Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / October 2005
What is a good range for mg/dL tests?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Cloud Burst - 28 Oct 2005 20:19 GMT Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in the morning before eating anything and getting consistent 85-90 numbers with my new meter.
Here's a sample now that I'm testing more:
85 8am, before taking any food, then breakfast: toast/butter/jelly 16oz very strong coffee with non-fat milk, 3 equals 211 9am, then: no food or drink 197 10am, then: 16oz Engl Breakfast tea with non-fat half-and-half, 1 equal 157 11am
So is this normal/ok/reasonable? Should my range be smaller?
Oh, and while I'm here I have another question. My pharmacy has given me my Actos in 15MG pills instead of 30MG, so I'm supposed to take 2 per day instead of one. I wondered if it makes sense to take one in the morning and one in the evening, just to spread them out since it would be easy to do.
Thanks.
CB
oldal4865 - 28 Oct 2005 20:46 GMT Cloud Burst wrote in message ...
>Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have >finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > >CB Oops. A general goal for diabetics is to never go above 140 mg/dL for any reason.
Another goal is to keep your "2 hour after meal blood sugar" to no more than 30 points higher than your "before meal blood sugar".
For most of us, breakfast is really difficult. There's some hormone effects at Dawn and early morning which amplify the effects of eating carb.
Regards Old Al
ADE - 28 Oct 2005 20:48 GMT Hi CB, What kind of toats did you use; wheat, white, multi grains ? How many carbs in that jelly ? You might want to experiment eating peanut butter with cellery and bacon/egg to see how your glucose would react. I think that 211 and 197 are a little bit high. Some people are more sensitve to carbs in the morning than others. I can not make any comments on the medications due to lack of knowledge. By the way, remember that discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to see that book being sold at Costco. Anyway, take care yourself.
J.C. Hartmann - 29 Oct 2005 00:31 GMT > By the way, remember that > discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to > see that book being sold at Costco. Anyway, take care yourself. You think that's scary, look at the NY Times Hardcover Advice Bestseller List right now.
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/
Yes, that's the sound of P.T. Barnum giggling that you hear.
Alan S - 29 Oct 2005 02:34 GMT >> By the way, remember that >> discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Yes, that's the sound of P.T. Barnum giggling that you hear. Hi Jim
Scary? That's downright terrifying!
HARDCOVER ADVICE Top 5 at a Glance
1. NATURAL CURES "THEY" DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT, by Kevin Trudeau
There are hundreds of sources of information on Trudeau; I think this one is the best bio I've seen: http://www.mlmsurvivor.com/felon.htm "Kevin Trudeau is a marketer extraordinaire, with a more-than-checkered past. A twice-convicted felon, he served time in a Federal penitentiary, for credit card fraud. The Federal Trade Commission has prosecuted him more than once for making and airing fraudulent infomercials. He has been the subject of investigations by 18 state Attorneys General and the US Postal Service. His involvement in Nutrition for Life, Inc. (NFLI), a multilevel marketing business based in Houston, TX, ended ignominiously after the SEC began investigating his distributor recruitment practices On April 17, 1996, the Illinois Attorney General filed suit against Trudeau and a partner for running an illegal pyramid scheme with Nutrition for Life and Nightingale-Conant, another MLM dealing in motivational books and tapes. The State of Michigan ordered Trudeau to cease all marketing in the state related to his business, the Trudeau Marketing Group."
2. THE PURPOSE-DRIVEN LIFE, by Rick Warren
I'll stay away from evangelists or I'll upset too many here. http://www.purposedrivenlife.com/rickwarren.aspx "Rick Warren is the founding pastor of Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, California. He and his wife, Kay, began the church in their home in January 1980, with one family. Now, with 22,000 in attendance each weekend, and over 80,000 names on the church roll, Saddleback is one of America's largest and best-known churches."
Enough for me to avoid it.
