Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Diabetes / March 2006
Beta-cell burnout?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Wooly - 22 Oct 2005 15:52 GMT So, Monday I have an appointment with the endo. She's been telling me all along that she's got "something else" she can add to the metformin, but only if I lose some (more) weight. I'm guessing this is one of the TZDs, which I've already decided I won't take.
My C-pep suggests I'm producing plenty of my own insulin but having trouble using it - witness the fact that my BG is going up while my weight is dropping and my cardio has remained pretty much constant.
As I see it I have two additional treatment options: Insulin, or beta-cell stimulants such as Byetta or Glipizide.
My long-term concern with the beta-cell stimulants is accellerated beta-cell burnout resulting in eventual insulin dependence. The Pfizer prescribing info for Glucotrol(tm) states "Some patients lose their responsiveness to sulfonylurea". Am I wrong to interpret this as a veiled reference to beta-cell burnout?
I don't know what, if any concerns I ought to have about adding insulin to my therapy. Most of the side-effects I've read about have to do with hypo episodes but since I'm rarely alone I don't think that will be a concern. As nearly as I can tell insulin will be the better of the two choices.
Comments and pointers to further reading appreciated.
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
RK - 22 Oct 2005 16:34 GMT | So, Monday I have an appointment with the endo. She's been telling me | all along that she's got "something else" she can add to the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] | | Comments and pointers to further reading appreciated. Insulin would be okay, but would take much adjusting for a T2. Theres always the risk of a hypo though not very often for a T2. Then you have the problem of needing more insulin to combat the IR which in turn causes weight gain. Then you have the cost of the insulin itself. You could use Regular but you need to take that 30mins prior to eating and it's not very fast acting.
good luck
RK,t1 pumper
Wooly - 22 Oct 2005 17:21 GMT On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:34:33 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com> spewed forth
>Insulin would be okay, but would take much adjusting for a T2. Theres >always the risk of a hypo though not very often for a T2. Then you have >the problem of needing more insulin to combat the IR which in turn causes >weight gain. Then you have the cost of the insulin itself. You could use >Regular but you need to take that 30mins prior to eating and it's not very >fast acting. So its six of one, half dozen of the other. When I was pregnant and diagnosed with "gestational diabetes" the endo I was seeing then had me on 70/30. I'd go hypo at night and have high BG during the day, and I was starving all the time. Pregnancy, insulin and an 1800 calorie diet just didn't get along every well. Add my ignorance (I was only going to be "diabetic" for a couple of months so didn't bother trying to learn anything) and my household wasn't a happy one.
At any rate.
NIH has some studies on the website suggesting that sulfonyurea ought to be my next course of action, but I think I'd rather skip straight to insulin - no sense burning out my beta-cells until I have to, right?
Cost won't be an issue, at least at this point. I'm fortunate to have good insurance with a low copay for diabetic supplies and medications and, so far, no limits on quantities of same.
If I could just convince my carrier that the statins are part of "standard combination therapy for T2 diabetics" I'd be much happier! Lipitor made me itch like mad, but is unfortunately the only formulary statin on my plan right now. I'm paying a hefty pharmacy copay for Crestor but that will probably change to full retail when the new plan year starts in January.
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
RK - 22 Oct 2005 18:09 GMT You still should be on a sulfonyurea to help combat the IR that will be your worst enemy in this battle. Get that down and you'll be back on easy street.
RK, t1
| On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:34:33 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com> spewed forth | [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] | This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. | Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account... Wooly - 22 Oct 2005 18:42 GMT On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:09:04 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com> spewed forth
>You still should be on a sulfonyurea to help combat the IR >that will be your worst enemy in this battle. Get that down >and you'll be back on easy street. Any sulfonylurea is going to boost my native insulin by goosing my beta-cells to increase their output. This is, in its basic analysis, no different than if I were to inject insulin. On the other hand if I'm injecting I have substantially more control over the quantity of extra insulin in my system, unlike the action of a sulfonylurea. Added bonus of insulin therapy: less stress on those beta cells.
I think the only way to "overcome insulin resistance" is to become unfat, something I don't see happening for me until I get my BG under more reasonable control than I've been seeing with diet, excercise and metformin therapy. Even then there are no guarantees, apparently...
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
RK - 22 Oct 2005 22:31 GMT actually you best look up what too much insulin in the body will do to your heart. just injecting insulin is NOT going to help you decrease weight if anything it will eventually ADD weight if you aren't extremely careful and by what you are saying that oral meds just aren't doing the job ..
you really need to discuss this with your doctor and not take this into your own hands. even advise here sometimes can be bad... since we don't know your whole medical profile.
RK, t1
| On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:09:04 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com> spewed forth | [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] | This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. | Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account... Wooly - 22 Oct 2005 22:51 GMT On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:31:51 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com> spewed forth
>actually you best look up what too much insulin >in the body will do to your heart. just injecting >insulin is NOT going to help you decrease weight >if anything it will eventually ADD weight if you >aren't extremely careful and by what you are saying >that oral meds just aren't doing the job .. Yes yes.
>you really need to discuss this with your doctor >and not take this into your own hands. even advise >here sometimes can be bad... since we don't know >your whole medical profile. You might recall that I originally asked for comments and additional resources about insulin side effects. YOu might also recall that the first sentence of my original post had to do with an appointment I have on Monday with my endocrinologist.
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
W. Baker - 22 Oct 2005 23:09 GMT : On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:09:04 GMT, "RK" <reisak@gmail.com> spewed forth
: >You still should be on a sulfonyurea to help combat the IR : >that will be your worst enemy in this battle. Get that down : >and you'll be back on easy street.
: Any sulfonylurea is going to boost my native insulin by goosing my : beta-cells to increase their output. This is, in its basic analysis, : no different than if I were to inject insulin. On the other hand if : I'm injecting I have substantially more control over the quantity of : extra insulin in my system, unlike the action of a sulfonylurea. : Added bonus of insulin therapy: less stress on those beta cells.
: I think the only way to "overcome insulin resistance" is to become : unfat, something I don't see happening for me until I get my BG under : more reasonable control than I've been seeing with diet, excercise and : metformin therapy. Even then there are no guarantees, apparently...
