Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

S. Mutans

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dale R - 20 Dec 2006 19:21 GMT
I remember reading in this group once that S. Mutans was the main
cause of tooth decay.
 Someone posted,  '...no S. Mutans, no tooth decay."  ( IIRC this was
disputed by another poster).
 But the thread had started with someone asking why some people have
considerable decay while others enjoy excellent dental health with
minimal care -- and why, if S. Mutans is the culprit, some people have
it and others do not.
 IOW, how do people get it?  Is it typically contracted at an early
age?  Can it be at any age?
 Do people acquire S. Mutans from other people? ( i.e. kissing, sharing
eating utensils, etc.)
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 20 Dec 2006 23:15 GMT
>   I remember reading in this group once that S. Mutans was the main
> cause of tooth decay.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>   Do people acquire S. Mutans from other people? ( i.e. kissing, sharing
> eating utensils, etc.)

    I  certainly have only a clinical (not research) expertise in
cariology.  But I believe some other bacterial species have been
implicated as well, though certainly S. mutans is the most consistently
named.
    Circulating salivary immunoglobulins are also said to modulate caries
activity.
    Yes, there has to be implantation of the bacterium in the
mouth--usually early in life--whether by oral contact, sharing eating
utensils, etc.  Certain studies (that naturally I don't have at my
fingertips) have proposed a similar mechanism for some
periodontal-associated microbes.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Newbie - 20 Dec 2006 23:50 GMT
>>   I remember reading in this group once that S. Mutans was the main
>> cause of tooth decay.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>Steve

Not to mention the Freudian observation that babies put
everything in their mouth.
Newbie - 20 Dec 2006 23:54 GMT
>>   I remember reading in this group once that S. Mutans was the main
>> cause of tooth decay.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>Steve

You could always go gnotobiotic <hehe>
Dale R - 21 Dec 2006 00:31 GMT
Dale wrote:
"I remember reading in this group once that S. Mutans was the main cause
of tooth decay.
    Someone posted, '...no S. Mutans, no tooth decay." ( IIRC
this was
disputed by another poster).
    But the thread had started with someone asking why some
people have considerable decay while others enjoy excellent dental
health with minimal care -- and why, if S. Mutans is the culprit, some
people have it and others do not.
    IOW, how do people get it? Is it typically contracted at an
early age? Can it be at any age?
    Do people acquire S. Mutans from other people? ( i.e.
kissing, sharing
eating utensils, etc.) '
***********************************************
Steve wrote:
                "I certainly have only a
clinical (not research) expertise in cariology. But I believe some other
bacterial species have been implicated as well, though certainly S.
mutans is the most consistently named.
                Circulating salivary
immunoglobulins are also said to modulate caries activity.
                Yes, there has to be
implantation of the bacterium in the mouth--usually early in
life--whether by oral contact, sharing eating utensils, etc. Certain
studies (that naturally I don't have at my fingertips) have proposed a
similar mechanism for some periodontal-associated microbes."
 **********************************************
 I have requied periodic dental work (cavities filled, etc.) throughout
my life since I was a child.  I am starting to date someone with perfect
teeth...I'm sure you know where I'm going with this.
 Might she begin to have dental problems (caries) due to kissing
someone who has?
 Is the likely reason for the pristine condition of her teeth that
there is no S. Mutans present?
 This is the basis of my inquiry -- seems as though tooth decay is
arguably just another contagious disease.
 She does take very good care of her teeth, nonetheless.
TIA
Steven Bornfeld - 21 Dec 2006 04:01 GMT
> Dale wrote:
> "I remember reading in this group once that S. Mutans was the main cause
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>   She does take very good care of her teeth, nonetheless.
> TIA

    Are you the first guy she's ever kissed?
Seriously, caries is multi-factorial, and if she has no history of decay
and good oral hygiene, it's very unlikely you will infect her with s.
mutans.

Steve
Newbie - 21 Dec 2006 15:11 GMT
>>   Is the likely reason for the pristine condition of her teeth that
>> there is no S. Mutans present?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Steve

No kidding !  Golly-Gee-Willikers !

Here's something interesting:

A DNA Vaccine Encoding a Cell-surface Protein Antigen of Streptococcus mutans
Protects Gnotobiotic Rats from Caries

http://jdr.iadrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/81/11/784
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.