound like my hubby! :)

Your experience sounds a lot like mine, only I was about 10 yrs.
younger.  And my diagnosis was T1.  Have your docs mentioned that it's
possible you're T1 instead of T2?  Just the fact that they've put you on
insulin (no oral meds, right?) makes me wonder.

Mary
Chief - 02 Nov 2005 23:45 GMT
>> "oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>> @individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Mary

Hi Mary,
 
 He never really said but I did take fairly rigorous flight physicals
every year until I was 45 and retired in 1995. I can't imagine they missed
I was diabetic all those years.

Isn't Type 1 for younger folks? And aren't low Bg's more of a problem for
T1's? I can stop eating and still have high BG readings. Even at only 800
to 1000 cal a day I'm running an average of 160's.  

I'm not talking from knowledge just wondering.

I do remember feeling more tired than normal about a year after I retired
but just chalked it up to getting older and doing less exercise. I didn't
feel the need to see a doctor until last month.

He said my BGs were to high to treat with pills and diet - so he gave me
the Novolog pens, gave me a lesson on taking a reading with a meter, gave
me  a weeks supply of strips and an appointment 45 days later - two weeks
off.

Yep, I'm thinking if he doesnt open up with some information soon I'm out
of here and looking for a new doctor.

From what I have read at the different Diabetes sites my BG's when they
were 400 and up were to high for just pills but I have wondered why I don't
have both the pills and the shots because these shots peak out shortly
after you take one and drop off rapidly so getting control of my BG seems
to be harder than it should be.

I think he should have given me both so that I could use the pen after
meals and let the pills hold it down between meals. But then I'm no doctor.
Mary - 03 Nov 2005 01:16 GMT
>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> I think he should have given me both so that I could use the pen after
> meals and let the pills hold it down between meals. But then I'm no doctor.
Hi Chief!

I don't know what happened--I responded quite awhile ago, but it hasn't
shown up yet.  I must have sent it into outer space somehow--

Anyway, T1 can occur in children and adults of any age, contrary to what
was believed to be true in the past.  I was struck by your comment that
your wife and kids could smell the acetone breath on you--the same
happened to me when I was diagnosed as T1 about 10 yrs. ago (my
co-workers could even smell it through my surgical mask).  Just don't
hear that too often when people recount their experiences at diagnosis.

I'm thinking that you may find out later that your diagnosis is really
T1, especially with the presence of high blood sugars, ketones, extreme
thirst, 30lbs weight loss (that's what I had too) and your MD starting
you on insulin immediately.  Maybe I'm wrong, but if I were you I would
get the opinion of a non-military endocrinologist (preferably
diabetologist), just to be sure that you're receiving the correct treatment.

If you stay on insulin, you will certainly need a basal insulin, such as
long acting Lantus.  That would even out your bgs between the meal
boluses that you're taking.

Mary
Chief - 03 Nov 2005 01:36 GMT
>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
>
> Mary

The doctor I'm using is a civilain endo doc who was referred by a doctor
I  saw first when I thought the problem was my stomach. I will certainly
have a ton of questions when I get to the second visit.

I didn't realize there were Diabetologists - Are they endos with a couple
of extra courses?

This may be a strange question - Is there a benefit to having one or the
other type of Diabetes?

I'm thinking the samething - I need something for the 'tweens'

Maybe this month is for me to get it down to a managable point and then
he'll figure out what the best course will be.

Thanks for taking the time Mary


David - 03 Nov 2005 01:59 GMT
>>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>
>  

Hi,  this is Mary's husband, Dave.  Personally, from all the emphasis on
eating "just the right thing" and "low carbing" to "no carbing", I'm
glad I'm a T1 on a pump.  I can control my lifestyle to be more "normal"
than many of those who describe what they go through as T2's.  Some of
the meds they take cause side effects and complications.

T2's, as a group tend to suffer more problems because of their numbers
and their belated diagnoses.

OTOH, a T1's bg can go into the stratosphere during illness or mistakes
in therapy.

dave
Ozgirl - 03 Nov 2005 02:26 GMT
"David" <David@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:37ednZ0Oretj_fTeRVn-

> Hi,  this is Mary's husband, Dave.  Personally, from all the emphasis on
> eating "just the right thing" and "low carbing" to "no carbing", I'm
> glad I'm a T1 on a pump.  I can control my lifestyle to be more "normal"
> than many of those who describe what they go through as T2's.  Some of
> the meds they take cause side effects and complications.

As can the huge amounts of insulin a type 2 needs to take
whilst highly insulin resistant. If the beta cell damage
isn't too great a type 2 could reduce their insulin
resistance greatly with weight loss, muscle building and
insulin resistance drugs.

With improved insulin resistance the ability to eat more
carbs returns.
David - 03 Nov 2005 03:08 GMT
> "David" <David@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:37ednZ0Oretj_fTeRVn-
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> With improved insulin resistance the ability to eat more
> carbs returns.

I'm getting my own taste of "huge amounts of insulin"; I'm on Medrol.
Tomorrow's the last day of it, thank God.  I run through a whole
reservoir (150U) of insulin in one day while on Medrol (it usually lasts
more than 3 days)

Dave
Chief - 03 Nov 2005 19:28 GMT
"Ozgirl" <are_we_there_yet@maccas.com> wrote in news:wHdaf.7410$Hj2.3537
@news-server.bigpond.net.au:

> "David" <David@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:37ednZ0Oretj_fTeRVn-
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> With improved insulin resistance the ability to eat more
> carbs returns.

What if your already fairly fit? What are the beta cells? Are there any
foods that help insulin resistance?

This insulin resistance sound like me to a T. I thought last night I
could do with less and boy was I wrong. It seems that anything lower than
about 16 units on the Novolog pen has no effect at all. I dropped it to
10 last night and woke up to a dry mouth, dry tongue, headache, and
fatigue. My BG was 210 but it was on its way down.

