Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What is a good range for mg/dL tests?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Cloud Burst - 28 Oct 2005 20:19 GMT
Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
the morning before eating anything and getting consistent 85-90
numbers with my new meter.  

Here's a sample now that I'm testing more:

  85 8am, before taking any food, then breakfast:
     toast/butter/jelly
     16oz very strong coffee with non-fat milk, 3 equals
 211 9am, then:
     no food or drink
 197 10am, then:
     16oz Engl Breakfast tea with non-fat half-and-half, 1 equal
 157 11am

So is this normal/ok/reasonable?  Should my range be smaller?  

Oh, and while I'm here I have another question.  My pharmacy has
given me my Actos in 15MG pills instead of 30MG, so I'm supposed
to take 2 per day instead of one.  I wondered if it makes sense
to take one in the morning and one in the evening, just to spread
them out since it would be easy to do.  

Thanks.  

CB
oldal4865 - 28 Oct 2005 20:46 GMT
Cloud Burst wrote in message ...
>Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
>finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>CB

  Oops.     A general goal for diabetics is to never go above 140 mg/dL for
any reason.

Another goal is to keep your "2 hour after meal blood sugar" to no more than
30 points higher than your "before meal blood sugar".

For most of us,   breakfast is really difficult.    There's some hormone
effects at Dawn and early morning which amplify the effects of eating carb.

Regards
 Old Al
ADE - 28 Oct 2005 20:48 GMT
Hi CB,
What kind of toats did you use; wheat, white, multi grains ? How many
carbs in that jelly ? You might want to experiment eating peanut butter
with cellery and bacon/egg to see how your glucose would react. I think
that 211 and 197 are a little bit high. Some people are more sensitve
to carbs in the morning than others. I can not make any comments on the
medications due to lack of knowledge. By the way, remember that
discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to
see that book being sold at Costco. Anyway, take care yourself.
J.C. Hartmann - 29 Oct 2005 00:31 GMT
>  By the way, remember that
> discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to
> see that book being sold at Costco. Anyway, take care yourself.

You think that's scary, look at the NY Times Hardcover Advice Bestseller
List right now.

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/

Yes, that's the sound of P.T. Barnum giggling that you hear.
Alan S - 29 Oct 2005 02:34 GMT
>>  By the way, remember that
>> discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Yes, that's the sound of P.T. Barnum giggling that you hear.

Hi Jim

Scary? That's downright terrifying!

HARDCOVER ADVICE
Top 5 at a Glance

1. NATURAL CURES "THEY" DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT, by
Kevin Trudeau

There are hundreds of sources of information on Trudeau; I
think this one is the best bio I've seen:
http://www.mlmsurvivor.com/felon.htm
"Kevin Trudeau is a marketer extraordinaire, with a
more-than-checkered past. A twice-convicted felon, he served
time in a Federal penitentiary, for credit card fraud. The
Federal Trade Commission has prosecuted him more than once
for making and airing fraudulent infomercials. He has been
the subject of investigations by 18 state Attorneys General
and the US Postal Service. His involvement in Nutrition for
Life, Inc. (NFLI), a multilevel marketing business based in
Houston, TX, ended ignominiously after the SEC began
investigating his distributor recruitment practices On April
17, 1996, the Illinois Attorney General filed suit against
Trudeau and a partner for running an illegal pyramid scheme
with Nutrition for Life and Nightingale-Conant, another MLM
dealing in motivational books and tapes. The State of
Michigan ordered Trudeau to cease all marketing in the state
related to his business, the Trudeau Marketing Group."

2. THE PURPOSE-DRIVEN LIFE, by Rick Warren

I'll stay away from evangelists or I'll upset too many here.
http://www.purposedrivenlife.com/rickwarren.aspx
"Rick Warren is the founding pastor of Saddleback Church in
Lake Forest, California. He and his wife, Kay, began the
church in their home in January 1980, with one family.
Now, with 22,000 in attendance each weekend, and over 80,000
names on the church roll, Saddleback is one of America's
largest and best-known churches."

Enough for me to avoid it.

