> My dentist has recomended that I have all my dental sealants removed (
> I have about a dozen).
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> proceedure if it absolutley neccessary. Any thoughts or comments would
> be appreciated in helping me decide.
It is true that decay can form under sealants. However, careful
inspection with a sharp explorer will generally show if the sealant is
failing. And even if not, the x-rays should show any significant decay.
I agree that sealants frequently fail, just as old fillings sometimes
fail. That's the time to replace them--not just on a whim.
JMO,
Steve
Dartos - 27 Dec 2006 15:57 GMT
Like Steve says, nothing lasts forever. Lots of sealants have been,
and are placed over grooves and fissures that have not been adequately
cleaned of debri. The grooves were probably not tested with
a Diagnodent (laser decay finding instrument).
So..it *might* be a good idea to get the old sealants off, take a look,
replace them if nothing is wrong, and do a small filling if decay is
found.
I think there should be some reason for removing them though.
Visual evidence of leakage or an X-ray showing decay.
I also don't like the idea of 'drilling' to get the old sealant
material removed. Using air abrasion would be my choice.
JMO,
D
> It is true that decay can form under sealants. However, careful
> inspection with a sharp explorer will generally show if the sealant is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> JMO,
> Steve
Well, I just recomended remove the sealants if then were broke or with
decay detected by Ray X ou visual inspection, or if then are causing a
oclussion problem...
Remove it just because they are older, in my opinion is not a minimal
invsive technic ...If you have no decay, you can just make a control
with your doctor...
> My dentist has recomended that I have all my dental sealants removed (
> I have about a dozen).
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> proceedure if it absolutley neccessary. Any thoughts or comments would
> be appreciated in helping me decide.
daisy - 29 Dec 2006 04:49 GMT
> Well, I just recomended remove the sealants if then were broke or with
> decay detected by Ray X ou visual inspection, or if then are causing a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > proceedure if it absolutley neccessary. Any thoughts or comments would
> > be appreciated in helping me decide.
Thank you everyone for your very helpful comments.
My dentist informed me that it would be impossible to detect any decay
until after the sealants were removed - she has not taken any x rays.
Is this information incorrect? Also could the extensive drilling she
intends to use to remove them be harmful to my teeth.
Thank you.
urban611@gmail.com - 29 Dec 2006 11:05 GMT
I do not agree with that opinion. Any interproximal xray aka bitewing
should show decay even if its localized on oclusal surface of the
tooth, even under the sealant.
Steven Bornfeld - 29 Dec 2006 15:16 GMT
>> Well, I just recomended remove the sealants if then were broke or with
>> decay detected by Ray X ou visual inspection, or if then are causing a
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> intends to use to remove them be harmful to my teeth.
> Thank you.
Impossible is too strong a word. It is sometimes possible to miss
early caries on the chewing surfaces of the teeth on x-ray, but
generally it can still be caught on x-ray before it reaches any
significant extent. I also agree that extensive drilling should not be
necessary. This strategy implies there will be extensive drilling on
teeth that might NOT be decayed. Does that make sense to you? It
doesn't to me!!
And why has she not taken x-rays?
Steve