With most cases, I still think the NTI should come first. If
that isn't enough, then add the botox.
Of course Jim and a few others may be able to recognize patients
that need both from the start.
I wouldn't be able to separate those cases without trial and
error (plus I'm not trained to use Botox anyway).
Steve
Steve,
The issue of using Botox comes down to several factors. The first being
it's use for treating TMD's (trigeminally mediated disorders) is an
off-shelf use and is not going to be covered by any form of insurance that I
am aware of. So it's strictly a cash expense out of pocket for the patient.
The going rate is somewhere around 12.50$ USD per unit.
Typically the patient would have 20 to 50 units injected in each side of the
temporalis and 10 to 50 units on each side of the masseter. So you can see
the expense can be high, but the results are indeed substantial.
You would not want to treat a patient without proper parafunctional control,
and when you combine these two therapies the results are truly significant.
The second is training and certification. We just held a one day Botox®
Dental course here in San Diego, taught by Andrew Blumenfeld, MD- the worlds
leading expert in the use of botulinum toxin and so training is available.
I would be happy to offer more to this discussion as I am able, but we're
quite busy following our wrap-up (we also held a two-day ABC's of TMD's with
Dr's Boyd & Glassman). Steve drop me an e-mail if this type of course might
interest you. We have many courses scheduled throughout this year in
various cities across the US and we will be adding some more to the calendar
once we can make some decisions on cities/dates.
TD
> With most cases, I still think the NTI should come first. If
> that isn't enough, then add the botox.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Webby
The Webby - 26 Feb 2007 16:02 GMT
> Steve,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> am aware of. So it's strictly a cash expense out of pocket for the patient.
> The going rate is somewhere around 12.50$ USD per unit.
It was my understanding that Medicare *might* pay for part of this
expense. And having said that, it is also my "understanding" that if
Medicare pays for something, the traditional insurance also will.
I also "understand" that this probably has something to do with who
delivers the care. I'm thinking that "who" delivers the care probably
needs to be someone "certified". Is this the case?
Webby
> Typically the patient would have 20 to 50 units injected in each side of the
> temporalis and 10 to 50 units on each side of the masseter. So you can see
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> >>
> >> Webby
Tim Dixon - 26 Feb 2007 16:18 GMT
I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label use.
I will research the matter and see if I can find any additional info.
>> Steve,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>> >>
>> >> Webby
Buddy Luv - 03 Mar 2007 01:38 GMT
>I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label
>use.
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>>> >>
>>> >> Webby
Who in the DC are does this?
The Webby - 03 Mar 2007 15:10 GMT
> >I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label
> >use.
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> >
> Who in the DC are does this?
The idea of a "TMJ Dentist" is somewhat disturbing. And the idea of a
"TMJ Dentist" using Botox for "TMJ" is a big red flag until proven
otherwise.
What to you want the Botox to "treat"?
Webby
BooBoo - 03 Mar 2007 01:51 GMT
>I only know that to use botox for TMD's and migraine it is an off-label
>use.
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>>> >>
>>> >> Webby
Who in the DC are does this?