: +++++++++++++
: Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. : This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. : Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account... You might try one of the shorter acting beta cell pusher drugs liek Prandid or Strlix. Yu take them with a meal and they only work for a little while tking care of the carbs you system can't handle alone. Yu can get mild hypos with them. I use Starlix occasionally when I expect to eat more than usual or when I am not sure of teh content of the foods, like in a restaurant. some poeple use them with evey meal. It depends what you need. It is a kind of compromise between pushing the beta cells all day and not pushing them at all, leaving you with high bgs.
This might work for you.
Wendy
oldal4865 - 22 Oct 2005 17:45 GMT >So, Monday I have an appointment with the endo. She's been telling me >all along that she's got "something else" she can add to the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > >+++++++++++++ "Some patients lose their responsiveness to sulfonylurea" means exactly what you thought. When too many beta cells die, none of the pills can force the remaining fraction to produce enough insulin.
One of the leading theories of T2 cause is that you have a genetic defect which causes the premature death of your beta cells at a rate which is tied to the amount of insulin you ask them to produce. Your best chance of keeping beta cells alive is to take the load off them. Beta cell stimulants tend to increase the load. If you want to protect them, you want to supplement your natural supply with injected insulin and otherwise cut the load by reducing your Insulin Resistance (BTW: High I.R. increases heart attack risk so don't ease off in your fight against it just because your sugars start to look good).
Insulin injections are tricky but a T2-still-making-his-own-insulin can expect to be able to avoid hypos. Folks like me have to inject exactly as much insulin as we need lest we go high. A little mistake in guessing the dose can send us low really fast. That's the kind of insulin therapy you are trying to avoid when you remark on beta cell burn out causing insulin dependence.
When "supplementing", folks in your present situation deliberately shoot less insulin than they need and rely on their beta cells to make up the shortfall. That takes the load off the beta cells while doing much to avoid hypos.
You didn't mention Symlin which is really aimed at folks using insulin right now but also is expected to be used by T2 in the future. It does not act to increase insulin supplies but still helps a lot with after-eating sugars, and also works to cut appetite. Most users report weight loss.
Note that there is some evidence that T2 have a beta cell repair mechanism operating. Their actual problem is that the death rate is greater than the repair rate so they suffer a net loss of beta cells. High Insulin Resistance amplifies this imbalance. If you really wipe out your Insulin Resistance, there are clinical trials which suggest that you start rebuilding your supply instead of watching it slowly decrease. Insulin supplementation is thought to have the same effect.
Citation for Insulin supplementation helping with beta cell burnout:
Take the test at
http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2867
, pick answer "8", read the explanation which represents clinical proof that insulin injections protect beta cells.
Sorry for the awkward format but I can't locate a direct cite for Dr. Reaven's work.
FWIW, Uncle Enrico went through this logic process some time ago; picked insulin, and is quite happy with his choice, i.e.
" . . . From: Uncle Enrico <Uncle@nospam.com> Newsgroups: alt.support.diabetes Date: Sunday, June 05, 2005 12:45 AM Subject: Re: Need comments from the group.
I was on your same dosage of Glipizide for several years and had two or three hypos a week, particularly with exercise. I always had to carry glucose tabs. I gained weight with Glipizide and often had ruined exercise outings because of the hypos. The effect of Glipizide seemed to be a little too unpredictable, no matter how closely I monitored things.
Then, a well-respected endo visited my diabetes support group and told me and others that Glipizide and other sulfonylureas had these characteristics--weight gain and hypos. She said she preferred beginning with insulin sensitizers like Metformin/Glucophage, and then only going to insulin pushers like Glipizide if diet, exercise and Metformin didn't work.
I soon began taking Metformin, went on a strict slow carb/low carb diet, along with 1 to 2 hours of daily exercise, gradually reduced my Glipizide to a very small amount, 1.25 mg a day, as I lost 45 pounds in 10 months. Despite the small amount of Glipizide, I still got hypos.
I did some research into the benefits of "early insulin therapy," discussed it with my doctor, and am now taking a small dose of insulin in the morning only, to deal with my dawn phenomenon. I've eliminated the Glipizide and am keeping my weight down. My last A1C before going on the insulin, and while still taking 1.25 mg. of Glipizide was a 5.3. The insulin has improved my morning and afternoon numbers, so I'm expecting a better A1C on the next test. I have had absolutely no hypos with the small dose of insulin I take each morning.
All the professionals I've talked to, my doctor, 1 endo and 2 diabetes educators, believe that I'm on the right path. A Dr. Richard K. Bernstein, M.D. has advocated this approach for many years. He has a book titled "Diabetes Solution" that I've closely read and refer to often. Bernstein advocates small doses of insulin and a strict low carb/slow carb diet for both his Type I's and II's.
There is ample research to support the value of early insulin therapy. Leading endocrinologists support this treatment. My goal is to preserve my ability to produce insulin rather than burning out what I've got left with sulfonylureas. I'm not suggesting anyone do this. I'm just telling you what has worked for me.
Frankly, I don't think that early insulin therapy would have been right for me if I were still seriously overweight. More insulin could make weight loss harder and increase my problem with insulin resistance. I feel comfortable with this program because I have reached a normal weight and continue to maintain it.
By the way, modern syringes are virtually painless. There is an emotional barrier that causes diabetics to resist insulin treatment that I believe is unjustified given research data showing the efficacy of "early" rather than "last resort" insulin therapy.
Type II Dx'd 5/98 Insulin and Metformin Diet: I prepare all my own food: slow carb/low carb. Lean protein and lots of slow carb vegetables, nuts, olive oil. Recently added Blueberries to the diet. Exercise: daily walking and or biking--one to two hours. Height: 5' 7" Weight: 158 pounds, down from 203 ten months ago. A1C 5.3. . ."
Regards Old Al
Wooly - 22 Oct 2005 18:26 GMT >"Some patients lose their responsiveness to sulfonylurea" means exactly what >you thought. When too many beta cells die, none of the pills can force >the remaining fraction to produce enough insulin. Sounds like the cure is worse than the disease, in this instance. I'll pass, thanks.
>When "supplementing", folks in your present situation deliberately shoot >less insulin than they need and rely on their beta cells to make up the >shortfall. That takes the load off the beta cells while doing much to >avoid hypos. Great, fine, whatever is necessary. I'm thinking a small dose of basal insulin might be all I need but I'm prepared to learn how to calculate dosing for fast-acting insulin as well so that I can better manage my post-prandial readings.
