Saw this and thought worth forwardign to more suitable ngg for informed
comment/debnuking - or confirmation of veracity?
-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
Given the provenance, this post copied to sci.skeptic. That said, the
general consensus among dentists nowadays appeared to be that mass
fluoridation was not to be recommended.
COPY AND POST TO YOUR MP
-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
David Icke - The Robots' Rebellion (1994, 2005 reprint) page 304 (Part II:
The Light)
...Preventative medicine which removes the causes of dis-ease before they
become physical problems is largely ignored by the medical establishment,
because to do what is necessary would mean re-thinking all its values and
misguided principles. Instead, even preventing illness - or claiming to - is
used to stoke the fires of financial opportunism and exploitation. Did you
know that the fluorides added to drinking water in the name of fighting
tooth decay were used as rat poison for nearly 40 years?
Since the early 1900s industrial fluorines have been a major polluter of
rivers and streams, poisoning land and animals. They are a by-product of the
aluminium industry. In 1939 the Mellon Institute in the USA asked Dr Gerald
Cox to find a market for fluoride waste. Cox, a biochemist, suggested the
idea of putting them in the public drinking water . This delighted his
paymasters, the Melon Institute, because it was owned by the family of
Andrew Mellon, the owner of the Aluminum Corporation of America (ALCOA). In
1944, Oscar Ewing was employed by ALCOA at an annual salary of $750,000, and
this was fifty years ago! Within months he had moved on to be the head of
the Federal Security Agency and he began a campaign to have fluoride added
to public water supplies. By 1951, he had persuaded Congress that it was a
good idea and was given two million dollars to start the work. You could not
put this rat poison into rivers and streams because it was considered too
dangerous, but you could put it into water that people drank. This was great
for ALCOA, but terrible for the people, and this sort of covert
wheeler-dealing is going on behind the politician-speak every day.
Interestingly, fluoride has been shown to dull the intellect.
*************************************************
David Icke - Children of the Matrix (May 2001, March 2002 reprint) pages
359-363 (Serving the Dragon: the Future)
...
Fluoride. Come on, drink up.
Fluoride is another major intellect suppressant that is being added to
drinking water supplies and toothpaste. Sodium fluoride is a common
ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anaesthetics, hypnotics,
psychiatric drugs, and military nerve gas. It is one of the basic
ingredients in Prozac and the Sarin nerve gas used in the attack in the
Japanese subway system. Independent scientific evidence has claimed that
fluoride causes various mental disturbances and makes people _stupid,
docile, and subservient_. This is besides shortening life spans and damaging
bone structure. The first use of fluoridated drinking water was in the Nazi
prison camps in Germany thanks to the Illuminati's notorious pharmaceutical
giant, I.G. Farben. This was the company that ran camps like Auschwitz and
it still exists as its constituent parts like Bayer. Does anyone think the
Nazis did this because they were concerned for the teeth of the inmates?
This mass medication of water supplies with sodium fluoride was to sterilise
the prisoners and force them into quiet submission. Charles Perkins, a
chemist, wrote the following to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on October 2nd 1954:
"...In the 1930's, Hitler and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be
dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German
chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control,
which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan
was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of
drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in
whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce
sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium
fluoride occupied a prominent place."8
Charles Perkins said that repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of
fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by
slowly poisoning and "narcotising" a certain area of the brain, thus making
him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. He called it a
"convenient light lobotomy". The real reason behind water fluoridation is
not to benefit children's teeth, he said. If this was the real reason there
are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and
far more effective, he points out. The real purpose behind water
fluoridation was to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and
control and loss of liberty. Perkins said that when the Nazis under Hitler
decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian
General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel,
and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by
the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to
"communise" the world:
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official
of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the
Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity
of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry,
biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine - any person who drinks
artificially-fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never
again be the same person mentally or physically."9
That is the very reason the Illuminati has been expanding the consumption
of fluoride ever since and what better way to suppress the minds of the
population than through the public drinking water supplies? When we drink
anything made from fluoridated water, including beer and soft drinks, we are
being slowly and consistently drugged. Fluoride is a by-product of the
aluminium industry and the scam to add it to public drinking water came from
the Mellon family in the United States, which controls the aluminium cartel
called ALCOA. The Mellons are big-time bloodline, close friends of the
British royal family, and dictators of US policy through the Illuminati
network. Industrial fluorines are major polluters of rivers and streams,
poisoning land, fish, and animals. It was costing the aluminium industry a
fortune to deal with them, but the Mellon family manipulated a situation in
which this poisonous waste product became an enormous source of income and
human control. In 1944, Oscar Ewing was employed by ALCOA at an annual
salary of $750,000. Imagine what that would be today! But within months he
left to become head of the US Government's Federal Security Agency and began
a campaign to add sodium fluoride to public drinking water. The Mellons now
sell it for use in drinking water and toothpaste at a 20,000% mark-up.