3. YOUR BEST LIFE NOW, by Joel Osteen http://www.christnotes.org/_joel-osteen.asp "pastor Joel Osteen continues to pursue the large vision the church has always had through pastoring the nearly 30,000 regular attendees at Lakewood, preaching to hundreds of millions throughout the world through television, supporting hundreds of missionaries throughout the world, feeding the poor, clothing the naked, and holding widely attended meetings through Joel Osteen Ministries."
Another? *sigh* O me of little faith. I'll make a small side bet that dear Joel himself is neither poor nor naked these days.
4. GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS 2006
At last - something intelligent, like the world's longest fingernails or the record for numbers of eggs standing on end (just broken recently, I hear).
5. THE MARTHA RULES, by Martha Stewart
Another jailbird.
Maybe that's the secret to getting on the list. We need to send Jennifer, Jenny, Annette, Quentin, OldAl and Gretchen Becker to jail. Maybe they could share a cell (well, two cells) and come out to be multi-millionaires, interviewed by Oprah and Dr Phil for super-credibility and then start their own "Cooking for Diabetes" show with guys with English accents (no, Quentin, not Kiwi) promoting the zucchini peeler and the low-carb omelette-maker and multi-level marketing of blueberry yoghurts and protein shakes and...
I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At number 1.
Even better if they start a church. Hmmm, "The First Church of the Islets of Langerhans" has a certain ring to it. Nobody but initiates would know the secret of what that meant:-)
Well, it was just a thought....
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Chris J. - 29 Oct 2005 23:04 GMT >>> By the way, remember that >>> discussion about that Kevin Tredeau book a while ago, I was shock to [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Scary? That's downright terrifying! As you point out, we seem to reward certain criminals. I remember a few years ago in the computer security industry: the top pay often went to hackers who had been convicted.
>Maybe that's the secret to getting on the list. We need to >send Jennifer, Jenny, Annette, Quentin, OldAl and Gretchen [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At >number 1. How very true... But, I have to wonder: Does Quentin know that a fellow antipodean is campaigning to have him locked up? :-)
Alan S - 30 Oct 2005 00:28 GMT >>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for >>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At >>number 1. > >How very true... But, I have to wonder: Does Quentin know that a >fellow antipodean is campaigning to have him locked up? :-) Some of my (and possibly his) ancestors arrived here that way.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Chris J. - 30 Oct 2005 00:38 GMT >>>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for >>>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Some of my (and possibly his) ancestors arrived here that >way. Which, incidentally, means that you are living proof that heredity, and not environment, is the determinate factor in the propensity for criminality... :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
Alan S - 30 Oct 2005 04:23 GMT >>>>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for >>>>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >and not environment, is the determinate factor in the propensity for >criminality... :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) Boyoboy. I'm glad I don't agree. I'm sure the Bush, Nixon, Kennedy, and Tudor descendants would disagree too.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Chris J. - 30 Oct 2005 06:04 GMT >>>>>I'd certainly pay for a book by them. I've already paid for >>>>>Gretchen's - hers should definitely be on that list. At [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >Boyoboy. I'm glad I don't agree. I'm sure the Bush, Nixon, >Kennedy, and Tudor descendants would disagree too. But, Alan, you persist in your incorrigible penchant for breaking laws all the time, specifically those of nature: Driving upside down, walking upside down, Christmas in mid-summer, Fall in April, the list goes on and on! And need I even mention the Platypus?
Peabody - 30 Oct 2005 15:30 GMT Chris J. says...
> But, Alan, you persist in your incorrigible penchant for > breaking laws all the time, specifically those of > nature: Driving upside down, walking upside down, > Christmas in mid-summer, Fall in April, the list goes on > and on! And need I even mention the Platypus? Yes, but he can also have sex upside down, and still be on top.
None Given - 28 Oct 2005 20:51 GMT > 85 8am, before taking any food, then breakfast: > toast/butter/jelly [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > So is this normal/ok/reasonable? Should my range be smaller? Tomorrow try eggs and/or meat with no toast and no jelly, use cream instead of non-fat whatever in your tea and coffee. See if that don't give you better numbers.