Also, It seems that the quickness of the effect of the shots is much
later than the paperwork about the insulin says it is. It's supposed to
kick in within an hour. and I'm suposed to eat something 5 to 30 minutes
after I take a shot. But what is happening is that the shot doesn't kick
in until  3 hours.

SO I take a shot, eat 30 min later hit a high BG an hour later and then
see a big drop 1 to 2 hours later.  
Mary - 03 Nov 2005 02:07 GMT
>>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 111 lines]
>
>  

Sure, Chief.  I guess I misunderstood about your endo.  A dibetologist
is an endo who specializes in diabetes.  Wow, your "strange question" is
difficult to answer.  Any type of diabetic can end up with the same
complications as another, but the difference is how close they keep
their bgs to normal range...closer to normal, supposedly less chance of
complications.  Is it a benefit to be T1 on insulin or T2 on diet &
exercise, or oral meds, or insulin or all the above?  I guess it depends
on the individual.  I prefer insulin (tho I've never taken orals) just
because I can bolus for any type of food that I want to eat.  I don't
have to worry so much about carb content except to count the carbs for
my insulin bolus.  Of course, using that logic, a careless
insulin-dependent person can destroy their body by eating unhealthy
foods.  Just because we can bolus for donuts doesn't mean we should eat
them!  Anyway, I'm sure there are others here who will try to answer
your question, too.

So you were in the AF?  I've just heard from my youngest son that he's
been accepted into pilot training (USN)!  He and his wife are on cloud
nine!  My husband was also in the AF and in Viet Nam.

Mary
Chief - 03 Nov 2005 05:48 GMT
>>>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 133 lines]
>
> Mary

Sounds like walking a tightrope. I think that for me it's best to forget
about gum drops and french fries and move on to pickles(Yuck!!!), celery
sticks, and peanuts. It's easier for me to just drop habits quickly  and
never revisit them than to go back and forth. I think I am fairly well
used to the idea of being a salid and chicken kinda guy from here on out.
I ate great food all over the world, drank many a bar dry, and now it's
payback time.

But I gotta tell you sometimes after years of running and keeping fit and
trim the words "Why me" slip into my thoughts when Im standing at the
checkout counter next to a guy who's way, way overweight, out of shape
and buying twinkies, jelly beans, and moon pies. Then I just plop down my
cash for a new jar of dill pickles, wipe the drool from my chin and move
on.

I was in the Army. Drafted in 1970 and ended up staying until 1995
because I loved to fly and loved to travel. I hope your son does well and
stays well.
Chris J. - 03 Nov 2005 07:26 GMT
>Sounds like walking a tightrope. I think that for me it's best to forget
>about gum drops and french fries and move on to pickles(Yuck!!!), celery
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>I ate great food all over the world, drank many a bar dry, and now it's
>payback time.

Chief, what I'm about to say may well endanger the lives of some
people here: they might keel over in shock at hearing *me* say this!

You don't have to be draconian on your diet. Sure, during the first
month or so you may have to be extra careful. I certainly did.
However, as time passes and you stabilize, you will probably find that
you can still eat most of the foods you ate before. Maybe not in as
large a serving, but they are still there.

For example, pre Dx (we often call the date we were diagnosed Dx day,
or Dx) I used to love german breads. I'd basically assumed that I'd
never be able to eat things like that again. Well, I just had a round
with dinner, and no problem, and have been having a round with lunch
or dinner quite often lately.  

BTW, to explain my opening comment (the bit about shock): When I first
arrived here my diet was truly draconian, and even when I broadened my
diet a bit I'd totally exclude many, many foods that I used to love,
to the point where my eating habits are a bit of a running joke around
here. :-) .

>But I gotta tell you sometimes after years of running and keeping fit and
>trim the words "Why me" slip into my thoughts when Im standing at the
>checkout counter next to a guy who's way, way overweight, out of shape
>and buying twinkies, jelly beans, and moon pies. Then I just plop down my
>cash for a new jar of dill pickles, wipe the drool from my chin and move
>on.

Chief, I sure know that feeling! Granted, I was 30 lbs overweight, but
I'm very active. My main hobby is mountain hiking, which I do almost
daily, plus a lot of other activity. Also, I ate a lot better than
most people even before Dx. I've never liked sugar, and if I was in
line with you it would be the pickles I'd go for, not the sugary stuff
you mentioned, because that's the sort of thing I like. Yet, at 38,
here I am a T2... The best explanation I've heard is that genetics
plays a huge role in this.
Alan S - 03 Nov 2005 09:36 GMT
>But I gotta tell you sometimes after years of running and keeping fit and
>trim the words "Why me" slip into my thoughts when Im standing at the
>checkout counter next to a guy who's way, way overweight, out of shape
>and buying twinkies, jelly beans, and moon pies.

It's your own fault. You chose your parents and grandparents
badly.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Chief - 03 Nov 2005 19:39 GMT
>>But I gotta tell you sometimes after years of running and keeping fit
>>and trim the words "Why me" slip into my thoughts when Im standing at
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.

Yep, I should have known better. When that boat docked in New York, I
should have stuck with the first class passengers. But no, not me. Like an
idiot I found a broke potatoe eating mick and what have I got to show for
it? A craving for fresh potatoes and the inability to eat one.  
Mary - 03 Nov 2005 16:18 GMT
>>>>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 151 lines]
> because I loved to fly and loved to travel. I hope your son does well and
> stays well.
Thanks, Chief.  "Why me?" is perfectly understandable, but one thing you
can be thankful for is that diabetes didn't hit you until after you
retired.  That's one thing I think about with my son--how disappointed
he would be if he got something like diabetes, and I pray to God he
doesn't.  He's had great experiences and opportunities in the Navy, and
I hope he makes it to retirement as he wishes.