>You didn't mention Symlin which is really aimed at folks using insulin right >now but also is expected to be used by T2 in the future. It does not act >to increase insulin supplies but still helps a lot with after-eating sugars, >and also works to cut appetite. Most users report weight loss. I've read the prescribing information on the stuff. I'm not too impressed with "slows gastric emptying", tho I suppose this is one of the contributory factors in "increased satiety leading to decreased caloric intake and potential weight loss". I've got to vote for fast processing over bloating and gas, thanks!
[Thoughts engendered by Uncle E's quoted comments below]
>Frankly, I don't think that early insulin therapy would have been right for >me if I were still seriously overweight. More insulin could make weight loss >harder and increase my problem with insulin resistance. I feel comfortable >with this program because I have reached a normal weight and continue to >maintain it. I *am* losing weight, but not as fast as my diet and excercise habits lead me to believe I should be. I didn't get fat overnight, I don't expect to become unfat overnight, but unless I can get the BG under better control I don't see myself getting unfat at all.
>By the way, modern syringes are virtually painless. There is an emotional >barrier that causes diabetics to resist insulin treatment that I believe is >unjustified given research data showing the efficacy of "early" rather than >"last resort" insulin therapy. I got over that a looooong time ago :) My current endo has been resisting the idea of starting me on insulin, maybe I'll convince her on Monday...
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
Uncle Enrico - 22 Oct 2005 20:19 GMT > My long-term concern with the beta-cell stimulants is accellerated > beta-cell burnout resulting in eventual insulin dependence. The > Pfizer prescribing info for Glucotrol(tm) states "Some patients lose > their responsiveness to sulfonylurea". Am I wrong to interpret this > as a veiled reference to beta-cell burnout? I moved to insulin earlier than necessary to avoid Beta cell burnout. I used Glucotrol or Glipizide for 6 years and am glad to be rid of it.
Insulin gives me the control I need that sulfonylureas never provided all that well. Glipizide/Glucotrol gave me hypos way more often than insulin ever has.
I recommend that you lose the excess weight so that you can improve your insulin sensitivity and only have to inject small doses of insulin. The smaller the dose, the better uptake you get from the insulin. The less insulin in your system, the more sensitive you will be to it.
Check out Dr. Bernstein's website info on "The Laws of Small Numbers" re this issue:
http://www.diabetes-book.com/book/chapter7.shtml
Wooly - 22 Oct 2005 21:44 GMT >I recommend that you lose the excess weight so that you can improve your >insulin sensitivity and only have to inject small doses of insulin. The >smaller the dose, the better uptake you get from the insulin. The less >insulin in your system, the more sensitive you will be to it. Yes yes. I've been (slowly, oh so slowly) losing weight, but recently my BGs have been creeping despite this and the metformin therapy. Foods that weren't blipping me at all as recently as 6-8 weeks ago are now producing unacceptable spikes. My FBG is consistenly in the 120s, my PPBGs are climbing.
I'm caught in a do-loop with no exit: lose the weight to get control of the diabetes, but unless I can control the diabetes I can't lose the weight.
Something has to give.
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
outsor@citynet.net - 22 Oct 2005 21:09 GMT I haven't been following this thread, perhaps you explained the logic of:
"I'm caught in a do-loop with no exit: lose the weight to get control of the diabetes, but unless I can control the diabetes I can't lose the weight."
One loses weight by expending more calories then one consumes, however that process might differ among people. If you eat less and raise expenditure then you are moving in the right direction. Eating less and changing the ratios of the macro nutrients consumed means your body has to handle less glucose control using that part of the metabolic system involving insulin. Somewhere in the area of 500 fewer calories per day will over time average out to one pound lost per week. One eats less but doesn't do a severe fast so as not to send the now wobbling glucose system really out of control. Exercise at the time of one's post meal peak can level out those wobbles because muscele cells don't require insulin to uptake glucose while under moderate to high load.
Wooly - 22 Oct 2005 22:59 GMT >I haven't been following this thread, perhaps you explained the logic> Sure did, but only if you've been following my sporadic posts over the past month-six weeks which I don't expect many people have done.
>One loses weight by expending more calories then one consumes, <disingenuous> Gee, I'd have never guessed! </disingenuous>
<snip perceived condescension re: diet counselling and action of insulin in the human body>
Despite any conclusions to the contrary that you may have reached I am not lazy and I am not stupid. I did not asking for diet advice. I'm asking for feedback on adding insulin to an existing T2 treatment regimen and possible downsides to same. My inability to locate resources on the vast number of internets (sic) available to me is indicative of my ignorance, not stupidity. If one doesn't know what to look for one has a hard time finding things, wouldn't you agree?
Gee, that's pretty damned snippy of me, maybe I need to check my BG...
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
oldal4865 - 22 Oct 2005 23:57 GMT Wooly wrote in message ... . . .(snip). . . I'm
>asking for feedback on adding insulin to an existing T2 treatment >regimen and possible downsides to same. My inability to locate >resources on the vast number of internets (sic) available to me is >indicative of my ignorance, not stupidity.
>+++++++++++++ Most of the stuff is very disappointing. They tend to say that sugars go down, hypos go up.
One of the problems is that the average HbA1c for T2 in the U.S. is ~7.75. That correlates with a 24/7 bG somewhere around 200, i.e. pretty lousy. With control like that, you sometimes wonder what any changes in meds/regimes etc really mean.
One example:
JA Scarlett, RS Gray, J Griffin, JM Olefsky, and OG Kolterman Insulin treatment reverses the insulin resistance of type II diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 1982, 5: 353-363.
WJ Andrews, B Vasquez, M Nagulesparan, I Klimes, J Foley, R Unger, and GM Reaven Insulin therapy in obese, non-insulin-dependent diabetes induces improvements in insulin action and secretion that are maintained for two weeks after insulin withdrawal Diabetes 1984, 33: 634-642. (http://tinyurl.com/67oln)\
The above two cites demonstrate that giving insulin to folks with really lousy control improved their Insulin Resistance. Doesn't make sense unless you deduce that:
1. Folks with really lousy control are in Glucose Toxicity 2. Glucose Toxicity increases Insulin Resistance 3. Knocking out Glucose Toxicity with insulin should also reduce the G.T. Insulin Resistance adder.
Also, consider:
WT Garvey, JM Olefsky, J Griffin, RF Hamman, and OG Kolterman The effect of insulin treatment on insulin secretion and insulin action in type II diabetes mellitus Diabetes 1985, 34: 222-234.