 Signature No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes
Jenny - 28 Oct 2005 21:42 GMT > Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have > finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > So is this normal/ok/reasonable? Should my range be smaller? Your post meal numbers are not normal, nor reasonable, and certainly not okay!
The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists recommends people with diabetes keep their blood sugar level under 140 mg/dl at 2 hours.
In your case, your breakfast toast and jelly are full of fast-acting carbohydrate which is what raised your blood sugar. Try eating 2 eggs tomorrow instead of the toast and jelly and see whether it makes a difference.
Because your fasting blood sugar is normal, you could probably normalize your blood sugar at all times just by cutting way down on carbohydrate throughout the day. You'll also probably feel a lot better energy. With your blood sugar going W-A-Y up and then dropping back down, you probably feel tired or starving a lot of the time.
--Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
W. Baker - 28 Oct 2005 23:29 GMT : > Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have : > finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] : > : > So is this normal/ok/reasonable? Should my range be smaller?
: Your post meal numbers are not normal, nor reasonable, and certainly not : okay!
: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists recommends people : with diabetes keep their blood sugar level under 140 mg/dl at 2 hours.
: In your case, your breakfast toast and jelly are full of fast-acting : carbohydrate which is what raised your blood sugar. Try eating 2 eggs : tomorrow instead of the toast and jelly and see whether it makes a : difference.
: Because your fasting blood sugar is normal, you could probably normalize : your blood sugar at all times just by cutting way down on carbohydrate : throughout the day. You'll also probably feel a lot better energy. With : your blood sugar going W-A-Y up and then dropping back down, you : probably feel tired or starving a lot of the time.
: --Jenny
: http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info : http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info I agree tht your breakfast was not only to high in carbs, but it ws essential , oly carbs. You can try my favorite breakfast tht works for me. I have about 1/3-1/2 Cup of low fat cottage ceese with a small amount of a few fruits like 3 strwberries, ahandful of blueberries, a quarter ofan apple, a smil slice of canteoup or honeydew melon, etc- aout 3 different fruits, and to this with a big dollop od low fat, plain ogurt. I have this with black coffee, but I guess you could tr cream. This doesn't spike me at all and tastes delicious and is not all eggy. Of course, you have to test for yourself, as your ileage may vary (YMMV).
Wendy
Tiger Lily - 28 Oct 2005 21:51 GMT http://www.diabetic-talk.org/jennifer.htm
 Signature Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/ http://www.diabetic-talk.org/freeveggies.htm I have no medical qualifications beyond my own experience. Choose your advisers carefully, because experience can be an expensive teacher.
> Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have > finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > CB Alan S - 29 Oct 2005 01:29 GMT >Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have >finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > 16oz very strong coffee with non-fat milk, 3 equals > 211 9am, then: Excellent result - to learn from. Terrible result if you intend to continue doing that.
Tomorrow, try just two changes: a non-carb spread on the toast (peanut butter, or cheese (real, not American:-)) and pure cream in your coffee.
You'll get a surprise. But to really get good breakfast numbers, you'll need to eventually cut the toast and have some sort of protein instead. I've added some ideas at the foot of this answer.
Aim to be eventually under 140 at one hour. Read this: http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm Then print it out and read it again.
> no food or drink > 197 10am, then: Still coming down from that high. Aim to be under 120 at two hours.
> 16oz Engl Breakfast tea with non-fat half-and-half, 1 equal > 157 11am Still coming down - the carbs in that half-and-half had a small effect, but if the breakfast had been OK, the later tea would have been fine.
>So is this normal/ok/reasonable? Should my range be smaller? Definitely smaller.
>Oh, and while I'm here I have another question. My pharmacy has >given me my Actos in 15MG pills instead of 30MG, so I'm supposed >to take 2 per day instead of one. I wondered if it makes sense >to take one in the morning and one in the evening, just to spread >them out since it would be easy to do. Can't answer that one. Some ideas for breakfasts:
Breakfasts With Minimal Carbs
1. Egg. The humble egg can be cooked in so many ways: poached, fried (minimal oil in a non-stick pan), normal omelette (beat it lightly while cooking), fluffy omelette (seperate, whip the white with a spoonful of water, fold back with filling and yolk), scrambled with a little milk, frittata (sort of a heavier omelette with filling), and baked. Use fillings, cheese, fresh herbs if you can, dried if you can't.
