Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Crown in Pristine Condition-- Abutment fractured...?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rick - 16 Mar 2008 18:55 GMT
Is is possible that #8 tooth after prepped and fitted with a crown can
"fracture" due to "acute and chronic trauma"  when chewing caused by
missing 28-31? while the 18-month crown itself remains in pristine
condition?

Wouldn't decay be the more probable reason why abutment #8 fractured?

ric
Amatus Cremona - 16 Mar 2008 19:17 GMT
> Is is possible that #8 tooth after prepped and fitted with a crown can
> "fracture" due to "acute and chronic trauma"  when chewing caused by
> missing 28-31?

yes

>while the 18-month crown itself remains in pristine
> condition?

yes

> Wouldn't decay be the more probable reason why abutment #8 fractured?

Also, possible, but seen less often in only 18 months
Steven Bornfeld - 16 Mar 2008 22:14 GMT
> Is is possible that #8 tooth after prepped and fitted with a crown can
> "fracture" due to "acute and chronic trauma"  when chewing caused by
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ric

    Any number of reasons are possible.  Why guess, or do you not trust
your dentist?  If there's decay, it will be visible now.

Steve
Newbie@bix.nex - 17 Mar 2008 00:35 GMT
It ain't because 28-31 are missing.

Parafunction.

Bridge abutment ?
Endo ?  Post ?

>Is is possible that #8 tooth after prepped and fitted with a crown can
>"fracture" due to "acute and chronic trauma"  when chewing caused by
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>ric
rick - 17 Mar 2008 01:33 GMT
Why do you say it isn't because 28-31 are aren't missing?

ric

On Mar 16, 7:35 pm, New...@bix.nex wrote:
> It ain't because 28-31 are missing.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> >ric

Why

do you say it isn't because 28-31 are aren't missing?
Newbie@bix.nex - 17 Mar 2008 03:19 GMT
Because it has nothing to do with the fracture of #8

>Why do you say it isn't because 28-31 are aren't missing?
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> do you say it isn't because 28-31 are aren't missing?
Newbie@bix.nex - 17 Mar 2008 03:46 GMT
>Because it has nothing to do with the fracture of #8
>
>>Why do you say it isn't because 28-31 are aren't missing?
>>
>>ric

Wait a minute. Are 28-31 missing or not ?
rick - 17 Mar 2008 09:34 GMT
On Mar 16, 10:46 pm, New...@bix.nex wrote:

> >Because it has nothing to do with the fracture of #8
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Wait a minute. Are 28-31 missing or not ?

Yes, they are missing and it's my understanding that if "chronic
trauma" caused the fracture of #8, the missing 28-31 are the culprits.

Which is to say, the missing teeth caused an incorrect bite.

Of course the problem with this is that should have been seen before
the crown was placed, no?

ric
Steven Fawks - 19 Mar 2008 01:57 GMT
Missing teeth do not cause an 'incorrect bite'.  And it isn't
the bite, it's what is being done with it.  IOWs, the muscles,
ligaments, tendons, and bone can beat up anything.  Yes, missing
teeth can lead to increased forces on the remaining teeth, but
the bottom line is that you are probably clenching.

Parafunction is the term.

Steve Fawks

>>Wait a minute. Are 28-31 missing or not ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ric
Newbie@bix.nex - 22 Mar 2008 01:27 GMT
>On Mar 16, 10:46 pm, New...@bix.nex wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Yes, they are missing and it's my understanding that if "chronic
>trauma" caused the fracture of #8, the missing 28-31 are the culprits.

Disagree, parafunction is the "culprit".

>Which is to say, the missing teeth caused an incorrect bite.

Strongly disagree.

>Of course the problem with this is that should have been seen before
>the crown was placed, no?

If I could predict the future, I'd be on Wall St.

>ric
gary.alvo@gmail.com - 20 Mar 2008 00:07 GMT
> Is is possible that #8 tooth after prepped and fitted with a crown can
> "fracture" due to "acute and chronic trauma"  when chewing caused by
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ric

There are several factors that may be at play here.  If you are
missing #28-31 then you may be doing an inordinate amount of chewing
on your front teeth to compensate for not being able to chew on your
posterior (back) right side.

