Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tooth #20 - the continuing saga

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John - 13 Nov 2007 21:39 GMT
Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
so much.

The tooth itself is apparently not cracked, which is somewhat
disappointing.  It does have a strange groove down the middle of the
root, as if it was trying to form two roots, but didn't quite make
it.  Does this mean anything significant?  I can post a link to some
non x-ray digital images of the extracted tooth if anyone is
interested.

As for the pain at this point, it's much worse than it ever was
before, even 6 days post extraction.  In fact, it seems to be getting
worse over the past few days.  As for the quality of the pain, it
seems to be different than before, but it's hard to tell.  The gum
tissue is sutured closed over the socket, so does that rule out the
dreaded dry socket?

I get the sutures removed tomorrow.

John.
Steven Bornfeld - 13 Nov 2007 22:59 GMT
> Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
> this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> John.

    You almost certainly have a dry socket at this point.  The good news is
that assuming it's not infected (it probably isn't) you are nearly over
the hump.  Most lower second premolars have one root, but it's not
uncommon for them to split partially or even completely into 2 roots.

Steve
Steven Fawks - 14 Nov 2007 03:19 GMT
And if the endo was only in one canal.......

:-(
Steve

>     You almost certainly have a dry socket at this point.  The good news
> is that assuming it's not infected (it probably isn't) you are nearly
> over the hump.  Most lower second premolars have one root, but it's not
> uncommon for them to split partially or even completely into 2 roots.
>
> Steve
Newbie - 14 Nov 2007 18:52 GMT
IIRC there were two filled canals visible in the radiograph.
Could have had a third.

Maybe it was the 1st molar giving trouble ?

>And if the endo was only in one canal.......
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>> Steve
Dartos - 14 Nov 2007 20:52 GMT
> IIRC there were two filled canals visible in the radiograph.
> Could have had a third.
>
> Maybe it was the 1st molar giving trouble ?

I didn't remember the film.  You are correct about other teeth
potentially being involved.  Hard to tell from here, and even
sometimes in person!

D
Newbie - 15 Nov 2007 16:14 GMT
>> IIRC there were two filled canals visible in the radiograph.
>> Could have had a third.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>D

"Therein lies the rub" ;-)
Newbie - 14 Nov 2007 15:11 GMT
>Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
>this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>root, as if it was trying to form two roots, but didn't quite make
>it.  Does this mean anything significant?  
Ususally not.

>I can post a link to some
>non x-ray digital images of the extracted tooth if anyone is
>interested.

Sure.

>As for the pain at this point, it's much worse than it ever was
>before, even 6 days post extraction.  In fact, it seems to be getting
>worse over the past few days.  As for the quality of the pain, it
>seems to be different than before, but it's hard to tell.  The gum
>tissue is sutured closed over the socket, so does that rule out the
>dreaded dry socket?

No.

>I get the sutures removed tomorrow.
>
>John.
John - 14 Nov 2007 23:33 GMT
> >Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
> >this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Sure.

Here it is, along with the x-ray (I'm pretty sure the 4th view of the
tooth is the same side as the x-ray):

http://geocities.com/g0177325/

In reply to others: the first molar has never had pain-on-pressure
symptoms like #20, so I think we can rule out that as the source.
Zzzdentist@dentalminds.com - 15 Nov 2007 10:04 GMT
> In reply to others: the first molar has never had pain-on-pressure
> symptoms like #20, so I think we can rule out that as the source.

Is that area there in the oval a bit of orange, or is it just the way
the tooth looks?

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/3103/tooth204croppedjy1.jpg
John - 15 Nov 2007 14:27 GMT
On Nov 15, 5:04 am, Zzzdent...@dentalminds.com wrote:

> > In reply to others: the first molar has never had pain-on-pressure
> > symptoms like #20, so I think we can rule out that as the source.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/3103/tooth204croppedjy1.jpg

This site is blocked at work.  Please send it to me at
jla8128@gmail.com.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 15 Nov 2007 14:37 GMT
>>> Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
>>> this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> In reply to others: the first molar has never had pain-on-pressure
> symptoms like #20, so I think we can rule out that as the source.

    On the rightmost x-ray, there is a bit of pink sticking out from
between the roots.  This may indicate a perforation of the root, with
gutta percha sticking out.  This happens sometimes while instrumenting
severely curved canals.  If this represents a perforation, it was not
obvious on the x-rays you showed before.
    It is conceivable that this area may have been helped by being sealed
off with something like MTA, but surgery would have been necessary to
access the need, and even so it may not have worked.  But this may help
to explain the endodontic failure.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Newbie - 15 Nov 2007 16:22 GMT
>>>> Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
>>>> this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>Steve

BTW great pix !

Would like to see a close up of image #3,
especially the furcal area.

Appears to be a root perforation.

Would be very difficult to repair with MTA because
this seems to be the interproximal surface <distal ?>.

Could just be a bone spicule though, can't really tell.

BTW apical surgery for a mandibular bicuspid can be
a bit dicey due to the proximity of the mental foramen/
neuro-vascular bundle.
John - 15 Nov 2007 18:38 GMT
> >>>> Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
> >>>> this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Appears to be a root perforation.

Are you referring to the lighter colored line in that deep furrow?
My skills at macro photography with a Canon A520 are limited, this
picture
is probably about as good as it's going to get.