3. YOUR BEST LIFE NOW, by Joel Osteen
http://www.christnotes.org/_joel-osteen.asp
"pastor Joel Osteen continues to pursue the large vision the
church has always had through pastoring the nearly 30,000
regular attendees at Lakewood, preaching to hundreds of
millions throughout the world through television, supporting
hundreds of missionaries throughout the world, feeding the
poor, clothing the naked, and holding widely attended
meetings through Joel Osteen Ministries."

Another? *sigh* O me of little faith. I'll make a small side
bet that dear Joel himself is neither poor nor naked these
days.

4. GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS 2006

At last - something intelligent, like the world's longest
fingernails or the record for numbers of eggs standing on
end (just broken recently, I hear).

5. THE MARTHA RULES, by Martha Stewart

Another jailbird.

Maybe that's the secret to getting on the list. We need to
send Jennifer, Jenny, Annette, Quentin, OldAl and Gretchen
Becker to jail. Maybe they could share a cell (well, two
cells) and come out to be multi-millionaires, interviewed by
Oprah and Dr Phil for super-credibility and then start their
own "Cooking for Diabetes" show with guys with English
accents (no, Quentin, not Kiwi) promoting the zucchini
peeler and the low-carb omelette-maker and multi-level
marketing of blueberry yoghurts and protein shakes and...

I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for
Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At
number 1.

Even better if they start a church. Hmmm, "The First Church
of the Islets of Langerhans" has a certain ring to it.
Nobody but initiates would know the secret of what that
meant:-)

Well, it was just a thought....

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Chris J. - 29 Oct 2005 23:04 GMT
>>>  By the way, remember that
>>> discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Scary? That's downright terrifying!

As you point out, we seem to reward certain criminals. I remember a
few years ago in the computer security industry: the top pay often
went to hackers who had been convicted.

>Maybe that's the secret to getting on the list. We need to
>send Jennifer, Jenny, Annette, Quentin, OldAl and Gretchen
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At
>number 1.

How very true... But, I have to wonder: Does Quentin know that a
fellow antipodean is campaigning to have him locked up? :-)
Alan S - 30 Oct 2005 00:28 GMT
>>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for
>>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At
>>number 1.
>
>How very true... But, I have to wonder: Does Quentin know that a
>fellow antipodean is campaigning to have him locked up? :-)

Some of my (and possibly his) ancestors arrived here that
way.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Chris J. - 30 Oct 2005 00:38 GMT
>>>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for
>>>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Some of my (and possibly his) ancestors arrived here that
>way.

Which, incidentally, means that you are living proof that heredity,
and not environment, is the determinate factor in the propensity for
criminality... :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
Alan S - 30 Oct 2005 04:23 GMT
>>>>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for
>>>>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>and not environment, is the determinate factor in the propensity for
>criminality... :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

Boyoboy. I'm glad I don't agree. I'm sure the Bush, Nixon,
Kennedy, and Tudor descendants would disagree too.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Chris J. - 30 Oct 2005 06:04 GMT
>>>>>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for
>>>>>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Boyoboy. I'm glad I don't agree. I'm sure the Bush, Nixon,
>Kennedy, and Tudor descendants would disagree too.

But, Alan, you persist in your incorrigible penchant for breaking laws
all the time, specifically those of nature: Driving upside down,
walking upside down, Christmas in mid-summer, Fall in April, the list
goes on and on! And need I even mention the Platypus?
Peabody - 30 Oct 2005 15:30 GMT
Chris J. says...

> But, Alan, you persist in your incorrigible penchant for
> breaking laws all the time, specifically those of
> nature: Driving upside down, walking upside down,
> Christmas in mid-summer, Fall in April, the list goes on
> and on! And need I even mention the Platypus?

Yes, but he can also have sex upside down, and still be on
top.
None Given - 28 Oct 2005 20:51 GMT
>    85 8am, before taking any food, then breakfast:
>       toast/butter/jelly
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> So is this normal/ok/reasonable?  Should my range be smaller?

Tomorrow try eggs and/or meat with no toast and no jelly, use cream instead
of non-fat whatever in your tea and coffee.   See if that don't give you
better numbers.

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Jenny - 28 Oct 2005 21:42 GMT
> Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
> finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> So is this normal/ok/reasonable?  Should my range be smaller?  