Fluoride goes into drinking water at approximately one part-per-million, but
we only drink 1/2 of one percent of the water supply. The rest goes down
the drain as a free hazardous-waste disposal for the chemical industry. And
we pay for that. But the main reason, as always, is not money. It is
control. A former mind controller with the Illuminati told me of the
Mellons' deep involvement with the Illuminati and Satanism. She said that to
her knowledge the Mellon National Bank in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is an
Illuminati operation that launders money for them. Would you trust such a
family to put chemicals in drinking water and toothpaste because they want
to keep your teeth healthy? Not that fluoride does.
We have a Member of Parliament here on the Isle of Wight where I live in
England called Peter Brand, who is pressing for fluoride to be added to our
drinking water because it is "good for children's teeth". This man is a
professional doctor and the "health" spokesman for the Liberal Democratic
Party. In fact, he doesn't know his arse from his elbow and provides yet
another example of how doctors are so deeply uninformed. But because they
are doctors, many people think that they must know it all. Dr Hardy
Limeback, BSc, PhD in Biochemistry, head of the Department of Preventive
Dentistry for the University of Toronto, and president of the Canadian
Association for Dental Research, was once Canada's leading promoter of
fluoride in water supplies. But then suddenly he announced he had changed
his mind. He said: "Children under three should never use fluoridated
toothpaste or drink fluoridated water. And baby formula must never be made
up using Toronto tap water. Never."10 A study at the University of Toronto
revealed that people in cities that fluoridate their water have double the
fluoride in their hip bones compared with non-fluoridated areas, and they
discovered that fluoride was changing the "basic architecture of human
bones". There is a debilitating condition called skeletal fluorosis caused
by the accumulation of fluoride in the bones, making them weak and brittle.
The earliest symptoms are mottled and brittle teeth, and Dr Limeback said
that in Canada they were spending more money treating dental fluorosis than
treating cavities. But hold on. At least putting this poison in the water
and toothpaste is keeping teeth healthy and preventing cavities, yes?
Er...no.
As Limeback points out, they have been putting fluoride in the Toronto
drinking water for 36 years while Vancouver has never been fluoridated. Get
this: the population of Vancouver has lower cavity rates than Toronto! He
said that cavity rates are low all across the industrialised world -
including Europe, which is so far 98% fluoride free. This was due, he said,
to improved standards of living, less refined sugar, regular dental
check-ups, flossing and frequent brushing. There were now fewer than two
cavities per child in Canada. He said that those who continue to promote
fluoride are working with data that is 50 years old and questionable at
best. "The dentists have absolutely no training in toxicity," he said. "Your
well-intentioned dentist is simply following 50 years of misinformation from
public health and the dental association. Me, too. Unfortunately, we were
wrong." And not only are we drinking the poisonous sodium fluoride, we are
getting all the other crap from the aluminium industry, too. Limeback said:
"But certainly the crowning blow was the realization that we have been
dumping contaminated fluoride into water reservoirs for half a century. The
vast majority of all fluoride additives come from Tampa Bay, Florida,
smokestack scrubbers. The additives are a toxic by-product of the
super-phosphate fertilizer industry.
"Tragically, that means we're not just dumping toxic fluoride into our
drinking water. We're also exposing innocent, unsuspecting people to deadly
elements of lead, arsenic and radium, all of them carcinogenic. Because of
the cumulative properties of toxins, the detrimental effects on human health
are catastrophic."11
Alzheimer's disease has been linked to aluminium and to aspartame. In an
address to students at the University of Toronto Department of Dentistry, Dr
Limeback told them that he had unintentionally mis-led his colleagues and
students. For the past 15 years, he had refused to study the toxicology
information that is readily available to anyone. "Poisoning our children was
the furthest thing from my mind," he said. "The truth was a bitter pill to
swallow, but swallow it I did." Yet even though the biggest supporter of
fluoride has now condemned its use the Illuminati-controlled Canadian and
American Dental Associations and public "health" agencies, together with
those in the UK and worldwide, continue to tell the people that fluoridation
is good for them. This is just one example of "the bigger the lie, the more
will believe it". Illuminati placemen in the positions of medical
administration and "scientific research" tell the doctors and dentists what
is "truth" and what they should believe. They tell this to their patients
and the media, who simply take the official line and repeat it like parrots.