Abstract---We have studied the effects of 3 wk of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on endogenous insulin secretion and action in a group of 14 type II diabetic subjects with a mean (+/-SEM) fasting glucose level of 286 +/- 17 mg/dl. . . .(snip). . .. The insulin dose-response curve for overall glucose disposal remained right-shifted compared with age-matched controls, but the mean maximal glucose disposal rate increased by 74% from 160 +/- 14 to 278 +/- 18 mg/m2/min (P less than 0.0005). . . .
[ i.e. their insulin resistance decreased. . .see the Glucose Toxicity discussion after the first two cites]. . .
Endogenous insulin secretion was assessed in detail and found to be improved after exogenous insulin therapy. Mean 24-h integrated serum insulin and C-peptide concentrations were increased from 21,377 +/- 2766 to 35,584 +/- 4549 microU/ml/min . . . .
[i.e. their ability to manufacture insulin apparently improved by (35,584-21,377)/21,377 = 66% Note that Glucose Toxicity also suppresses insulin production so it makes sense that giving insulin to somebody with lousy control can improve their ability to manufacture insulin. ]
http://tinyurl.com/6vewu
IIRC, "Glucose Toxicity" is never mentioned in any of the cites.
If I win the Power Ball, I'll fund one myself.
Regards Old Al
Jenny - 23 Oct 2005 14:50 GMT >>I recommend that you lose the excess weight so that you can improve your >>insulin sensitivity and only have to inject small doses of insulin. The [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. > Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account... Wooly,
Have you checked your blood sugar levels on another meter? Changed your meter battery?
Meters go bad and sometimes it is hard to tell if your blood sugar is deteriorating or the meter heading south. I have also found that testing with control solution won't reveal if this is the case. Buying a cheap new meter (like the Walgreens one) may.
 Signature --Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
Wooly - 23 Oct 2005 15:18 GMT >Have you checked your blood sugar levels on another meter? Changed your >meter battery? Sure have. I've got three meters (old OneTouch Basic, an Ascensia, and my Ultra). They're all showing the trend.
+++++++++++++
Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET. This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
RB - 22 Oct 2005 23:34 GMT >So, Monday I have an appointment with the endo. She's been telling me >all along that she's got "something else" she can add to the [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. >Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account... Would Byetta be a candidate in this case?
Not using itmyself but am interested in the possible gains from this med.
RB
Ben Koski - 23 Oct 2005 00:20 GMT > So, Monday I have an appointment with the endo. She's been telling me > all along that she's got "something else" she can add to the [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. > Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account... She likely thinging of avandia which makes your insulin more sensetive rather firing up your pancreas. I also know this a pill out now which combines metformin and avandia
Uncle Enrico - 23 Oct 2005 01:39 GMT > I don't know what, if any concerns I ought to have about adding > insulin to my therapy. Most of the side-effects I've read about have > to do with hypo episodes but since I'm rarely alone I don't think that > will be a concern. As nearly as I can tell insulin will be the better > of the two choices. Byetta is expensive---$2400 a year based on my last reading. Byetta is recommended for those getting poor control from sulfonylureas and metformin. Perhaps that is your situation. Frankly, I prefer to wait and see how a new drug behaves in daily use in a large population before I try it.
In the meantime, insulin is a proven alternative and offers beta cell rest, something your pancreas might enjoy.
The one downside besides hypos was mentioned by RK. Some Type II's will overeat and begin injecting more and more insulin resulting in weight gain and increased insulin resistance. This is a bad thing to get into especially for the heart.
One has to be careful and conservative with insulin. I've managed to keep my weight down through strict carb control, exercise and low dose insulin. As I said before, I had many more hypos with sulfonylureas and I was often hungry. The effect was especially unpredictable when I exercised. With insulin, I can adjust for the exercise much more precisely.
By the way, the new needles are sharp and way less painful than a finger stick. Often there is no pain at all. My favorite is the BD Ultra-Fine II short needle. I get the 3/10ths cc syringe that holds no more than 30 units. I rarely need more than 10 units with low carbing and exercise.
Most days I get by with 5 units of N and 5 of R. Two of these $23 vials last me five months and they're available OTC in most states as are the syringes.
Many diabetics appeciate the benefits of Lantus because it's peakless, and I can see their point. My problem is that Lantus costs twice as much as what I'm using, and only has a 30 day shelf life. I'd have to throw away 75% of a vial unused. My frugal nature won't tolerate that. Besides that, I make use of the peak in R and N and find it helps control my "dawn phenomenon."
Tiger Lily - 23 Oct 2005 01:56 GMT Enrico i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months now...... might be longer and i have had NO problems with leaving it in the fridge to remain cold
however, i have some used cartridges (i used them) that i fill when i have a new vial to open (cartridges aren't available in Canada yet, a dear person sent them to me).......... and i use the cartridges at room temp for about 2.5 weeks with no degradation of the insulin
just fyi
kate
 Signature Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/ http://www.diabetic-talk.org/freeveggies.htm I have no medical qualifications beyond my own experience. Choose your advisers carefully, because experience can be an expensive teacher.
"Uncle Enrico" <> wrote in message .net...
My problem is that Lantus costs twice as much
> as what I'm using, and only has a 30 day shelf life. I'd have to throw > away 75% of a vial unused. Uncle Enrico - 23 Oct 2005 04:48 GMT > Enrico > i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > kate Tiger Lily, Did I understand you correctly that your in-use Lantus vial kept in the fridge maintains its potency and reliability for 6 or 7 months?
The manufacturer suggests that you can't depend on the results after using a vial for 30 days. I assumed this to mean that either the potency or the peakless quality of the result would become unreliable.
If what you say is true, I would try it.
RK - 23 Oct 2005 04:56 GMT | > Enrico | > i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] | | If what you say is true, I would try it. she's only been using Lantus for 6-7mons.
most I've gotten out of Lantus is 56days. thankfully I don't have to worry abt that any longer.. since pumping.
RK, t1
Hi_Therre - 23 Oct 2005 10:05 GMT >| > Enrico >| > i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >most I've gotten out of Lantus is 56days. thankfully I don't have >to worry abt that any longer.. since pumping. Don't use lantus? Since a T1, what do you use for your basal?
