Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New dental restorative materials

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kingdowdenis@yahoo.com - 22 Feb 2007 09:56 GMT
I just read article here http://www.swri.org/3pubs/ttoday/spring98/bite.htm

Is this currently in operations?
Dartos - 22 Feb 2007 15:31 GMT
If you mean do dentists now have this material to use restoring teeth,
the answer is no.

Composite, amalgam, gold, and porcelain are all very good restorative
materials.  However none of them are perfect.

I'm sure that better materials are under development, but it is a
difficult challenge to find a material that is strong, bonds well,
does not shrink, does not expand, is esthetic, and has other physical
properties similar to tooth structure.

D

> I just read article here http://www.swri.org/3pubs/ttoday/spring98/bite.htm
>
> Is this currently in operations?
John & Ninetta - 23 Feb 2007 02:08 GMT
> I'm sure that better materials are under development, but it is a
> difficult challenge to find a material that is strong, bonds well,
> does not shrink, does not expand, is esthetic, and has other physical
> properties similar to tooth structure.
>
> D

Hey D,

Do you remember about 15 years ago when a gallium-based alloy was
introduced?  I was still in dental school at the time but I remember much
talk about it.  It was still taking me 2 hours to do an occlucal amalgam on
a premolar.  Did anyone on smd every use it?  From what I recall, I think it
was called Galloy and was really hard to carve once it sets up.

John
Steven Bornfeld - 23 Feb 2007 02:46 GMT
>> I'm sure that better materials are under development, but it is a
>> difficult challenge to find a material that is strong, bonds well,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> John

    Anything is hard to carve once it sets up! ;-)
That's OK, I remember my dental school daze too.

Steve
Dartos - 26 Feb 2007 13:36 GMT
> Hey D,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> John

It was talked about for quite a while, but IIRC, it expanded too
much on setting, particularly if subjected to moisture upon
placement.

Hard to work with and it split teeth.

Never saw any of it first hand.

D
Tony Bad - 26 Feb 2007 14:55 GMT
Tried a sample on a relative...they want free care, then they have to be
prepared to be a test dummy...didn't like the handling properties, and
didn't like finished result. I replaced it less than a year later and it
seemed soft when removing. Odd?!?

T

> > Hey D,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> D
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 22 Feb 2007 17:33 GMT
> I just read article here http://www.swri.org/3pubs/ttoday/spring98/bite.htm
>
> Is this currently in operations?

    To my knowledge, there is no material like this ready for marketing.
Looks interesting though--thanks for posting.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Newbie - 23 Feb 2007 15:38 GMT
>> I just read article here http://www.swri.org/3pubs/ttoday/spring98/bite.htm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Steve

Did you notice where the 3.4 million went ?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.