> My teeth enamel on a lot of my teeth had started to wear in the mid 80s.
> So far my dentist opted to deal with this a lot of bonding in the mid 90s
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> J.
<<Is the enamel wear on the lip-side of the teeth, the palate-side
(tongue-side), the chewing surfaces, or just near the gum-line?>>
It depends on the tooth. Some needed bonding on 1 surface. Some needed it
on 2 or 3. Some have wear nearer the gums while lots of others have wear
that extends all the way to the chewing surface.
I found some old invoices on what bonding work was done in 96. These show
the teeth numbers with what surfaces were done. There were actually 4 more
teeth done than shown here (one's not shown are tooth numbers 3,4,5,6) but
don't have further info on paper about those. One of the invoices is
missing. Wondering what the letters mean.
Tth# description # surfaces
10 Composite 2 surf. FI (I as in Irene)
11 Composite 2 Suf DI
12 Composite 3 Surf LOB
13 Composite 3 Surf LOB
14 Composite 2 Surf OB
15 Composite 2 Surf OB
18 Composite 1 Surf O (this looks like a zero and not an O actually)
19 Composite 1 Surf O (this looks like a zero actually)
20 Composite 1 Surf O (this looks like a zero actually)
21 Composite 1 Surf O (this looks like a zero actually)
22 Composite 1 Surf O (this looks like a zero actually)
28 Composite 1 Surf B
29 Composite 1 Surf B
30 Composite 2 Surf OB
31 Composite 2 Surf OB
(3,4,5,6 were also done)
J.
jay-n-123 - 07 Mar 2007 00:37 GMT
Note: Only 5 of the teeth had "zeros" for a suface description..was that a
typo? There were no zeros in any other description, only the letter O.
J.
Lurker - 07 Mar 2007 03:25 GMT
> <<Is the enamel wear on the lip-side of the teeth, the palate-side
> (tongue-side), the chewing surfaces, or just near the gum-line?>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> J.
Jay,
L=Lingual- the tooth surface next to your tongue
O=Occlusal-the chewing or grinding surface of the bicuspid and molar
teeth
B=Buccal- the tooth surface which is next to your cheeks.
I am not sure what FI or DI mean.
Did you ever purge while you were weight lifting? Purging can cause
great damage to the enamel, especially on the lingual surfaces.
(Although you show relatively less damage on the lingual surfaces,
purging has been uncovered as a "relatively" common practice for many
competetive wrestlers and body builders... so I am just asking).
Did you take in large amounts of Vit C or sports drinks? These can
also cause enamel erosion. I have no idea about L-ornithine but as an
alkaline amino acid, perhaps its breakdown products (in saliva) are
acidic?
In any case, it sounds like you are in good hands.
Good luck,
Sue (nondentist)
Steven Fawks - 07 Mar 2007 03:53 GMT
Probably:
Facial-incisal
Distal-incisal
D
> I am not sure what FI or DI mean.
jay-n-123 - 07 Mar 2007 08:09 GMT
I didn't purge. I used to take a 500 mg time released vitamin c pill on a
daily basis. I also used to drink a lot of cola. BTW I don't think I
clenched my teeth when I lifted weights.
J.
Amatus Cremona - 07 Mar 2007 12:10 GMT
Did you chew the Vit-C ?

Signature
/
Amatus
/
>I didn't purge. I used to take a 500 mg time released vitamin c pill on a
>daily basis. I also used to drink a lot of cola. BTW I don't think I
>clenched my teeth when I lifted weights.
>
> J.
Amatus Cremona - 07 Mar 2007 12:09 GMT
At this point, I would bet $15 on acid reflux disease.

Signature
/
Amatus
/
> <<Is the enamel wear on the lip-side of the teeth, the palate-side
> (tongue-side), the chewing surfaces, or just near the gum-line?>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> J.
Newbie - 07 Mar 2007 14:58 GMT
>At this point, I would bet $15 on acid reflux disease.
I'll see your $15 and raise you a dram of Cask 191.
Amatus Cremona - 07 Mar 2007 17:06 GMT
I wonder how much a single shot of "191" would cost.

Signature
/
Amatus
/
>
>>At this point, I would bet $15 on acid reflux disease.
>
> I'll see your $15 and raise you a dram of Cask 191.
Newbie - 07 Mar 2007 19:11 GMT
>I wonder how much a single shot of "191" would cost.
The Balvenie site says that only 83 70cl bottles were made.
They sold for £6,000 each in 2002.
If you could find one, it would be worth it.
Kinda like:
Why does divorce cost so much ?
Because it's worth it !
They are coming out with some vintage bottles now.
1972 IIRC.
Lurker - 08 Mar 2007 02:13 GMT
> >I wonder how much a single shot of "191" would cost.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> They are coming out with some vintage bottles now.
> 1972 IIRC.
I used our 1972 IIRC to swish with, as an anesthetic, while awaiting
my RCT appointment. I was wondering why my husband was so cranky. I
guess I shouldn't have messed with the malt whiskey.