RK - 24 Oct 2005 03:52 GMT | >| > Enrico | >| > i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] | > | Don't use lantus? Since a T1, what do you use for your basal? Since I pump, I strickly use Novolog in my pump. My pump is setup to mimic my old pancreas the best that it can. Which it gives me .4u per hour from 12Mid - 4am. Then it gives me 1.1u per hour from 4:00am - 8am, this is to cover my DP and allows me lower FBG such as 70-95 most mornings, unless I sleep wrong and back hurts worse then normal it's not uncommon to wake with a 300+ FBG. Then .7u per hour from 8am - 6pm, then .5u per hour from 6pm - 12Mid when it all starts over again.
So, basically, I just use the novolog as a basal, it just keeps a steady flow of insulin pumping into my body. Then when I eat, I calculate out my carbs... how I feel and guestimate what my ratio is going to be and then just dial up another x amount of novolog to take for the meal, or the same if I need a correction after I eat. --- So, while pumping you almost have to take into account the overage of insulin that is still in your body .. if you don't figure right, you can drop real low real quick.
Such as an example today... I had a chimicunga for lunch at work and small bag of Munch chips (didn't finish it all was full) anyhow, the chimmy was 86g of carbs and 21g protein. So, I setup my pump for a combo bolus which gave me 5u immediately then another 3.6u over the next 2hrs to cover the fat in the chimmy. Well at 2.5hr was at 163, didn't shoot enough to cover the chips.. bad me! Anyhow.. then at 4hr tested again, was at 84, so I polished off the bag of chips, and didn't inject anymore, because I wanted to be higher when in a hour I was leaving to drive home. I tested right before I left and I was at 102, so w00t! just fine, well stopped at Walmart to get a new coffee mug and a few rubbermaid thingys for the Chili Mike made for dinner tonight, well got home and I was shaking like a leaf.. well tested duh me!!! 42!!! Like WTF! So tested again.. 44... and once more for good measures.. 41. So, I enjoyed a huge bowl of Chili with saltines in there... then had a peanut butter, chocolate thingy for desert and now 1.5hrs later just tested and I'm at 210, but I didn't shoot prior to eating because I wanted to see how much it would raise me so I didn't drop low again.
f.ck! what a headache them lows bring on... feels like my head got wacked by a baseball bat.
RK, t1
Hi_Therre - 24 Oct 2005 13:16 GMT >| >| > Enrico >| >| > i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >.7u per hour from 8am - 6pm, then .5u per hour from 6pm - 12Mid when >it all starts over again. Novolog has about a three hour drop dead cycle. Lantus, I think has about a 12 hour drop dead cycle. Using novolog as a basal must give you a constant rise/fall cycle of useful insulin. Wouldn't it be better for your system to use lantus and use novolog only for on-demand like meals? I'm curious of the advantage of using novolog over lantus for long term for pumpers.
RK - 24 Oct 2005 19:44 GMT | >| >| > Enrico | >| >| > i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] | on-demand like meals? I'm curious of the advantage of using novolog | over lantus for long term for pumpers. No it's much more useful to use a short acting insulin then a long acting because the insulin in our body is all one type it all works the same, we just put out little bits at a time all the time, then when we eat we let out what our body knows we need to cover the food. In a "normal" person this system isn't flawed. For a diabetic, micromanaging insulin gets you the best results of fine tuning the control over insulin.
With Lantus, it's time released and didn't do dick for me the way it should have, as many T1's find out. It's a good insulin for T2's who don't need to worry about varrying insulin needs as the real body had. With Lantus you don't get to pick, oh i need x amount between these times and x amount now. With a pump you can change your dose on the fly and stop it when needed to allow you not to go too low if your exercising or an activity. Lantus doesn't drop you either.
Mack or Dave can better answer I'm sure. I just know, with a constant dose of insulin coming in, I feel 110% better then I have for a long time prior.
RK, t1
Tiger Lily - 23 Oct 2005 18:18 GMT the package material says the Lantus is good for 28 days outside of the fridge
i leave my vial in the fridge (and all the filled cartridges) in a dark bag to keep them from the light, and i get 45 days from each vial (the length of time it takes me to use the cartridges up......... which were from one vial)
kate
 Signature Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/ http://www.diabetic-talk.org/freeveggies.htm I have no medical qualifications beyond my own experience. Choose your advisers carefully, because experience can be an expensive teacher.
> > Enrico > > i have been using Lantus for ??? 6 or 7 months [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > If what you say is true, I would try it. Jenny - 23 Oct 2005 14:59 GMT > Most days I get by with 5 units of N and 5 of R. Two of these $23 vials > last me five months and they're available OTC in most states as are the > syringes. Enrico,
Can you spell out your regimen in more detail? Is the N your basal and the R for after meals?
Also, does the Lantus deteriorate at 28 days even if you do not reuse a syringe? Bernstein makes a big deal about how reusing a syringe with Lantus will cause it to precipitate out around polymerized seeds.
--Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
Uncle Enrico - 23 Oct 2005 16:05 GMT >> Most days I get by with 5 units of N and 5 of R. Two of these $23 >> vials last me five months and they're available OTC in most states as [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > --Jenny I'm a Type II with a unique situation. My high numbers have been confined to the morning between say 3-4 am and noon. The rest of the day I'm usually fine with just low carbing, exercise and Metformin. I'm now at a near normal weight for my height with the exercise and diet so my insulin sensitivity has improved.
At 3:30 am when my alarm gets me up for the bathroom visit, I test and then inject 5 units of N and 5 of R (loaded the night before) and go back to bed for two hours. This works great for me but could kill others, so DON'T TRY THIS!!!! This gives me normal numbers through the morning without any hypos during my morning exercise. I arrived at this through a lot of self-testing.
I don't reuse syringes when loading from vials because of the contamination problem. I occasionally load a double dose in a syringe and use it for two injections.
Based on what RK has said about 56 days for Lantus, I'd be throwing away too much expensive insulin.
Uncle Enrico - 23 Oct 2005 16:21 GMT > Enrico, > > Can you spell out your regimen in more detail? Is the N your basal and > the R for after meals? PS Jenny, thanks for your website. The research you've abstracted for us along Dr. Berstein and his book motivated me to get moving on diet, exercise and early insulin therapy.
PPS that 50/50 blend of N and R gives me an extended period of insulin release that R or N alone wouldn't provide. I occasionally increase the ratio of R to N and inject say 4 units before meals on an as-needed basis when I indulge in more carbs after the morning hours.