You have an advantage in that over the years you have developed a good
attitude and habits concerning your fitness/health level.  If you get a
T1 diagnosis (which I think you will), you would be a perfect candidate
for an insulin pump, and it would give you more freedom to do what you
desire in life.

As for the twinkies, jelly beans & moon pies--sometimes I drool for
them, eat them, then realize that it wasn't all that great anyway.
Aside from that, if you learn carb counting (whether on shots or a
pump), you can eat those things but just learn to bolus insulin to cover
them.  You won't have to limit your diet much, if at all, when you're
trained properly--and that will take a well-informed MD, diabetes
educator and dietician team that can educate you properly.

Just ask my husband--he eats a lot more junk food than me :) -- we both
pump.  And both our A1Cs are in the 5 or 6 range.

Mary
Chief - 03 Nov 2005 19:57 GMT
>>>>>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 162 lines]
> to God he doesn't.  He's had great experiences and opportunities in
> the Navy, and I hope he makes it to retirement as he wishes.

I wouldn't worry - it doesn't accomplish much. Funny thing about that.

Guys who focus on making it to retirement often don't make it to
retirement.

Guys who focus on doing the best job they can almost always make it to
retirement.

I've found it's best to set goals just outside of the realm of the
possible and reachable when your young.

> You have an advantage in that over the years you have developed a good
> attitude and habits concerning your fitness/health level.  If you get
> a T1 diagnosis (which I think you will), you would be a perfect
> candidate for an insulin pump, and it would give you more freedom to
> do what you desire in life.

Just in the limited net surfing I've done it seems that Type 1 has more
research going on. But who knows what is happening as we speak.  

> As for the twinkies, jelly beans & moon pies--sometimes I drool for
> them, eat them, then realize that it wasn't all that great anyway.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Mary

I think, I'll stick with my new and improved diet regardless of what the
BG does or doesn't do. I'm finding the low carb and high fiber stuff is
agreeing with my digestion much better.

Take Care
Mary - 03 Nov 2005 23:31 GMT
>>>>>>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>>>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 202 lines]
>
> Take Care
Sounds great!  The junk food is just that--junk.  And a lower carb,
higher fiber diet will benefit you in many ways.  Keep up the good work.
 It sounds like you're doing as much as possible until you get your
next appt with the endo.  Hang in there!

Mary
Mary - 04 Nov 2005 05:14 GMT
>>>>>>>>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>>>>>>>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 202 lines]
>
> Take Care
For sure my son is focusing on doing the best job possible.  He wants to
make the Navy a career, but he's already done so well because of his
hard work and determination.  He's been Senior Sailor of the Quarter
twice in the past few years--once for his ship (USS Abraham Lincoln) and
once at the base in Tokyo.  Sorry I'm bragging--can't help myself--but
it's to his credit, not mine!  He's a great kid (oops, man).
Ma¢k - 06 Nov 2005 14:28 GMT
>once for his ship (USS Abraham Lincoln) and

I helped build that Carrier.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Ma¢k - 03 Nov 2005 01:47 GMT
>  He never really said but I did take fairly rigorous flight physicals
>every year until I was 45 and retired in 1995. I can't imagine they missed
>I was diabetic all those years.

he didn't say?  first sign that you need to switch docs. look for an
endocrinologist they specialize in diabetes care.

>Isn't Type 1 for younger folks?

No.  Type 1 can develop at any age.  However it's onset is not as
rapid in adults as it is in children which frequently leads to being
misdiagnosed as a type 2.

This does not mean that you were actually misdiagnosed simply because
your GP started you out on insulin.

The correct diagnostic tools are blood tests, namely a c-peptide or
c-reactice peptide.  or the GAD anti body test.  This will actually
show which type you are.

>And aren't low Bg's more of a problem for
>T1's?

No.  There are oral meds that type 2s take that will cause lows and
reactive hypoglycemia often precedes full blown type 2 diabetes and
does not go away once that diagnosis is established and lows from that
do not require meds.

> I can stop eating and still have high BG readings. Even at only 800
>to 1000 cal a day I'm running an average of 160's.  

until you get an official diagnosis based on the proper blood tests we
can only guess as to the causes for this at this point and there are a
few.  Going too long between meals will cause a liver dump of stored
glycogen.  you avoid this by eating the correct daily amount for you
in 6 to 8 small meals rather than 3 large meals.  You could still be
experiencing glucose toxicity which makes control very difficult to
establish for a type 2 in the beginning.  the insulin you are using is
not enough to get you out of it and control the BG correctly.  There
are other possibilities.

>I'm not talking from knowledge just wondering.

keep doing so, you are on the right track.

>I do remember feeling more tired than normal about a year after I retired
>but just chalked it up to getting older and doing less exercise. I didn't
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Yep, I'm thinking if he doesnt open up with some information soon I'm out
>of here and looking for a new doctor.

you should be insisting on a referral to an endocrinologist now.  this
git handed you insulin and tossed you out the door with no real
knowledge or training.  That's is not just irresponsible it is down
right dangerous.

>From what I have read at the different Diabetes sites my BG's when they
>were 400 and up were to high for just pills but I have wondered why I don't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>I think he should have given me both so that I could use the pen after
>meals and let the pills hold it down between meals. But then I'm no doctor.

if you are type 2 it would been better to give you the insulin long
enough to reduce your BG and start you on the oral meds and at the
same time change your diet and exercise routine.  Then drop the
insulin and attempt to maintain with orals and diet and exercise and
if possible in time drop the orals.

you were not given any diabetes education, you were not given the
opportunity to make any decisions in your own goals and treatment and
you are not being closely and properly monitored.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Chief - 03 Nov 2005 02:22 GMT
>>  He never really said but I did take fairly rigorous flight physicals
>>every year until I was 45 and retired in 1995. I can't imagine they
>>missed I was diabetic all those years.
>
> he didn't say?  first sign that you need to switch docs. look for an
> endocrinologist they specialize in diabetes care.

