> There have been books written to help dentists sell dentistry. It has
> been a long time since one was written to help the consumer to know
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Fred
On Feb 26, 1:09 am, fr...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Feb 22, 7:11 pm, fr...@comcast.net wrote:
> The negative responses from dentists is now over 1400. I think we hit
> a a sore point with over treating over charging dentists.
>
> Fred
Last time I looked, it was 1276 (not over 1400) *replies*. This is not
the same as "negative responses". A lot of posts within the thread
weren't direct responses to the book, and the majority of posts were
written by a handful of individuals (not all of them were dentists,
either).
My worry is that, while there is a need for a consumer's guide to
dentistry, the book is likely to use similarly twisted "statistics"
and sweeping generalisations, which ultimately don't help patients.
Don't get me wrong, I reckon the idea itself is great - but a more
objective re-write, taking into account some of the criticisms leveled
at the current version, would be appreciated.
Steven Fawks - 27 Feb 2008 02:42 GMT
He's probably adding in the ones on the Internet Dental Forum, but
none of them have said, "Atta boy Fred", so I'm sure they are all
considered by him to be negative.
There certainly are crooks in the dental field. Some of them have
been fostered by the dental insurance companies themselves. Some
would be crooks on their own.
However, most dentists are trying to do right by the
patient and the dental profession.
The lack of knowing your dentist as a person, and the dentists
knowing their patients has led to a depersonalization of dental
care, yet it is a very personal encounter. The same thing has
happened with eye care, pharmacy, medicine, you name it. Services
are viewed more as commodities, yet there is no correlation at
all.
It's much easier to cheat someone that you don't know. The patient
sometimes doesn't pay the bill, and the professional sometimes
charges too much, or delivers too little.
Sign of the times I guess.
:-(
Steve
> Last time I looked, it was 1276 (not over 1400) *replies*. This is not
> the same as "negative responses". A lot of posts within the thread
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> objective re-write, taking into account some of the criticisms leveled
> at the current version, would be appreciated.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 27 Feb 2008 04:24 GMT
> He's probably adding in the ones on the Internet Dental Forum, but
> none of them have said, "Atta boy Fred", so I'm sure they are all
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dartos (Steve Fawks) has made some valid points.
It is unfortunate, as Dartos states, that this is the sign of our
times.
We seem to be regressing instead of progressing as a society in areas
such as honesty, integrity,
empathy, responsibility etc.
It is my hope that the professions that take care of human beings such
as the medical professions
do not follow the lead of greed but instead treat all patients as they
would treat themselves and their families.