Jenny - 23 Oct 2005 17:02 GMT > PPS that 50/50 blend of N and R gives me an extended period of insulin > release that R or N alone wouldn't provide. I occasionally increase the > ratio of R to N and inject say 4 units before meals on an as-needed > basis when I indulge in more carbs after the morning hours. Enrico,
Thanks for the explanations. My excellent family doctor decided I should start with Lantus because my fasting blood sugar wouldn't normalize with diet, Metformin, or Avandia, and he is very concerned about my blacking out/blood pressure drop problem.
I was surprised, since I didn't think my numbers were anywhere near bad enough to require it, but he told me that while he wouldn't recommend it for most of his patients, he would for me, because "Lower is better and you are highly motivated." So I am giving it a try.
However, if I'd shot the dose he prescribed, and shot it at night, when he prescribed it, I would have ended up in the emergency room as it turned out to be twice what I need. He did not take into account that I am thin, that I low carb, and that despite what the endo said, the fact that I developed prediabetes while very thin and gestational diabetes while thin suggests that I may not be the standard IR type 2.
Fortunately, after reading Bernstein on insulin very carefully, I started with a much smaller dose and discovered that even 6U shot in the mid-morning is a bit more than I can tolerate.
I am now doing the same kind of careful testing and titration you describe. Timing the shot makes a huge difference in how it affects me. So does when I take my metformin.
I also was glad I'd read Bernstein and found out about short needles. The nurse at my doctor's office started out her demo with a 1 inch needle which was quite terrifying. When I asked them to prescribe the short needles, they prescribed one that was one half inch long. I managed to get the pharmacist to get me the 5/16th inch short needles that Bernstein mentioned. They are completely painless which is a huge relief. I literally can't tell if the thing has gone in and have to look to be sure! I don't have anywhere near enough fat on me for a 1 inch needle--it would have come out the other side of a pinch!
--Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
Uncle Enrico - 23 Oct 2005 21:46 GMT > I also was glad I'd read Bernstein and found out about short needles. > The nurse at my doctor's office started out her demo with a 1 inch > needle which was quite terrifying. I love the short needle. I suppose people who are seriously overweight need longer needles, but a 3/10ths CC syringe with a 5/16ths 31 gauge needle is about as friendly looking a syringe as you'll find. Now if they came in pastels with Hello Kitty on them, they'd be perfect.
I recently opened up new injecting territory that is even more painless than the stomach, which sometimes gives me a sting. My Blue Cross nurse recommended the upper quarter of the buttock, which I'd never thought of using. One of the hosts on DLife injects his bicep, which is similarly painless for me.
None Given - 24 Oct 2005 21:07 GMT > I love the short needle. I suppose people who are seriously overweight > need longer needles, but a 3/10ths CC syringe with a 5/16ths 31 gauge > needle is about as friendly looking a syringe as you'll find. Now if > they came in pastels with Hello Kitty on them, they'd be perfect. I'm surprised they don't.
 Signature No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes
RK - 24 Oct 2005 03:56 GMT | > PPS that 50/50 blend of N and R gives me an extended period of insulin | > release that R or N alone wouldn't provide. I occasionally increase the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] | started with a much smaller dose and discovered that even 6U shot in the | mid-morning is a bit more than I can tolerate. huh?
Lantus doesn't lower your glucose. Lantus is an even insulin that keeps a bg constant, that is what the purpose of a Basal is for.
RK, t1 .. who knows more then the quacks
Uncle Enrico - 24 Oct 2005 05:30 GMT > | Fortunately, after reading Bernstein on insulin very carefully, I > | started with a much smaller dose and discovered that even 6U shot in the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Lantus doesn't lower your glucose. Lantus is an even insulin that keeps > a bg constant, that is what the purpose of a Basal is for. How unlikely is a hypo with Lantus? Is a hypo unlikely even with a large dose?
Jenny - 24 Oct 2005 18:03 GMT > Lantus doesn't lower your glucose. Lantus is an even insulin that keeps > a bg constant, that is what the purpose of a Basal is for. > > RK, t1 .. who knows more then the quacks RK,
I'm not using Lantus to lower post meal numbers. My post meal numbers are reasonable. I'm using it to lower the fasting level--either pre-meal or upon waking, that has been steadily getting higher and doesn't respond to oral meds. Hence a basal is the correct approach.
Since you are so adamant that type 2s shouldn't give type 1s advice, it seems like it might be a good idea for you not to give Type 2s advice, which I see you doing frequently here, not always accurately.
Adding a basal to Metformin and/or Avandia/Actos when fasting blood sugar is not controlled is the standard treatment for type 2.
The only question is when to add the basal. Since the pattern of deterioration in type 2 is that a sudden increase in fasting bg will occur within 2 years, followed by a very steep upward change in post-meal numbers (from the low 200s, which is where I am unmedicated on a full carb diet, to 300 or more) some doctors think earlier is better. My doctor is one of them.
And Lantus can most definitely cause hypos when used alone. I've heard this from Type 2s who have used it, and the prescribing information warns of it. A --Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
None Given - 24 Oct 2005 21:00 GMT > Many diabetics appeciate the benefits of Lantus because it's peakless, > and I can see their point. My problem is that Lantus costs twice as much > as what I'm using, and only has a 30 day shelf life. I'd have to throw > away 75% of a vial unused. My frugal nature won't tolerate that. Besides The pens might be good for that.
 Signature No Husband Has Ever Been Shot While Doing The Dishes
outsor@citynet.net - 23 Oct 2005 18:44 GMT "As I see it I have two additional treatment options: Insulin, or beta-cell stimulants such as Byetta or Glipizide.
My long-term concern with the beta-cell stimulants is accellerated beta-cell burnout resulting in eventual insulin dependence. The"
The two are very different. Both prompt insulin output but in very different ways. Byetta doesn't cause lows as it has no effect when glucose falls below a certain level. Byetta is a mimic of a hormone we all produce in the gut after eating. Unlike the other class of drugs, those hormones are known to stimulate beta cell reproduction and one of the great hopes for that class of mimics is that will happen oppisite to burn out and even maybe to reversing cells already lost.
Uncle Enrico - 23 Oct 2005 21:49 GMT > Byetta doesn't cause lows as it has no effect when > glucose falls below a certain level. Byetta is a mimic of a hormone we > all produce in the gut after eating. Unlike the other class of drugs, > those hormones are known to stimulate beta cell reproduction and one of > the great hopes for that class of mimics is that will happen oppisite to > burn out and even maybe to reversing cells already lost. The minute we find out that Byetta can regenerate lost beta cells in humans as it has been show to do in test animals, I'm going with Byetta.