2. Meat. Bacon, Ham, small steak, hamburger patty (watch the fat), chicken, prosciutto, hot dogs and so on. Can be fried, grilled/broiled, chopped after cooking and added to omelettes, frittata or scrambled eggs. For bacon or other fatty meats, drain on absorbent paper before serving.
3. Fish. Smoked, canned or fresh. Can be poached, fried, as a mornay (easy on the thickener), mixed in a stir-fry etc. Same for seafood.
4. Mushrooms. Small ones can be sliced and cooked with onions, herbs , garlic etc and a little oil and a smidgin of flour for a gravy. Large ones can be filled with bolognaise or napoli sauce (or whatever you like), topped with grated cheese and baked in the oven. Also another good omelette filling.
5. Casseroles and stews - beef, lamb, chicken, mince (ground beef) etc can be pre-prepared and divided into individual breakfast sized serves. Put them in small plastic containers in the freezer and zap one in the microwave for breakfast. Check the carbs in the recipe to check suitability. Beef bourgignon, Irish Stew (watch the spuds), chicken fricassee, whatever your favourite is. Always test at 1 hr the first time with casseroles - thickeners are usually the carb culprits for high BGs.
6. Leftovers - slices of roast meat, re-heated or cold, re-heated chops etc
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Jerry Freedman - 29 Oct 2005 13:55 GMT > >Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have > >finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 91 lines] > > Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia. I agree that this diet will definitely get your BG down but wouldn't it be "binding". I eat all bran ( extra fiber) in the morning( unbinding). Piece of swiss for snack and a sandwich for lunch made with "good" bread. Around here, Boston, thats Pigs Can Fly brand. Its dense, chewy, heavy, low glycemic...for dinner bare hamburger, some meat with vegetables, salad ( lots of salad). Have great bGs and am dropping a lot of weight
Alan S - 29 Oct 2005 14:19 GMT >I agree that this diet will definitely get your BG down but wouldn't it >be "binding". I eat all bran ( extra fiber) in the morning( unbinding). [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >vegetables, salad ( lots of salad). Have great bGs and am dropping a lot >of weight I eat plenty of fibre in my other meals, particularly in the evening. No problems with regularity as a result. It is possible to include all the nutrients, vitamins and fibre you need once you understand the effects on your body.
If your system works for you - great. What are your BGs an hour after breakfast? Not all of us (type 2) have a problem in the morning - just most of us:-)
And, as long as you eat adequate fibre - it doesn't really matter what time of day you eat it in my opinion.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Jennifer - 29 Oct 2005 17:34 GMT Hi CB...
Your 8a number is just wonderful.
Your other numbers are just not.
Here's the advice I give all those who are looking to get control of their diabetes...
Sounds like you're planning a move to take control of your diabetes... good for you.
There is so much to absorb... you don't have to rush into anything. Begin by using your best weapon in this war, your meter. You won't keel over today, you have time to experiment, test, learn, test and figure out just how your body and this disease are getting along. The most important thing you can do to learn about yourself and diabetes is test test test.
More than most anything, what you eat will affect your diabetes and your blood glucose numbers.
And more than anything you eat, carbs will affect your diabetes and your blood glucose numbers.
So, the most important information you can begin to compile about yourself, is how your body handles carbs.
This sounds like you would need a low carb food plan right?
You don't... what you need to uncover is YOUR Personalized Carb Number.
Which actually works better for most everyone. Because low to one person is wildly high to another, but waaaaay too low for someone else.
Is low carb less than 30g a day? Is it anything less than the Pyramid reccomendations?
Finding your Personalized Carb Number is easy.
Here's how you can figure out your own Personalized Carb Number.
The single biggest question a diabetic has to answer is:
What do I eat?
Unfortunately, the answer is pretty confusing.