Because hardly anyone does any research of their own, dentists, doctors,
"journalists", or public, it becomes an accepted "fact" that fluoride in
drinking water and toothpaste is good for teeth and not harmful. That same
scenario is repeated in relation to every subject every day and, as a
result, the human population lives in its own little fairyland. This
manufactured illusion is so entrenched in the human psyche that when the
truth does come out, most people laugh in its face. There need to be massive
class action lawsuits against the authorities by those who have already had
their health devastated by fluoride, Prozac, and aspartame. This is already
happening in Canada over the use of mercury, another poison and intellect
suppressant, in tooth fillings. And there you have that phrase again which
is constantly repeated when the adverse effects of drugs, food additives,
and other chemicals in our diet are listed: intellect suppressant. With the
truth about fluoride now being more widely circulated, suddenly "new
research" has conveniently revealed that it is good for stopping brittle
bones and reduces the risks of fractures. This has been used to apply yet
more pressure for the expansion of fluoride in drinking water. Fluoride is
not there to protect teeth. That's just an excuse. It is there to suppress
the intellect of the population so they don't think, question, or rebel.
x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
Amatus Cremona - 11 Feb 2008 19:32 GMT
Can we post articles about the return of real unicorns?

Signature
/
Amatus
/
> Saw this and thought worth forwardign to more suitable ngg for informed
> comment/debnuking - or confirmation of veracity?
[quoted text clipped - 260 lines]
>
> x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
Matt - 12 Feb 2008 20:44 GMT
> Can we post articles about the return of real unicorns?
http://www.fluoridealert.org/2007research/top10.html
(((((
> 7) U.S. Dentists "Unaware" of Recent Fluoride Research
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> 7) Yoder KM, et al. (2007). Knowledge and use of fluoride among Indiana dental professionals. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 67(3):140-7.
)))))
Jan Drew - 13 Feb 2008 06:25 GMT
>> Can we post articles about the return of real unicorns?
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> )))))
Matt - 12 Feb 2008 20:51 GMT
> Saw this and thought worth forwardign to more suitable ngg for informed
> comment/debnuking - or confirmation of veracity?
I didn't read your whole post. Some of it is certainly true, other
parts at best doubtful. I wouldn't send it to an MP. Here are a few
links to get somebody started:
http://www.fluoridation.com/colquhoun.htm
http://www.fluoridealert.org/faqs.htm
http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-deception.htm
http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/index.html
> -x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
> Given the provenance, this post copied to sci.skeptic. That said, the
> general consensus among dentists nowadays appeared to be that mass
> fluoridation was not to be recommended.
Jan Drew - 13 Feb 2008 06:26 GMT
>> Saw this and thought worth forwardign to more suitable ngg for informed
>> comment/debnuking - or confirmation of veracity?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> general consensus among dentists nowadays appeared to be that mass
>> fluoridation was not to be recommended.
Matt - 13 Feb 2008 00:46 GMT
> Saw this and thought worth forwardign to more suitable ngg for informed
> comment/debnuking - or confirmation of veracity?
Here is an interview of Dr. Paul Connett, Prof. Emeritus of Chemistry,
St. Lawrence University, by Joe Broadhurst of CKUT radio. The context
is the proposed fluoridation of the water supplies of Dorval, Quebec and
Montreal, Quebec.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP-1VDvvAQw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObfSo2h6fJI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06QVgpqRZrI
> -x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
> Given the provenance, this post copied to sci.skeptic. That said, the
> general consensus among dentists nowadays appeared to be that mass
> fluoridation was not to be recommended.
Jan Drew - 13 Feb 2008 06:26 GMT
>> Saw this and thought worth forwardign to more suitable ngg for informed
>> comment/debnuking - or confirmation of veracity?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> general consensus among dentists nowadays appeared to be that mass
>> fluoridation was not to be recommended.