Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Root canal & crown

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
yeh_linda@yahoo.com - 04 Jun 2007 07:20 GMT
After root canal, does tooth has to be crowned? Are onlays also
recommended?
Thanks
George - 04 Jun 2007 21:31 GMT
On Jun 4, 7:20 am, yeh_li...@yahoo.com wrote:
> After root canal, does tooth has to be crowned? Are onlays also
> recommended?
> Thanks

It depends on the tooth that underwent the root canal treatment and
how badly damaged it is. Anterior teeth (incisors and canines) do not
always need a crown after root canal, although a crown would be needed
if the tooth is badly damaged (missing a lot of tooth structure).
Usually a crown on anterior teeth after root canal should be
accompanied by a post inside the root.
Posterior teeth (molars and premolars) will usually require a crown
after root canal to reduce the chance of suffering a catastrophic
structure, since root canal treatment on these tends to take away a
lot of internal structure due to their morphology. Premolars usually
require a post inside the root, whereas molars usually don't. An onlay
is a viable alternative to having a crown; the choice of an onlay over
a crown will usually depend on how much tooth is left for the dentist
to work with.
If the outcome of the root canal treatment is uncertain for any reason
(eg a shortfill in a calcified canal or chronic infection with a large
lesion seen on the xray) and the tooth is not severely broken down,
the dentist may choose to use a provisional restoration, usually a
bonded composite restoration, until good healing is evident. The tooth
should be placed out of occlusion so that the patient can't exercise a
lot of biting pressure on it to reduce the chance of a fracture.

Regards,
George
Amatus Cremona - 05 Jun 2007 12:21 GMT
I vote for an onlay instead of a crown (unless the tooth was already
destroyed for a full crown.  Most teeth need some sort of restoration after
RCT.  20 years ago, we were all taught to always place a post and crown
after RCT.  Now we know that the post does not help, and many times causes
fracture of the root.  There is current debate over whether or not the
entire biting surface of the tooth needs to be cut back prior to
restoration.  Many of us are beginning to leave that way of thinking as
well--since bonding strengths are getting better.

I say restore the tooth however it would have been restored if a RCT had not
been done.  (assuming an indirect bonded restoration).

Signature

/

Amatus

/

> On Jun 4, 7:20 am, yeh_li...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> After root canal, does tooth has to be crowned? Are onlays also
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Regards,
> George
George - 05 Jun 2007 20:37 GMT
I agree Steve. I have been doing quite a few onlays on RCted molars
and usually prfer them over a crown, assuming the tooth can take them.

Regards,
George
yeh_linda@yahoo.com - 05 Jun 2007 21:47 GMT
> I agree Steve. I have been doing quite a few onlays on RCted molars
> and usually prfer them over a crown, assuming the tooth can take them.
>
> Regards,
> George

How much molar is considered to be sufficient for a onlay?
Amatus Cremona - 06 Jun 2007 03:05 GMT
Depends

>> I agree Steve. I have been doing quite a few onlays on RCted molars
>> and usually prfer them over a crown, assuming the tooth can take them.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How much molar is considered to be sufficient for a onlay?
Newbie - 06 Jun 2007 17:21 GMT
>> I agree Steve. I have been doing quite a few onlays on RCted molars
>> and usually prfer them over a crown, assuming the tooth can take them.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>How much molar is considered to be sufficient for a onlay?

Enough
BillPierce@aol.com - 14 Jun 2007 14:54 GMT
If I might add a tag to this discussion, I have a question about RCT.
I have a premolar that had a very deep cavity 18 years ago, and the
dentist opted to do a crown.  Unfortunately, a month ago the crown
came loose and broke, taking a portion of the wall of the tooth with
it.  My current dentist says there is no longer enough tooth material
to anchor a new crown without RCT and a post.  I am reluctant to do
this, because the roots and nerve are healthy.  Moreover, I have
absolute fear and loathing of RCT, having had it done seven times over
the years (I'm 59).  I'm wondering if there are any options other than
RCT for an otherwise healthy tooth that needs sufficient material to
support and anchor a crown.  Any opinions about this would be welcome.
Victor - 16 Jun 2007 10:45 GMT
I had the nerve of a back tooth removed in other country by the
dentist who was my friend. He did not do any root canal & crown but
just a large filling. After 10 years, it is still fine. No infection,
no fracture. I am sure no dentist in here want to do it this way. But
the RC and crown I had in US really cause a lot problem in my life. I
still have uncomfortable biting until now.

Theoretically root canal & crown are to save teeth. But I do think
they also weaken tooth too much. If the teeth are well cared, I would
like to run a little risk to reduce heavy treatment in my mouth.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 16 Jun 2007 15:23 GMT
> I had the nerve of a back tooth removed in other country by the
> dentist who was my friend. He did not do any root canal & crown but
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> they also weaken tooth too much. If the teeth are well cared, I would
> like to run a little risk to reduce heavy treatment in my mouth.

    You are correct that it will be difficult to find a dentist to restore
a tooth permanently that has not had a completed root canal.
    My perspective is a little different--most teeth needing root canal
have already been greatly weakened by decay and previous restorations.
However, proper restoration of teeth following successful root canal
treatment can lead to long-term success.  If you have pain long after a
root canal something is wrong and it should be looked into.
    We may not agree on what constitutes "well cared" for.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Victor - 16 Jun 2007 10:48 GMT
I had the nerve of a back tooth removed in other country by the
dentist who was my friend. He did not do any root canal & crown but
just a large filling. After 10 years, it is still fine. No infection,
no fracture. I am sure no dentist in here want to do it this way. But
the RC and crown I had in US really caused a lot problems in my life.
I
still have uncomfortable biting until now.

Theoretically root canal & crown are to save teeth. But I do think
they also damage tooth very much. If the teeth are well cared, I would
like to run a little risk to reduce heavy treatment in my mouth.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.