What confounds us all is the fact that different diabetics can get great results on wildly different food plans. Some of us here achieve great blood glucose control eating a high complex carbohydrate diet. Others find that anything over 75 - 100g of carbs a day is too much. Still others are somewhere in between.
At the beginning all of us felt frustrated. We wanted to be handed THE way to eat, to ensure our continued health. But we all learned that there is no one way. Each of us had to find our own path, using the experience of those that went before, but still having to discover for ourselves how OUR bodies and this disease were coexisting.
Ask questions, but remember each of us discovered on our own what works best for us. You can use our experiences as jumping off points, but eventually you'll work up a successful plan that is yours alone.
What you are looking to discover is how different foods affect you. As I'm sure you've read, carbohydrates (sugars, wheat, rice... the things our Grandmas called "starches") raise blood sugars the most rapidly. Protein and fat do raise them, but not as high and much more slowly... so if you're a T2, generally the insulin your body still makes may take care of the rise.
You might want to try some experiments.
First: Eat whatever you've been currently eating... but write it all down. Test yourself at the following times:
Upon waking (fasting) 1 hour after each meal 2 hours after each meal At bedtime
That means 8 x each day. What you will discover by this is how long after a meal your highest reading comes... and how fast you return to "normal". Also, you may see that a meal that included bread, fruit or other carbs gives you a higher reading.
Then for the next few days, try to curb your carbs. Eliminate breads, cereals, rices, beans, any wheat products, potato, corn, fruit... get all your carbs from veggies. Test at the same schedule above.
If you try this for a few days, you may find some pretty damn good readings. It's worth a few days to discover.
Eventually you can slowly add back carbs until you see them affecting your meter.
The thing about this disease... though we share much in common and we need to follow certain guidelines... in the end, each of our bodies dictate our treatment and our success.
The closer we get to non-diabetic numbers, the greater chance we have of avoiding horrible complications. The key here is AIM... I know that everyone is at a different point in their disease... and it is progressive. But, if we aim for the best numbers and do our best, we give ourselves the best shot at heath we've got. That's all we can do.
Here's my opinion on what numbers to aim for, they are non-diabetic numbers.
FBG under 100 One hour after meals under 140 Two hours after meals under 120
or for those in the mmol parts of the world:
Fasting Under 6 One hour after meals Under 8 Two hours after meals Under 6.5
Recent studies have indicated that the most important numbers are your "after meal" numbers. They may be the most indicative of future complications, especially heart problems.
Listen to your doctor, but you are the leader of your diabetic care team. While his /her advice is learned, it is not absolute. You will end up knowing much more about your body and how it's handling diabetes than your doctor will. Your meter is your best weapon.
Just remember, we're not in a race or a competition with anyone but ourselves... Play around with your food plan... TEST TEST TEST. Learn what foods cause spikes, what foods cause cravings... Use your body as a science experiment.
You'll read about a lot of different ways people use to control their diabetes... Many are diametrically opposed. After awhile you'll learn that there is no one size fits all around here. Take some time to experiment and you'll soon discover the plan that works for you.
Best of luck!
Jennifer
> Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have > finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > CB Cloud Burst - 30 Oct 2005 19:00 GMT >Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have >finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > >CB Thank you everyone for the mostly on-topic replies. Today's numbers are much better now that I'm aware of what's going on.
On a side (yeah, off topic) note, I checked my wife just for fun and she was 238 one hour after breakfast. I was 130. The difference was she had real (brown) sugar and non-fat half-and-half with her oatmeal while I had mine (and my coffee) with non-fat milk and equal.
My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way.
CB
Priscilla Ballou - 30 Oct 2005 19:09 GMT > >Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have > >finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way. Uh, if you test her at that level again, she will have been. Better get her to go see her MD, pronto. 238 is not a normal reading.