Your post meal numbers are not normal, nor reasonable, and certainly not
okay!

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists recommends people
with diabetes keep their blood sugar level under 140 mg/dl at 2 hours.

In your case, your breakfast toast and jelly are full of fast-acting
carbohydrate which is what raised your blood sugar.  Try eating 2 eggs
tomorrow instead of the toast and jelly and see whether it makes a
difference.

Because your fasting blood sugar is normal, you could probably normalize
your blood sugar at all times just by cutting way down on carbohydrate
throughout the day. You'll also probably feel a lot better energy. With
your blood sugar going W-A-Y up and then dropping back down, you
probably feel tired or starving a lot of the time.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
W. Baker - 28 Oct 2005 23:29 GMT
: > Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
: > finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
: >
: > So is this normal/ok/reasonable?  Should my range be smaller?  

: Your post meal numbers are not normal, nor reasonable, and certainly not
: okay!

: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists recommends people
: with diabetes keep their blood sugar level under 140 mg/dl at 2 hours.

: In your case, your breakfast toast and jelly are full of fast-acting
: carbohydrate which is what raised your blood sugar.  Try eating 2 eggs
: tomorrow instead of the toast and jelly and see whether it makes a
: difference.

: Because your fasting blood sugar is normal, you could probably normalize
: your blood sugar at all times just by cutting way down on carbohydrate
: throughout the day. You'll also probably feel a lot better energy. With
: your blood sugar going W-A-Y up and then dropping back down, you
: probably feel tired or starving a lot of the time.

: --Jenny

: http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
: http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info

I agree tht your breakfast was not only to high in carbs, but it ws
essential , oly carbs.  You can try my favorite breakfast tht works for
me.  I have about 1/3-1/2 Cup of low fat cottage ceese with a small amount
of a few fruits like 3 strwberries, ahandful of blueberries, a quarter
ofan apple, a smil slice of canteoup or honeydew melon, etc- aout 3
different fruits, and to this with a big dollop od low fat, plain ogurt.  
I have this with black coffee, but I guess you could tr cream.  This
doesn't spike me at all and tastes delicious and is not all eggy.  Of
course, you have to test for yourself, as your ileage may vary (YMMV).  

Wendy
Tiger Lily - 28 Oct 2005 21:51 GMT
http://www.diabetic-talk.org/jennifer.htm

Signature

Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet
/server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk
More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/
http://www.diabetic-talk.org/freeveggies.htm
I have no medical qualifications beyond my own
experience.
Choose your advisers carefully, because experience
can be
an expensive teacher.

> Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
> finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> CB
Alan S - 29 Oct 2005 01:29 GMT
>Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
>finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>      16oz very strong coffee with non-fat milk, 3 equals
>  211 9am, then:

Excellent result - to learn from. Terrible result if you
intend to continue doing that.

Tomorrow, try just two changes: a non-carb spread on the
toast (peanut butter, or cheese (real, not American:-)) and
pure cream in your coffee.

You'll get a surprise. But to really get good breakfast
numbers, you'll need to eventually cut the toast and have
some sort of protein instead. I've added some ideas at the
foot of this answer.

Aim to be eventually under 140 at one hour. Read this:
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm
Then print it out and read it again.

>      no food or drink
>  197 10am, then:

Still coming down from that high. Aim to be under 120 at two
hours.

>      16oz Engl Breakfast tea with non-fat half-and-half, 1 equal
>  157 11am

Still coming down - the carbs in that half-and-half had a
small effect, but if the breakfast had been OK, the later
tea would have been fine.

>So is this normal/ok/reasonable?  Should my range be smaller?  

Definitely smaller.

>Oh, and while I'm here I have another question.  My pharmacy has
>given me my Actos in 15MG pills instead of 30MG, so I'm supposed
>to take 2 per day instead of one.  I wondered if it makes sense
>to take one in the morning and one in the evening, just to spread
>them out since it would be easy to do.  

