> I just think we already use fluoride toothpaste, don't understand why
> the dentist still give us the gel. Looks a bit surplus. Or maybe it is
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thank you very much, Dr. Steve.
Good questions, tough to answer most. As the child becomes more
efficient at rinsing, less fluoride will be ingested. The usual
recommendation is no more than a pea-sized quantity of toothpaste on the
brush should be used.
There has to be some ingestion from the varnish too, but here the good
thing is that the concentration of fluoride where it is applied is very
high, but the total amount of fluoride in the application is very low,
since the total volume of varnish used is minuscule.
Steve
nyscof - 29 Jul 2007 12:22 GMT
About Fluoride Varnish
http://jada.ada.org/cgi/content/full/131/5/589
Excerpts:
" Two commercially available fluoride varnishes in the United States
have the highest fluoride concentration of any fluoride vehicle
(22,600 ppm F-)80 and are intended to be delivered by dental
professionals. Despite the rapid setting time of the varnish and the
small dosage used, the risk exists that young children will ingest
some of the product during placement. In addition, as fluoride is
released from the varnishes after treatment, some fluoride will be
ingested. "
"Ekstrand and associates82 conducted analyses of plasma fluoride
concentrations in four children (ages 4, 5, 12 and 14 years) after
Duraphat varnish was applied. The amount of varnish applied ranged
from 2.3 to 5.0 mg. Peak plasma fluoride concentrations of 3.2 to 6.3
micromolar were found within two hours of treatment, followed by a
rapid two-hour decrease and a slower decrease thereafter. These levels
were comparable with those found after brushing with a fluoridated
toothpaste (mean ? standard deviation, 3.63 ? 0.45 ?mol/L) or after
ingesting a 1-mg F- tablet (4.47 ? 0.47 ?mol/L),"
"Two cases of contact allergy to Duraphat varnish have been reported:
one is a case of dermatitis in a dental assistant's hand, and the
other is a case of a stomatitis in a patient.85 These allergies were
likely related to the colophony component of the varnish. The
manufacturer of Fluor Protector claimed that a short-term burning
sensation is a side effect if the varnish comes into contact with the
gingival tissue. In product advertisements, the manufacturer of
Duraphat claims that the use of varnish in patients with ulcerative
gingivitis and stomatitis is contraindicated."
***
NYSCOF
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof
Fluoridation News Releases
http://tinyurl.com/6kqtu
Tooth Decay Crises in Fluoridated Areas
http://www.fluoridenews.blogspot.com/
Fluoride Action Network http://www.FluorideAction.Net
Fluoride Journal http://www.FluorideResearch.Org
On Jul 22, 10:42 am, Steven Bornfeld <dentaltwinm...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> > I just think we already use fluoride toothpaste, don't understand why
> > the dentist still give us the gel. Looks a bit surplus. Or maybe it is
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Steve