Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Seeking TMJ Dentist who uses Botox in the Wash DC metro area

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Buddy Luv - 24 Feb 2007 23:57 GMT
Need recommendation
Seeking TMJ Dentist who uses Botox in the Wash DC metro area
Steven Fawks - 25 Feb 2007 01:48 GMT
Why Botox?

What treatments have you tried and with what level of success?

Steve

> Need recommendation
> Seeking TMJ Dentist who uses Botox in the Wash DC metro area
Buddy Luv - 25 Feb 2007 01:58 GMT
> Why Botox?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> Need recommendation
>> Seeking TMJ Dentist who uses Botox in the Wash DC metro area

Splints with no success
Steven Fawks - 25 Feb 2007 02:46 GMT
Probably not an NTI though.....right?

'horseshoes' just don't measure up.

:-)
Steve

> Splints with no success
The Webby - 25 Feb 2007 15:39 GMT
> Probably not an NTI though.....right?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> > Splints with no success

There are some cases that are responding well to a combination of NTI
and Botox injections.  This is probably something that should/could be
discussed here in smd.  As for success with Botox alone?  I don't know
about that but I'm sure someone out there does.

Webby
Steven Fawks - 26 Feb 2007 04:04 GMT
With most cases, I still think the NTI should come first.  If
that isn't enough, then add the botox.

Of course Jim and a few others may be able to recognize patients
that need both from the start.

I wouldn't be able to separate those cases without trial and
error (plus I'm not trained to use Botox anyway).

Steve

> There are some cases that are responding well to a combination of NTI
> and Botox injections.  This is probably something that should/could be
> discussed here in smd.  As for success with Botox alone?  I don't know
> about that but I'm sure someone out there does.
>
> Webby
Tim Dixon - 26 Feb 2007 15:33 GMT
Steve,

The issue of using Botox comes down to several factors.  The first being
it's use for treating TMD's (trigeminally mediated disorders) is an
off-shelf use and is not going to be covered by any form of insurance that I
am aware of.  So it's strictly a cash expense out of pocket for the patient.
The going rate is somewhere around 12.50$ USD per unit.

Typically the patient would have 20 to 50 units injected in each side of the
temporalis and 10 to 50 units on each side of the masseter.  So you can see
the expense can be high, but the results are indeed substantial.

You would not want to treat a patient without proper parafunctional control,
and when you combine these two therapies the results are truly significant.

The second is training and certification.  We just held a one day Botox®
Dental course here in San Diego, taught by Andrew Blumenfeld, MD- the worlds
leading expert in the use of botulinum toxin and so training is available.
I would be happy to offer more to this discussion as I am able, but we're
quite busy following our wrap-up (we also held a two-day ABC's of TMD's with
Dr's Boyd & Glassman).  Steve drop me an e-mail if this type of course might
interest you.  We have many courses scheduled throughout this year in
various cities across the US and we will be adding some more to the calendar
once we can make some decisions on cities/dates.

TD

> With most cases, I still think the NTI should come first.  If
> that isn't enough, then add the botox.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Webby
The Webby - 26 Feb 2007 16:02 GMT
> Steve,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> am aware of.  So it's strictly a cash expense out of pocket for the patient.
> The going rate is somewhere around 12.50$ USD per unit.

It was my understanding that Medicare *might* pay for part of this
expense.  And having said that, it is also my "understanding" that if
Medicare pays for something, the traditional insurance also will.  

I also "understand" that this probably has something to do with who
delivers the care.  I'm thinking that "who" delivers the care probably
needs to be someone "certified".  Is this the case?

Webby

> Typically the patient would have 20 to 50 units injected in each side of the
> temporalis and 10 to 50 units on each side of the masseter.  So you can see
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> >>
> >> Webby
Tim Dixon - 26 Feb 2007 16:18 GMT
I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label use.

I will research the matter and see if I can find any additional info.