He's an endo recommended by a doctor I initially went to for what I
thought at the time was the problem - my stomach.

I think I need to look around more. I never needed a doctor for anything
but a flight physical my entire life. I guess I need to get Doctor smart
quick.

>>Isn't Type 1 for younger folks?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> c-reactice peptide.  or the GAD anti body test.  This will actually
> show which type you are.

Wonder why I wasn't told what Type I am?

>>And aren't low Bg's more of a problem for
>>T1's?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> not enough to get you out of it and control the BG correctly.  There
> are other possibilities.

The original prescription was for 6units (using the Novolog pen) after
each meal.

I tried that for a about a week and then called the doctor when the meter  
reading was over 600(Hi) after a week in the 300-400's He told me to
raise the amount up until I get it down. Today I'm using 26units.

My training is as an engineer and I keep hoping to see a pattern develope
where I can say that if I take X number of shots of quanity Y at these
times then for most days of eating z amount of carbs this will keep me at
a decent level.

That would make me a happier man. This ping pong game of chasing the BG
all over the place is wearing me out. It's really a pain when just before
bed I get a high reading and then have to figure out what to do and wait
to see if it was the right thing to do


>>I'm not talking from knowledge just wondering.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> knowledge or training.  That's is not just irresponsible it is down
> right dangerous.

He's an endo doc. In his defense, I was backdoored onto his schedule by a
a friend of his. I'll give him the second visit and see what happens.  

 I fully intend to approach this desease like I would a test flight and
I already have completely changed my lifestyle, diet, habits  and
exercise routine. I am willing to do whatever it takes to have as normal
a life as I can get.  The rest is up to a competent doctor.



>>From what I have read at the different Diabetes sites my BG's when
>>they were 400 and up were to high for just pills but I have wondered
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> you were not given any diabetes education - nope, you were not given
the opportunity to make any decisions in your own goals and treatment -
nope and you are not being closely and properly monitored - nope.

Look like three strikes? I'll hit the second appointment and see if there
is any future in this relationship.

Thanks for taking the time. Appriciated
RK - 03 Nov 2005 03:53 GMT
| >>  He never really said but I did take fairly rigorous flight physicals
| >>every year until I was 45 and retired in 1995. I can't imagine they
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
| but a flight physical my entire life. I guess I need to get Doctor smart
| quick.

Ouch! yep, you need to let your fingers do the walking and quickly.

| >>Isn't Type 1 for younger folks?
| >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
| >
| Wonder why I wasn't told what Type I am?

Most doctors don't say, it's almost automatically presumed because
of weight and age you would be a T2...

| >>And aren't low Bg's more of a problem for
| >>T1's?
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
| reading was over 600(Hi) after a week in the 300-400's He told me to
| raise the amount up until I get it down. Today I'm using 26units.

Using 26u for a meal is close to a T2 dose.

| My training is as an engineer and I keep hoping to see a pattern develope
| where I can say that if I take X number of shots of quanity Y at these
| times then for most days of eating z amount of carbs this will keep me at
| a decent level.

Hate to burst your balloon... but that will rarely happen even for a T1 most
times.  You'll soon learn, you can eat the exact same thing, at the exact
same
time.. just the next day and you can even have the exact same premeal
glucose
reading, but you will not have the exact same after you finish... We humans
are
just weird like that.

I get really lucky with my guestimating some days.. some days I'm playing
catchup with corrections because I royally messed up with my guessing how
many carbs...

| That would make me a happier man. This ping pong game of chasing the BG
| all over the place is wearing me out. It's really a pain when just before
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
|
| Thanks for taking the time. Appriciated

Listen to Mack, he might be a T1.. but he's a smart cookie.. he's one of the
ones that knocked some sense into me to make me fight for proper treatment.

I believe if it weren't for some here, i'd prolly be dead from DKA..

btw.. watch out for the Trolls around here too.. seems their multiplying
like
larve <g>

RK, t1
Chief - 03 Nov 2005 05:56 GMT
>| >>  He never really said but I did take fairly rigorous flight
>| >>  physicals
[quoted text clipped - 155 lines]
>
> RK, t1

I guess your right and I won't get the 'perfect world'. Sure would be
nice. Who knows maybe they will find more and better stuff since the
number of diabetic cash cows are growing so rapidly. Maybe this newsgroup
will be empty someday. What could possibly make a troll interested in
Diabetes - weird.  

Thanks
Ma¢k - 03 Nov 2005 04:55 GMT
>>>  He never really said but I did take fairly rigorous flight physicals
>>>every year until I was 45 and retired in 1995. I can't imagine they
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>but a flight physical my entire life. I guess I need to get Doctor smart
>quick.

Yes, definitely shop around.  One thing that might help you is to look
for the local American Diabetes Association support groups, these are
face to face support groups run by fellow diabetics.  They usually
take place in hospitals, borrowing or renting their cafeterias or
meeting rooms.  Call the local hospitals and ask if they host any.
The members will know which endos in the area are the best.

Sadly their are idiots who get the specialist titles.  I've run into a
couple of them in my 30 as a type 1.  Luckily when it comes to
specialists there are fewer idiots because of the requirements and
because of the highly self motivated and self educated patients they
have to deal with.

>>>Isn't Type 1 for younger folks?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>Wonder why I wasn't told what Type I am?

the test may never have been done.

>>>And aren't low Bg's more of a problem for
>>>T1's?
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>bed I get a high reading and then have to figure out what to do and wait
>to see if it was the right thing to do

okay you need to stop right here.

