> Thank you, Dr. Vasserman.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> May I ask the brief definition of a permanent bonded retainer?
Thanks for the good info Steven; I'm glad to hear that some can
dispense with the retainer. I'm sure every case is unique.
It makes me wonder that if I had braces as a child, then my teeth would
have been better set by now, with less proclivity to shift?
Dr. Vasserman DDS wrote:
> Your situation is not hopeless and if it has only been 2 months you can
> still correct it.
My retainer still fits; when I put it in it is very tight, but loose
enough by morning to be easily removed. One concern is, does such
back-and-forth movement on the teeth actually weaken their setting in
the jaws?
> Not all ortho can be accomplished with stable results because many
> times you are not fixing the original culprit that caused your teeth to
> be crooked for example mouth breathing, tongue thrusting, airway
> obstruction, etc...
I'd like to know more about this, if you know of any online resources.
I was under the impression that teeth shifted because of a genetic
predisposition. The Dr. that applied my braces did say that I was
probably 'grinding' at night, and there are tiny vertical cracks on
some teeth.
The orginal purpose for braces was not so much appearance as to relieve
occasional 'popping' in my jaws.
Thanks.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 22 Jan 2007 16:09 GMT
> Thanks for the good info Steven; I'm glad to hear that some can
> dispense with the retainer. I'm sure every case is unique.
>
> It makes me wonder that if I had braces as a child, then my teeth would
> have been better set by now, with less proclivity to shift?
I'm treading lightly now, as I don't want to overstep my expertise.
If you'd had orthodontic treatment before your growth was complete,
your othodontist would very likely have you in retention at least until
growth is completed. My impression is that age at which orthodontic
treatment has little to do with ultimate stability of the result, but
that growth can change the result, so that the situation will have to be
monitored into adulthood. Otherwise, I see no particular reason why
starting earlier in itself would have led to a more stable long-term result.
Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 02 Feb 2007 03:53 GMT
had a patient that after having ortho as a child and having perfect
straight teeth to age 26 after the next four years she developed an
open skeletal bite. She now needs orthognathic surgery otherwise she
can not put her teeth together. Point is just because "growth stopped"
does not mean the jaws will not change. This is not a guarantee. Teeth
continue to move throughout the alveolar process in response to muscle
pull. I have also ran into a dentist that was able to get orthopedic
movement in an adult without surgery. So nothing is in stone.
carabelli - 02 Feb 2007 13:58 GMT
"Alexander Vasserman DDS" <purple543210@yahoo.ca> wrote ................ I
have also ran into a dentist that was able to get orthopedic
> movement in an adult without surgery. So nothing is in stone.
You would have to show me the money on that one.
carabelli
Steven Bornfeld - 02 Feb 2007 14:51 GMT
> had a patient that after having ortho as a child and having perfect
> straight teeth to age 26 after the next four years she developed an
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> pull. I have also ran into a dentist that was able to get orthopedic
> movement in an adult without surgery. So nothing is in stone.
I have heard of this happening in trauma cases, and also in severe
rheumatoid arthritis cases. But in any case, it seems there should be
an explanation for significant skeletal changes after growth has ended.
Do you know any back story on this?
Steve