Can't answer that one. Some ideas for breakfasts:

Breakfasts With Minimal Carbs

1. Egg. The humble egg can be cooked in so many ways:
poached, fried (minimal oil in a non-stick pan), normal
omelette (beat it lightly while cooking), fluffy omelette
(seperate, whip the white with a spoonful of water, fold
back with filling and yolk), scrambled with a little milk,
frittata (sort of a heavier omelette with filling), and
baked. Use fillings, cheese, fresh herbs if you can, dried
if you can't.

2. Meat. Bacon, Ham, small steak, hamburger patty (watch the
fat), chicken, prosciutto, hot dogs and so on. Can be fried,
grilled/broiled, chopped after cooking and added to
omelettes, frittata or scrambled eggs. For bacon or other
fatty meats, drain on absorbent paper before serving.

3. Fish. Smoked, canned or fresh. Can be poached, fried, as
a mornay (easy on the thickener), mixed in a stir-fry etc.
Same for seafood.

4. Mushrooms. Small ones can be sliced and cooked with
onions, herbs , garlic etc and a little oil and a smidgin of
flour for a gravy. Large ones can be filled with bolognaise
or napoli sauce (or whatever you like), topped with grated
cheese and baked in the oven. Also another good omelette
filling.

5. Casseroles and stews - beef, lamb, chicken, mince (ground
beef) etc can be pre-prepared and divided into individual
breakfast sized serves. Put them in small plastic containers
in the freezer and zap one in the microwave for breakfast.
Check the carbs in the recipe to check suitability. Beef
bourgignon, Irish Stew (watch the spuds), chicken fricassee,
whatever your favourite is. Always test at 1 hr the first
time with casseroles - thickeners are usually the carb
culprits for high BGs.

6. Leftovers - slices of roast meat, re-heated or cold,
re-heated chops etc

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Jerry Freedman - 29 Oct 2005 13:55 GMT
> >Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
> >finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
>
> Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.

I agree that this diet will definitely get your BG down but wouldn't it
be "binding". I eat all bran ( extra fiber) in the morning( unbinding).
Piece of swiss for snack and a sandwich for lunch made with "good"
bread. Around here, Boston, thats Pigs Can Fly brand. Its dense, chewy,
heavy, low glycemic...for dinner bare hamburger, some meat with
vegetables, salad ( lots of salad). Have great bGs and am dropping a lot
of weight
Alan S - 29 Oct 2005 14:19 GMT
>I agree that this diet will definitely get your BG down but wouldn't it
>be "binding". I eat all bran ( extra fiber) in the morning( unbinding).
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>vegetables, salad ( lots of salad). Have great bGs and am dropping a lot
>of weight

I eat plenty of fibre in my other meals, particularly in the
evening. No problems with regularity as a result.  It is
possible to include all the nutrients, vitamins and fibre
you need once you understand the effects on your body.

If your system works for you - great. What are your BGs an
hour after breakfast? Not all of us (type 2) have a problem
in the morning - just most of us:-)

And, as long as you eat adequate fibre - it doesn't really
matter what time of day you eat it in my opinion.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Jennifer - 29 Oct 2005 17:34 GMT
Hi CB...

Your 8a number is just wonderful.

Your other numbers are just not.

Here's the advice I give all those who are looking to get control of
their diabetes...

Sounds like you're planning a move to take control of your diabetes... good
for you.

There is so much to absorb... you don't have to rush into anything.  Begin
by using your best weapon in this war, your meter.   You won't keel over
today, you have time to experiment, test, learn, test and figure out just
how your body and this disease are getting along.  The most important
thing you can do to learn about yourself and diabetes is test test  test.

More than most anything, what you eat will affect your diabetes and
your blood glucose numbers.

And more than anything you eat, carbs will affect your diabetes and
your blood glucose numbers.

So, the most important information you can begin to compile about
yourself, is how your body handles carbs.

This sounds like you would need a low carb food plan right?

You don't... what you need to uncover is YOUR   Personalized Carb Number.

Which actually works better for most everyone.  Because low to one
person is wildly high to another, but waaaaay too low for someone
else.

Is low carb less than 30g a day?   Is it anything less than the
Pyramid reccomendations?

Finding your Personalized Carb Number is easy.

Here's how you can figure out your own Personalized Carb Number.

The single biggest question a diabetic has to answer is:

What do I eat?

Unfortunately, the answer is pretty confusing.