26 units of novolog is extremely high for any type 1 to take.  That is
an amount that a type 2 would take due to "insulin resistance".
Insulin Resistance = IR is the defining characteristic of type 2
diabetes.  Also you have to factor in how long the insulin will
actually last.  Novolog will not last long enough to cover your bodies
needs between meals.  So if you are still dealing with the initial
glucose toxicity and or high insulin resistance you have nothing to
cover your body's needs when the novolog wears off in about 3 hours
maybe up to 4 tops as it peters out.  It will be most effective at
around 1.5 to 2 hours after injecting.

>>>I'm not talking from knowledge just wondering.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
>Thanks for taking the time. Appriciated

Diabetes Education classes are pretty much standard for all new
diabetics with insurance coverage or the ability to pay out of pocket.
They are taught by CDEs Certified Diabetes Educators and may even
include a Dietician.  The endo should have the schedule for the
classes in his area and should have written you a script/order for the
class for your insurance company the day you saw him.  

Ask for this.

Ask about the proper meds to reduce insulin resistance.  They can be
taken with injected insulin but you will cut back on the dosage of
insulin and find your between meal BGs staying down.

regular exercise has to become a part of the program.  many type 2s
find that a half hour to an hour walk after some meals greatly reduces
post meal BGs.  It also improves health in other areas and allows us
to spend quality time with spouses.  It's a win win plan no matter how
you look at it.

as far as your questions about testing frequency and getting your
insurance to pay for it goes.  The problem is that many companies do
not think type 2s need to test frequently, not even when they are
newly diagnosed and learning.  They are wrong.  And you have to fight
with them sometimes.  A good endo who supports your desire to maintain
good control will write you the scripts specifying the number of times
per day that you should be testing or the minimum number of strips per
month you should be getting and include the instruction to refill as
needed.  A good testing pattern for a newly diagnosed type 2 is
explained at http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org under the newly
diagnosed section aka Jennifer's Advice to newbies.  Once you get your
BG under control and get your A1c where it should be and you learn how
your body reacts to certain meals then you cut back on the testing
only to the point where you are comfortable.  Testing only once a day
or only twice a day or only relying on the A1c test results is
completely inadequate for good diabetes management.  And since "you"
are using insulin you must test as frequently as any type 1 would.

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Nicky - 03 Nov 2005 15:04 GMT
> Wonder why I wasn't told what Type I am?

Cos they haven't done the tests to see yet. I'd insist on them, in your
shoes. You may not be a straightforward diagnosis.

> My training is as an engineer

Aha! One of those : )  Look for Derek Paine's experiences on the
www.mendosa.com website - he talks your language. Problem is, each of us
reacts to different foods, exercise and experiences differently, so you'll
still have to do all your own testing - but it gives you some heads-ups.

> and I keep hoping to see a pattern develop
> where I can say that if I take X number of shots of quanity Y at these
> times then for most days of eating z amount of carbs this will keep me at
> a decent level.

If you're a T2, your exogenous insulin needs are (hopefully) going to drop
to nothing, as Chris J experienced. If you're not - don't ask me : )

Nicky.

Signature

A1c 10.5/5.6/<6  T2 DX 05/2004
1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine
95/74/72Kg

Chief - 03 Nov 2005 19:16 GMT
>> Wonder why I wasn't told what Type I am?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> you'll still have to do all your own testing - but it gives you some
> heads-ups.

Not completely a left brainer - I do wear matching socks - most of the
time.

>> and I keep hoping to see a pattern develop
>> where I can say that if I take X number of shots of quanity Y at
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Nicky.

Thanks for the info. I got so much in the last day that I didn't know and
some great links.
Chris J. - 03 Nov 2005 03:59 GMT
>you should be insisting on a referral to an endocrinologist now.  this
>git handed you insulin and tossed you out the door with no real
>knowledge or training.  That's is not just irresponsible it is down
>right dangerous.

I totally agree with what Mack says here, but I'd like to add that
while dangerous, it's not sadly not uncommon. It happened to me too,
when I left the hospital.

>>I think he should have given me both so that I could use the pen after
>>meals and let the pills hold it down between meals. But then I'm no doctor.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>insulin and attempt to maintain with orals and diet and exercise and
>if possible in time drop the orals.

I was put on Metformin in the hospital, then they increased the dose a
week later. As for getting off the insulin, one way that can be done
is, if using a chart or similar method of calculating doses, let the
lowering blood sugar levels reduce the amounts per day, then the
number of shots, until they reach zero. That's how I did it, though
that wasn't my Doc's plan at all. (so let the more experienced weigh
in on this if you consider it).
Chief - 03 Nov 2005 06:09 GMT
>>you should be insisting on a referral to an endocrinologist now.  this
>>git handed you insulin and tossed you out the door with no real
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> that wasn't my Doc's plan at all. (so let the more experienced weigh
> in on this if you consider it).

I can see this happening just today I dropped the shot to 10 units for
the dinner meal - it was 26 units until tonight. But I'm up right now
just to check if I dropped it to much or not enough.

But at the same time I took off a couple of months just to deal with this
stuff and I'm eating much less than I think I will need when I start
working again. So I probably started this all wrong to begin with.

My Goal has been to get the BG down to 140 and below and no higher. Today
was the best day yet with my BG around 100 all day except for two
excursions over 200. One early in the morning and one at 1 PM. The one at
1PM really confused me because I did not eat a lunch at all and went
walking instead.

But I can see now that it's possible to get to diet and exercise.

Wouldn't that be great. If that happens I'm retiring completely.


Chris J. - 03 Nov 2005 07:05 GMT
>Chris J. <chris@noadress.com> wrote in

>> I was put on Metformin in the hospital, then they increased the dose a
>> week later. As for getting off the insulin, one way that can be done
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>the dinner meal - it was 26 units until tonight. But I'm up right now
>just to check if I dropped it to much or not enough.

The downward trend is a good sign! Don't get depressed if you have
minor setbacks, though. They do happen.

>But at the same time I took off a couple of months just to deal with this
>stuff and I'm eating much less than I think I will need when I start
>working again. So I probably started this all wrong to begin with.

