Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fixed Long-Term Retention

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich - 18 Feb 2007 23:12 GMT
Greetings,
About 25 years ago (I am 53 years old), I wore braces for 4 years.
Initially they were to open the spaces where my 5-year molars had been
removed as a teenager to install bridges. However, I did have a moderate
diastema & a rather larger space between my slightly rotated right
lateral upper incisor & first canine which were corrected by the
treatment. As I recall, I wore a retainer for at least the prescribed
period of time after removal of the bands. Over time however, the right
lateral incisor has begun to slide under the adjoining central incisor,
lifting it up slightly & reproducing the diastema. I have made an
appointment with an orthodontist to address this issue. My question is
regarding the re-occurrence of this condition after correction. Is it
common for an orthodontist to permanently cement a band or wire behind
the upper front teeth to retain their position or is this considered
unusual? I ask this because there is no obvious reason why this tooth
migrated behind the other because my wisdom teeth were removed in my
20's & I had no teeth removed, etc. It seems that this could occur even
while wearing a removable retainer for the rest of my life.
Any input both pro & con is appreciated.

Thank you,

Rich
Steven Bornfeld - 19 Feb 2007 00:01 GMT
> Greetings,
> About 25 years ago (I am 53 years old), I wore braces for 4 years.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Rich

    If there is reason to believe that an orthodontic result will not be
stable, permanent retention is indeed sometimes done.  The bite will not
always allow an orthodontic wire to be used as a retainer.  It is
possible to drill a small channel between adjacent teeth and use a wire
or other device in the channel and bond in.  These retainers tend to
require periodic maintenance, patching and replacement in my limited
experience.  The teeth may also be crowned and splinted this way, which
is effective but obviously rather aggressive unless crowns are otherwise
needed.  It is also possible to do a bonded lingual retainer similar to
what is done with a Maryland bridge.

Steve
Rich - 19 Feb 2007 00:41 GMT
>     If there is reason to believe that an orthodontic result will not be
> stable, permanent retention is indeed sometimes done.  The bite will not
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Steve

I had considered crowning them but they are in relatively good cosmetic
shape & that seemed a little aggressive with no turning back. Do you
have a link where I could see or read about the lingual retainer?
Otherwise I'll do a search.
Thank you for responding. I appreciate your professional opinion.

Rich
Steven Bornfeld - 19 Feb 2007 01:23 GMT
>>     If there is reason to believe that an orthodontic result will not
>> be stable, permanent retention is indeed sometimes done.  The bite
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Rich

Google "Maryland Bridges".  They usually are used to replace teeth, but
the flat metal wings can be extended to cover the linguals of multiple
teeth.  They may require some reduction of the linguals of your upper
teeth (depending on your bite), but certainly less than for traditional
crowns/bridges.
I haven't had good luck with them as bridges (ie: to replace missing
teeth--they've often fallen out) but for your application should be less
demanding and less likely IMO to fall out.

Steve
Rich - 19 Feb 2007 02:36 GMT
> Google "Maryland Bridges".  They usually are used to replace teeth, but
> the flat metal wings can be extended to cover the linguals of multiple
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Steve

Yes, actually I found many illustrations after I originally replied to
your post. I can see where that would entail almost the expense of a
bridge to compensate the dentist for his time to prep the teeth & the
lab to fabricate a wing. I was thinking more along the lines where the
ortho could cement an lingual arch wire or splint without the necessity
of removing any or a minimal amount of tooth enamel. On the other hand,
I can also see where a tooth prepped & bridged from behind with a custom
Maryland wing would be quite effective & long-lasting inasmuch as the
supports are not required to support a prosthetic tooth in a bridge.
I'll bring it up at my consult on Wednesday.
Thanks again, Doctor Steve.

Rich
Steven Bornfeld - 19 Feb 2007 03:57 GMT
>> Google "Maryland Bridges".  They usually are used to replace teeth,
>> but the flat metal wings can be extended to cover the linguals of
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Rich

    Actually the expense should be considerably less--less preparation time
for the dentist, easier to impression, and lower lab fee.  For lower
teeth it is generally not necessary to prepare the teeth at all.
    There are cemented wire splints--they are frequently placed in drilled
channels that may take you closer to the pulp than the etched metal
retainer bridge.
    Without the channel they can work, though more likely on the lower jaw,
and will still usually need periodic patching:

http://cudental.creighton.edu/images/lingual%20retainer%20fixed%201.jpg

http://www.harmonorthodontics.com/lower_retainer.jpg

Steve
Rich - 24 Feb 2007 05:28 GMT
>     Actually the expense should be considerably less--less preparation
> time for the dentist, easier to impression, and lower lab fee.  For
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Steve

I had my consultation with the orthodontist. He seemed very
conscientious, honest & intelligent. He said he always used fixed
lingual retention on adult patients to prevent incisor relapse. The
problem is that my overbite mostly relapsed where my bottom teeth
impacted my upper incisor just short of my upper palate...exactly where
he places the fixed wire. He conjectured that he could place the wire
lower on my upper teeth whereby my overbite would allow my lower
incisors (possibly)to miss the wire as it passes when I bite. His
concern is that when I am chewing I may hit the wire if I were not
vigilant. I already had impressions & get brackets (upper 6 front teeth
only, 6-9 months) in 10 days. Is it unheard of or bizarre to ask about
cutting a channel to counter sink (at least partially)the retention wire
making it almost impossible to hit with my lower teeth? I may also ask
him about a bonded band (ala the Baltimore bridge). He seems like a
professional who enjoys a challenge; at least I hope he does. He also
said that he can close the diastema & straighten the lateral incisor but
it would create two smaller spaces on either distal side of the lateral
incisors. To do it absolutely correctly would be to re-correct my bite
which would at age 53 & two lower bridges be a major lengthy & costly
production. I told him I could live with the over bite & would be happy
with no central space & permanent fixation to prevent re-occurrence
(less than $900 out of pocket with insurance).
Anybody out there cutting grooves in patient's teeth to embed a fixation
wire?
Thanks again.
Rich.
Steven Bornfeld - 24 Feb 2007 17:03 GMT
>>     Actually the expense should be considerably less--less preparation
>> time for the dentist, easier to impression, and lower lab fee.  For
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> Thanks again.
> Rich.

    It is certainly done.  I've occasionally done it myself, but not in
connection with ortho cases--rather on the prescription of a
periodontist who wishes the teeth splinted for periodontal support and
prevention of drifting due to periodontal disease (as opposed to
prevention of relapse after orthodontic treatment).
    I used to use something called (IIRC) "Splint-loc" which involved a
braided wire with eyelets, through which small pins were threaded into
the dentine.  Composite resin was flowed in.  It was difficult to place,
but they held up for quite a while.
    I would think that some orthodontists might try this, but I don't know
how comfortable those who haven't done much restorative dentistry since
dental school would be.  There is a risk of pulpal involvement, esp. if
the teeth are rotated or malposed (I suppose this wouldn't be the case
with you).  A good set of x-rays would be useful in assessing the risks
to the pulp.
    It sounds like your orthodontist is being diligent and directing
treatment well.

Steve
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.