On Mar 16, 10:46 pm, New...@bix.nex wrote:
> >Because it has nothing to do with the fracture of #8
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Wait a minute. Are 28-31 missing or not ?
Yes, they are missing and it's my understanding that if "chronic
trauma" caused the fracture of #8, the missing 28-31 are the culprits.
Which is to say, the missing teeth caused an incorrect bite.
Of course the problem with this is that should have been seen before
the crown was placed, no?
ric
Steven Fawks - 19 Mar 2008 01:57 GMT
Missing teeth do not cause an 'incorrect bite'. And it isn't
the bite, it's what is being done with it. IOWs, the muscles,
ligaments, tendons, and bone can beat up anything. Yes, missing
teeth can lead to increased forces on the remaining teeth, but
the bottom line is that you are probably clenching.
Parafunction is the term.
Steve Fawks
>>Wait a minute. Are 28-31 missing or not ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ric
Newbie@bix.nex - 22 Mar 2008 01:27 GMT
>On Mar 16, 10:46 pm, New...@bix.nex wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Yes, they are missing and it's my understanding that if "chronic
>trauma" caused the fracture of #8, the missing 28-31 are the culprits.
Disagree, parafunction is the "culprit".
>Which is to say, the missing teeth caused an incorrect bite.
Strongly disagree.
>Of course the problem with this is that should have been seen before
>the crown was placed, no?
If I could predict the future, I'd be on Wall St.
>ric