I started badly too. I came out of hospital not having a clue as to
what I could eat. I thought that carbs were bad, Protein was bad in
large doses, and fat was out! So, I ended up eating steamed broccoli
and tofu for every meal, and not getting good nutrition or enough
calories.  

>My Goal has been to get the BG down to 140 and below and no higher.

That is a good goal IMHO (In My Humble Opinion). .

>Today
>was the best day yet with my BG around 100 all day except for two
>excursions over 200.

>One early in the morning and one at 1 PM. The one at
>1PM really confused me because I did not eat a lunch at all and went
>walking instead.

That might have been what we call a liver dump.
When the liver senses your BG is getting low (0ften caused by skipping
meals) it can release glucose into the bloodstream. In the early
stages of treatment a T2 can have glucose toxicity, which compounds
the problem. Also, the liver takes a while to adapt after long periods
of high BG's, so might release at higher levels then it should. (If
I've bungled this explanation, someone please correct me).

Was the one in the morning before or after breakfast?

>But I can see now that it's possible to get to diet and exercise.

It may be. I never did. I'm still on a pill called Metformin. However,
Metformin has some benefits; it's shown to help protect the heart, and
lower insulin resistance. In my own opinion, (and not everyone here
agrees), for me personally,   I'd stay on it even if I didn't need it
to keep my BG's down. It's one pill twice a day, so no big deal for me
at all.

However, if your doc puts you on it, I'd suggest starting at a low
dose (say 500mg a day) and working your way up to whatever is
prescribed. The reason is that it can have some nasty intestinal
effects on some people, sometimes just temporary, and starting low and
working your way up seems to be the vastly preferred method. I don't
know what percentage of people have trouble with it. I never had any
problems.  
Chief - 03 Nov 2005 19:07 GMT
>>Chris J. <chris@noadress.com> wrote in
>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> know what percentage of people have trouble with it. I never had any
> problems.  

Still got two long weeks before I get to spent the 15 minutes with the
doctor. Never looked forward to a doctors appointment before.

Question

When I get the BG range lower will that mean that the symptomes of a high
BG will also start lower?

I think that happened this morning. I had the dry mouth, dry tongue,
fruity smell and fatigue. But when I tested the BG was high 210, but I
haven't had a problem at that level before. After the info dump I got fro
this group yesterday, I am thinking that this morning could be a good
sign.
Nicky - 03 Nov 2005 20:46 GMT
> When I get the BG range lower will that mean that the symptomes of a high
> BG will also start lower?

Yes. You may also feel hypo at lower levels - or when you get a big bg
change, even when you're not in dangerous hypo territory. The treatment's
the same - a small amount of fast-acting carbs, wait a bit, test again.

Nicky.

Signature

A1c 10.5/5.6/<6  T2 DX 05/2004
1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine
95/74/72Kg

Chris J. - 03 Nov 2005 22:09 GMT
>Still got two long weeks before I get to spent the 15 minutes with the
>doctor. Never looked forward to a doctors appointment before.

I can certainly agree with that! I was the same. I hate going to the
Docs, but since Dx, especially my early appointments, I can't wait.

Actually, in order to avoid postponing my two-week appointment by one
day, I passed up a free night at a 5-star resort. In hindsight, I'd
have taken the one day delay and had the free extra day, but back then
I wouldn't even consider it.

>Question
>
>When I get the BG range lower will that mean that the symptomes of a high
>BG will also start lower?

In my opinion, yes. That was certainly the case with me.

I never really felt the thirst and other symptoms, at all. Looking
back, I'd feel very tired after a carby meal, and had low energy
overall, but that was about it. And my Bg at diagnosis was over 600.
However, not long after getting my Bg's down, I felt the old tiredness
suddenly return (turned out I'd inadvertently eaten a very carby meal)
and was at 163. So, there was definitely a change for me.

>I think that happened this morning. I had the dry mouth, dry tongue,
>fruity smell and fatigue. But when I tested the BG was high 210, but I
>haven't had a problem at that level before. After the info dump I got fro
>this group yesterday, I am thinking that this morning could be a good
>sign.

It could be, as it may very well indicate lowering BG's, and your body
getting used to them. That's important on many levels.

With me, my FBG's (morning fasting BG's) were the last thing to come
down. For a while they were my highest of the day.

When I first started, my BG's were all over the place. 600 in
hospital, and my in-hospital readings (after starting insulin) ranged
in the three and four hundreds. For a while after I got out, they
bounced all over the place, from the 120's to over 400 a few times.
Chief - 04 Nov 2005 00:05 GMT
>>Still got two long weeks before I get to spent the 15 minutes with the
>>doctor. Never looked forward to a doctors appointment before.
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> in the three and four hundreds. For a while after I got out, they
> bounced all over the place, from the 120's to over 400 a few times.

Chris, This is selfish to say but I can't tell you how great it is to
hear simular experiences.

Someone ought to take this road show public. I'd imagine there are tons
of diabetics thinking they are the only person in the world with their
problems.

I don't think I got past the first three google pages of diabetes sites
but there really wasn't much there beyond what any dictionary would have
except Mendosa's page.  

I guess the worry of a lawsuit keeps the info flow down.
Chris J. - 04 Nov 2005 00:59 GMT
>> When I first started, my BG's were all over the place. 600 in
>> hospital, and my in-hospital readings (after starting insulin) ranged
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Chris, This is selfish to say but I can't tell you how great it is to
>hear simular experiences.

Not selfish at all! I posted them in the hopes that it would be
helpful to you to hear them, and I'm delighted that you feel as you
do.  

>Someone ought to take this road show public. I'd imagine there are tons
>of diabetics thinking they are the only person in the world with their
>problems.

I totally agree. I was very lucky: I stumbled onto this group during
my first internet searches, a few hours after getting out of hospital.