What confounds us all is the fact that different diabetics can get great
results on wildly different food plans.  Some of us here achieve
great blood glucose control eating a high complex carbohydrate diet.
Others find that anything over 75 - 100g of carbs a day is too
much.  Still others are somewhere in between.

At the beginning all of us felt frustrated.  We wanted to be handed
THE way to eat, to ensure our continued health.  But we all
learned that there is no one way.  Each of us had to find our own path,
using the experience of those that went before, but still having
to discover for ourselves how OUR bodies and this disease were coexisting.

Ask questions, but remember each of us discovered on our own what works best
for us.  You can use our experiences as jumping off points, but eventually
you'll work up a successful plan that is yours alone.

What you are looking to discover is how different foods affect you.  As I'm
sure you've read, carbohydrates (sugars, wheat, rice... the things our
Grandmas called "starches") raise blood sugars the most rapidly.  Protein
and fat do raise them, but not as high and much more slowly... so if you're
a T2, generally the insulin your body still makes may take care of the rise.

You might want to try some  experiments.

First:  Eat whatever you've been
currently eating... but write it all down.
Test yourself at the following times:

Upon waking (fasting)
1 hour after each meal
2 hours after each meal
At bedtime

That means 8 x each day.  What you will discover by this is how long
after a meal your highest reading comes... and how fast you return to
"normal".  Also, you may see that a meal that included bread, fruit or
other carbs gives you a higher reading.

Then for the next few days, try to curb your carbs.  Eliminate breads,
cereals, rices, beans, any wheat products, potato, corn, fruit... get all
your carbs from veggies.  Test at the same schedule above.

If you try this for a few days, you may find some pretty damn good
readings.  It's worth a few days to discover.

Eventually you can slowly add back carbs until you see them affecting your
meter.

The thing about this disease... though we share much in common and we
need to
follow certain guidelines... in the end, each of our bodies dictate our
treatment and our success.

The closer we get to non-diabetic numbers, the greater chance we have of
avoiding horrible complications.  The key here is AIM... I know that
everyone is at a different point in their disease... and it is progressive.
But, if we aim for the best numbers and do our best, we give ourselves the
best shot at heath we've got.
That's all we can do.

Here's my opinion on what numbers to aim for, they are non-diabetic numbers.

FBG                          under 100
One hour after meals       under 140
Two hours after meals     under 120

or for those in the mmol parts of the world:

Fasting                              Under 6
One hour after meals         Under 8
Two hours after meals       Under 6.5

Recent studies have indicated that the most important numbers are your
"after meal" numbers. They may be the most indicative of future
complications, especially heart problems.

Listen to your doctor, but you are the leader of your diabetic
care team.  While his /her advice is learned, it is not absolute.   You
will end up knowing much more about your body and how it's handling
diabetes than your doctor will.   Your meter is your best weapon.

Just remember, we're not in a race or a competition with anyone but
ourselves... Play around with your food plan... TEST TEST TEST.  Learn what
foods cause spikes, what foods cause cravings... Use your body as a science
experiment.

You'll read about a lot of different ways people use to control their
diabetes... Many are diametrically opposed. After awhile you'll learn that
there is no one size fits all around here.  Take some time to experiment
and you'll soon discover the plan that works for you.

Best of luck!

Jennifer

> Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
> finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> CB
Cloud Burst - 30 Oct 2005 19:00 GMT
>Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
>finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>CB

Thank you everyone for the mostly on-topic replies.  Today's numbers
are much better now that I'm aware of what's going on.  

On a side (yeah, off topic) note, I checked my wife just for fun and
she was 238 one hour after breakfast.  I was 130.  The difference
was she had real (brown) sugar and non-fat half-and-half with her
oatmeal while I had mine (and my coffee) with non-fat milk and equal.  

My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way.  

CB
Priscilla Ballou - 30 Oct 2005 19:09 GMT
> >Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
> >finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way.  

Uh, if you test her at that level again, she will have been.  Better get
her to go see her MD, pronto.  238 is not a normal reading.

