Sorry for late reply. But doctor visits take time;-)
I take you words for it. It's not a big deal because it's on the
back end.
Now when you said in a earlier post "However, the rearmost upper
tooth on the two x-rays on the left of the screen appears to have
a very large cavity," were you referring to this black spot that
I showed you on my picture? But then you also said "The cavity
is between the teeth." So you couldn't possibly referring to this
black spot as it's on the biting side.
Yesterday I handed the x-rays to my new dentist and told him that
my previous dentist said I have cavities. Now my new dentist is
someone with years years of experience and I've heard of good
comment from other patients. But I happen to be his new patient.
He looked at the x-rays and said he didn't see any cavities. He
had me lie down and took another visual look and said again he
didn't see any.
Then I called my previous dentist up and said my new dentist
didn't find any cavities (for anyone who's interested in why I
changed my dentist, it's because my previous dentist doesn't take
my insurance but he did check my teeth and did the x-rays). He
said he didn't remember well as the visit was two months ago. He
looked up my record anyway, and said the cavity is "on tooth 18,
occlusal and buccal". Which he explained to me as "on the cheek
side and on the biting surface." So that's also different from
your "between the teeth".
Should I tell my new dentist the cavity's location as the other
dentist told me?
>> Thank you all for helping. But this is getting interesting.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve
> Sorry for late reply. But doctor visits take time;-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> a very large cavity," were you referring to this black spot that
> I showed you on my picture?
No. IIRC, the "black spot" on the photo was clearly an amalgam filling
(on the chewing surface of the tooth.
But then you also said "The cavity
> is between the teeth." So you couldn't possibly referring to this
> black spot as it's on the biting side.
Right. The cavity was visible in the x-ray as a diffuse dark area. I
can't look for the link right now; I recall the decay was on the distal
(the surface up against the third (or final) molar. I believe Dr. Fawks
mentioned decay on the opposite second molar as well. I believe he's
probably right about this.
> Yesterday I handed the x-rays to my new dentist and told him that
> my previous dentist said I have cavities. Now my new dentist is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> had me lie down and took another visual look and said again he
> didn't see any.
Possible. The x-rays don't scan that well; I'd take the word of the
dentist who examines you under normal circumstances.
> Then I called my previous dentist up and said my new dentist
> didn't find any cavities (for anyone who's interested in why I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Should I tell my new dentist the cavity's location as the other
> dentist told me?
No. As good a dentist that I daresay I am, I'm at a hugh disadvantage
to the good dentist examining you. If your old dentist saw cavities, it
may be appropriate for the two to speak to each other if their diagnoses
were different, but they're the doctors. I'm just an anonymous (to you)
potential troublemaker. This is not rocket science; they should be able
to find any cavities that are present.
Good luck,
Steve
>>> Thank you all for helping. But this is getting interesting.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001