> Would be very difficult to repair with MTA because
> this seems to be the interproximal surface <distal ?>.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> a bit dicey due to the proximity of the mental foramen/
> neuro-vascular bundle.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 15 Nov 2007 18:40 GMT
> Are you referring to the lighter colored line in that deep furrow?

    The pinkish bow-shaped line about 2/3 of the way down the root.  Looks
to me like an errant gutta percha point emorging out the side of the root.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

John - 15 Nov 2007 21:33 GMT
On Nov 15, 1:40 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote:

> > Are you referring to the lighter colored line in that deep furrow?
>
>         The pinkish bow-shaped line about 2/3 of the way down the root.  Looks
> to me like an errant gutta percha point emorging out the side of the root.
>
> Steve

Actually, looking at the actual tooth with a magnifier, that line is
just the backside of the deep furrow that happens not to be coated
with dried blood.  One gutta percha canal is completely contained
within the tooth, and the only place the other emerges is at the root
tip which I presume is also where that puff of filler came out and is
also visible on the x-ray.

John.
Newbie - 15 Nov 2007 22:37 GMT
>On Nov 15, 1:40 pm, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
><bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>John.

OK, how about washing off all of the blood with a little H2O2
and re-photographing the 'furrow" <furca> from the perpendicular ?
Newbie - 15 Nov 2007 16:15 GMT
>> >Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
>> >this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>In reply to others: the first molar has never had pain-on-pressure
>symptoms like #20, so I think we can rule out that as the source.

What about the other bicuspid, #21 ?
John - 15 Nov 2007 17:49 GMT
> >> >Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
> >> >this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> What about the other bicuspid, #21 ?

#21 is completely pain free as well.
Zzzdentist@dentalminds.com - 16 Nov 2007 15:31 GMT
> #21 is completely pain free as well.

Are those openings in the oval areas? How many orifices (holes) can
you see near the end of the root with the magnifier?

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/2808/rootnt9.jpg

One other thing that I noticed was that on the xray the gutta percha
fills appear to be divergent for a tooth with two connected roots that
appear to be convergent with a common root tip.

This is all in for forensic interests of course just to try to figure
out why the tooth persisted in giving you problems.  As you can
probably tell, unusual anatomy can present with all sorts of twists.
Anyone who has done a root canal has experienced aggravating
failures.  When you're working blind into a small dark hole of a canal
with twists and curves with a tiny file, it can be quite challenging.

Zzzdentist
www.dentalminds.com
jla8128@gmail.com - 16 Nov 2007 23:24 GMT
On Nov 16, 10:31 am, Zzzdent...@dentalminds.com wrote:

> > #21 is completely pain free as well.
>
> Are those openings in the oval areas? How many orifices (holes) can
> you see near the end of the root with the magnifier?
>
> http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/2808/rootnt9.jpg

(Thanks, I got your email with the jpegs.)

There are in fact two holes at the root tip where the gutta percha
exits.

> One other thing that I noticed was that on the xray the gutta percha
> fills appear to be divergent for a tooth with two connected roots that
> appear to be convergent with a common root tip.

Yes, that's the way it seems. I'll post a picture of the tip head on
tomorrow...

> This is all in for forensic interests of course just to try to figure
> out why the tooth persisted in giving you problems.  As you can
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Zzzdentistwww.dentalminds.com
Newbie@bix.nex - 18 Nov 2007 21:04 GMT
Though your analysis is standard fare from the dental educators,
I must tell you that based on symptoms and history that lower
bicuspids are very prone to vertical fracture.
Sure, upper Bi's are notorious, but it happens to lowers too.

With better examination and better photographs, at a higher
magnification it should be apparent that there is a vertical root
fracture of tooth #20. This is not uncommon and is rarely diagnosed
before extraction. A bit of puff or overfill would not cause the
symptoms described.

If any tooth keeps hurting after endodontic treatment after more than
6 to 12 months one should consider root fracture and the tooth should
be extracted. This is a judgment call and should be carefully
considered.

Did a #29 RCT+Crn as a RPD abutment about 2 yrs ago.
A fistula formed and it was at first thought to be a RCT failure.
Sent the patient for an endo consult, and we thought that it may
be a perio leision.  While treating the perio leison a 10mm pocket
was found in the middle of the buccal. Since the patient was already
anesthetized, went ahead and opened the tissue. Cleaned out all
granulation tissue and left the buccal plate at the exisiting level.

At this time, 6 mos. post surgery, and at recall, all is well, pt has
zero pain, fistula has resolved, and the gigngival tissue looks
completely normal. Pt. has been informed that #29 is likely to fail at
sometime in the future. On the positive side the RPD has double
T-clasps for #28 and #29.

We are crossing our fingers and hoping for the best.

>> #21 is completely pain free as well.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Zzzdentist
>www.dentalminds.com
John - 14 Nov 2007 23:34 GMT
> >Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
> >this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Sure.

Here it is, along with the x-ray (I'm pretty sure the 4th view of the
tooth is the same side as the x-ray):

http://geocities.com/g0177325/

In reply to others: the first molar has never had pain-on-pressure
symptoms like #20, so I think we can rule out that as the source.
C.J. Thomas - 25 Nov 2007 12:23 GMT
Looks like a damn good root canal...

>> >Well, I finally went ahead and got it extracted.  I had high hopes of
>> >this finally being the beginning of the end of the pain.  So far, not
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> In reply to others: the first molar has never had pain-on-pressure
> symptoms like #20, so I think we can rule out that as the source.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.