> I had my #15 extracted today. It was very badly broken, with very little
> tooth left past the gumline, but the oral surgeon was able to extract it
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> was billed for a more expensive procedure than was performed, but I'm
> still curious.
> > I had my #15 extracted today. It was very badly broken, with very little
> > tooth left past the gumline, but the oral surgeon was able to extract it
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> know if an extraction is surgical or not, but you might ask. Often, one
> criterion is whether sutures were used.
Insurance won't ask, because I don't have any - I have a reduced-fee
plan that's not insurance and I paid the entire cost out of my pocket.
No, no sutures, no incisions, no other tools than forceps and a wad of
gauze. Well, I know now that if, Tooth Fairy forbid, I need another
extraction, to go to another oral surgeon!
Thank you for your reply.

Signature
"Did Father shoot him? I will eat Grandfather for dinner."
- Helen Keller, on learning of the death of her grandfather
email: aripee at inanna . com
Steven Bornfeld - 07 Nov 2006 16:42 GMT
>>> I had my #15 extracted today. It was very badly broken, with very little
>>> tooth left past the gumline, but the oral surgeon was able to extract it
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Thank you for your reply.
Unfortunately, "upbilling" of services is very common--both in
insurance and discount plans.
In fairness to the surgeon, the distinction between a surgical and
non-surgical extraction is not always clear cut, and reimbursement
levels are not always fair. For instance, removing 4 loose lower
incisors, recontouring bone and placing a couple of sutures can
sometimes be reimbursed legitimately at a higher rate per tooth than
taking out an upper second molar with dilacerated roots with a forcep.
It may be bending the truth to call this a surgical extraction. Still,
the average fee for a non-surgical extraction of an erupted tooth by an
oral surgeon is probably over $200 (I'm just guessing). If you paid
less than this, you probably got a bargain, and if it was done quickly
and well and with little postoperative pain, I wouldn't make a fuss
about it.
Steve
REP - 08 Nov 2006 06:07 GMT
> Unfortunately, "upbilling" of services is very common--both in
> insurance and discount plans.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> and well and with little postoperative pain, I wouldn't make a fuss
> about it.
I paid $252 for the exam, x-ray and extraction. I don't have any
complaint about the work itself - it was the most skillful Novacaine
injection I've ever had, for one - and the while it does hurt like hell,
that's not surprising, since my teeth have unusually long roots that
enter the sinus. (The surgeon didn't prescribe painkillers, but my
internist did.) I was just curious if the procedure I had matched the
procedure I was billed for - I'm not planning to rush to his office and
throw a fit or anything; I'll just know that if I need more of this kind
of work, to not pay before it's done and to consider another oral
surgeon.
Again, thank you for your replies. I have really terrible teeth and am
just finally now able to begin getting them worked on, and what I don't
know about dental work is vast.

Signature
"Did Father shoot him? I will eat Grandfather for dinner."
- Helen Keller, on learning of the death of her grandfather
email: aripee at inanna . com
Newbie - 08 Nov 2006 22:01 GMT
>> > I had my #15 extracted today. It was very badly broken, with very little
>> > tooth left past the gumline, but the oral surgeon was able to extract it
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
>Thank you for your reply.
Of course even though you were there you didn't see what the surgeon did.
Any tooth off at the gumline can be considered a 'surgical' extraction.