Additionally, when an anterior (front) tooth that has a crown
fractures, I usually look for the possibility that the tooth was in
need of endodontic (root canal) treatment.  If it did need endo
treatment the tooth becomes brittle and can fracture more readily than
a vital (live) tooth could.  Possibly the combination of both
situations, missing some back teeth and needing endo treatment on #8
precipitated the fracture.

Your dentist may be able to put the crown back with a post and build-
up.

God luck.
rick - 21 Mar 2008 02:26 GMT
On Mar 19, 7:07 pm, gary.a...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Is is possible that #8 tooth after prepped and fitted with a crown can
> > "fracture" due to "acute and chronic trauma"  when chewing caused by
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> God luck.

Then let me put this to you and Steve Fawks: should I have been
informed before the crown was placed on #8, that missing #28-31 would
compromise the integrity of the crown?

ricland
Amatus Cremona - 21 Mar 2008 21:02 GMT
no

I suspect you have been told enough times over the years that the back teeth
should be replaced.  You chose not to do so.  Don't blame the consequences
on someone else.

> On Mar 19, 7:07 pm, gary.a...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> ricland
rick - 22 Mar 2008 01:03 GMT
> no
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> > ricland

You assume a great deal.

I wasn't never told the mixing teeth compromised the integrity of a
new crown on #8.

Are you saying you'd have told me this?

ric
Amatus Cremona - 22 Mar 2008 21:29 GMT
Y

>> no
>>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> ric
Newbie@bix.nex - 22 Mar 2008 01:38 GMT
>> Your dentist may be able to put the crown back with a post and build-
>> up.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>ricland

No, because it didn't.

The scapegoat that you are looking for is  *your*
own parafunctional habits.
The Webby - 22 Mar 2008 05:21 GMT
> >> Your dentist may be able to put the crown back with a post and build-
> >> up.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> The scapegoat that you are looking for is  *your*
> own parafunctional habits.

What is so amazing about this discussion is that not so many years ago,
it is likely that no one posting here or advising you there would have
uttered the words "parafunctional habits".

As for the "habit" of it all ... WB, does that not suggest that it is
within the *will power* of the individual to change the habit/s??? It
does seem that way given your chosen words.  But is it more so that the
person would need to utilize something that alters or in some way
interupts that habit/s ... for the person with the habits???

I am asking this because as some/many of us might agree, the term
"parafunctional habit" is not yet a household expression.  And when the
everyday-Joe hears this expression they are likely to be asking
themselves, *** "WHAT???  What is a parafunctional habit?????" *****

Obviously, this might need a thread of its own.  ;-)

Webby
Newbie@bix.nex - 22 Mar 2008 15:55 GMT
>As for the "habit" of it all ... WB, does that not suggest that it is
>within the *will power* of the individual to change the habit/s??? It
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Webby

Good point, what term would you suggest ?

Have many habits myself, blinking, swallowing, breathing...
all of which are conciously alterable, but persist nonetheless.
Steven Fawks - 23 Mar 2008 13:27 GMT
I saw nothing in the quoted text that I had written, but the
fact that #28-31 were missing is not the reason you had problems
with crowning #8 *as the sole reason or likely reason*.

The potential problem that *might* have been identifiable is
that your teeth show damage from parafunctional activity.
Treating the parafunction in addition to the crown might have
avoided this altogether.

However, I inform many patients of their parafunctional
problems, and they don't want to listen.  They especially
don't want to bother wearing even a simple NTI device to
control the problem.

They do not understand the severity of the problem, and just
want to wait and see how every thing goes.  The next cracked
tooth, fractured cusp, or broken crown comes along and most
of them finally get the message.

Unfortunately, it is often many hundreds of dollars and sometimes
lost teeth, before the 'awakening'.

Steve

> Then let me put this to you and Steve Fawks: should I have been
> informed before the crown was placed on #8, that missing #28-31 would
> compromise the integrity of the crown?
>
> ricland
erach27@gmail.com - 24 Mar 2008 03:35 GMT
heard of urine therapy (156,000 web-pages)
or rubbing with ghee (clarified butter) http://spacetimemotion.tripod.com

consult your doctor first.

Erach
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.