Jefferson - 24 Oct 2005 20:31 GMT > "As I see it I have two additional treatment options: Insulin, or > beta-cell stimulants such as Byetta or Glipizide. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > the great hopes for that class of mimics is that will happen oppisite to > burn out and even maybe to reversing cells already lost. I think you are confusing the issue here. Byetta has been found to bring about new beta cell proliferation as well as a better balance between proinsulin and insulin production (there is a reduced proinsulin to insulin ratio). In other words Byetta may stem the tide of beta cell loss. Where as Glipizide merely stimulates existing beta cells to produce more insulin. Another effect of Byetta is to inhibit glucagon's stimulation of glucose production in the liver.
Frank
Uncle Enrico - 25 Oct 2005 04:08 GMT > Byetta has been found to > bring about new beta cell proliferation ...
> Frank Aren't these findings based solely on animal studies?
Jenny - 25 Oct 2005 15:02 GMT >> Byetta has been found to bring about new beta cell proliferation ... > >> Frank > > Aren't these findings based solely on animal studies? Yes. And as generations of diabetes research have proven, lots of things that heal mice and rats don't do much for people, because the details of our glucose metabolisms aren't the same as those of rodents.
Not surprisingly, given the effect of hope on drug company stock prices, there seems to be a great deal of drug-company hype floating around about Byetta. The fact is, the people taking it are guinea pigs, and the real effects of the drug won't be known for 5-10 years.
Back when I worked in the computer field, it was well known that you never want to buy Release 1.0 of anything. Wait for Release 1.3 or 1.4 when the major bugs will have been cleared up. Byetta is definitely Release 1.0.
Reading the Byetta blog, it looks like some people get dramatic improvements in their blood sugars. But it is not at all clear if this is because the nausea and vomiting had brought their daily carb intake down from 300g to something much more reasonable. Back when I had Gestational Diabetes my doctor told me that my daily vomiting and continual nausea was controlling my blood sugar so well there was no need to do anything further.
Other people don't report dramatic results. Yet others don't seem to see an effect at all. This is not surprising, because there is no attempt to determine what is broken in the glucose pathway before starting the drug. Lots of different things can cause elevated blood sugars (a.k.a. type 2 diabetes). So the system the lizard spit works on is going to help some, and not others.
My feeling about Byetta is that, for now, it should only be used for the condition it was approved for--people who cannot achieve A1cs below 7% despite the use of oral drugs and insulin.
Unfortunately, reading the blog it looks like, as usual, drug salesmen are hyping it to family doctors and giving them free samples, leading them to prescribe it to people with much milder type 2 diabetes who might be better off using the standard treatments--diet, met, glitazones, and insulin.
That said, Release 1.4 might be interesting . . .
--Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
Jefferson - 25 Oct 2005 19:45 GMT >> Byetta has been found to bring about new beta cell proliferation ... > > Aren't these findings based solely on animal studies? Daniel Drucker's site is a nice compilation of information on the incretin hormones - http://www.glucagon.com/exendin-4_human_data.htm. The is also a search feature on the home page of this site.
The in vivo evidence is in animal studies, but there is in vitro evidence in human studies. One thing you can't do with humans is to take out their pancreas and dissect them. Also the patients that can be placed on Byetta therapy are poorly controlled and would need a much larger proliferation of beta cells to become "non-diabetic." I suppose the issue would be resolved if someone with A1c in the range of 5% to 7% could get the therapy. First phase insulin secretion is an early defect in type 2 diabetes. Exenatide Augments First and Second Phase Insulin Secretion in Response to Intravenous Glucose in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes - http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/rapidpdf/jc.2005-1093v1. "Conclusions: Short-term exposure to exenatide can restore the insulin secretory pattern in response to acute rises in glucose concentrations in DM2 patients who, in the absence of exenatide, do not display a first phase of insulin secretion. Loss of first-phase insulin secretion in DM2 patients may be restored by treatment with exenatide."
The following appeared in the October 1, 2005 issue, but the article may have been written in 2004. So it appears as though positive in vivo evidence in humans is still partially waiting, evidence such as in the above article covering first phase insulin secretion is almost proof postitive.
"Recent studies have demonstrated that it is feasible to regenerate and expand the beta-cell mass by the application of hormones and growth factors like glucagon-like peptide-1, gastrin, epidermal growth factor, and others. Treatment with these external stimuli can restore a functional beta-cell mass in diabetic animals, but further studies are required before it can be applied to humans." Source: Regulation of Pancreatic Beta-Cell Mass - http://physrev.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/4/1255
Nonetheless, many of the features described in the graphic below are reported in patients on Byetta therapy.
A graphic representation of the process to increase beta cell mass - http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/144/12/5145/F1.
http://www.glucagon.com/glp-1_and_islet_proliferation.htm
The following was an in vitro study rather than a in vivo study using human beta cells.
"The peptide hormone, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), has been shown to increase glucose-dependent insulin secretion, enhance insulin gene transcription, expand islet cell mass, and inhibit ß-cell apoptosis in animal models of diabetes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether GLP-1 could improve function and inhibit apoptosis in freshly isolated human islets. Human islets were cultured for 5 d in the presence, or absence, of GLP-1 (10 nM, added every 12 h) and studied for viability and expression of proapoptotic (caspase-3) and antiapoptotic factors (bcl-2) as well as glucose-dependent insulin production. We observed better-preserved three-dimensional islet morphology in the GLP-1-treated islets, compared with controls. Nuclear condensation, a feature of cell apoptosis, was inhibited by GLP-1. The reduction in the number of apoptotic cells in GLP-1-treated islets was particularly evident at d 3 (6.1% apoptotic nuclei in treated cultures vs. 15.5% in controls; P < 0.01) and at d 5 (8.9 vs. 18.9%; P < 0.01). The antiapoptotic effect of GLP-1 was associated with the down-regulation of active caspase-3 (P < 0.001) and the up-regulation of bcl-2 (P < 0.01). The effect of GLP-1 on the intracellular levels of bcl-2 and caspase-3 was observed at the mRNA and protein levels. Intracellular insulin content was markedly enhanced in islets cultured with GLP-1 vs. control (P < 0.001, at d 5), and there was a parallel GLP-1-dependent potentiation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion (P < 0.01 at d 3; P < 0.05 at d 5). Our findings provide evidence that GLP-1 added to freshly isolated human islets preserves morphology and function and inhibits cell apoptosis." Source: Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Inhibits Cell Apoptosis and Improves Glucose Responsiveness of Freshly Isolated Human Islets - http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/144/12/5149
Frank Roy Jefferson, Md.
