Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

RCT

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
otheeravneetkaur@yahoo.com - 01 Apr 2008 16:52 GMT
what r chances of failure of RCT in lower premolar with curved root in
which apical transportation had occured ,patient have no pain
recently, in postoperative radiograph master GP cone is penetrating
outward from apical 3rd
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 01 Apr 2008 17:05 GMT
> what r chances of failure of RCT in lower premolar with curved root in
> which apical transportation had occured ,patient have no pain
> recently, in postoperative radiograph master GP cone is penetrating
> outward from apical 3rd

    I could only guess.  It depends on whether the case was vital when it
was opened (a vital case will do better) and whether the entire canal
was completely cleaned before the perforation occurred.  I think it's
unlikely with severe apical transportation that the apical third has
been well instrumented.  But you may get lucky.  Make sure you tell the
patient.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

George - 01 Apr 2008 18:54 GMT
On Apr 1, 5:05 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote:
> otheeravneetk...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > what r chances of failure of RCT in lower premolar with curved root in
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Brooklyn, NY
> 718-258-5001

I'll just add that it also depends on the extend of the GP overfill.
Historically underfilled canals have fared better than overfilled
ones. Only time will tell!

Regards,
George
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 01 Apr 2008 19:00 GMT
> On Apr 1, 5:05 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
> <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Regards,
> George

    I hadn't heard that.  In fact, the endos were always telling us that
our gp and sealer was so biocompatible that moderate overfills weren't a
problem.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Amatus Cremona - 01 Apr 2008 22:49 GMT
I have seen lots of overfilled canals that never were a problem.  Gutta
percha does very well.  Silver point overfills were a source of failure.

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>> On Apr 1, 5:05 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
>> <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Steve
Newbie@bix.nex - 01 Apr 2008 23:44 GMT
>I have seen lots of overfilled canals that never were a problem.  Gutta
>percha does very well.  Silver point overfills were a source of failure.

Agree but with them new fangled apex locators, you can obturate
'dead on' almost every time.

Transportation ?  MTA.

GP overfill, just keep an eye on it.
George - 02 Apr 2008 19:29 GMT
On Apr 1, 7:00 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote:

>         I hadn't heard that.  In fact, the endos were always telling us that
> our gp and sealer was so biocompatible that moderate overfills weren't a
> problem.

I've done some moderate overfills that have responded well, but both
GP and all sealers are cytotoxic to some degree. I was referring to a
study I once show that analysed a number of RCTs and their follow-ups
and found that 1-2mm underfills had a higher success rate than
overfills. Perhaps that would make sense if a significant number of
those RCTs were vital cases?

Regards,
George
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.