Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Amalgam Risk Assessment

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jay - 24 Apr 2007 23:28 GMT
Amalgam, which has been in use in dentistry for 150 years, consists of
50 % elemental mercury and a mixture of silver, tin, copper and zinc.
Minute amounts of mercury vapour are released continuously from
amalgam. Amalgam contributes substantially to human mercury load.
Mercury accumulates in some organs, particularly in the brain, where
it can bind to protein more tightly than other heavy metals (e. g.
lead, cadmium). Therefore, the elimination half time is assumed to be
up to 1 - 18 years in the brain and bones. Mercury is assumed to be
one of the most toxic non-radioactive elements. There are pointers to
show that mercury vapour is more neurotoxic than methyl-mercury in
fish. Review of recent literature suggests that mercury from dental
amalgam may lead to nephrotoxicity, neurobehavioural changes,
autoimmunity, oxidative stress, autism, skin and mucosa alterations or
non-specific symptoms and complaints. The development of Alzheimer's
disease or multiple sclerosis has also been linked to low-dose mercury
exposure. There may be individual genetical or acquired
susceptibilities for negative effects from dental amalgam. Mercury
levels in the blood, urine or other biomarkers do not reflect the
mercury load in critical organs. Some studies regarding dental amalgam
reveal substantial methodical flaws. Removal of dental amalgam leads
to permanent improvement of various chronic complaints in a relevant
number of patients in various trials. Summing up, available data
suggests that dental amalgam is an unsuitable material for medical,
occupational and ecological reasons.

PMID: 15789284 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra
ctPlus&list_uids=15789284&query_hl=46&itool=pubmed_docsum

ahuangdds2@gmail.com - 26 Apr 2007 02:57 GMT
> Amalgam, which has been in use in dentistry for 150 years, consists of
> 50 % elemental mercury and a mixture of silver, tin, copper and zinc.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&...

I like amalgam, and I do them on my patients. But I like Cerec onlays
and indirect porcelain onlays better than amalgam. I hope in my life
time we will not need to use amalgam any more. Too bad there is not a
material cheap enough and easy enough to replace amalgam. Composite is
okay.....I just can't do them fast enough and good enough to be
profitable.
yeh_linda@yahoo.com - 26 Apr 2007 22:43 GMT
On Apr 25, 6:57 pm, "ahuangd...@gmail.com" <ahuangd...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > Amalgam, which has been in use in dentistry for 150 years, consists of
> > 50 % elemental mercury and a mixture of silver, tin, copper and zinc.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> okay.....I just can't do them fast enough and good enough to be
> profitable.

What if put a stainless steel crown on the top of amalgam fillings?
Will the mercury vapour be sealed in the crown?
oN - 30 Apr 2007 16:58 GMT
.....
> > I like amalgam, and I do them on my patients. But I like Cerec onlays
> > and indirect porcelain onlays better than amalgam. I hope in my life
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> What if put a stainless steel crown on the top of amalgam fillings?
> Will the mercury vapour be sealed in the crown?

Let the electric force be with you :)))
That's useful for sparkling.
All the best,
Proka
Steven Fawks - 27 Apr 2007 02:49 GMT
Guess that's why I ain't rich.

Dropped amalgam in 1985.

;-)
Steve

> I like amalgam, and I do them on my patients. But I like Cerec onlays
> and indirect porcelain onlays better than amalgam. I hope in my life
> time we will not need to use amalgam any more. Too bad there is not a
> material cheap enough and easy enough to replace amalgam. Composite is
> okay.....I just can't do them fast enough and good enough to be
> profitable.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.