>I don't think I got past the first three google pages of diabetes sites
>but there really wasn't much there beyond what any dictionary would have
>except Mendosa's page.  

I found a few sites, many offering contradictory advice. Mendosa's
page is a good one though!
Ma¢k - 03 Nov 2005 01:23 GMT
>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>be a better place - at least for the men. Come to think of it maybe it's
>time for a detailed study?  

I can see where the frequent sex would be good for the men, but why
would men wearing daisy duke cut off shorts be a good thing for men
for any reason?

Signature

Mâck©®
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
...Theodore Roosevelt

        (o o)  
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."

Jesus never hated anyone.

Chief - 03 Nov 2005 01:39 GMT
>>"oldal4865" <oldal4865@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3sne17Fp088aU1
>>@individual.net:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> would men wearing daisy duke cut off shorts be a good thing for men
> for any reason?

What? I thought it was my day to be funny.

Besides you ever seen a guy dressed in Daisy Dukes trying to get the seam
out of his throat? Pretty dang funny and a laugh is always good.
vbhol - 01 Nov 2005 11:07 GMT
>> Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?
>>
> yes. and it's KETONES.
>
> Dave

Someday, somebody is going to correct that spelling error on those
meters.  Some meters come up with "keytones".  I guess the person who
programmed it was not "diabatic" ;)

VBH
Priscilla H. Ballou - 01 Nov 2005 19:30 GMT
> >> Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> meters.  Some meters come up with "keytones".  I guess the person who
> programmed it was not "diabatic" ;)

Or at least they could have it play a little tune...

Priscilla
Nicky - 01 Nov 2005 20:58 GMT
> Someday, somebody is going to correct that spelling error on those meters.
> Some meters come up with "keytones".  I guess the person who programmed it
> was not "diabatic" ;)

Maybe "adiabatic"? : )

Nicky.

Signature

A1c 10.5/5.6/<6  T2 DX 05/2004
1g Metformin, 100ug Thyroxine
95/74/72Kg

Priscilla H. Ballou - 31 Oct 2005 22:00 GMT
> Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?

If you're eating pretty low-carb, sure.

Priscilla
RK - 31 Oct 2005 22:07 GMT
| Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?

yes for a T2.. it's called "low carb" eating. and some say its
unhealthy (oh here comes the fighting again) some say it
isn't.. me, if it isn't natural then its unhealthy.. we need a
certain amount of energy a day for fuel for our bodies.,
low carbing isn't the way *I* choose to lose weight.

for a T1 can mean the same, unless they have high glucose
at the same time... then T1's run into trouble most often.

i used to be there often.. my medical chart is stamped
DIABETIC IDDM - DKA PRONED
Quentin Grady - 02 Nov 2005 07:11 GMT
This post not CC'd by email

>if it isn't natural then its unhealthy..

G'day G'day Reisa,

I'm fascinated by the methods people use to decide what is right and
wrong. One way is to make a generality and then fit the specific into
that generality to decide what to do.   You know the sort of thing.

Stealing is wrong except in exceptional circumstances.  
Therefore shoplifting is wrong except in exceptional circumstance.

I got to wondering whether this was really how they did it or merely
how it appeared to them that they did it.  Let me give you an example.

Injecting insulin isn't natural. I know of no other animal that
injects insulin from some external source into its body. Most humans
don't even do it.  Yet, I fully accept that T1 diabetics must do it if
they are to stay healthy.  IMHO, unless you wish to play around with
semantics, you will also admit injecting insulin is an unnatural yet
healthier option for T1s if they do it right.  That would seem to mean
that for some reason you had already decided low carb was unhealthy
and the generalisation came after the fact in a supporting role.  

OK, let's look at low carb diets in nature.  It is tempting to think
that they don't exist, yet some humans live in cruel climates.

How would an Inuit in the depths of Winter get say 55% of their
calories from carbohydrate?  <rhetorical>

>we need a certain amount of energy a day for fuel for our bodies.,

This is another generality which makes it even clearer that the
decision on specifics can precede the formation of the generality.
Put simply the specific cannot be deduced from the generality.

Perhaps you meant to say something like, "We need a certain amount of
glucose per day."   It isn't really important.

>low carbing isn't the way *I* choose to lose weight.

Same.  

I don't do the exceptional low carb diet that produces ketones in the
urine.  

FWIIW some low carb advocates do NOT advocate reducing carb intake to
the point where ketones are produced.  The originators of the GO-diet
were quite adamant on the subject.

http://www.lowcarb.ca/atkins-diet-and-low-carb-plans/go-diet.html

They claimed weight loss was fastest when one reduced carb intake to
the point just before ketones appeared in the urine. Unfortunately I
can't direct you to a reference for this tidbit as their website
http://www.go-diet.com is now reduced to a single page flogging off
their book. If the tidbit should be available elsewhere on the net
then I have just illustrated the point I was making about decision
making.  <grin>

Best wishes,

Signature

Quentin Grady       ^  ^  /
New Zealand,       >#,#< [
                   / \ /\    
"... and the blind dog was leading."

http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

RK - 02 Nov 2005 16:16 GMT
| This post not CC'd by email
|
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
|
| Best wishes,

Perhaps since I was raised pretty old fashioned I still hold those
old fashions true today.  Just to give you an example of where I'm
coming from... First off, I was adopted as a baby.  My adopted mother
always kept me moving, she had me in several activities and always
physical.  She'd nag the living tar outta me if I'd open the frig door after
school when I was hungry.. or nag and bitch at me if I ate something
that wasn't healthy.  We always had fresh nuts, fruit and veggies at home
to eat.. I never was a sweets eater... a slice of cake or pie... a candy bar
here
or there would do me for weeks.  She'd told me once that she was told my
natural mother was severely obese as was her whole family.  My adoptive
mother was 5'0 and most times 105lbs... she once got to 126lbs but that was
when she was flat on her back for 4month with phlebitis.. right after the
clots
desolved she was up moving and quickly lost the weight again.  We always
ate healthy.. very little red meat.. lots of pork, fish and chicken.. always
had
one small starch food and 2 veggies at dinner often with a salad as well.
She
always made sure I had a healthy good complex carb breakfast and fruit with
a sandwich for lunch.

