>I have grown to believe that those patients with thermal sensitivity or
>extreme sensitivity to dental cleaning, are clenchers (isometric bruxism).
>I could be wrong.
I have noticed that in several of these types of patients. Can't say its
universal, but will monitor it more closely.
John
Dartos - 23 May 2007 13:23 GMT
I think you are both right. Lot's of individual variation, but
almost all of the sensitivity cases involve clenching as one of
the major factors. Tartar control and whitening toothpastes
add to the difficulties as well.
'Course, patients will look at you (with masseters and temporalis
muscles bulging) and say, "*I* don't clench *MY* teeth".
Some will say, "Yeah...I *DO*. How did you know that?"
I made 4 NTIs yesterday, and that's not a record.
JME,
D
>>I have grown to believe that those patients with thermal sensitivity or
>>extreme sensitivity to dental cleaning, are clenchers (isometric bruxism).
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> John
Amatus Cremona - 23 May 2007 14:55 GMT
If you think about it,,,,,,,,,,, there should be a reason these teeth remain
sensitive and do not cease being sensitive as the pulp recedes. Constant
abfraction from isometric bruxism during clenching would be one explanation.

Signature
/
Amatus
/
> >I have grown to believe that those patients with thermal sensitivity or
> >extreme sensitivity to dental cleaning, are clenchers (isometric
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> John
>I have grown to believe that those patients with thermal sensitivity or
>extreme sensitivity to dental cleaning, are clenchers (isometric bruxism).
>I could be wrong.
But I don't think you are wrong at all on this subject.