Jenny - 25 Oct 2005 22:44 GMT These studies are very intriguing. But only time will tell if the drug does what they claim for it without significant, dangerous side effects.
It's always good to keep in mind that these studies are often sponsored and paid for by the drug company, as is the case in the human study you cite where they infused insulin to normalize blood sugar and then infused the exenatide. That study is small and looks only at a one time response to a method of administration very different from what people do in real life. One time response may be very different from daily use over a period of years.
Indeed, the prescribing information which cites the results from giving the drug to patients doesn't show the kind of dramatic change in any measurement that would suggest normalization of anything.
It seems to me that if it was believed the drug really could do wonders for people in the earlier stages of Type 2, some genius at the drug company would have done some studies with those patients, rather than only with those with the elevated A1cs. This makes me wonder, if, as with other drugs, they use the people with the greatly elevated A1cs because it is much easier to achieve a 1% drop in A1c in those patients rather than in those of us closer to 6% who still have abnormal fasting and abnormal post-meal response.
Most important, what does this powerful hormone do to other organs of the body over time? If we've learned one thing from previous drugs, it is that there are receptors for our wonder drugs on organs other than the ones we target and blocking or stimulating them can result in unintended consequences which take years to become visible.
So yes, very interesting stuff, but if you rush to try it you are most definitely being a guinea pig and there may be some interesting results when they do your autopsy. <sigh>
> Daniel Drucker's site is a nice compilation of information on the > incretin hormones - http://www.glucagon.com/exendin-4_human_data.htm. [quoted text clipped - 72 lines] > Frank Roy > Jefferson, Md.
 Signature --Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
Alan S - 26 Oct 2005 00:32 GMT >Most important, what does this powerful hormone do to other organs of >the body over time? If we've learned one thing from previous drugs, it >is that there are receptors for our wonder drugs on organs other than >the ones we target and blocking or stimulating them can result in >unintended consequences which take years to become visible. I'm with you Jenny. You mentioned waiting for version 1.4.
I'll wait for 5.1.
Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
 Signature Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Jefferson - 27 Oct 2005 04:26 GMT > That study is small and looks only at a one time > response to a method of administration very different from what people > do in real life. One time response may be very different from daily use > over a period of years. The points you made are all mentioned in the Discussion section of this article. In spite of being sponsored by a couple of companies, other alternatives are also mentioned.
> It seems to me that if it was believed the drug really could do wonders > for people in the earlier stages of Type 2, some genius at the drug > company would have done some studies with those patients, rather than > only with those with the elevated A1cs. Actually the A1c average mentioned for the participants was 6.6% and ranged from 5.9 to 7.3%. While the survey design was for A1c between 6.1 and 8.5%, in practice it came out lower. "One limitation of our study is that we do not know whether the results can be generalized to all patients with type 2 diabetes, notably those with a longer disease duration and more complex therapy (combination of oral antidiabetic agents, combination of antidiabetic tablets and insulin, or insulin only). The full recovery of first-phase insulin secretion may, accordingly, be limited to early states of the disease. This, however, can and should be tested in further studies focusing on patients with more advanced stages of type 2 diabetes." http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/rapidpdf/jc.2005-1093v1
This makes me wonder, if, as
> with other drugs, they use the people with the greatly elevated A1cs > because it is much easier to achieve a 1% drop in A1c in those patients > rather than in those of us closer to 6% who still have abnormal fasting > and abnormal post-meal response. In the case of this study this point is mute.
Since it is normal for the beta cell mass to increase in pregnant women, I wonder whether the incretin hormones would be of much effect in women who have had gestational diabetes prior to the onset of T2 DM.
> Most important, what does this powerful hormone do to other organs of > the body over time? If we've learned one thing from previous drugs, it > is that there are receptors for our wonder drugs on organs other than > the ones we target and blocking or stimulating them can result in > unintended consequences which take years to become visible. You could have said that for aspirin. It's effects are not totally known after many years of use. NSAIDs like ibuprophren are now being questioned concerning their impact on heart attacks, yet they might save someone from dementia.
I have reservations about Byetta myself, yet it has been tested in excess of 82 months in some patients. Nevertheless, some of the other GLP-1 mimics use mechanism more like the natural hormone and they look more interesting to me.
Frank
Jenny - 27 Oct 2005 15:54 GMT >> It seems to me that if it was believed the drug really could do >> wonders for people in the earlier stages of Type 2, some genius at the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ranged from 5.9 to 7.3%. While the survey design was for A1c between > 6.1 and 8.5%, in practice it came out lower. In the above paragraph, I had been referring to the A1c data presented in the Byetta Prescribing Information which reflected the longer term experience of patients injecting it, not those of the population in the one time infusion study. The A1c data there looked very much like the data for Metformin or Avandia--a very modest drop in what was, to start with, a much too high A1c.
> You could have said that for aspirin. It's effects are not totally > known after many years of use. NSAIDs like ibuprophren are now being > questioned concerning their impact on heart attacks, yet they might save > someone from dementia. I wish someone HAD said that for Aspirin and NSAIDs. If you'll recall, I developed a permanent case of bilateral tinnitus from taking a standard dose of Clinoril (generic: sulindac, a prescription NSAID) for slightly over 3 weeks. Any exposure to aspirin, NSAIDS or, for that matter, foods containing a lot of naturally occurring salycilate worsens the tinnitus to crazy-making levels. Since developing the tinnitus I have run into other people who have developed it from these drugs too. The prescribing information for Clinoril mentions "tinnitus" as a side effect, but does NOT mention that it is permanent. It is not something I'd wish on my worst enemy.
> I have reservations about Byetta myself, yet it has been tested in
> excess of 82 months in some patients. Nevertheless, some of the other > GLP-1 mimics use mechanism more like the natural hormone and they look > more interesting to me. --Jenny
http://www.geocities.com/lottadata4u/ Type 2 Diabetes info http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean/ Low Carb info
David B. - 08 Mar 2006 18:01 GMT Go for Byetta!!!!! It will control your BG and help you absorb your natural insulin level better than anything on the market currently that I know of.
Check it out for yourself.
> So, Monday I have an appointment with the endo. She's been telling me > all along that she's got "something else" she can add to the [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%. > Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
|
|
|