>> Google "Maryland Bridges". They usually are used to replace teeth,
>> but the flat metal wings can be extended to cover the linguals of
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Rich
> Actually the expense should be considerably less--less preparation
> time for the dentist, easier to impression, and lower lab fee. For
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Steve
I had my consultation with the orthodontist. He seemed very
conscientious, honest & intelligent. He said he always used fixed
lingual retention on adult patients to prevent incisor relapse. The
problem is that my overbite mostly relapsed where my bottom teeth
impacted my upper incisor just short of my upper palate...exactly where
he places the fixed wire. He conjectured that he could place the wire
lower on my upper teeth whereby my overbite would allow my lower
incisors (possibly)to miss the wire as it passes when I bite. His
concern is that when I am chewing I may hit the wire if I were not
vigilant. I already had impressions & get brackets (upper 6 front teeth
only, 6-9 months) in 10 days. Is it unheard of or bizarre to ask about
cutting a channel to counter sink (at least partially)the retention wire
making it almost impossible to hit with my lower teeth? I may also ask
him about a bonded band (ala the Baltimore bridge). He seems like a
professional who enjoys a challenge; at least I hope he does. He also
said that he can close the diastema & straighten the lateral incisor but
it would create two smaller spaces on either distal side of the lateral
incisors. To do it absolutely correctly would be to re-correct my bite
which would at age 53 & two lower bridges be a major lengthy & costly
production. I told him I could live with the over bite & would be happy
with no central space & permanent fixation to prevent re-occurrence
(less than $900 out of pocket with insurance).
Anybody out there cutting grooves in patient's teeth to embed a fixation
wire?
Thanks again.
Rich.
Steven Bornfeld - 24 Feb 2007 17:03 GMT
>> Actually the expense should be considerably less--less preparation
>> time for the dentist, easier to impression, and lower lab fee. For
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> Thanks again.
> Rich.
It is certainly done. I've occasionally done it myself, but not in
connection with ortho cases--rather on the prescription of a
periodontist who wishes the teeth splinted for periodontal support and
prevention of drifting due to periodontal disease (as opposed to
prevention of relapse after orthodontic treatment).
I used to use something called (IIRC) "Splint-loc" which involved a
braided wire with eyelets, through which small pins were threaded into
the dentine. Composite resin was flowed in. It was difficult to place,
but they held up for quite a while.
I would think that some orthodontists might try this, but I don't know
how comfortable those who haven't done much restorative dentistry since
dental school would be. There is a risk of pulpal involvement, esp. if
the teeth are rotated or malposed (I suppose this wouldn't be the case
with you). A good set of x-rays would be useful in assessing the risks
to the pulp.
It sounds like your orthodontist is being diligent and directing
treatment well.
Steve