>> Steve,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>> >>
>> >> Webby
Buddy Luv - 03 Mar 2007 01:38 GMT
>I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label
>use.
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>>> >>
>>> >> Webby

Who in the DC are does this?
The Webby - 03 Mar 2007 15:10 GMT
> >I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label
> >use.
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> >
> Who in the DC are does this?

The idea of a "TMJ Dentist" is somewhat disturbing.  And the idea of a
"TMJ Dentist" using Botox for "TMJ" is a big red flag until proven
otherwise.

What to you want the Botox to "treat"?

Webby
BooBoo - 03 Mar 2007 01:51 GMT
>I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label
>use.
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>>> >>
>>> >> Webby

Who in the DC are does this?
Tony Bad - 26 Feb 2007 14:52 GMT
> Probably not an NTI though.....right?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> > Splints with no success

I have seen one case that responded well to botox...with relief from
symptoms for about 4 months with each series of injections. This prompted me
to read up, and I found results are mixed, but the positive results seem to
outweigh the negative. I don't believe the FDA has approved the use of Botox
for TMJ treatment, but there are some good results.

That said, I might opt for a go with an NTI or at the very least, care with
another doc before trying injections. Not a knock against prior care, but
there are many varied approaches to TM therapy, so a couple of tries with
different docs may be a good plan.

T
The Webby - 25 Feb 2007 15:20 GMT
> > Why Botox?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Splints with no success

Hmmm.  I know who to ask.

Webby
The Webby - 25 Feb 2007 15:57 GMT
In article
<tmjiatroepidemic-4D4954.07205025022007@news.phx.highwinds-media.com>,

> > > Why Botox?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Webby

So..... I asked.  And I was told that a post concerning Botox and
dentistry will be forthcoming asap!  Now that's service ... and with a
smile no less!!!  

Webby
Tim Dixon - 25 Feb 2007 16:19 GMT
> In article
> <tmjiatroepidemic-4D4954.07205025022007@news.phx.highwinds-media.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Webby

An interesting question.  I cannot personally recommend anyone in the DC
area as I don't know of anyone.  Buddy Luv are you willing to travel if
necessary?  And by travel, I mean California?

Because this is a complicated subject I will need to time to prepare a post.
I don't have time this morning, but I will get to it this afternoon.

TD
The Webby - 26 Feb 2007 15:33 GMT
> > In article
> > <tmjiatroepidemic-4D4954.07205025022007@news.phx.highwinds-media.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> TD

I don't know where the OP went. But I would like to see some up to date
info on the subject of the NTI and Botox as a treatment.

W.
Tim Dixon - 26 Feb 2007 15:50 GMT
>> > In article
>> > <tmjiatroepidemic-4D4954.07205025022007@news.phx.highwinds-media.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> W.

NTI & Botox:

One way to measure results of parfunctional control with and without
adjunctive botox is by using  JVA (joint vibration analysis).

I am going to reference the results of one case.

The patient was asked to clench as hard as they could "without" an NTI in
place in the three bursts with the results being measured in microvolts of
temporalis and masseter activity.

Without NTI:
R-Temporalis - 207.3 mv
L-Temporalis - 153.9 mv
R-Temporalis - 144.1 mv
L-Temporalis - 271.4mv

With NTI:
R-Temporalis - 42.3 mv
L-Temporalis - 67.6 mv
R-Temporalis - 50.1 mv
L-Temporalis - 126.3 mv

With NTI and Botox-A:
R-Temporalis - 16.4 mv
L-Temporalis - 3.3 mv
R-Temporalis - 21.0 mv
L-Temporalis - 23.8mv

Typically we see a 75% reduction of microvolt emg on a patient with proper
parafunctional control, and as you can see by the numbers above this was
pretty close to that, if not better.  With the addition of botox injections
you can see the added benefit.  A patient at rest usually has about 2.0mv of
temporalis activity.

Now if you would like to use this as a model to ask additional questions I
will be happy to answer as best I can.

TD
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.