When I was 27, my half sister found me and to my surprise she was a heffer.
I quickly learned so was my natural mother.. who died of liver failure at
the
age of 47 and weighing in at a hefty 425lbs.  I've NEVER been over 165lbs in
my life! lol and that was when I was pregnant no less!  ---

My point to this little story?.... is that my adoptive mother was raised in
the
mid-west in the heart of Iowa.... her father was a strawberry and green bean
farmer... she knew the value of needing complex carbs for energy for the
body
as she did knowing the simple rule... you'll lose weight if you burn more
calories
then you eat.  I was like that as well my entire life... I still am mostly
and work the
best I can at it with my back problems.

I realize that not all are as fortunate as I have been.  But... when you
compare
injecting insulin to remain alive to starving the body of needed nutrients
for the
sole sake of losing weight.. that to me is just down right dumb... there is
no
comparision in my book... You cannot make logic out of that.

RK, t1 by no fault of her own
Quentin Grady - 02 Nov 2005 23:17 GMT
This post not CC'd by email

>Perhaps since I was raised pretty old fashioned I still hold those
>old fashions true today.  Just to give you an example of where I'm
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>and work the
>best I can at it with my back problems.

G'day G'day Reisa,

 Thank you for your reply. It is much appreciated.  It is clear you
have a strong sense of identity and that how you grew up has been
important in forming that strong sense of identity  It confirms for me
that the reasons people give for making various choices has very
little to do with logic they provide in support of their decisions.
The decision has already been made. What you have shown me most
clearly is how that decision was made.  

Some people suggest there is a hierarchy that governs our choices.
It has been a while since I thought about such things but it goes
something like,

1 Beliefs about what is greater than ourselves, what we are part of.
2 Beliefs about identity.
3 Beliefs about what is OK.
4 Beliefs about capability
5 Context.

The ones at the top tend to over ride those at the bottom.
If you look at what you have felt important to say to me you will
recognise that it is very much about your genetic make up, ie beliefs
about your identity and about the family and the community you grew up
in. (What is greater than yourself)

>I realize that not all are as fortunate as I have been.  But... when you
>compare
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>no
>comparision in my book... You cannot make logic out of that.

Oh. Not once have you used the word "natural" in your summary.  What
was and wasn't natural was a vital part of the supporting logic given
with deciding not to adopt a low carb diet. As you have shown most
clearly is the actual reasons were based on upbringing, family and
identity.

>RK, t1 by no fault of her own

Interesting.  It must be terrible to be afflicted with an incurable
condition that is no fault of one's own.  

Out of a sense of curiosity which I may come to regret,

"Do you think it is easier to be afflicted with say T2 diabetes which
many people blame fairly and squarely on the person who has it?"

Best wishes and thank you for a fascinating discussion.

Signature

Quentin Grady       ^  ^  /
New Zealand,       >#,#< [
                   / \ /\    
"... and the blind dog was leading."

http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

RK - 03 Nov 2005 01:23 GMT
| This post not CC'd by email
|
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
| clearly is the actual reasons were based on upbringing, family and
| identity.

perhaps the natural part comes in to play that here in the states for
hundreds of years midwesterners have always eaten a higher carb meal.

one thing that I didn't put which probably I should have.. is that the era
that I was raised in... basically circa 1940's is that the family never sat
around
doing nothing.. there was always an activity or two... the kids today really
don't do much of anything other then play video games, on the computer
or listen to their iPods.. heck soon they'll be able to watch their iPods as
well.

so... natural being since the caveman (if there was such a thing) eating
higher
carbs was a must to subtain their energy levels to go hunting.  --

then again, i'm not totally baggin on ultra low-carb.  I consider what I
used to
eat high carb.. I moderate carb now... anywhere from 100gm-140gm a day.  I
maintain my weight along with a good bg reading most times, despite my
pain... and still am complication free.  Can't ask for anymore then that.

Reisa... off to the gym for the kid

| >RK, t1 by no fault of her own
|
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
|
| Best wishes and thank you for a fascinating discussion.
pverburgh - 22 Nov 2005 15:51 GMT
Wow, RK, what a story you told about yourself.  As you can tell, I am
reading some of the other posts here.  Hope that I will be able to learn
some.

Jeannette

> | This post not CC'd by email
> |
[quoted text clipped - 117 lines]
>
> RK, t1 by no fault of her own
None Given - 02 Nov 2005 19:43 GMT
> FWIIW some low carb advocates do NOT advocate reducing carb intake to
> the point where ketones are produced.  The originators of the GO-diet
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  They claimed weight loss was fastest when one reduced carb intake to
> the point just before ketones appeared in the urine. Unfortunately I

I think Atkins advocated gradually increasing carbs until the dieter is out
of ketosis for a week,  then dropping back down to the level where they are
barely in ketosis to get the best loss rate.    The extreme low carb
business and slowly adding things back is mainly to break addictions and
identify food intolerances.  Some things are actually closer than it looks
at first glance.

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

gman99 - 31 Oct 2005 23:11 GMT
> Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?

Depends on what you are doing. Ketones are a NATURAL by-product of
burning fat so if you are dieting you may well have normal BG and be
producing ketones.
Beav - 01 Nov 2005 02:08 GMT
> Is it possible to have normal BG levels and still have high keytones?

You can if you're eating a low carb diet. The ketones are a by-product of
burning fat and before anyone "goes off on one", ketones in your urine is
NOT the same a ketoacidosis.

Signature

Beav

Reply to "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com" (with the obvious
changes)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.