Prisiclla
Signature

"Inside every older person is a younger person -- wondering what
the hell happened."  -- Cora Harvey Armstrong

Jenny - 30 Oct 2005 20:06 GMT
I checked my wife just for fun and
> she was 238 one hour after breakfast.  I was 130.  The difference
> was she had real (brown) sugar and non-fat half-and-half with her
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> CB

According to the ADA "Criteria for the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus"
any two random readings over 200 mg/dl are diagnostic of diabetes.

Your wife needs to address this. Unfortunately, many doctors will look
only at her fasting blood sugar or Hba1c test and if the fasting number
is under 125 mg/dl and the A1c under 7%, they will tell a patient that
they are not diabetic.

But when a person has a very high blood sugar level after meals it can
do a lot of damage to the body, particularly the cardiovascular system.
One study found a significant increase in heart attack deaths among
women over 50 who had normal fasting blood sugars but diabetic post-meal
numbers. So you must not take your doctor's word that a normal fasting
blood sugar or A1c means she's fine.

The good news, is that discovering this abnormality now and correcting
the blood sugars now means your wife can avoid developing complications.
Fully 1/2 of all people with diabetes have irreversible complications at
the time of diagnosis because their elevated post-meal numbers were NOT
noticed until they had years to damage the kidneys, nerves, heart, etc.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
None Given - 30 Oct 2005 22:57 GMT
> On a side (yeah, off topic) note, I checked my wife just for fun and
> she was 238 one hour after breakfast.  I was 130.  The difference
> was she had real (brown) sugar and non-fat half-and-half with her
> oatmeal while I had mine (and my coffee) with non-fat milk and equal.
>
> My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way.

You might want to suggest she have that checked out.  Did she wash her hands
before the test?

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Peabody - 31 Oct 2005 00:33 GMT
None Given says...

>> My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way.

> You might want to suggest she have that checked out.
> Did she wash her hands before the test?

Why did you ask that, None?
David - 31 Oct 2005 00:40 GMT
> None Given says...
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Why did you ask that, None?

their inference is that her skin could have had a sugary substance on
them. It's possible and will affect the result.  It's happened to me on
RARE occasions.

Dave
Jenny - 31 Oct 2005 01:37 GMT
> None Given says...
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Why did you ask that, None?

Good point!  A tiny bit of maple syrup or sugar on your finger tip can
give you a VERY diabetic blood sugar reading if it mixes with the blood
sample.

That's why you need to see a high post-meal number a couple times before
drawing a conclusion.

--Jenny

http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/  Type 2 Diabetes info
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/  Low Carb info
None Given - 31 Oct 2005 02:11 GMT
> None Given says...
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Why did you ask that, None?

It's possible she got some of that sugar on her hands and it messed up the
test.

Signature

No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes

Alan S - 31 Oct 2005 00:56 GMT
>>Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have
>>finally started to test more often.  I have been testing only in
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
>CB

Hi to CB's wife.

I'm sorry, but I think you need to become a regular reader
here too.  Get your insurance sorted out, then get to a
doctor for proper testing and a probable diagnosis. In the
meantime, read
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm

At least, unlike some, there will be no need to cook
different meals in your house.

CB, I'm a little confused. We have had a regular poster here
named Cloud Burst with the same email addy for several years
- but your posts are newby style questions. Are you the same
cb, back with a new start?

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Cloud Burst - 31 Oct 2005 17:56 GMT
>Hi to CB's wife.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>- but your posts are newby style questions. Are you the same
>cb, back with a new start?

Yes!  I guess you can say I'm beginning to take my condition
seriously.  My original doctor just wanted me to test every
other day or so in the morning before eating.  I ended up
testing every third day just to save money and nuisance.  

I have minor neuropathy in both my feet (maybe from around
the ball of the foot to my toes) but it's pretty much full
time now.  Plus I'm beginning to have other symptoms and I
want to see if taking control will help, or if they aren't
related to my T2.  

CB
Alan S - 01 Nov 2005 00:17 GMT
>>Hi to CB's wife.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>CB

Well, welcome again then:-)

Sorry to hear of the neuropathy, so I hope that you're one
of those who can reverse the problem.

You've seen me say it a thousand times - I just said it to
your wife - but I'll say it anyway. Pretend you're a newby
and read Jennifer again - but put it into practice this
time.

Best wishes,

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
Signature

Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.