Prisiclla
 Signature "Inside every older person is a younger person -- wondering what the hell happened." -- Cora Harvey Armstrong
Jenny - 30 Oct 2005 20:06 GMT I checked my wife just for fun and
> she was 238 one hour after breakfast. I was 130. The difference > was she had real (brown) sugar and non-fat half-and-half with her [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > CB According to the ADA "Criteria for the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus" any two random readings over 200 mg/dl are diagnostic of diabetes.
Your wife needs to address this. Unfortunately, many doctors will look only at her fasting blood sugar or Hba1c test and if the fasting number is under 125 mg/dl and the A1c under 7%, they will tell a patient that they are not diabetic.
But when a person has a very high blood sugar level after meals it can do a lot of damage to the body, particularly the cardiovascular system. One study found a significant increase in heart attack deaths among women over 50 who had normal fasting blood sugars but diabetic post-meal numbers. So you must not take your doctor's word that a normal fasting blood sugar or A1c means she's fine.
The good news, is that discovering this abnormality now and correcting the blood sugars now means your wife can avoid developing complications. Fully 1/2 of all people with diabetes have irreversible complications at the time of diagnosis because their elevated post-meal numbers were NOT noticed until they had years to damage the kidneys, nerves, heart, etc.
--Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
None Given - 30 Oct 2005 22:57 GMT > On a side (yeah, off topic) note, I checked my wife just for fun and > she was 238 one hour after breakfast. I was 130. The difference > was she had real (brown) sugar and non-fat half-and-half with her > oatmeal while I had mine (and my coffee) with non-fat milk and equal. > > My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way. You might want to suggest she have that checked out. Did she wash her hands before the test?
 Signature No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes
Peabody - 31 Oct 2005 00:33 GMT None Given says...
>> My wife has never been diagnosed diabetic, by the way.
> You might want to suggest she have that checked out. > Did she wash her hands before the test? Why did you ask that, None?
David - 31 Oct 2005 00:40 GMT > None Given says... > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Why did you ask that, None? their inference is that her skin could have had a sugary substance on them. It's possible and will affect the result. It's happened to me on RARE occasions.
Dave
Jenny - 31 Oct 2005 01:37 GMT > None Given says... > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Why did you ask that, None? Good point! A tiny bit of maple syrup or sugar on your finger tip can give you a VERY diabetic blood sugar reading if it mixes with the blood sample.
That's why you need to see a high post-meal number a couple times before drawing a conclusion.
--Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
None Given - 31 Oct 2005 02:11 GMT > None Given says... > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Why did you ask that, None? It's possible she got some of that sugar on her hands and it messed up the test.
 Signature No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes
Alan S - 31 Oct 2005 00:56 GMT >>Now that I have my new meter and a good supply of strips I have >>finally started to test more often. I have been testing only in [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > >CB Hi to CB's wife.
I'm sorry, but I think you need to become a regular reader here too. Get your insurance sorted out, then get to a doctor for proper testing and a probable diagnosis. In the meantime, read http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org/NewlyDiagnosed.htm
At least, unlike some, there will be no need to cook different meals in your house.
CB, I'm a little confused. We have had a regular poster here named Cloud Burst with the same email addy for several years - but your posts are newby style questions. Are you the same cb, back with a new start?
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Cloud Burst - 31 Oct 2005 17:56 GMT >Hi to CB's wife. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >- but your posts are newby style questions. Are you the same >cb, back with a new start? Yes! I guess you can say I'm beginning to take my condition seriously. My original doctor just wanted me to test every other day or so in the morning before eating. I ended up testing every third day just to save money and nuisance.
I have minor neuropathy in both my feet (maybe from around the ball of the foot to my toes) but it's pretty much full time now. Plus I'm beginning to have other symptoms and I want to see if taking control will help, or if they aren't related to my T2.
CB
Alan S - 01 Nov 2005 00:17 GMT >>Hi to CB's wife. >> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > >CB Well, welcome again then:-)
Sorry to hear of the neuropathy, so I hope that you're one of those who can reverse the problem.
You've seen me say it a thousand times - I just said it to your wife - but I'll say it anyway. Pretend you're a newby and read Jennifer again - but put it into practice this time.
Best wishes,
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
|
|
|